Girl's Behavior 
Guy's Behavior 
Flirting 
Dating 
Relationships 
Fashion & Beauty 
Health & Fitness 
Marriage & Weddings 
Shopping & Gifts 
Technology & Internet 
Break Up & Divorce 
Education & Career 
Entertainment & Arts 
Family & Friends 
Food & Beverage 
Hobbies & Leisure 
Other 
Religion & Spirituality 
Society & Politics 
Sports 
Travel 
Trending & News 
Would artificial wombs end the Pro-life vs Pro-choice conflict? (Page 2)
Anonymous
(18-24) 
Click "Show More" for your mentions
Most Helpful Opinion(mho) Rate.
Learn more
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
32Opinion
I actually think it will make the battles much more severe. Because I don't think women just want the ability to not carry the pregnancy to term, I think they expect to have the right to choose to terminate the pregnancy if they want.
If I didn't have to carry the baby, I would actually consider having one.
I doubt it. People are very passionate about it on both sides
That, combined with hyper realistic, affordable, companion androids will destroy the pro-choice movement and many women out there will need to try a lot harder to find a husband.
Nah. Many of us don't care if guys choose AIs to have sex/children with.
1) Weeds out unattractive/insecure guys.
2) Humanoid AIs will like have superior strength to the point that they will stop a man trying to get physical.
3) Many women won't be burdened by creepy men.
I wholeheartedly agree that companion androids should exist... as long as they have a choice of partner and aren't treated as mere objects.
@AuroraRoseat >fundamental misunderstanding of 'AI'
they are objects
Fully self-aware AIs? I don't think so.
@AuroraRoseat lol @ 2. Getting rejected by an appliance.
@AuroraRoseat... where is this fully self aware ai you speak of? Do you understand what a massive leap you are talking about? Fully aware AI may NEVER be possible
Imagine a male AI being nagged to self destruction.
@No_Archons I think you’re making a lot of assumptions about the unknown. It is still a possibility. They might not exist currently but if they do ever exist, their rights should be considered. That is what should have been gleaned from my original comment. I’m thinking pretty far into the future... unless humanity destroys itself before.
The other two comments were funny.. lol
The main point is that I disagree with the comment of making it a lot harder to find husband material. It will help weed out undesirables in my opinion.
Its gunna force women to be worth more than a fuck, which most r not. Also it str8 up probs isn't possible the kind of ai u speak of, learn something about computer science its my field
Undesirables. Sounds like Hitler.
If all a woman does is ply a man to provide for them in exchange of sex, then yes an Android is superior in many ways.
I doubt it. I feel like people would want to preserve the right to kill their fetus
Yes. There is way too much tension between men and women at the moment and one of the things women LOVE to brag about is the fact they can give birth. Just let me buy a kid from one of these labs and to hell with dating, sex and marriage.
It would have to. Now any woman who wants to end the occupancy of her uterus could just transfer the baby to an artificial womb.
Otherwise it's really that they just like killing unborn babies.
No because the feminists will mandate that anything male needs to be exterminated.
I'm ded
No, as women still need to have the choice of not having biological children.
I would think the people that are pro life would argue now that artificial wombs are unethical.
That type of science is faraway and it still wouldn't.
Morally speaking it's just digging a deeper hole. You're going to produce kids whose mother is a plastic bag. Where do you want to go with that?
No, not at all.
It has nothing to do with the womb and everything to do with what's inside it.
This is what I've been saying since the debate arose
In some cases but not for the vast majority. Some women simply don't want to have kids.
No, because people will always need something to argue about. God forbid we let every individual make their own choices and let it be.
No it bring up a whole set of issues.
No because liberals love killing babies to much.
No. Women would still want to kill it
L... O... L
Not really. It just adds a new choice to the mix.
Not as long as feminist SJWs exist.