Do you think it’s fair to refer to circumcision as Male Genital Mutilation (MGM)? (Page 3)

[Anonymous]

Are you trying to make this issue into some kind of competition or something? You must be a feminist.

Circumcision is, by definition, Male Genital Mutilation. There is no other accurate answer to this question.

[CarpetDenim]

I agree.

I am not a feminist, but good on you for somehow interpreting that out of a question that I literally provided NO details on or ANY kind of suggestion as to what my personal belief about this issue is.

[Anonymous]

it's the same as women having their clit removed at birth

[Opinion Owner]

the hood of their clit removed at birth*

[Anonymous]

No, I think male circumcision is actually something good and beneficial!

[madgoat]

Yes although fgm is much worse.

[Anonymous]

Yup. That's what it is.

[NYCQuestions1976]

OUCH

[EnglundUberAlles]

Yes.

And no, in that order.

[QueenOfBaku]

They're just getting rid of the problematic part

[RickPen]

What problem could it possibly cause?

[QueenOfBaku]

Dunno, search it up

[RickPen]

Are you unable to follow up what is problematic? The burden of proof is on you for your statement, not the asker. If you really don't know (as I suspect), then actually searching the foreskin functions, and damage caused by circumcision would be beneficial.

Documentaries exist: try "American Circumcision" on Netflix, "Elephant in the Hospital" on Youtube. Both would have more information for you as well.

[simplelikeme]

No... that is just a plain and simple option.

[sicosico]

No I like the looks of the cut ones

[CT_CD]

Possibly

[BronzedAdonis]

Yes.

[esotericstory]

Yes I think so, both cause brain damage.

[angiebangie]

No way!

[reptocarl2]

I don’t think so

[TwoToTooTutu2]

I guess.

[chriscdi]

does it matter? lol

[WowwGirl]

No that's silly

[Seppel]

For me it's the same

[Anonymous]

Nope