Is Lululemon's "namaste put" offensive?

TheVictoria
Lululemon abruptly removed their best selling "namaste put" underwear because a woman in Seattle said it was cultural appropriation and that it white-washed her culture.

From my understanding on black culture appropriation, the offensiveness part comes from the history of black people being stigmatized for their appearance and other cultural things. So when white people start doing those things and it's suddenly trendy, it's a big slap in the face. For example, dreadlocks were for a long time (and many would still agree) associated with with being informal and dirty. So when it showed up on white girls on high fashion runways, it was offensive to a lot of black people.

On the other hand, I've had white friends invited to Indian wedding ceremonies that were invited to "dress up" in saris and join in on the other festivities. And I've heard that people in Japan (not Japanese Americans) actually think it's nice when Americans start wearing kimonos or other Japanese things because they see it as interest and admiration of their culture. So these two things have further supported my understanding that it was the social oppression that leads to objection to cultural appropriation.

So... Is using "namaste" in this manner (ie. naming Lululemon underwear) really offensive to many Indian people? Is it different with Indian-American people? How about shirts that say "namaste in bed"? Have Indian people really faced so much prejudice in America as to make this intolerable? Or is it still offensive regardless?

Please let me know your thoughts below. Let me know if you're Indian or not, too.
Is Lululemons namaste put offensive?
Is Lululemon's "namaste put" offensive?
8 Opinion