Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
Do these laws apply to unconventional armed forces like the IRA, Liberation army of the donetsk peoples or the Nordic resistance?
I would like to why were war crime allegations pressed against Serbian civilian militias and none against NATO for bombing civilians in 1999. Why was mladic found guilty of war crimes when there was no official declaration of war?
@NikolaiIvanov what Nordic resistance?
Responsible for the norweigan mosque shooting, lynching of terrorists (refugees) basically patriots.
The norweigan patriot Anders Behring Breivik was also a member.
@NikolaiIvanov I will let you off with the Serbian one due to your age, trust me the response would be different.However when you have a country carrying out genocide against a people, then that’s war crimes.When you have Serbian militias deliberately placing mines and other devices under dead bodies of children, when you have them deliberately starving them shooting unarmed civilians, then that’s a war crime.The bombing campaign was very limited and very targeted.The United Nations were who put the twat on trial for crimes against humanity en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO_bombing_of_YugoslaviaDefending a country that was actively pursuing a genocide against ethnic Albanians will put you firmly in the camp of supporting genocide.
@NikolaiIvanov basically terrorists.That twat deserved to be fed his own testicles along with any fuckwit that supported him
Do you think that the IRA's disarmament by Bill Clinton has now been let down after Brexit?
@NikolaiIvanov Bill Clinton, what’s he got to do with the price of eggs, he’s just some American cock
It was he who ended the "troubles' wasn't he.
It's so depressing to see the once greatest empire now having referendums to break away from rule brittania to this?
@NikolaiIvanov nope cock all to do with GFA
The treatment to Serbia was biased , support to Croatia from the Vatican and Germany was because of religious reasons same in the case of Bosnia by Turks and Arabs which was made it the terror capital of Europe. I think of Srebrenica as a crusade.https://youtu.be/-7_FYq2VXwQBosnians used child soldiers that fought alongside NATO and the UN. Un troops raped Bosnian children as well. Only case Serbia was ravaged because they resisted against losing their sovereignty.
@NikolaiIvanov there was no rape of people by NATO troops and it was only NATO involved.You are simply backing and promoting both genocide and terrorism.That very much sums you up.Considering your other threads on owning weapons and killing people.And now your backing of genocide and terrorism.You should be on a watch list.
I've lost my belief in the police and the armed forces that's why personal protection matters to me.
I repeat the words of mladic "War against terror is not genocide."
@NikolaiIvanov as I said you back genocide, having a conversation with you is akin to a person that backed not just Hitler but also Himmler.
Also excluding the ethical aspects should these laws be applied to private contractors.
for instance drone or air strikes because a country decided to use chemical weapons on its own people (Syria or Iraq)
So the question is whether the humanitarian action in this case would require UN Security Council authorization to be legal? Or if there’s a humanitarian exception in the case of war crimes against civilians, as your example indicates. If the attack had occurred on another country, there would have clearly been a right to self-defense on the part of the attacked country.
ok sorry i misread my own question... so its just asking if for instance chemical warfare-which is banned by the geneva conventions-- can sometimes be justified if circumstances were right for it?Like
It’s a good question. I suspect that under the letter of international law, no, but a war crime like that can gegersllynonku be prosecuted with outside involvement.
* generally only be
Looks like someone paid attention in history class
It has been*
That was the point at which it ran out of fuel. If it had hit some kind of 'dome', don't you think it would have been totally destroyed, and simple blackness would have ensued because the camera would have been destroyed as well? There is no 'dome' above Earth, because the Earth ISN'T FLAT!
@Bellatris that;s like a slow moving paper plane hitting a fish tank not much will happen remember it doesn't hit it in a few seconds which means its to slow TAKES A WHILE also there is a giant snake circling the earth wanna see it
It's NOTHING like a paper plane hitting a fish tank! At the velocities that rockets need to attain in order to reach orbit (and yes they do reach orbit, because the Earth isn't flat but a sphere and space is real), hitting a solid object would result in the total obliteration of the rocket, because it would be travelling at between approx 9.3 to 11 km/s, the latter of which is escape velocity. Using the simple kinetic energy formula Ek=1/2mv^2, it's easy to see how completely wrong you are about it being comparable to a "paper plane hitting a fish tank"!Anyway, that's your homework for today. From the mass of the rocket (which isn't stated in the video, so you'll have to do a bit of research on this to find its value) and the velocity at which it's travelling, work out the kinetic energy using the formula I gave. It's ridiculously easy, it's just rocket science for God's sake! Now I don't want to hear any more about your silly 'dome'! The Earth is an oblate spheroid, it orbits the sun which is at the centre of the solar system, and the Bible is BULLSHIT! A giant snake? You're either a complete and utter idiot, or you're just trolling. Which is it?
Uhhh there is legal.un.org/.../book_1.pdfwww.findlaw.com/.../international-law.html