And are there really gender exclusive opinions?
Why are guys' opinions that are appealing to some women considered "simping"?
And are there really gender exclusive opinions?
Simps ruined a lot of things for "normal" men.
At the point that when somebody makes a good point on a discussion about the other gender but this is not widespread in consensus, it's simply labeled as simping and tossed aside without a second thought.
At the same time, you can recognize a smart debater from a simp for how submitted those are to women. Basically they live to be the door mat and wallet for manipulative bitches. Sad, sad excuses for male humans.
No simping is when men are doing everything in their power to just get some pussy but they aren't gonna get it and they realize they aren't gonna get it but keep trying. Respecting women is always a good thing but going after women who you know in your right mind isn't gonna give you the time of day is simping. Go after someone that you have a chance with.
Well, that can be somehow right but not accurate. I've posted what Wikipedia defines it in one of the opinion here.
However, it does have synonyms in other languages. To put it my own words, it is someone who sells away their character in order to please the opposite sex. For example when part of your behaviour is meant to impress them.
And if you put that label to anyone who doesn't agree with majority male idea, he won't be taken any seriously. Any idea why?
Not necessarily. Simpings definition is bending over backwards repeatedly for someone who isn't going to give you the time of day. That makes sense. However some men try and apply "simp" to guys who just simply treat women like people. The guys who just throw it around like that are usually some of the most disrespectful people, and yet expect women to still sleep with them. They are usually more worried about what other men think of them, giving homoerotic vibes.
Simps are useful... However they aren't respectable people and their opinions aren't credible, because their motivation is always too obvious.
Opinion
3Opinion
Because they are simping.
No, it isn't, simping is.
By large, men are called simps when they are simping.
And simping itself stops discussion if left rampart.
If you don't stop simping at it's root, you get a tyrant trans deer calling the shots of what used to be a thriving community, not to mention the pedo whores selling only fans to 9 year olds with their bathtub streams.
And there are literally banned words.
You asked: "Isn't that a way to cancel an objective discussion. Because it seems like objectifying women is more manly thing, and I think many guys would rather keep their thoughts to themselves even if they are virtuous and truthful just so they don't be called simps.
And are there really gender exclusive opinions?"
I answered: "By large, men are called simps when they are simping.
And simping itself stops discussion if left rampart.
If you don't stop simping at it's root, you get a tyrant trans deer calling the shots of what used to be a thriving community, not to mention the pedo whores selling only fans to 9 year olds with their bathtub streams.
And there are literally banned words."
obviously you dont understand what a simp is
Well if I am not mistaken, this is what I got from Wikipedia.
"Simp is an Internet slang term describing someone who performs excessive sympathy and attention toward another person, sometimes in pursuit of a sexual relationship. Urban Dictionary defines a simp as "someone who does way too much for a person they like"."
I love simps.
Because usually it's simping.
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions