if a woman has like 3 abortions, call it for what it is, she’s a serial killer and she shouldn’t be allowed to have children.
by the way I’m liberal, but all the shit they keep trying to push lately on society is pissing me off
I personally think both sides are missing the entire point on all of this. Can’t be abstinent until marriage? Fine. I won’t judge you because if I did I would be a hypocrite.
But over my entire life I have always been VERY careful to use protection. Before sex I ask if the girl is on birth control. If she is I still use a condom. If she isn’t then I’m extra careful that I roll the condom on right. Even when I cum I pull out a bit to prevent “swimmers”. On three different occasions I’ve broken a condom (I’m above average size) on three different women. But I actually bought two women plan B. The third one got it herself. We ended up dating for a year.
Now why am I giving all those details? Because although I was sexually active I am a fucking responsible adult. Yes I know unprotected sex feels great. But I only do that after I’ve known a girl for a while and I trust she’s on the pill, IUD or something else.
Society needs to do a better job and training people at doing everything to make white not meeting red (unwanted). We need to work on contraceptive development to make birth control 100% effective. We are close but not all the way there. And yes I favor tax sponsored birth control funding for low income communities all the way up to plan B.
But abortion is NOT birth control. The game changes when the egg is fertilized. That is a separate human being with its own DNA. And all the people saying “it’s a clump of cells” or “it’s the woman’s body”. Fuck you. For real fuck you and your mental gymnastics. Thats a separate human life now. I’ll make rare exceptions for rape, incest or if pre natal testing determined there is something seriously wrong with the baby. But those make up only tiny fraction of unwanted pregnancies.
I just wonder that what happens to these women the day they pass away and meet the soul of their aborted child in the afterlife. What would they say to them? I do believe in God’s grace. I do believe these women can be forgiven. That’s the power of Christian redemption. But still what would you say to your child you decided to abort?
Also another thing that is almost never discussed is the psychological impact on the would be father of a woman who had an abortion.
Do you really think all these guys are happy the abortion didn’t happen? Don’t you think some of them wanted to keep their child alive?
Yes the father doesn’t have to carry the child to term. But still it IS his child. This has psychologically devastated more men than most people really know.
A lot of things are " normalized" these days. We're in a perverse society. People act like having the technology we have today makes us more advanced. Not the case at all. We're still in a backwards society where everything is allowed. No more responsibilities. No more consequences.
All the pro-abortionist arguments exist to help them feel better about the acts they're committing and the beliefs they have.
1. "Just a clump of cells" removes the humanity of the baby. If they understood the humanity they wouldn't agree to abortion. When a baby is wanted, women throw gender reveal parties, they have baby showers, et cetera but the moment the baby isn't wanted, they revert to the argument that it's "just a clump of cells". That's not how things work when it comes to life.
2. "Can't live on its own" allows them to believe that they're not really committing an awful act because they think the baby is dead anyway.
3. "My body my choice" doesn't apply to abortion. Not your body. Separate chromosomes. But they use this argument because they want to have an excuse to remove the baby within them.
4. "What if they're disabled?" is an argument made as if those with struggles, disabilities, deformities et cetera are less valued than others, are less worthy of life than others. Some of the best people I've ever met have Downs Syndrome. They're a million times worthy of their lives than pro-abortionists who think they're holier than thou.
5. "Can't live outside the womb" helps them, once again, remove responsibility. Yet, there are many people dependent on machines to stay alive. What is their worth?
Some people do it because premarital sex is rampant. This is another reason why God had said that sex belongs between a married couple, a man and a woman, male and female. That you shouldn't be murdering anyone or even sacrificing your children to other's gods. It's is abominable to him. Why? Because 1, obvious reasons, it is flat out evil to do such things. And any human being of him that has humanity would understand that it is wrong. Human beings naturally know it is wrong. 2. Another is a human being and of your flesh. Having to do such a thing is a crime and it's hurtful. Parents are supposed to protect their children, not want to see harm done nor should harm them at all.
But since many now think premarital sex is okay or even taking the things of God for granted, people make these mistakes that are often preventable. At the same time, men have brought this upon themselves and have taken women for granted also. Family as well as their own children. Many don't want marriage, a good amount don't know how to keep it, and when they have a good woman, they don't respect her. The same can be said for women nowadays. But either way, everybody who does this mostly is basically lost. And the cycle just continues. It is all part of the world's systems programming.
To desire children isn't an issue.
To desire sex isn't an issue.
To not want children isn't an issue.
To not want sex isn't an ISSUE.
What IS the ISSUE is what one decides to DO with those choices, and whether or not it is a good choice for that person.
Thank you yes you are absolutely right. People are not being responsible now days and they don't take the word of God seriously. That is why people shouldn't be having sex until their married but they don't listen.
@Alwayreckles93 @btbc92 words from gold...
I have really mixed emotions of abortions and I’ll tell you why.
1. Religion
I’m a Muslim and my religion tells me that we shouldn’t have abortions because it’s basically murder UNLESS the pregnancy puts the woman’s health at risk. And that’s where I go to first when I make a decision, my religion.
2. Being human
As a human I don’t think it can ever be in me to have an abortion. No matter what circumstances I go through I could never willingly kill another soul let alone my own baby. I don’t care if it’s a bunch of cells developing - it’s a human life and it’s made out of me. I can’t do it. No way. No sir.
3. Woman and pressure
Here’s when the other side of the story comes in. I am very appreciate that everyone is different and also we all go through very different emotions and feelings. Some women are just not in the right place to have a baby and to that I say please don’t burden a child with a rubbish life if that’s all you can offer. You can’t pour from an empty cup and children are very responsive to their mothers.
I can’t judge another woman for making decisions based on her welfare. Because I appreciate that we all have triggers to an extent.
Opinion
110Opinion
I don’t care what you call it. Women are the authority over their own pregnancy and they decide what goes.
Ya, they’re legally allowed to kill their children. That’s my point.
Clearly nothing if it’s protected under law. What’s wrong with you? You can’t read? LOL
By your decision (abortion) you murder another person - an innocent child. But someone kills, he must face consequences. Otherwise anyone can kill anyone and world will descend into chaos. If women kills a child (in her body or go to school and random-pick one there), she should also face consequences that any normal murder has.
Who are you to make such rules. You are not God! This is same as Kim Dzong Un executing his subjects - he claims to be their their governing body. Or nazis killing people in concentration camps - they also claimed to be the their governing body.
Is it ok to kill a family member in our house, because “My house, my rules”. Or is it ok for a school principal to suffocate his pupils, because it is his school? Is he not their "governing body"?
And even if you would make it legal, it is still not moral and never will. Murder is murder and your excuses about governing bodies will not change it.
Even some criminals have enough decency to not kill small children. Is oppressing small innocent, defenceless babies all you can do? Are you coward? Maybe try attacking someone your own size and capable of defence. You additionally let doctor do the dirty job for you. By giving him the disposition to kill you do not absolve yourself. You still have blood on your hands!
Instead of writing here think about yourself. If you really find joy in child killing then you are morally disordered. It is evil thing to do. Work on improving yourself.
No the government decides what they are allowed. Abortion is not a right it's a privelege.
Yes, we are
Yeah. The same as a principal who decides to suffocate a few pupils in his office, because he has an authority over them. Yo can not even form an argument against so you just repeat the same thing over again and again like a barrel organ or something. You want to kill, your choice, but you will face the consequences.
Considering suicide is not legally permitted, many other medical procedures are prohibited, aren't free to ingest any any substance we like into our bodies, and are forced to inject vaccines into it, I have little authority over my body.
@MzAsh Yes. If there is no God you can get away with it. But if He exists, He knows what have you done. You also need to live with a consciousness that you deliberately killed someone, that you are a monster inside. Of course there are criminals who feel no remorse. I watched once how a prisoner sentenced to death for murder was happy and all smiling before execution. He shouted "See you in hell!". Perhaps you are a person like him. But then, do not be surprised that decent humans will not like it if they ever find out about your dark side.
Because it isn’t murder. If it was murder than imagine how fucked and ridiculous it’d be if doctors went to jail just for preforming a medical procedure?
It’s unheard of, either way there’s no conclusive evidence on weighed life begins at conception or first breath, etc so it’s stupid for people to parrot they know life begins at conception because scientists and doctors that specialize and this film have yet to come to a conclusive explanation yet on that question.
There’s also no such thing as normalizing abortion. That entails abortion isn’t normal which doesn’t make any sense since abortion has existed for several centuries , abortion has existed ever since pregnancy existed.
The earliest recorded abortion is 4,000 years old. Abortion was usually carried out by the midwives and or care takers. Abortions can be tracked all the way down to 3,000 BC.
Abortion isn’t murder, you’re just regurgitating fear tactics that play off of emotions rather than making any logical arguments. Do better
" imagine how fucked and ridiculous it’d be if doctors went to jail just for preforming a medical procedure?"
in the 1700-1800s it wasn't considered a crime to enslave people. does that mean black folks back then did not deserve the right to be treated like humans?
also there are currently doctors out there prescribing drugs to patients that are far more lethal than drugs you buy off cartels, does that mean that people who have license to do whatever it is they do are 100% in the right?
@CasaNorba I’m aware just because it’s legal doesn’t means it’s moral. My point is that women should have the right to choose the medical procedures they want to on their body. I don’t believe anyone else has the right to revoke that individual liberty.
I also understand their are bad doctors but I’m failing to see where to correlation is to women’s right to abortion?
I don't see it as murder because I don't believe a fetus to be alive. Or at the very least, an independent life form. So in my mind you can't really take away life, from something that isn't even alive yet. It is still apart of the mother, it is dependent on using the women's life force to keep it alive. (that in itself should be enough to let a woman chose if she wants the fetus in her or not)
Of course it all comes down to morality.
And to that I say...
If you have never been through an abortion personally... if you have never had a fetus removed from your body then you don't get a say in abortion rights. Yeah you can have an opinion, but unless your a woman who has been through something traumatic like that, you keep that opinon to yourself.
Who tf are we to decide what these women should do with their bodies? We don't know what it's like?
And also to me personally, when it comes down to my own morals. I think it is CRUEL to take away a women's rights to her own god damn body. I really can't believe that abortion is even as big of an issue as it is. How hard is it to let people make descions over their own body? Men should not have a say, women who have not been through the process of abortion should not have a say.
That's my take on it. I don't give a shit if people think abortion is or isn't murder, that's so irrelavent to the real issue here. And you focusing on something so fucking stupid just proves my point. y'all are over here arguing about abortion being murder when there are women sitting alone, waiting to go through something so trauamtic.
Cmon...
I would murder anyone if they use my organ against my will then except i allow it by this logic. I dont understand why a fetus should have more rights than an adult human being. I dont have a right to use anyone's organ against its will. So why can a fetus have this right? Anyway it is not murder, since it is not even alive.
Furthermore, i only respect vegan "pro lifers" If you are a pro life then dont murder animals to eat just because it is delicious. This is why i make a difference between pro lifers and anti abortion people. Majority of you are hypocritical anti abortion freaks. Do you really want to lock up these women although prisons are full and many pedos and rapists are outside? If you all really care about kids, then you would adopt them. Unhealthy, disabled, "too old" kids etc dont get adopted. Healthy cute toddlers and babys get adopted and so other kids ain't worthy for adoption according to statistics. How sad is that🤔😔? I am done of people who act like they care about kids but their actions show the opposite. By the way forcing women to give birth will cause unhealthy kids since stress during pregnancy and other things like drugs/alcohol that are taken by the mother to overcome this situation affect the fetus in very bad way. As i said none of you piece of shits adopt these "unhealthy" kids. So it is extremely sadistic to me to make these kids go trough this since you all dont give a f about them after they are born. According to statistics kids without parents or with toxic families end up being criminals. You just create broken humans with shitty lifes for your sadistic hypocritical beliefs and idealogy.
Note: i will never abort. So i have nothing to loose under antiabortion laws
Do you believe in "souls"? If so, do you think the male and female chromosomes each carry "half a soul" and it unites on conception? No, they don't. But no one ever asks this question, do they? You immediately refer to it as murder. Well, you're not murdering anyone if there's no SOUL attached to the embryo yet, are you?
So, when DOES the soul get "assigned" to the embryo? Hmmm. Perhaps not until it's determined that the embryo is more viable? That's possible, isn't it? I can tell you this much - it's not attached at 6 weeks, or any time in the first tri-mester. No, I can't prove that to you, so you won't believe me anyway. Let's just say it's "esoteric knowledge" that I learned from a very advanced soul.
What you're doing when you abort is something else entirely, and that's between the people doing it and the Creator, but it's not murder. You're interfering with Karma, and that means you have to pay a price, just like every other action you take.
All of that said, I don't think abortion is a good thing, but I think it might be a better thing than an unwanted child who might end up in foster care and likely have a fucked up life.
No one even does abortions if the woman is too far into her pregnancy because then it’s actually considered a person. Doing it earlier on isn’t murder because the unborn child hasn’t even developed yet. It’s so easy for someone who had no problem bringing a child into the world because they knew/know they are set and prepared to take care of a child or maybe they just like children in general so they’re totally against abortion for that or those reasons but who are you to judge someone because someone chose to not birth a child for their own personal reasons? And call them something they’re not when it’s actual serial killers walking around and never had a abortion in their entire life and can’t because some serial killers are men. No one just gets abortions just because, it’s always a purpose/reason behind it. Sure you can easily say “Well don’t have sex. Don’t have unprotected sex if you don’t want kids.” Blah blah blah naturally so sex happens. You can’t stop it and most times it happens in the moment and you don’t think clearly because lust takes over your entire body including your mind and things happen from there, and if what occurs from is something you’re not prepared for, by all means do what you have to do. You can make of that last part how you choose to.
It's not murder, Murder by definition is unlawful killing of another human without justification or valid excuse.
Abortion has both of these things therefore we have decided in many courts around the world that it is not murder.
Meanwhile a lot don't because "Justification and Valid excuse" are highly subjective.
But if your a supporter of democracy not fascism when it's voted one way more than the other, that's just how it is. Complain by all your free will to do so, vote ageist it. You are free to your opposite side.
But at the end of the day somethings are more you have to learn to just accept that's the way society is growing to be and think on a whole. You can still just reject the idea.
But no need to say un-factual things like it's murder, when the definition of murder clearly would define abortion as something else.
Wait did you just say murder only applies if I have an excuse? So I can just kill you for pissing me off and writing this nonsense on my post and say that to a judge and I’d get off? I’m not even going to bother corresponding with you. You clearly aren’t functioning properly
So you think been pissed off is a valid excuse or don't you know the meaning of valid?
Cause one of these makes you need mental help and the other means your not the sharpest tool in the shed.
And you can argue with me all you want but just look up the word murder. The definition is right there.
Did she give an excuse as to what a valid EXCUSE is? Did you? I know for a fact you probably dropped out of highschool or barely finished and you’re trying to argue with ME? I know for a fact that you probably have the IQ of a peanut but you just try to cover it up by being rude
“Your not the sharpest tool in the shed” says the person who can’t write properly. How about you go drink some chocolate milk and go to bed. You’re like 8, right?
Honestly I'm against abortion.
The only way it would be somewhat rational to me is it was a life or death choice between the mothers or the babies life due to complications.
But I also realize that it's not my body. So it's not my choice.
And I don't talk down to those women not make them feel bad for what they have done.
What they have done well stay with them, it's their choice. And once they make it, it's done. After that, it's only between them and the god they believe in.
**by the way I was almost an abortion baby. My mom changed her mind.
Except out tax dollars pay for most abortions as planned parenthood payments. Furthermore when that woman was raped on that train a few weeks back people did something similar and isn’t get involved because “her body not their choice” and their being charged.
I really don't care about the tax money. Once it's out of my hands idc where the money goes.
Also I never heard about whatever woman your talking about. I don't follow the news.
And I don't believe then even when you get raped, that it would be an excusable reason to abort. But that's just my opinion.
I don’t like abortion at all but could understand in cases of rape or molestation at least. Apparently she was molested on the train and people recorded and didn’t help.
Agreed.
They act as if there was a magical moment when "it" stops being "mother's" property (people argumenting that is is their body and they can do whatever they want with it), and starts being "baby".
The baby still would die without mother even after the moment of birth. Even adults are "just bones covered by muscle and fat cells, which are covered by thin skin membrane.
The moment general public decides to have sex - you guys knew possible consequences of having sex (child, sexually transmitted infections,...) beforehand, so no take backs as you already made your free choice. You can't have freedom of choice without the responsibility for consequences.
Disclaimer: The abortion should be allowed to victims of involuntary sex (rape,...), because they, unlike general public, didn't have the "free choice about their body to have sex".
1) There is no debate about normalizing abortion. People will seek abortion because they need it. Because their life depend on it. Because they wouldn't be good parents, and they don't want to be. Abortion has been a practice for as long as pregnancy existed. It's way more common than murder, WAY more common. Women who get abortions don't feel bad about it, because they needed it. The debate is about *legalizing* safe access to abortion, so that the people who need it can get it in a safe way.
2) Abortion is not murder. Even if you don't accept that it's just a clump of cells, for whatever reason. No matter how you spin it, it's about the mother's body. If you had a real person getting in your womb, I'm pretty sure it would qualify as legitimate defense to kill them.
3) "she shouldn’t be allowed to have children", uh, that's what abortion is about?
So you are anti women's-rights? You are okay with forcing a person to remain pregnant?
If it's so important that the fetus live, then let's take it out of the unwilling person and you can carry and raise it. You can pay all the fines and carry all the responsibility, since you are offering.
Murder is the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another. Abortion can be defined as the deliberate termination of a pregnancy by the removal of an embryo or fetus from the uterus. This topic that is not universally agreed on. It is determined by law that a fetus is in fact not a human being and so we can say that abortion is not murder. Can we really say that we would value the life of an unborn fetus over a living breathing human? Would you force a woman that is raped or medically unsound to not be able to get rid of the child? Even in cases of incest? Don't start with the whole adoption crap. Millions of children are left at the mercy of people to adopt without them ever doing anything for them. Left to be neglected. Why force such an existence.
Technically it IS just a group of cells.
An EVOLVED means to EVENTUALLY produce another being.
TECHNICALLY CANCER is ALSO just a purposeful reproducing group of invasive cells...
the issue 'defaults' to IF... AT THIS TIME, this evolving group of cells is 'welcomed' by its Host.
Traditionally, humans have ALWAYS espoused the 'right' to excise UNWELCOMED parasitic
lifeforms and SINCE these evolving cells draw nourishment FROM their Host, to the detriment OF their Host... they ARE 'parasitic'. Ethically harsh perhaps, nevertheless pragmatically 'true'.
Abortion is the LEAST 'wise' means to excise an unwelcomed 'growth' but NO LESS 'unwise' than not responsibly employing a prophylactic to prevent infusion of a self-serving lifeform (like COVID)
But SOME, will stubbornly decry it IS 'their right' to NOT use preventative protection~
"but a conglomeration of cells in the early phase of pregnancy can hardly be characterized as a human person. The human identity, personality, and worth is associated with the functioning of the brain, so only when the brain is fully developed can there be any talk about an unborn human being"
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7476658/
I don't care for it. People can do whatever they want to their own bodies and thangs inside them
Pretty simple. Low IQ people like abortion because then they have no consequence for being too stupid to use contraceptives properly.
They're too stupid and dishonest to see the cognitive dissonance in the fact that it's illegal to tamper with or destroy certain animal eggs, but not illegal to kill a fetus. Or how you can get an extra charge when you kill a pregnant woman's fetus... but not if you were just a doctor and she asked for it. So the reality? As a society, we've decided that it's alright to kill human fetuses because they can't fight back and nobody will miss them when they're gone. Doesn't matter if it's more immoral than killing 95% of adult humans, it's super easy and saves the wemons the trouble of having to go through all that pregnancy nonsense. We could be mass executing violent felons, homeless, the menally ill and disabled, but nope! Gotta kill all the unborn babies so women don't have to pay the price for getting creampied. Lazy cunts.
You want to murder the homeless and mentally ill? What a sicko you are!
I have always used condoms in my sexual life. Even after married I used them for a quite a while. And I am pro choice.
@This_Is_My_Opinion8 Pfft... drop that "pro choice" nonsense. You're pro abortion. "Pro life" and "pro choice" are misnomers.
You want me to say pro abortion. I say it. With no issue. Same thing, different names.
@This_Is_My_Opinion8 I guess you don't know what "misnomer" means, eh? Like I said, your kind aren't known for being particularly smart.
No I have no idea what that means. I can and will google it. Let's see...
"a wrong or inaccurate name or designation."
At any point I gave it a wrong name or designation.
But never hearing a random term beforehand doesn't reflect at all my intelligence. Prejudgment someone and wrongly using a word you brag about knowing on the other hand...
Well, at least your open and honest about being a psychopath. Most try to hide it.
@This_Is_My_Opinion8 What makes you stupid is you saw the word, disregarded it, responded in a way that shows that you have no clue what I was saying.
But you've done a good job in exemplifying why I don't bother arguing with pro abortionists anymore. I could make the perfect argument to why abortion is wrong, it'd go in one ear and out the other with you dolts, and you'd reply with "Durrh, muh body muh choice" or with some other slogan. It's obvious that you could only even understand the first sentence of what I said too. Do you know what "cognitive dissonance" is?
I get there's plenty of people who don't participate in abortion and yet support it... But I doubt people like you actually think about it that hard, or are even capable of it, so you just default to the established "right" position. But if we get down to the nitty gritty details of abortion... I don't there's much you'd support.
Do you support killing a viable fetus that can survive outside a mother's womb? Do you support forcing people to pay for abortions that they oppose with their tax dollars? Do you support the women who use abortion as plan C birth control and don't bother with any other protection? I suppose I shouldn't be surprised if you say yes to any of these... what would be surprising is if you actually have the attention span to make it this far.
@Rachelspiks Uh huh. What's ironic about my point is most abortionists say there's nothing wrong with killing a fetus for the reason that it will be mentally disabled... but then when I hint that it's just as wrong as genociding the mentally disabled apparently I'm the twisted one. Selective abortion IS eugenics.
So yeah, enjoy patting yourself on the back for being morally superior when it comes to your position on killing babies in the womb. You absolute pinnacle of righteousness.
I admitted to not knowing what misnomer was. I said I was going to see what it was and I did. That is the opposite or disregarding it.
I will tell you on a while if I know what cognitive dissonance means or not...
From where I stand you are trying to dismiss me as inferior to escape a perfectly harmless discussion. In fact I will admit I love to argue so bring your best. By all means tell me why you think abortion is wrong... and I will calmly explain you why are wrong. To help you understand.
My country was one of the first in Europe to legalize abortion. And I disagree, very much, when you say there is nothing to support. But I can't wait for you to try to prove me wrong.
If the mother does not desire that fetus, yes I support it. Always better than bring a child to a mother that doesn't want it or isn't prepared for it.
There are many laws that people don't support and yet have to pay for with their taxes. Why would abortion be any different?
The amount of girls who use abortion as plan C over and over is negligible at best. So no issue there.
As you can see I have valid reasons to say yes to all of them. If you don't consider them valid reasons tell me why and I will again calmly explain to you why you are wrong.
Where is my cognitive dissonance now?
@celtero they say you are the twisted one for a good reason. You sound like the kind of guy that thinks he is right and doesn't put the hypotheses of being wrong. If many people are telling you something there is the chance they are on to something.
In this case they are because is completely different to not being a disabled person into this world and to kill one that is already here. "Into this world" and "Here" as in already born in case you are wondering.
In no way shape or form killing a fetus that will soon be a disabled individual, is the same, biologically or ethically, similar to killing an a disabled born person.
@This_Is_My_Opinion8 Lol... you're amusing.
Alight, you still aren't completely sure what I'm talking about, so I'll loop around to my initial point if you want to make an argument.
Why is it that destroying an eagle's or turtle's eggs is illegal, but killing a viable human fetus isn't?
Same to you my friend.
If that eagle or turtle kill their eggs no one things twice about it right?
Also you are kinda illogical aren't you? Comparing killing animal eggs, an act of cruelty that brings you nothing besides endangering a species. To abortion, an act that will ensure that many individual don't have their lives ruined or aren't brought into a very precarious situation.
Can't you spot the difference?
Uh huh. That's why humans artificially preserve so many species that would've gone extinct due to their own incompetence.
It isn't cruel. They're just a clump of cells bro. Can whip up one hell of an omlette with a leatherback clutch. No difference between a human embryo and a turtle one.
Don't see how giving birth and putting the child up for adoption ruins lives. All the adopted people I know are fine.
Those damn turtle eggs are fucking up my beach though. Better get rid of those useless clumps of cells.
@celtero Just to be clear.
Before you said I disregarded a word I didn't knew. I told you I properly addressed it. And you didn't mention it again.
You just throw random judgement to see what sticks don't you?
Same thing with the questions you almost defied me to say "Yes" to. I addressed them and nothing came from you after. Hope this trend doesn't continue or this will be boring.
I made you a question. If you could spot the difference between a violent act of killing a random creature offspring and a compassion act of not ruining many lives. Apparently you couldn't.
But I will try to explain.
Do you have any idea the state of the institutions that harbor kids for adoption? I already did volunteer work at some and I can give you an inside view. They are barely able to accept more children. Their education is poor at best. They know very well what their situation is it eats their spirit. Most of them have behavior problems. Drug abuse is common. But they will be adopted, right? Well the adoption process takes forever. Most kids will never be adopted. Some are even returned. Yes while I worked with them I knew one kid that had already been returned twice. Guess what his mental state was.
You say "clumps of cells". Like that is a bad word. Again, no logical person will ever say that a fetus is the same, biologically or ethically, to an already born person.
If not think what would be harder for you. Set fire to a recently born baby, or set fire to an incubator with viable embryos?
Because the decision was made by medical doctors, senior legal people, who looked at the ethics over a number of years.
eventually drafting a law on abortion.
i would hazard a guess this type of thing was mention in first 5 minutes and then they moved on to the other matters.
There are people on here who are anti abortion but also homophobic and have said they would disown their child if came out Gay or Lesbian. Some have even mentioned shooting them.
That’s a great life for a child, yes they were born, however they now live in fear of their homophobic parents and when they eventually come out, get disowned, abused, kicked out of the house.
The term your looking for is ensoulment. It's a topic that has been widely debated since antiquity. Aristotle believed it was 40 or 90 days and more recently it's been pushed later in a pregnancy and some now believe it's at first breathe. No scientific determination has been made as to when a fetus gains consciousness. So it's all a matter of belief and various regions of the country have differing beliefs. Forcing people to preform and pay for a procedure they sincerely consider to be murder, in my opinion would, be cruel and unusual punishment.
The lack of uniformity in belief about ensoulment and, since no scientific conclusion derived from a falsifiable theory is available, determining the availability of abortion should be done on the most local level possible. Paying for abortion through a tax also causes injustice. The tax payer who believes in an early conception point could be forced to fund murder.
@AKeeblerElf no the word I was looking at was not including religion or politics.
Both can go fuck off.
DO YOU THINK THE CHILD WILL LEAD A GOOD LIFE IF IT IS BORN OUT OF A MOTHER THAT HATES IT , DOESN'T WANT IT, SEES IT AS A BURDEN?
100 YEARS AGO, ORPHANS WEREN'T ADOPTED INTO LOVING FAMILIES! ORPHANS WERE FREQUENTLY ADOPTED BY FAIMLIES THAT NEEDED AN EXTRA MAID OR SERVANT. THESE POOR ORPHAN KIDS WERE TRADED THEIR SERVANT DUTIES FOR A MEAL.
SURE, YOU CAN ARGUE THAT WE CAN RANDOMLY HAND OUT INNOCENT VULNERABLE CHILDREN TO ANY PARENT WILLING TO ADOPT. HOW THE FUCK WOULD YOU KNOW IF THESE VULNERABLE KIDS WILL BE TREATED WELL? WHY DO YOU THINK ADOPTION AGENCIES ARE SO PICKY ON WHO THEY HAND OUT THEIR KIDS TO?
IDIOTS LIKE YOU ARE WITHOUT BRAINS. YOU'RE NOT DOING THE UNBORN BABY ANY FAVORS BY LETTING IT OUT INTO THE WORLD.
Then you should just not have sex if a child is going to be that inconvenient for you and by the way lots of rich people privately adopt and will pay you for it getting paid to get rid of your baby is a lot better than paying to get rid of it
Who has an easy life? Most people don’t so that’s no excuse to deny them life
@AgapeHanma93
[by the way lots of rich people privately adopt and will pay you for it getting paid to get rid of your baby is a lot better than paying to get rid of it]
NO, there are not a lot of "rich people" that are willing to adopt. Firstly, if they were so rich, they could go for IVF fertility treatments to have their own children. Nobody wants to adopt. Overwhelming majority of those who want to adopt are folks who cannot have their own children.
And secondly, the overwhelming majority of families in America ARE NOT RICH.
Thirdly, how do you know these "rich folks" are going to treat these kids well? how do you know they aren't sexual predators? how do you know if they are of decent moral standing? how do you know if these rich people aren't abusive?
is it moral to just randomly hand kids off to absolutely anyone?
@AgapeHanma93
[Who has an easy life? Most people don’t so that’s no excuse to deny them life]
My life hadn't been easy. But at least I wasn't molested as a kid or being bought as an orphan to be a slave / servant. For thousands of years all throughout history, orphan kids were typically adopted into families to become servants or maids.
what makes you think this won't happen if you aren't careful on who you give these kids to?
If that’s your only concern then you should get to know the people your giving your baby to and by the way lots of rich people can’t have kids and at least one fourth of the country is rich
if you’re that concerned then don’t have sex
@AgapeHanma93
the woman is already pregnant. the mistake is already been made. how do you tell a pregnant woman that she shouldn't have sex? you can't reverse a pregnancy. telling her that she shouldn't have had sex will not solve any problems. Playing the blame game won't help the situation.
[If that’s your only concern then you should get to know the people your giving your baby to and by the way lots of rich people can’t have kids and at least one fourth of the country is rich]
there is absolutely no way for an adoption agency to interview, study millions of people to see if these families are good people or not. This is why adoption agencies have strict requirements for parents that are looking to adopt. they don't just hand out kids to absolutely anyone.
And for any kids that DO end up getting abused, I WANT YOU TO BE EQUALLY HELD RESPONSIBLE for anything bad that happens. I want you arrested and charged for anything bad that happens to these children.
You do realize that the agency is just a middle man right what your talking about only happens if both of the other to parties involved don’t care in other words she can pick and choose who she wants to give her baby to and talk to and get to know the people who want to adopt and pay the process is a hassle but most people willing to go through with it won’t mistreat the child
@AgapeHanma93
as far as i know, adoption agencies have VERY STRICT requirements on who they hand out children to.
And if you're so confident like god, i want you to be ultimately responsible for any child abuse, torment , slave cases as a result of handing out kids to absolutely anyone who wants to adopt.
why don't you take a look at what has happened for THOUSANDS of years throughout history? orphan kids have never been treated well. Many of them were sold into families as a servants or maids and it really wasn't uncommon to see an orphan mistreated.
Why won’t you just keep your baby then
Then you shouldn’t be having sex
It’s that simple
Then she and the dad should raise their baby
Well then find a good home for the baby because your trying to create a scenario where abortion is only option and it’s not it never is
@AgapeHanma93
[Well then find a good home for the baby because your trying to create a scenario where abortion is only option and it’s not it never is]
is it really that easy to find a good home for the baby? are there enough good homes for the baby? how can you guarantee that there will be enough homes for all babies? do you think you're in heaven where all babies are treated well? where do you think you are?
why don't you take a look at all throughout history? orphans were treated like shit for thousands of years. what makes you think that this can't happen nowadays?
you're just an idealist. you're living in your own imagination that the world must be perfect that all orphans should get great homes. THE WORLD DOESN'T WORK THAT WAY.
do you really think you're in heaven?
Yes there is enough and after the baby is born she should never have sex again because she clearly isn’t ready for it
@AgapeHanma93
orphans have been mistreated for thousands of years. and now you're expecting to lower adoption requirements. you want every couple to adopt. you want to blindly hand off children to all sorts of people. AND YET, you want to ensure that all these kids to be treated well.
IF YOU'RE GONNA LOWER THE ADOPTION REQUIREMENTS, YOU ARE INCREASING THE CHANCES THAT THESE KIDS WILL NOT BE TREATED WELL.
Your putting blame on me and not on the person to cowardly to step up and raise their own
I meant too
@AgapeHanma93
[Your putting blame on me and not on the person to cowardly to step up and raise their own]
Of course i am putting the blame on you. because if child abuse , torment, death cases arise , I want YOU TO BE ARRESTED AND CHARGED.
you want to criminalize abortionists for killing unborn babies? i want to criminalize you for maltreatment of children.
every child who is born , deserves a decent upbringing. No child should be born onto earth just to suffer.
do you realize that terrible childhoods tend to also give rise to criminals? Most criminals / murderers tend to have terrible upbringings where they were severely abused
Because their PARENTS failed them children need to be with their mothers and fathers and like I said if they don’t want to deal with it then don’t have sex
And you don’t see that as failure on the parents part
@AgapeHanma93
you can't force parents to love or want their own children.
you can't force adopting parents to treat their kids well.
you can't guarantee that there will be enough good families that want to adopt.
you also can't change the fact that the overwhelming majority of families in america do not want to adopt.
Whether you love them or not your responsible for them and must take care of them nothing in life is guaranteed by your logic we shouldn’t do what isn’t guaranteed then we’d be doing nothing
I gotta be honest here I think your lazy a coward and perverted because you want to have your cake and eat it too you don’t want to pay the price of intimacy you only want to reap the benefits without the work (a lot of women are like this nowadays always )
@AgapeHanma93 I rather not be born into a hard life
We Are One cell. And each day it doubles next day we are 3 cells. Then next day 6 calls 12 calls 24 calls 48cells 96cells in one week in 7 days then 192 cells 384 cells and they are not 1 type of cell it is estimated over 30 trillion sells are in the human body that's from. Human cells. Brain cells. Bacterial cells. Blood cells that one cell equals 30 trillion
30.000.000.000.000
I am 100% pro-life I am 100% pro-choice if a lady if a woman if a girl has been raped has made the decision to give up her child cuz whatever might have happened I will stand in front of her and I back her play. And if I have to pay for it in the long run I will do so it is her choice only her choice if a rapist forced her out of r a p e I will fight for her and make sure nobody else first is her to do what she wants to do that's her choice and I am pro-life right is right wrong is wrong it's her choice
And by the way there are over 200 different types of cells in our body. And if somebody out there wants to become very very wealthy learn how to remove dead cells from our bodies because there's only one clump of cells and that's what causes wrinkles an and that's what makes you look old makes you slow down the build up of cells in your body in your twenties is when you're in your Prime that's when your body has the perfect amount of cells overtime the clump of cells get overcrowded starts to build up it slows us down. come up with the detox to remove dead cells from our bodies. You become very wealthy
they want to distance emotionally from the reality, so they use words to make it not so. like waiving a magic wand. They don't want interference with their ability to manage their lives.
Reality is... life starts at conception... end of story. That is a life.
Reality is... if mom, or some mom and dad, aren't' there for that infant, it stands no chance in life.
The problem is emotional damage... and that is where the solution is. Avoid emotional damage, do things the right way, heal the inner children/hearts, build families on a foundation of good values, and build little children into well trained adults.
The rest of it is a waste of time arguing...
Yes if a woman has abortions, they should be required to go through therapy to figure out what is going wrong... and so should the guy.
Seems like for most people here is you either all for it or not at all. For me it depends on the situation. For woman who got herself in that situation because of bad choices, I don’t agree with abortion in that matter. There’s a lot of families out there that can’t have child and they would love to adopt. That’s what my friend did when she became pregnant after her rape. She found a nice family that wanted to adopt her baby. She said even though that bad thing happened to her, she got a beautiful baby out of it and she wouldn’t change it if she could.
On the other hand, if the child will be born with severe birth defects or abnormalities and won’t live a good life then I see it as acceptable.
I like the Republican version of abortion… safe legal and rare. Some abortions need to happen. But I know women that have abortions like contraception and they need to be either sterilized or made to pay a hefty fine. Tax payer covered abortions fine if your limited to one single abortion without special circumstances like rape. But at this point abortions been given as an option and look what happened. Have an inch and they took a mile as they say so fuck it. Make it illegal and hold people accountable. Men HAVE to pay child support without a choice in the abortion so take away the choice.
Yes but pp gets special subsidies from the government and we all know it’s tax payer covered and we also know a majority of what pp does.
Also do you really think the government honestly spends $140 per bolt? They use that to cover up spending.
Just dropping this section specifically
Title X does not allow federal funds to be used for abortions. Medicaid, however, does allow government money to be spent on them — in very restricted cases.
The 1977 Hyde Amendment dictated that federal Medicaid funds could only be used to fund abortions in cases of rape, incest or to protect the life of the mother. However, some states have expanded cases in which they will provide funds. Currently, 17 states allow funds to be used for "medically necessary" abortions. In those cases that these states count as medically necessary but that are not permitted by the federal guidelines, states cover the cost alone.
Question. If a person has $500 needs to pay their $500 rent but then you offer to help their burden and give them $500 on the condition they don’t drink alcohol with YOUR $500… couldn’t they spend YOUR $500 on the rent and theirs on the alcohol? That’s like the big deal with tiktok. They can share your personal info with parent companies but not direct with the cap. But if they share with the parent company the parent company can share with the company… your arguing semantics at this point.
Eh bad example, the complaint is tax payer money and it isn't being used on that. What they do with their own money is up to them.
Let's do this another way. If you buy something off Amazon and then Jeff Bezos hires an entire yacht full of sex workers and snorts a years worth of coke off their tits, does that make you morally responsible for buying a slow cooker?
Of course not.
Your federal tax dollars are not going to abortions. They are going to things like handing out condoms and making sure people don't have std's because the last thing we need is another pandemic of some sort of super dick rotting std.
PP also just happens to do abortions off private donations.
I don't know I think we could use a super dick rotting std right now… neither you nor I have any skin in that game and maybe these women will stop being promiscuous sluts and make better choices…
Well most women are screwing a minority of men so either way I’m good. Ide prefer it if it did only effect men.
Damnit bri always coming in here fucking up my mood with your FACTS! Lol jk.
But that only means 70% of men get married between them ages. It don’t show rates of sex outside marriage, number of partners, or the rates of women married. I bet it’s higher then 70%.
71% men 79% women I win lmao. Besides this it includes previous generations. If you look at the younger dating market it’s total shut and way different.
Lmao oh my God I'm dying over here on that comment. I can't stop laughing
Yeah it means that a lot of guys are getting laid and then 70% of guys stop getting laid once they get married 😆
79% of women doesn't mean more women, it could also mean we are more likely to marry same sex or it means there are less of us than men which makes our numbers higher 😉
It is killing a person but at the same time if you force a woman to have a child she doesn't want you will end up having more babies dumped or killed by a mother that isn't ready to have a baby.
Of course this isn't always hiw it ends up but we have pushed birth control everyone knows what it is and should use it but you can't depend on them doing it
It should be the choice of that individual whether or not they want it. If you have a young girl say age 14 who gets pregnant and is terrified to tell her parents she should have the option to eliminate the pregnancy as sad as that is.
Everyone has different opinions and that's just the way it is.
And that's why there should be no sex before marriage...
Sex comes after marriage! Or if they want to make sex before marriage they must take full safety measures and be ready for anything wrong!
In my opinion if a woman is married she have no right to decide about the baby inside of her without her husband, the final say is for her husband, still abortion is a crime if it's not done for harsh reasons!
If the woman got pregnant and she wasn't married than her boyfriend will have a say which will be taken into consideration but the final say is for the woman...
If the girl got pregnant from a rape than the decision is fully her's...
The final say is not the husband it should be a mutual decision but if your married most wouldn't be having an abortion.
It's mutual right but the final decision is for the man cause the man is the head of the house, the man leads and the wife follows...
I agree with you that if the couple are married than there won't be any abortions cause it's a gift from god and the baby is the seed of love between a man and his wife!
Instead of abortion, there will be a celebration, the close people to us will be invited to share our happiness, also the husband will enjoy kissing the womb of his wife where his baby is being created and the wife will enjoy her pregnancy safe and warm inside her house and her husband will buy all the necessary supplements and vitamins and will take good care of his wife who loves him more than anything in this world!
Man is head of the house? Um I'm sorry but that is something that was true from the 60's and back. The man is NEVER to be the one making that decision on his own its both man and woman's decision.
For you it works likes that but for me it doesn't...
That's why we all have our own opinions.
Because it's obviously not murder and the only reason people like think it's murder is because you haven't thought about it enough yet. Our society has a massive, massive problem with people being bad at abstract thinking.
Think about what abortion does. It ends the life of an organism that thinks much more like an animal than a human. All the primary reasons why murder is typically illegal do not apply to abortion. Murder is illegal because it harms humans in the ways only our complex thought process... and maybe the thought process of a few other higher animals... can be harmed. Self-aware humans are capable of planning for the future. Murder steals our ability to complete those goals. Self-aware humans miss their peers when they die. Murder steals away our peers. Self-aware humans can fear death or the loss of our ability to influence society. Legalizing murder would mean society falling into chaos due to that fear.
I'm tired of hearing you and the likes of you talking as if you are the holy grail of advise. Abortion is a personal thing and is for each individual to make these choice, not for some babbling snot like yourself trying to mandate your personal position. Learn to mind your own fucking business and not stick your nose in everyone elses.
@katiesmuff Yes, thank you
is it murder to have sex with a condom too then? or masturbate? or just not get pregnant and have a baby every time you could have? jeez. With your logic not letting a sperm be born into a person is murder too...
it's better to have an abortion than a baby you don't want or can't care for for whatever reason. us women have the right to decide what happens to our bodies, abortion should be a last resort and i don't think anyone would chose to do it if they could avoid it so stop judging. you don't know what they've been to and they are definitely not murderers.
I hope anyone who reads this and needs an abortion knows better. You're not murderers you are making the best decision you could in that situation, don't listen to crazy freaks it's hard enough as it is but you are making the RIGHT decision and you're still a good person <3
@Darksign what you abort isn't yet a baby either...
@Darksign it is not a baby. at first it's just a cell. When you make an abortion it is not a baby, it's something that in no way can survive on it's own. When it gets to the point it could have survived abortion is no longer an option. stop being an idiot.
I think it is the pharma/doctors creating business for themselves - you take the pill, have unprotected sex, it is abortion from the moment you conceive. Then there are the manually performed abortions, surgeries.
That, in turn, makes you need a therapist, plus you get STDs and alike along the way, so you become a major customer/account/source of money for them.
If we all lived healthy lives, they'd be earning a whole lot less (the average ones anyhow)
It's like lawyers enticing divorces - their fees are huge and based on you working against yourself most of the time.
I think you’re not alone in you’re feelings. I think the left is leaving a lot of people behind. They’ve just gotten to extreme in their views.
In regards to abortion, I fully agree. There’s nothing normal about it. I think most people have seen the pictures of tiny hands and feet that were the remnants of an abortion or are aware based on studies those fetuses feel pain. How anyone can justify that for the sake of women’s rights or any other reason is beyond me. Even worse is the partial birth abortion. Killing a baby as it is partially being born is infanticide and an abomination and clearly shows the hard heartedness of those willing to defend such a pratice.
Abortion, typically, protects the aborted. When I say that people respond with horror... but that's because they're not skilled at thinking abstractly. Abortion functions as a miracle cure to any otherwise incurable disease. It ends the life of an organism that doesn't care whether it exists or not, sometimes, to prevent a human from coming into existence with sickle cell anemia or other incurable ailments. The only negative a fetus seems capable of experiencing from death is possibly physical pain... and I have not seen credible sources that say fetuses might be able to experience pain before 12 weeks... by which time about 90% of abortions have occurred.
That's keeping in mind, without experiencing pain from it, a fetus loses nothing from its death. If they're born to a parent who doesn't want kids though, they lose something. Therefore, most of the time, abortion appears to help children... and even when pain is a possibility... oftentimes birth defects aren't detected into 18 weeks or so when an ultrasound occurs.
The way I see it... I'm being "hard-hearted" in the same way a surgeon performing a brain surgery can be "hard-hearted" whereas you're being soft-hearted in the same way someone might object to a blood transfusion for religious reasons. That is to say... there are philosophical, logical forms of empathy, and emotional, instinctive forms of empathy. In this case, I'm thinking my philosophical, logical form of empathy is actually more empathetic than your emotional, instinctive form of empathy.
So... not only will I defend abortion. I'll actually encourage with the woman doesn't want a child and she's less than about 12 weeks into the first trimester. That's seems better in every way than just having the child to give it up for adoption. I think having a child just to give it up for adoption, unless the person specifically got pregnant to do that, is the primary thing we should focus on discouraging.
Although you do make a far more rational and logical argument than most proponents of abortion I simply cannot agree.
Human life is precious and should be protected from an unjust ending of it. Abortion is barbaric and morally wrong as far as I’m concerned.
You guys have no idea what u all r talking about. U are not the ones carrying the 👶 .
A woman can decide my body my choice!
So you simply "cannot agree." If you want to live in your illusionary bubble, ignoring reality, fine. We all do that, to some degree. We all invent our fictions worlds in which only our friends, and families and ourselves matter... and that's why we care deeply about our dogs while ignoring the plight of starving African children. That's just human nature, I think... to build our painted blue skies beneath which we live... but you have no right to determine that other people live within your bubble too. You have no right to insist that other people adhere to your fictional views of reality. They'll have their own.
@Pinkmatters I agree completely. However... you can't really argue any points that way. When I delve into abortion in logical ways... I think I can make other forms of arguments too. I think your simply stating "my body, my choice," works just fine... but society gets tons of that already. I'm trying something new.
You do realize that the people that get abortions are generally
- a raped girl
- or a college student that cannot afford having a child
- or a case of incest that will result in deformities (even worse and more expensive to take care of).
A fetus is a human undeveloped baby.
Getting an abortion should be legal everywhere in the world.
this right here
It's definitely killing someone. When do you draw the line where it's considered killing someone or not? Pretty stupid that people set a time frame for when it's all of a sudden considered killing something. Those kinds of people lack morals and emotional intelligence
So I’m very pro life… but I wasn’t always. Until I basically started trying to pin down when it became a life. And the only definitive event that I saw a way to clearly litigate was conception due to the now baby having its own unique dna. I would dissuade posts like this where u r misconstruing the other sides argument… stop using talking points and just have a genuine conversation where u assume that the other person doesn’t have I’ll will and try to figure it out together. U might get to a point where u disagree and that is fine but u will have a much better understanding of that person and argument.
I always see the excuse of “what if she was raped?” … listen… there’s clearly plan B to prevent that pregnancy from happening. Contact your doctor, they can help. It’s honestly not that hard. Especially if YOU KNOW that you don’t want a kid from someone who raped you. You wouldn’t hesitate. This is coming from someone with experience..
it's not always that cut and dry. what if she's like 15 and is to ashamed to tell anyone because it was her uncle or father or something creepy like that. that shit happens. how do you protect the underage then? or someone who doesn't really have access to a doctor soon enough? I don't necessarily believe in abortion but you have to accept that there are extraneous circumstances...
@whosnumber1 these instances make up less than 1% of abortions... so what about the rest of them?
It isn't murder any more than refusing to donate your organs to a stranger who will die without them is murder. No one has the right to use someone else's body for their survival. I don't know why religious people have carved out an exception for pregnant women, but I would guess it has to do with getting mad about sex.
If one life depends on another and the other life refuses to donate itself to the first's survival, that simply isn't how we define murder. If you want to carve out an exception for pregnant women then you need to be honest with yourself about why you are motivated to do so. Only through being honest with yourself is consistency possible. Be it a reckless teenager or rape victim, neither is required to donate their organs to sustain someone else's life.
I'm saying you haven't said that, but you should because it is clearly your motivation. If protection of life was the real concern then pro lifers would be at the forefront of universal healthcare, pre-k, public education funding, maternity leave, and so on. Instead they are usually the ones leading the charge against such things. So, the preservation of life is not your true motive.
But you can choose to stop believing it is murder at any time (it's not like there is any evidence anyway). You just don't want to.
Again, if protection of life was the goal then eliminating the causes of abortion would be a far more effective course of action. But pro lifers are usually more inclined to be against that sort of thing, so that can't really be the goal..
But you let others delude you into thinking it was murder in the first place. Now, instead of doing the thing that would most help to stop it (eliminating poverty), you let them further delude you into helping increase poverty which will only result in a higher demand for abortions.
@marish01 then maybe give it a start? There are lots of groups that strive for a strong social safety net. And if you're not sold on the idea of it working consider the baby boom generation. This was brought on by FDR's post-war policies of taxing the rich at 90% and using it to really get the economy churning by paying people to do stuff for the sake of getting it done - not just for the sake of profit. And as a result of all that financial security we saw the largest spike in births since probably in the history of the world.
When people can afford to raise children they don't get abortions.
There was an example a while ago of the following.
If someone dropped a petri dish with a fertilized egg / embryo in it, and a child and you can only save one from hitting the pavement, which one would you save and why.
Everyone said the baby because it's a baby.
There are procedures around abortion and up to how many weeks until the embryo is then considered a living human.
I wouldn't say abortion has been normalized, there is more literature, research and knowledge around it. Region is also not as popular as it once was, which is where many negative voices have come in the past on abortion.
I do not feel abortion is taken lightly by anyone. There is potential for long term health effects on the mother, as well as the mental trauma of going through it.
People have their reasons for abortion and it is not our place to judge them for it, but to support them during and after.
"I do not feel abortion is taken lightly by anyone." "... as well as the mental trauma of going through it."
If its not a baby it should be taken lightly. I dont think long and hard about getting my blood tested and a yearly check up. Why would someone have mental trauma over essentially a wart removal? Does not compute.
Depending on the way the abortion is performed, it can require surgery which has additional risks.
The medicine used creates a miscarriage, which if you have seen anyone going through a miscarriage, it is not a great experience.
The reason for the abortion could be from a traumatic experience. It may be as needed due to the woman's life being at risk.
It's not comparable to having a wart removed, or a blood test for an annual check up.
So having a broken arm is traumatic... it takes literally no thought to go to a doctor to have it set. Why is a clump of cells more difficult than legit bone sticking out of your arm?
Very true, you make a valid point regarding a bone break.
If someone is told the have to have an abortion due to their health and they are wanting to have a baby, there would be some psychological effects from that.
As well as society often views a broken bone as a badge of honor; whereas an abortion is taboo.
In the end though I'm lucky enough never to go through it personally with not having the right equipment, so it's just my opinion vs other opinions.
You have a good argument and good hearing a different perspective @bamesjond0069
So asker you are the anti-abortion liberal and I am your antithesis by being a pro-choice conservative
Why am I pro-choice because look at my field of fucks and see forthwith doth it be barren
I've had relationships and took a very simple line of if I got my partner pregnant then I would be happy to be a father but truthfully it was my partners choice, I don't know if they were on birth control but I assume they must be given as far as I know I'm not a father and I think that would have at least come up in conversation at some point, for all I know I might be firing blanks
You know, the really strange thing about this whole debate is that the people who argue that "it's just a clump of cells" also tend to be the same people who believe that life in general has no meaning, purpose, design or overall point, and that it's ultimately nothing more substantial than complex chemistry and electricity, the physical "stuff" of which it's made, so from that perspective aren't we all "just a clump of cells"?
You mean the retarted animals who have no brains at all would claim such things...
Life is priceless and when you get pregnant it's a gift from god to the married couple and that's why when a woman gets pregnant her husband makes a celebration and everyone is happy 😌
We are all just a clump of cell but this clump of cell have something called sentient but the clump of cell in the belly doesn't have sentient , just like microbes doesn't have it.
The funny thing with the whole issue is that if it were men who largely supported abortion and even mandated it as a right or law, I think women would still complain and still find it threatening or intrusive.
In pro-choice women's minds, abortion is good for women if having a baby is inconvenient for them, but if a man wants a woman to get an abortion then it means he's an asshole who cares only about himself and not wanting to be responsible.
There's bodily autonomy, there's the fact that no it's not alive, there's bodily autonomy, there's the already rampant overpopulation and poor livelihoods of actual living children, there's bodily autonomy, there's the fact that about 700 women die yearly from childbirth alone not to mention any other health complications wanted pregnancy or not, and did I mention fucking bodily autonomy.
Get a life instead of trying to dictate others
I don't see why a redundant medical procedure should be a right.
Most women who abort babies aren't at risk of dying nor were they raped... try again
Of course it's alive. Wtf
Calm down it’s NOT your body. Everyone has a reason why they choose to do certain things in life. You do not know those ppls circumstances relax and just make sure you do what’s right for you if you get pregnant.
How about you calm down, weirdo & read the question. I honestly do not care about what you females want to do, the fact remains. Society is downplaying it, for what it is, we are down playing it like it’s not murder when that’s literally what it is.
You’re the weirdo—upset about what someone else chooses to do with their body. That is not murder it’s called an abortion. You’re mom should have aborted you moron
*your
Why would abortion not be bad or an insinuation do murder- if you’re using it as a threat? You are so stupid and if you’re a tax payer and certain laws are being passed, it is your right to be concerned on what bullshit is being passed. Abortion is a cute litte term to help mentally fragile females not feel bad for KILLING their children.
**of
By the way, you are going to have really bad karma coming to you. Really shouldn’t have said that.
The asker loves cultural war talking points but not the real issues
Sweetheart wishing bad karma on someone is only asking for it yourself. Be carful how you use your words, have a good one.
Because sometimes you've to think outside your morals. Sometimes you need to break out your conscience and see what's good for you. A lot of people due to teen pregnancy suffer with making ends meet, due to children are forced to work outside their passion. That's like a lifelong sentence. Why would you do it to yourself? You think this self sacrifice won't lead to self hatred overall transferring into child neglect or abuse? Cuz sis, I got new for you.
What if she was raped? Women need autonomy over their bodies. I don't want anyone giving me orders about what happens inside my body based on their morality. Men and women are different biologically. If you want kids to be born to rapists and incesters or under coercion, I can't help you. How many living organisms did you murder just today when you brushed your teeth? How many animals did you murder for your lunch?
I think the most focus should be on the removal of potential suffering. Because if a kid is raised in a dysfunctional home, they'll likely have more suffering than a kid who was raised in a stable home. And for what? For love? Or because life is sacred, therefore you should be alive? Even if it means you'll be in a severely disadvantaged position? That's silly.
In all honesty, you NEVER know until you’re put into that situation. If a drunk driver causes an accident that results in the death of an unborn baby, I feel that’s homicide. But, in my opinion, when it’s the choice of the individual whose whole life could be negatively impacted or ruined because of a pregnancy, who am I to judge? Bottom line, it’s their body and their choice. Whatever the circumstances, it’s NONE of our business.
Listen, would I do it electively? No. But I like to mind my own business because what anyone else does with their body has nothing to do with me. Also, I had to have an abortion last November when my baby lost her heart beat in my second trimester so not all abortions are elective or "murder."
Is killing u bug murder... yes actually right, you're taking a life. You value human life more. It's clearly not the right thing to do. The question really is. Should we be permitted to do the wrong thing from time to time. Is there ever a time where that is acceptable.
Unfortunately, people's opinions differ on the matter, do they push for it's normalization.
Here in the U. S., we like-minded people aren't enough to change the laws to include it as murder, even when it clearly is. But rejoice, abortion-rates are dropping to record-lows here in the Union.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-49731167
This is a topic with many opinions, some radical, some more understanding. I'm not sure there is a right or wrong.
One thing I can say though. If the fetus is what's really important, why is it okay to abort in the case of rape or incest. Isn't that hypocritical?
It's just another way for these women to feel good about their murders.
It's a way to dehumanize people in general and a political tool for social conditioning. History repeats itself. They dehumanized black people in America for a long time and in nazi Germany with the Jewish and Polish people.
There needs to be a consensus on how far along a fetus is before it begins to feel pain and display other functions of a living being. It is above my pay grade but I know it is more than 6 weeks but less than ten minutes before mother goes into labor. I also know it should not be decided by either Joe Biden or the Pope.
She shouldn't be allowed to have children, she isn't having children. The problem with outlawing abortion isn't that they won't happen. They will. The problem is that they will be unsafe. A back alley or coat hanger abortion can kill the woman. Legal abortions ensure that the woman survives.
Abortion is so wrong. However, when they have abortions, most women are decived into thinking the baby is a clump of cells. They feel awful when they realize! They shouldn't be hated or looked down on, just pitied and loved.
It's called lowering the bar. They figure if they can get society to accept their sins like it's normal then they don't have to fel judged as a murderous POS. Doesn't matter though there's only one judge who matters. And there will be a reckoning for them. So just pray for them. They need God's help.
because for it to be "murder", some people define that as "the killing of sentient life". there's any good arguments for or against that. i don't understand why this is so polarizing and why not more people are in between. makes me think people can't realy think anymore these days. it's mostly tribalism. like monkey. you want to join a group of people (that have a certain opinion) instead of really think and understand.
Also abortions were always a thing. Not just recently. But people would use dangerous, brutal methods and not clean sanitary medical methods... So guess the latter is still way better.
Because by extension, every time a man masturbates you murder 100s of potential children by not getting women pregnant. So any day a non-pregnant woman doesn't have sex with a man, she's murdering potential children. If that sounds ridiculous to you, that just means you set the boundary of life to a different point, to after the egg and sperm mix. And others set it to when it has a brain, when it looks like a baby, etc.
Why do people disagree with you? Because they set a different boundary.
"It’s imperative that women"
Why only for women, why they can kill and men cannot? Why you are not fighting for male serial killers or rapists? Isn't that imperative that they should feel free to kill and rape as well? What about thieves? What is the difference? This is nonsense.
wrong thread
Because it is literally not murder. By that approach, every injection is murder, as you kill some cells on the way.
Hell, using an antiseptic is holocaust amongst bacteria.
An appendix surgery? Hell nah, it's an entire organ... do you see the flaw in your argument?
I count murder from the point that the fetus has a functioning nervous system, that might have the spark of consciousness.
By the way, a person who had 3 abortions should not be allowed to have sex. My argument goes for the first one - what might be an accident. Or a result of rape.
Because it isn't. If you really like to call it an excuse to say it's just a clump of cells, or a matter of fact a fetus, you know I can easily argue saying I'm sick with pro lifes making an excuse saying it's a human being there for it should have human rights or you're a murderer or anything like that. Or in short, making excuses to call someone a murderer to satisfy your own little sense of "justice"
Regardless of what your emotions on the topic may be, murder is a legal term. Since abortion is legally allowed, it does not meet the definition of murder.
Your feelings are just not considered when making legal definitions.
You do know an act of murder CAN occur and it’s not guaranteed the person would get arrested every time? You really thought you did something huh
Are you referring to someone literally getting away with murder? Not get caught committing a crime doesn’t make the act any less criminal.
What exactly is the argument you think you’re making?
Tbh I dont get the whole idea that the none conciouse bundle of human cells is a sacred thing? How many animals have you eaten to sustain your life?
Yeah they may not be worth as much as a humans to you but what the thousands that you've eaten surely have more value than a single non conciouse or sentient ball of cells.
Bravo. Move over to the conservative side - they're all much more accepting and moral. The liberals are liars and cheats, and love killing babies. Dumb AF too.
While I agree we need a third option to prevent unwanted pregnancies in the first place. I’m Republican but i completely support state sponsored birth control all the way up to plan B. But once the egg is fertilized it’s a game changer. We also need to focus on more effective adoption procedures.
@globetrotter22 - What's a 'third option'? BC for men? Sure.
I dont' support state-sponsored ANYTHING. If two people are not on BC they shouldn't be fucking around. PERIOD.
And absolutely yes - adopt it out if you can't or won't raise the child YOU created. There are plenty of ready willing and able adopters.
“ If two people are not on BC they shouldn't be fucking around. PERIOD. ”
Yeah I have heard a lot of republicans say that. But you can yell at these people until they are blue in the face and they are still going to make stupid decisions.
I rather pay taxes for $15 of birth control vs over $2000 a year paying for an abortion or dealing with a kid being raised in at risk environment (who will get involved crime). Getting on BC PREVENTS bigger problems from happening.
I’m about 95% conservative by the way. But this is one area I think people are missing the point on.
You can also add your opinion below!