No but it’s starting to make people realize just how desperate feminists are.
When feminists replace a male action hero with a female action hero, they are riding the coattails of a male. Movies like Tomb Raider and Atomic Blonde never received criticism for being female characters cause they are original female characters. But of course left wingers ignore that because it refutes their argument of “misogyny”.
Shows what you know. Shuri does become Black Panther over a decade ago in the comics so regardless of the actor's death irl, that part of the lore is spot on.
No, that's ridiculous. It IS causing low viewership of these movies and TV shows and comic books, resulting in large financial losses at the studios. But it's not their money, and they are fine losing hundreds of millions of dollars to push their political agendas.
Woke Star Trek failed and is a primary reason CBS/Viacom is near bankruptcy.
Woke Star Wars failed and resulted in Kathleen Kennedy being stripped of power, and Disney not even publicly acknowledging her contract renewal (which was only done for optics).
Woke Doctor Who failed so badly it's taking down the entire BBC.
Woke Ghostbusters - need I say more?
Woke James Bond - worst movie performances in the history of the series.
And Woke Indians Jones was so bad they are taking a year to rewrite it.
I’m glad these are failing not only because I’m strongly against woke ideology but because I don’t care to hear political rhetoric in my entertainment. I think the entertainment industry should stick to entertainment and leave politics to politicians.
I haven’t heard of this, nor do I support it. James Bond is a dude, period. I’m assuming the crowd who supports this would be pissed if the shoe was on the other foot and Captain Marvel became a dude or the Jennifer Lawrence chick from theHunger Games was switched to a guy.
But man, I could definitely get behind Idris Elba as James Bond.
Doris Elba seems like a cool ass dude and I think could pull off the role well. The Bond franchise has done a phenomenal job being able to reboot its main character over and over. Craig was refreshing because he was a new approach…a young experienced Bond. I think Elba would just bring a cool factor to the role that not even Craig did. And yes, he’s obviously black. I’m not suggesting him because of wokeness or whatever, I just think he’d be fun to watch, easy on the eyes, and, hey, why not a different race? To each their own!
@valid9inches I’m saying men have always disproportionately committed violent crimes so it wouldn’t make sense to say they’re committing more now especially when crime has been going down anyways
That's ridiculous. It's not turning men into criminals. That's probably what feminists want people to believe though. They want people to view men as these savages and to view women as these perfect, can do no wrong, god-like species. If anything these stupid people who are trying to give male character roles to females are just making men frustrated. Wouldn't women be frustrated if the men started gender swapping their intentionally female characters into male characters instead of creating something completely new on their own?
pretty sure it's the man in the photo who is called nick fletcher that is mp conservative, who was talking about how women in films are making men violent and blaming women like a typical sexist man.
I see so you don't care and like spreading around misinformation and not knowing things. Just to make dumbass comments online propaganda hate to a party not even involved. Great guy you are.
Indirectly. Attempts to make men more feminine, passive, harmless will have negative effects in society because society always needed masculinity to get built & maintained. For those who can't grasp it, just imagine if 90% of police officers were too afraid to even do their jobs? That's where all of this is headed. For those of us who don't think the cops should be doing everything in the first place this is already a problem, simply because too many men are too soft to protect their own home/neighborhood/kids.
like 90% of what's coming out of Hollywood sucks today. It's either a rehash or a propaganda piece and I dont have time, much less money to waste on such drivel.
How my brain works: You: Talk to me nicely with respect, as a peer Me: Hears you out and allows you to make your points and I kindly make my own and we agree or dont and shake hands.
or
You: Attempt to start lecturing Me: Notices I'm not wearing a wedding band and walks away.
the more people lecture me the less inclined I am to participate. The less likely I am to participate the more likely I am to do the exact opposite of what the lecturing party wants.
On its own, no. The fact that our society's new stance is that masculinity is evil does cause violence. Rather than being encouraged to embrace natural masculinity and use it for good, the message young men are hearing is "Masculinity is bad. Men are bad". I. e: no actual advice for how to be good men. As a result, this leaves a vacuum for bad behavior, which men can do very well, seeing as we have natural aggression which is directed at achieving good in a society embracing masculinity and is left to achieve bad in societies ignoring or hating masculinity.
No, we need guidance into directing our energy into moral pursuits. Men without guidance can become destructive very easily. It isn't women running around in Africa with guns massacring villagers, nor women on the streets of Chicago shooting each other. Humans need rules. Men especially, as male action is more physically directed (versus female action being more so about influence & social contact). Men without rules will destroy shit and each other until a new order is created.
Ok OBM, let's not drag the feminism word into this, ok. LOL It's been bastardized enough and I'm crusading, albeit quietly, to remind people what the simple, original definition is: to advocate for woman's rights on the basis of equality between the genders or sexes - you know, back when gender meant male or female. Every looney tune thing that gets associated with the term now, or any anti-men thing, just distracts from what it's really about.
Back to the question - uh, no. LOL But, I'm sure Ian Fleming is turning over in his grave over this latest Bond development. Not only is it the first time James Bond gets killed, but is NOTHING sacred? It's JAMES Bond, not Jane Bond. He's supposed to be devastatingly handsome, debonair, an amazing fighter, brilliant and of course, irresistible to women. He's supposed to bed at least 5 gorgeous ladies per movie, and flirt shamelessly with Moneypenny. A female 007 ? HOGWASH !! It's the end of the world as we know it !!!
Only really desperate men would start murdering innocent people over stupid shit like this but I must admit I don't like race, gender, or sexual orientation swap characters though just seem lazy. I honestly would rather create either new characters or use characters that companies refuse to promote and expand.
All it does is make for bad PC movies like ghostbusters. Leads to even further alienation of boys and young men from a society that equates putting boys down with helping women . Same with Dr who. Once a much needed male role model, now a boring and poorly written PC mess that spends most of it's time preaching outdated negative male stereotypes and is nothing but an insult to the entire male gender, It is so bad it's painful to watch.
People are responsible for their own actions. If men need more positive role models may I suggest, Martin Luther King Jr., Gandhi, Keanu Reeves, Mr. Rogers, Albert Einstein…. Or might I suggest that more young men become good role models.
Or it could just be ending movie patronage. I think it will be funny, or maybe not, when the "woke" (set) get upset that they are tuned out, and then get violent as a result.
Well it's dumb, it don't make a difference a good role model is a good role model no matter gender. This male propaganda this idea that more women in films causes violence is daft probably sexist to hell.
No that’s stupid, it’s annoying sometimes but it’s not causing men to be violent, the lack of fathers in the household is causing them to be more violent
Nothing of the sort. At max it just shows writers and directors don't really care about women representation. Cause if they did, they'd work to create new original women characters. Not be lazy and just genderbend existing characters.
It wouldn't be nice to put a mustache on the Mona Lisa, it's art. This characters and their stories are also art. No need to change what's already great.
it definitely makes movies stupid. As soon as I see a scene where a 100 lb woman beats up a bunch of Navy seals or slays a monster that just killed 20 men, I'm out
yeah because if he is fit and among the athletic elite is going to be 3 or 5x the strength and with much greater speed than even the strongest most fit woman on the planet. The very best 150lb man can defeat a team of "average" male soldiers
