
Why be conservative? Why hold values and ideals passed down from old dead people from the past and not set your own ideals, vaules and standards?


Because as even John Maynard Keynes - whose ideas inspired the New Deal and were the vehicle by which liberalism, as Americans understand the word, dominated US politics from the 1930s to the 1970s - wrote: “Practical men who believe themselves to be quite exempt from any intellectual influence, are usually Madmen in authority, who hear voices in the air, are distilling their frenzy from some academic scribbler of a few years back.”
First, a clarification of terminology. What Americans call conservatism is actually classical liberalism, albeit with a strain of Protestant traditionalism. What they call - and presumably the questioner calls - liberalism is actually "radical" liberalism.
The word "radical" here not meaning what it means in contemporary usage, i. e. extremist. Rather it means as the ancient Greeks used the term, i. e., meaning "to the root of." The classical liberals - tracing their ideas to John Locke - believed that man is a mildly diffidently social creature and that he creates government to deal with the inconveniences in the state of nature.
The "radical" liberals take this a step further. They believe that government can be so structured to compensate for the distortions that earlier societies have introduced into the human condition. In effect, that social engineering can compensate for the defects in society that distort man's social nature.
Please note that in the foregoing, how many old dead people inspire the ideas of liberals. They are, as Keynes said, "... the slaves of some defunct economist." They are not aware of the pedigree of the ideas that they espouse and are inclined to believe that they can engineer social arrangements - hence the "transformative welfare state" - to perfect man.
The lack of self-awareness combined with the hubris is what makes the case against liberalism in both its "classical" and "radical" forms. Suffice to say, the scope this leaves for grotesque misgovernment is enormous. They are "self-made men who worship their creators."
By contrast, classical conservatives recognize that government is natural to man. That changes must be gradual and that man's capacity to achieve the intended effects of his reforms is limited. The "law of unintended consequences" always pertains, and therefore that governance - and the values and ideals that inspire it - must be rooted in actual human experience and not merely vague abstractions.
As Michael Oakeshott wrote, "To be conservative, then, is to prefer the familiar to the unknown, to prefer the tried to the untried, fact to mystery, the actual to the possible, the limited to the unbounded, the near to the distant, the sufficient to the superabundant, the convenient to the perfect, present laughter to Utopian bliss. Familiar relationships and loyalties will be preferred to the allure of more profitable attachments; to acquire and to enlarge will be less important than to keep, to cultivate and to enjoy; the grief of loss will be more acute than the excitement of novelty or promise. It is to be equal to one's own fortune, to live at the level of one's own means, to be content with the want of greater perfection which belongs alike to oneself and one's circumstances."
This by the way, does not exclude a welfare state. As George will wrote, "Two conservatives (Disraeli and Bismarck) pioneered the welfare state, and did so for impeccably conservative reasons: to reconcile the masses to the vicissitudes and hazards of a dynamic and hierarchical industrial economy. They acted on the principle of “economy of exertion,” using government power judiciously to prevent less discriminating, more disruptive uses of power. . . . "
CONT.
Long story short, conservatism - in its classical Burkean form - is modest in its ambitions and aware of human limits and imperfections. The idea that, as the author put it, one can "set your own ideals, values and standards," is hubris. It is arrogating to oneself the wisdom of ages and assuming one's superiority to it.
To borrow a line, "If ye eat of the fruit of the tree, ye shall be as gods..." That story did not end so well.
TYPE-O: The full quote from Keynes reads: “Practical men who believe themselves to be quite exempt from any intellectual influence, are usually the slaves of some defunct economist. Madmen in authority, who hear voices in the air, are distilling their frenzy from some academic scribbler of a few years back”
The hell with that author. I decide what I wanna do and set my vaules and standards, not follow men and their philosophy from the past in their foolish so called wisdom.
You don't get it. The wisdom of this world is foolishness. Wisdom comes from God, not men of this world and their nonsense which they think is wisdom and knowledge..
See also my quote from the Bible. You have arrogated to yourself the wisdom of God. You pretend that we discern wisdom from the ether when in fact we see it expressed in human action. In the struggle by man - often great men - to search out wisdom.
Try it this way. You speak of God. Absent the Bible - written by men - how would you know what God wants? We glimpse the immortal through His expression in the wisdom of men. Always imperfectly, but perfection is not given in men.
The difference is that you presume to find that wisdom in yourself. Again, "If ye eat of the fruit of the Tree.." You, like the Biblical Adam, seek to "be as God."
The Bible teaches the fear of the lord which I have is the beginning of wisdom thus my wisdom comes from God.
God's word teaches the wisdom of this world is foolishness.
You are stuck in a circular argument. You see virtue and wisdom in human action - Lincoln frees the slaves - but that cannot be virtuous because it is not in the Bible.
The problem is that while God is the author of virtue, we cannot know what it looks like except to judge it in human action. To you, Lincoln freeing the slaves is not to be valued because Lincoln did it.
You have turned Christianity into mere abstraction.
Because the ideals and values they had in the past and for most of my life are the correct ones.
Only in my life time has homosexuality gone from being considered degeneracy to tolerated to accepted to celebrated. Generations in the past went to church and worshiped God. If they didn’t they respected those who did generally speaking. Now they rip up Bibles in Feminist protests and vandalize churches who dare speak out against the doctrines of the political left. In the past people were accountable for their behavior. Now everything from the government, to racism, to parents to wounded inner children is to blame for revolting behavior and no one understands the concept of being accountable for their choices and behavior. In the past children had respect for their parents or otherwise kept their mouths shut and expected punishment for poor behavior. Now we don’t punish children for anything. Everything is considered child abuse. I could literally go on and on. In the past you could watch TV without seeing women dressed like whores, or seeing men kissing men, and without every vice promoted as virtue. In the past women knew their place, children knew theirs, subordinates at work knew theirs and generally speaking you did not see upheaval in society…to the point of attacking police and burning down precincts and being hailed as a hero for doing so. You didn’t see teen pregnancy as common place. You didn’t see abortion being celebrated as a right of women, you didn’t see women smearing menstrual blood on their faces and declaring how oppressed they are in the land of the free. The point is the political left has laid deliberate siege to the truth, traditional American values, and Judaeo-Christian morality. If you think things are good now or are going to get better you’re probably deceiving yourself. Why would you not point to the past and say: “that was better, and it was better because of their values and ideals.”
Things used to be normal in this country. Now everything that was sacred and honored has been cast aside and replaced with alternative values and the newest religion: Woke Ideology. I wish we could go back to the way things were. That’s why be conservative.
Because those values and traditions are working great for my family.
There is no reason whatsoever that every individual would have to "invent the wheel" all over again in every aspect ot his life. When a system is funtioning well and succeeding in uniting the majority of people in a small or bigger group, in encouraging work ethics and discipline, as well as providing the majority of them with basic necessities like shelter and food and safety and role models, or just making those resources easier to find, then it's good enough and keeping it is beneficial to most. If there is also some room left for reasonable change by every generation, it will be great.
There's also the fact that people aren't equal and some people are mentally and physically more powerful than others. Conservative systems usually benefit the weakest, the most, and destroying them usually means favoring a very small group of thinkers and creators who would do well and find their way, with or without pre-existing institutions and internalized values.
Look at yourself, for example. You are too stupid to have an opinion about this matter, yet someone set you loose to "think for yourself". Now we are paying the price by reading your very dumb, loaded question.
How am I too stupid for deciding to not live my life in a box of traditions and vaules passed down because socity say so?
You are the stupid one that is afraid nor intellectual aware to think outside the box and just accept what you been told to accept from birth without questioning.
Thank you!
As someone from the UK who has been suffering a Conservative government doing everything they can to destroy and undermine those exact systems which protect the poorest and the weakest in society in favour of the richest and most powerful, I would have to politely disagree that Conservativism as a political ideology benefits the weakest in any way. By it's very definition it serves to 'Conserve' the divide between the 'haves' and 'have nots', and in most cases seeks to expand that divide.
@Gal67: She called me stupid and her response is mostly stupid too.
@Gal67:
"Look at yourself, for example. You are too stupid to have an opinion about this matter, yet someone set you loose to "think for yourself". Now we are paying the price by reading your very dumb, loaded question."
I'm liberal, so I'm guessing, but I think it's just about perspective. The view we have of the world, and how much we want it to change or stay the same, is based on our own experiences. Conservative people that I've met believe that older morals and values are sound based on their experiences.
Opinion
48Opinion
Isn't automatic rejection of past knowledge rather immature? It reminds me of privileged, snotty-nosed adolescents who have little knowledge or experience, but think they know more than their parents.
We could learn something from "old dead people". Some of them were really smart. Not that we have to copy them, but we can certain learn from them.
My dead grandparents had great values and ideals, and they had a lot of valuable knowledge to pass on. It would be stupid to simply write them off.
One could ask why be liberal, get manipulated by social engineering programs to believe cockamamie ideas, and trample the beliefs and customs of others?
Whose values and ideals are we to espouse, those of liberal, social studies professors? Post modernists? Even their philosophies have roots that go back many, many decades.
I question everything. I support positive change 100%. I have what used to be liberal values of open mindedness, tolerance, peace and liberty. I formulate my own opinions on individual issues. But modern liberalism is the opposite. I don't believe in tearing shit down and bashing people over the head just because I have different opinions.
This is actually a good question, as I'm a independant with libertarian and liberal and conservative links. So i'm the perfect guy to answer our question.
Basically every society, not just god awful racist sexist fascist america, has values and ideals that were created at the start of the foundation of the society. China, African countries, Russia, Norway, Sweden, every country has these. The people of the society come to identify with these values, just like you do with your Hispanic culture. And these foundations aren't always perfect and people often sneak in or contribute bad ideas to the foundation, so we have to let go of some of the foundation later. But what happens if you take away ALL of the foundation? You kill the original culture and society.
America was founded on freedom, liberty, justice, independance. Pretty cool things right? Well unfortantely federalist, racist slave owners, secret society illuminati people, got in the way of that. So a lot of men died and fought for that stuff to change. And the edgy struggle for black people didn't stop because there kept being Jim Crow. And white people found out how much they had been lied to and were actually not free in the 60s. So we took down the old conservative establishment, But the illuminati was still around, trying to divide a we couldn even see them attackig us from right under our nozez. But they were always here, from the beginning. America is about being able to stand up to your corrupt rulers. How many countries value systems allow that? Not much
It's a thing called tradition and it's to honor our ancestors that got us here in the first place. It's not that conservatives don't build their own values, it's that they build it off of pre-existing values. Like a foundation. So that's it's sturdy and won't easily change. Though it can make it hard for them to adapt with change and time. There's up sides and down sides. Like it keeps morals in check like don't steal, lie, murder, cheat. Stuff like that. Keeping the golden rule. (Though I've met a lot of people that say they keep to that golden rule but don't actually practice it). That's the right. The left are the exact opposite, easier to change and don't base their values and morals on the past, the down side to that is they can be too easily changed by the masses and what the population says rather then morals based on a solid ground. I don't care either way what people are, I'm in the middle cause I don't care. People are people,- people are stupid, I prefer to stay to my own, away from everyone else, and I don't care what other people do with their lives. Nobody is perfect, and people are born evil and inherently biased.
But you know why.
Traditional Conservative ideals hold a society together. A strong emphasis on traditional husband/wife/parent roles. A strong emphasis on the nuclear family, close-knit communities, give a society a proper foundation. The concept of state and local jurisdictions having more power than the federal government. And restricting the federal government's role to ensuring rights and freedoms of individual citizens, providing for the common defense, etc. These are the things that Conservatism was built upon.
These principles of course, have nothing to do with the crap that passes for Conservatism nowadays.
What passes for Conservatism nowadays according to you?
Well, Conservatives supposedly claim that now, the Office of the President wields absolute power. . . well. . . when a Republican is in office.
There has never been a time in America when we had a significant number of people claiming to be Conservative, supporting the notion that the President could not only overrule other branches of the Federal government, but use his power to punish states and overrule state law.
It is just incredible to see people claim to be Conservative because of their political beliefs and not because of convictions in principles.
I'm not talking about political conservatism.
What other kind of Conservatism has leaders, values, and ideals?
@Exterminatore Well, y'all pretend you care about principles.
You are only fooling yourselves.
I don't think most of what people call "conservative" is conservative at all. Through the middle and late 20th c., tax rates on upper income brackets were much, much higher than they are today. The Bush and Trump tax laws actually seem pretty radical to me. Bush's consolidation of executive power and the Iraq war were radical as well. Trump's disregard of institutions and traditions - such as an independent judiciary and respect for the free press - were radical as well.
"Conservative" and "liberal" aren't real.
People only temporarily side with either if they fit a particular thing (or set of things) that they agree with.
Real values are complex, individualized, and most people disagree on lots of things.
We invent left wing vs right wing so we can both ignore that it's the same stupid bird being elected either way, and so we can ignore that society is a myth, and if everyone were honest about everything they thought, almost no one would get along.
Because if you don't do it the way it has always been done makes you a 'libtard' or 'sjw'
Making your own decisions is the most important thing. It doesn't matter if your decision matches historical decisions or the modern social trends as long as you are doing it for you as opposed to because X says so.
Because liberalism went from moving forward to form a better society into sacrificing everything you and your country was built upon. Defacing statues, burning and lotting cities and canceling anyone who disagrees with you is what liberals in 2022 stand for.
Because the old dead people built civilization and societies that worked just fine. And liberals have created way more problems than they've solved. I'd rather be part of handing a working society to future generations than one that was set on fire and is doomed to fail.
thousands of years of experience passed on that generally work and address underlying human problems. Fail to understand and honor elders experience and wisdom, means repeat the past.
Evenso, it's still a mess no matter what.
being creative is good... to a point.
Because they’ve worked for thousands of years and made people more prosperous in the long run. Liberals hold on to a Marxist belief which has been taken on by the progressive that have gotten more people killed within 100 years and the entirety of the previous centuries combined. So it it’s conservatism and tradition vs Marxist liberalism I’ll take conservatism
I never considered myself a conservative but now the democrats are destroying this country and causing life to be much harder for me and my family I felt like I had to finally pick a side.
When Donald Trump first campaigned, he addressed issues that I had been talking about for the last 20 years. I was never a fan of his but I had to think that even if only got one or two of these things done it would be better that the failed policies that Obama had backed.
As I get older and mature, the more I realize how vitally important our values, ideals and traditions are. There is a point when “progressive” becomes regressive and it always leads to self destruction.
I think our generations will live long enough to regret subverting everything that gave us the freedom to destroy it.
Because some people see themselves as groups, not individuals. They seek validation and approval from their older generation, and just because it has worked in the past, they try to make it work in the present too.
How is following todays trends setting your own values and ideals?
You don't have to follow today's trends. I clearly said set your own vaules and standards.
And what if my own values and morals fit the standards of being conservative? But also why do you think politics isn’t a social construct? I’ve noticed that majority of democrats are typically of the same social construct as conservatives are as well.
Tell me your moral and vaules and how they differ from a liberal and don't mention politics and don't mention conservatives think stealing is wrong or some obvious stuff.
Why do I need to mention all of my values? If you can’t notice that politics is a social construct regarding how you live your life, that is on you.
I suspect you're a follower and scared to break convention that's why you are conservative. Lol
You expected that and I have said absolutely nothing about myself. I asked you how following todays trends is setting your own values and morals and you commented back with something completely irrelevant and not addressing that democrats also follow trends and such. You made a biased statement regarding conservatives without addressing that democrats do the same thing, so wouldn’t that make you a follower since you are just another extremist that makes biased statements?
You suspected that*
This is how I literally pictured you in my mind regarding your last post. 😂
@Hispanic-Cool-Guy think whatever you want. It amazes me that whenever people have nothing intelligent to say, they just cue out the insults. I am younger than you by 11 years and have a more intelligent way of thinking than you do.
Why you mad? LMBO... I didn't mean it as an insult. 😂
Where am I mad? I am just pointing out what I notice about people like you.
@kyleelyn199723 I love it when they mock more traditional conservative minded individuals and say they can't think for their own. All the while, they're literally doing what they're speaking out against by just following the latest fads (Gender politics, liberalism etc).
And whenever you call any of these people on their flawed beliefs, they just use insults instead of creating a solid argument.
@Wraith_Cemetery yep! I just can’t stand people that make blank statements regarding certain politic sides or views and they don’t realize how contradicting they sound when they don’t include the opposing side when the opposing side the literally the same exact thing only they follow modern day trends, they are STILL following trends and other peoples morals and values.
Does literally the same exact thing*
Because those values and ideals are worth preserving, because they've worked thus far, because the alternatives now on offer are just utterly abhorrent and insane, because "dead people" shouldn't be assumed to have been wrong simply because they're no longer with us (which is what you do here), because not every new idea should be enthusiastically embraced simply because it's new, because... because, because, because...
So many reasons. I could write a book about this.
Liberals and conservatives both have old and rehashed ideas by dead people. It's not exclusive to one group. I would say I hold my conservative cues because they are more often times honorable while liberal ideas tend to be more self centered. The conservative approach is slow and steady and the liberal approach is give me everything now, consequences be damned. And if you don't then we'll destroy and loot till we get it.
For the same reason you don't try to reach India by going north from Spain: the old ways WORK. The values and ideals that get handed down are those that passed the test of time.
Work how and for who? Those ideals and standards were set by rich old men in position of power to abuse and oppressed the weaker. It benefitted the powerful and privileged, not the lower class.
Incorrect. They *primarily* benefited the rich and powerful, true, but they also gave everyone a stable society, devoid of the horrors of life in the state of nature. New ideas about the individual and his role in society have been the very definition of a mixed bag; for every universal suffrage, you get two Communisms and a fascism and a half.
the same applies to Liberals? There are very Few new ideas, most are re-runs of old failed ideas... both Liberal and Conservative... Liberals used to all be Slave owners, now they try to convince the Freed slaves to vote with them, clever, but transparent.
I don't consider myself a traditionalist. I hold to some values that are old, some that are new, I pick and choose.
But you have to understand something, while some old values don't have a good justification for being upheld today, many still do. There's a good reason many are still upheld, and it's why they still are. New equals better by default is something a simpleton would think quite frankly.
In reality, people do develop their own values and standards. And despite the marketing of leftist values as "trendy" or "new", in fact they're rehashed from Cold War Communism or even older eras.
Most people go with what they been told since childhood and it being reinforced by their peers.
Most people don't like being the black sheep of society. Just a bunch of followers of whatever society says and structure them in.
Because with age comes Wisdom.
Why be an atheist? That is what you are sounding like, because our Ideals, Values, and Standards come from the Bible, Handed down to us By God.
Thieves make up their own rules, Ideals, Values and Standards. So do psychotics.
Our ideals, vaules and standards come from God? Only a fool will believe that.
So quick people forget how this country treated black people for a very long time. Not exactly Christian vaules and standards by a long shot, not to mention, it promotes abortion for over 50 years and leads and produces porn and promotes greed and materialism which God hates.
Get real.
Not at all. Jesus said to love one another as yourself. It was Christian Abolitionists that founded the Republican Party and demanded an end to Slavery.
Christians do not support Abortion, Nor do they condone Porn, or greed.
Porn greed and materialism comes from the Devil. You should know that,
The country promotes porn, riches and greed. Those aren't Christian vaules and standards as you suggested..
I never said that porn greed and Riches were Christian Values. YOU said that they were and I disagreed with you.
The country promotes it.
No, it does not. Thee are people that promotes it, but that is NOT the country.
I can't speak to this personally, not being a conservative. But my best guess is it's most likely because those old dead people had to really limit self destructive behavior in order to live comfortably.
Because you're talking about the people who set ideals for themselves and succeeded in life. Why wouldn't they be worth taking note of?
Everyone trying to be unique is overrated. People choose wildly different paths that are frequently toxic and don't interact with others well. Forking off of a proven path works better.
Maybe because those old dead people forged the greatest country the world has ever seen, and the new alive people think syrup is racist.
Great for the rich and powerful. Wasn't so great for those forced to picking cotton in the hot damn sun for free all day and being lynched to death for being a certain skin color. 😏
Yeah, there was no slavery anywhere else in the world done to any other races. Jesus Christ, read a history book.
Brutal slavery and murder of those of a different skin color is never right and a great and good country won't do that. You're the one claiming America is the greatest country ever.
It absolutely is. Or was before liberals started trying to ruin it. There’s more slaves in Africa today than there ever were in America. That doesn’t mean slavery is right, but it was certainly accepted practice in every country. Remember it was Africans who sold the slaves to Americans, and the Muslim slave trade was infinitely worse than the Atlantic slave trade.
Again, read a history book.
@hispanic
If you can find a better country I suggest you move there.
Also tired of hearing of slavery. Slavery ended in 1864 with the Emancipation Proclamation and effectively in 1865 with the end of the civil war. Nearly all of the peoples of the world have enslaved each other and under far worse circumstances than blacks.
Slavery is related to a topic which is near and dear to my heart…. racism…or the lack of it in America.
Sick of listening to black people, on the whole, blame white people, the government, and imaginary racism for their lack of accountability, poor decisions, and lack of skill and drive. I’m no longer remaining silent and calling these people out for the liars and fake victims they are. Blacks are not the only group of people who had a tough time here in America and not the only group who faced persecution. Italian did. The Irish faced major persecution…. but we don’t talk about that because their white and unlike blacks they aren’t still complaining as if they experienced it themselves 165 years after the fact. At least blacks had the privilege of being slaves. Many Indians didn’t even get the chance. We exterminated many of them and forcibly removed them from lands they occupied. Now they have Casinos and are making millions. Maybe blacks should get out of the professional victim business and into the casino business.
@Exterminatore: Major difference between slavery and brutal slavery and just plain cruelty.
@hispanic
So what do you make of the many Celts who the Romans worked to death in mines under the most brutal of circumstances. What of the slavery the Jews had forced upon them by the Nazis? What of the slavery the Vikings…were the Irish not brutalized by them? What about the famous harems of the various Claiphs and Emirs and Sultans. How many white girls were forced to be whores by them?
Study history. You will find the blacks had it better than a lot of others taken into or sold into slavery.
Speaking of which…I have Irish blood so I want my slave reparations for my ancestors taken as slaves by the Vikings from roughly 800-1100. Actually since I have Viking ancestors too…I guess the debt gets canceled out.
@Hispanic-Cool-Guy is this good slavery or brutal slavery? (READ A FUCKING BOOK)
www.fairplanet.org/.../
Slavery isn't inherently evil.
Being cruel is though.
"slavery isn't inherently evil" has to be the stupidest thing I've read on this site today.
I consider myself a moderate as I don’t agree or disagree with either conservatives or liberals 100%.
And I suppose parroting back what’s shoved down our throats by the media is setting your own values? Yeah right
I just happen to believe in personal choice and self reliance
because most new ideas are not well thought out and will never pass the test of time. there is wisdom in our traditions that were passed down to us from our ancestors.
Like what?
like traditional gender roles. the family unit with a father and mother. a home with a strong father and loving mother is the foundation of society. anything else is flawed and compromising for the children from the start.
A father and mother is common sense..
However there is no common sense when it comes to these people who want to change society. All this SJW and CRT crap there trying to push in schools only ruins and corrodes society while also creating strife. Most new ideas never last because they are not mutually beneficial for those involved.
You mean like the values in the constitution, created by old dead people? I still hold those very dear and always will.
All I know is that whatever path you're taking right now is clearly making you very unhappy. Just looking at your responses makes me think it's time for you to re-evaluate your misery.
Some people's values are more conservative than others. That's just how it is. There's many different reasons why someone would be conservative. Religion happens to be one of them.
You shouldn't try to fix what isn't broke. Adam and eve did that when they ate from the tree, and here we are still trying to do things our own way. How many years of suffering does it take for humans to understand we can't set our own standards?
Why stick to tried and tested when you can rape children and die raped and disgraced at prison? (this is an exaggeration, but you get the point. You can exchange for any other thing, like living exclusively on led, etc...)
Why do liberals want to transform the US into a nation they view as ideal when it's been shown not to work? We're actually seeing it in real time.
That’s an oversimplified misrepresentation of what conservatism really is. It’s funny how you’re against abortion, you’re a Christian, yet you consider yourself a liberal. Lol, buddy you’re just all kinds of confused.
So because I'm against abortion/murder that means I can't possibly be a liberal in my attitude and personal views? Makes no sense.
Abortion in the U. S. was passed by a conservative majority judges in the 60's.
And not all liberals think alike. I'm my own person with my unique life experiences.
@kings
He is confused. I keep telling him he’ll end up a conservative. There’s no other end for anyone who reads scripture and practices what it says.
Can’t see how someone can be against homosexuality, transvestitism, transgenderism, a one world government, abortion and be in favor of doing as the Bible says and not be a conservative.
I think he’s afraid of the label. He’s a moderate conservative he just doesn’t know it yet.
@Exterminatore: I hate conservatives and conservativeism that isn't mine. I fully hate the standards of past society. I set my own path and vaules, not others, so quit calling me a damn conservative.
@hispanic
The standards of society in the past were based on biblical values. How can you not like that?
@Exterminatore: If you would know the Bible, God tells us not to follow the traditions of men. I follow God's standards and rules, not men nor their damn traditions. You act like homosexual conservatives don't exist, well they do and by the millions around the world.
What Jesus was referring to regarding traditions, was the many additional commands the Jews added to God’s revealed will that God did not command. Your point there is limited to a theological matter not to this topic.
They are few and far between. I can only think of 1 homosexual conservative. Al Rantel. He was more of a moderate than anything. If there are millions you should have no trouble naming 5 or 10 who are famous right?
@Exterminatore: God's word clearly speaks for itself. We aren't suppose to follow the philosophies nor the traditions of men of this world. Get that through your thick head already.
Colossians 2:6-10
As you therefore have received Christ Jesus the Lord, so walk in Him, rooted and built up in Him and established in the faith, as you have been taught, abounding in it with Thanksgiving.
Beware lest anyone cheat you through philosophy and empty deceit, according to the tradition of men, according to the basic principles of the world, and not according to Christ.
For in Him dwells all the fullness of the Godhead bodily; and you are complete in Him, who is the head of all principality and power.
“I fully hate the standards of past society”, While being a Christian and preaching Bible verses LOL. You’re really good at contradicting yourself, I’ll give you that.
@hispanic
Cool. Don’t celebrate Halloween, Independence Day, Thanksgiving, Labor Day, Veterans Day and so on and so forth. They’re all the traditions of men.
You are misapplying that scripture and won’t debate that with you.
@Kingofkings1992: You don't know the Bible. We Christians are supposed to be against the standards and traditions of this world. We have no part in it. So don't talk what you don't know.
@Hispanic-Cool-Guy You’re just spewing vomit from your mouth and don’t even realize what you’re saying. Looks like we won this debate. Better luck next time
@Exterminatore: I don't celebrate Halloween. And celebrating a country or holiday is totally different than to subscribing how one ought to live their lives from a traditional standpoint. Once you been shown your views don't jive with God's word you clearly say you don't want to argue.
I don't want to argue neither but don't try to convince me that the social and moral traditions of men are good because they aren't, in fact far from it.
@hispanic
I don’t agree and won’t argue it with you. Bottom line is man’s traditions and views are not equal to God’s and should not be given the same status and level of respect.
@Exterminatore: You made my case for me. Then don't follow it.
@Hispanic
No one is saying Conservative ideology should be equated in status to God’s word. No one is saying we must live as we used to as additional commands or limits in addition to God’s word.
That’s what the Pharisees were doing as with all the Jewish religious leaders. They were saying: “God said you shall keep the Sabbath holy and not work on it…. now there are few things we want you to understand as being work. For instance…. walking more than 500 steps is work….499 is not work….500 is work…. and if you must pour oil into a pan to cook…. that’s work….. lifting a glass to take a sip more than 60 times on the sabbath constitutes work”…. and so on and so forth. These are the traditions of men Jesus was referring to. It’s want lead Jesus to say:
“Come to me, all who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you, and learn from me, for I am gentle and lowly in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light.””
Matthew 11:28-30 ESV
The Jewish religious leaders added so many commands and statutes to God’s commands that they became serious burdens for some to carry out.
By that logic you shouldn’t be Christian. Since Christianity itself was passed down from old dead people.
Totally different. Christianity is the gospel of God unto Salvation, not man made rules and traditions of sinful men.
Well maybe because values and belief systems get passed down onto us
@Hispanic
He’s right you know.
@Exterminatore: No, he's not. Jesus clearly heavy criticized the Pharisees for their damn traditions passed down from generations to generations.
Traditions of men and their philosophies are to be rejected. Only God's standards matter.
@hispanic
We’re talking about the traditions of men as opposed to the mandates of God in relation to theology. Societal traditions are not what Jesus was referring to.
@Exterminatore: In Colssians its clearly referring to society and their traditions. Men always oppose God's way therfore you shouldn't follow the traditions that mostly come from unsaved wicked men.
@hispanic
I don’t agree and won’t argue this one with you.
@Exterminatore: You wanna Play both sides. It's either God's way and standards or men's way and traditions. It can't be both.
@Hispanic
No one is saying Conservative ideology should be equated in status to God’s word. No one is saying we must live as we used to as additional commands or limits in addition to God’s word.
That’s what the Pharisees were doing as with all the Jewish religious leaders. They were saying: “God said you shall keep the Sabbath holy and not work on it…. now there are few things we want you to understand as being work. For instance…. walking more than 500 steps is work….499 is not work….500 is work…. and if you must pour oil into a pan to cook…. that’s work….. lifting a glass to take a sip more than 60 times on the sabbath constitutes work”…. and so on and so forth. These are the traditions of men Jesus was referring to. It’s want lead Jesus to say:
“Come to me, all who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you, and learn from me, for I am gentle and lowly in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light.””
Matthew 11:28-30 ESV
The Jewish religious leaders added so many commands and statutes to God’s commands that they became serious burdens for some to carry out.
@Hispanic-Cool-Guy So is it wrong if someone had a family tradition of playing board games every Friday night?
@WhiteBoyChill: I'm not talking about that. I'm talking what society passes down on what should be done and how we ought to live our lives. I reject that. I hate the systems of their traditions.
I think traditions are very important. They are a part of culture.
@Exterminatore: Holidays, yes, but not how people ought to live their lives according to what traditions say. Makes you a sheep to the systems without thinking for yourself.
@hispanic
Doesn’t make you a sheep if you can look at how things were and how things are now and can objectively discern that conservatism is better.
I am old enough to have lived through the changes that have taken place. I’m old enough to remember my grandparents generation. Their thoughts, and beliefs. What they found to be acceptable, what was tolerated for them. I can examine those things and conclude we were better off.
Further more I can examine liberalism and see it is a tool of the Devil. It is all about rebellion and destroying traditional values and replacing them with new ones. Godless ones.
If the way previous generations lived was over all Godly, we can compare their way of life to the Bible. If the way the current generations live is ungodly we can discern that too. We know right from wrong. If I can look at the previous generations and see their attitudes and thoughts and beliefs were more closely aligned to biblical principals then I can conclude that is the way people ought to live. It’s not about being a sheep or failing to think for myself. I can see conservative ideology is good.
@Exterminatore: What a bunch of bull. People of the world and heathens are sinners all day and all night. People in your grandparents generation were heading to hell left and right by the second.
China and India are very conservative nations yet the immense majority of their population are enemies God and righteousness.
Quit being naive thinking conservatives and conservatism automatically means good and righteousness because it's not.
Because it took generations to come up with a working system, you think you can reinvent one by yourself in your teens and 20s? I mean you can freestyle a bit, but don’t throw the entire thing out
because ideas are like genetics. the best ones have been around a while. new ideas haven't stood the test of time and are often born from emotions rather than practicality
not values like... deficit spending gutting social security fund polluting the air and corporate welfare
Because they work very well and nothing anyone else does works hardly at all if at all. So just logic.
Why be liberal. Believing in values held by dead people?
A liberal mindset is to move forward and to be free from social outdated constructs, but some liberals take it too far.
Marx wanted to move forward from outdated constructs.
He wrote of "hidtorical evolution".
If you were living during the time Karl Marx was alive and happened to be born into poverty and being oppressed socially and economically by the elites, you would have been on Karl Marx side because he would have been a voice to help you better your condition.
so people don't run over kids in school zones gong 60 miles over the speed limit
Why do you think that you are smarter than the people who came before you?
Because I can see their systems are B. S. and only favor the rich and powerful and mostly men in society.
The systems passed down aren't for equity, justice and fairness for the better of all.
I don't have any one label, I am too complicated. And I don't need validation from any tribe.
I don't know, makes things boring and it's lame
Why learn anything from other people at all? Why not figure out everything on your own?
Asking me to become liberal where I come from is like asking a Jew to sieg heil
Soros is a rat-bastard, I mean a proper Jew
Because millions died to learn it and millions have died to protect them.
No, no. Live and do as I say or get canceled.
Live and let live is so 2014.
@Exterminatore Lol, unfortunately that’s true.
Unfortunately.
Why look to yourself if you're the one confused?
Lmfaooooo 😂 I'm so sick of u
The pic took me tf out @DizzyDesii bruh🤣🤣
Give some examples of new ideas and values?
I just have my own style and own personality. My vaules and standards come from the Bible not men of this world.
@Hispanic-Cool-Guy I don’t see how you making a blank statement regarding conservatives says anything about you following the Bible
@Hispanic-Cool-Guy also if you follow the Bible, then you also follow the trends and values of old dead people
@kyleelyn199723: Wrong. The Bible is the inspired word of God. We true born again Christians follow the tradition of God's word and standards, not of men, in fact God prohibits we follow the traditions of men because men ways often contradict with God's way of doing things.
@Hispanic-Cool-Guy actually I am correct. Everything regarding the Bible is how people back in biblical times used to follow life, so yes you are following trends. Again, I don’t understand how you making a blank statement regarding to conservatives says anything about the Bible.
@kyleelyn199723: No, you're dead wrong. God clearly commands Christians in His word not to follow the philosophy nor the traditions of men.
@Hispanic-Cool-Guy your first issue is that you are a Christian. The way you are on GaG, you don’t come off as a very religious, Bible following person at all.
Not sure. Been asking for awhile.
Conservatives can't conserve anything.
Exactly. Same with Marxists and Socialists.
You can also add your opinion below!