
Does Congress and the Senate need term limits?

Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News 
I agree term limits is the most important thing then we don't have this partisan bickering. Then we will not have the royalty of each party. I also think they need to take away their pensions. I've seen people come into the system honest to their values. By the time they leave the system their multimillionaires or more. Where did they get their funds from not from their typical paycheck, or the books that they write.
desperately
5 terms for the House; 2 for the Senate.
That seems reasonable
Opinion
12Opinion
Yes. This is probably the single biggest oversight (intentional or not) in the formation of US government. There should also be limits imposed on unelected appointees.
Not only that, much stricter ethics requirements as well. Their interests are not at all aligned with those of their constituents- and VV it shows. You can’t have a democracy without that alignment.
ABSO-FUGGIN-LUTELY!
The Founding Fathers EXPECTED that as 'gentleman/land owners' their service be TRANSIENT,
NOT a life's 'career'.
Very much agree!
How stupid are Republicans?
THEY ALREADY HAVE TERM LIMITS YOU IDIOT.
It's the Supreme Cort that has no term limits you absolute butterball.
Proof you don't know anything. Representatives and Senators have no limits on terms. Six year terms for senators with no limits to how many times you can be reelected. Same for the representatives except its every two years. Next time actually look up your facts before making yourself look like someone who should have beaten with a barbed hammer at birth.
And also, Justices don't need term limits because they don't make or approve laws. They only verify whether laws are constitutional or not. Please do your research before you decide to show us all how big of a retard you are.
Yes, the founding fathers never intended for anyone to become a professional politician. Two terms and you are all done.
Agreed. And would add:
- While in term, officials would not have any health insurance policies that aren’t also provided as an option for the general public. I believe in would also be fair for them to pay a percentage toward the premiums, as most of the general population also has to contribute handsomely for health insurance. - Once the term has ended, no benefits further “special life time benefits”, just for serving a term.
@TechXPanthr Yes and anyone using a PAC gets automatically disqualified.
Usa needs republican leadershit. Not Elizabeth IIs pussy pelmets
65 should be the cuttoff, AND there needs to be term limits
I’d be for it, but really incumbents are re-elected by those who don’t vote.
Yeah term limits and age limits we don't need people in their 80s
Yes but they will never vote that for themselves.
Term limits should have been from the start
Yes. So should supreme court.
But they don't make nor approve laws. They only interpret the more questionable ones as to whether they follow our constitution or not. Term limits aren't needed for that.
Small businesses are a target. This is known.
we have term limits, they are called elections.
That honestly sounds logical, but I do believe that the issue isn’t that straight forward. And I do believe this is an issue - career politicians
@TechXPanthr
I lost my Conservative Representative 2 years ago due to Elections.
Yup.
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions