Because we do own America. Neo-liberalism is a cancer to the United States and the west in general. Classical liberalism is a medicine to the United States. We want to live in reality not fantasy we don’t want the idea of John money to be embraced nor do we want the racist neoliberal ideas of Derrick Bell, Alan Freeman, Kimberlé Crenshaw, Richard Delgado, Cheryl Harris, Charles R. Lawrence III, Mari Matsuda, and Patricia J. Williams. who basically want to kill all white peoples.
we want to live in a society where your free to say and do what you want. The civil rights act should have been a temporary thing. You can’t force businesses to survive people they don’t want to survive, if a country club doesn’t want to allow Jews in that’s there right it’s also the right for people who disagree with that idea not to give the place business. Americans hate racism (unless your progressive then you love racism) so as American we would choose not to go to a business that doesn’t allow blacks or Jews in side on which case they will go out of business and the free market punishes the racist the civil rights act is no longer necessary and it’s actually in conflict with the constitution
0
0 Reply
Most Helpful Opinions
Anonymous
(25-29)
+1 y
I'm not sure but the democrats are currently being all of your issues but under wannabe grand wizard Joey Biden (guy's so high on the smack he gets from Afghanistan he probably thinks he's Harry fucking Potter) Civil rights won't apply under his plans because everyone will be in gulags of some description where you work everyday for your stale bread and scratchy blanket until you drop down dead and the people around you have been kept so ravenously starved they'll decend upon your corpse like zombies or wolves or pigs, pawing at the flesh cheeks bulging like hamsters with blood oozing down their chins, the children won't see this because the grand master will be too busy molesting them and having them perform in for him to care about the outside of his fortress but once they get too old and unwanted off they go to the gulag
0
0 Reply
Anonymous
(18-24)
+1 y
Sounds like another scam like the tea party. People are sheep especially Americans so to exploit that a charismatic person comes up with an organisation that could be basically anything such as political left or right, religious, atheist, racist, a charity, social activist racially diverse, homophobic, pro lgbtq, nationalist, globalist etc basically anything and you push an extreme doctrine and recruit feeble minded sheep and you extract a good living out of it...
0
0 Reply
Anonymous
(25-29)
+1 y
Those guys are young glowies and they work for people who own America.
The right wing believes that America is for every legal citizen. The difference is that the left wing believes that if you don’t agree with them you shouldn’t be here. The right is perfectly willing to allow the left to live as they are fit as long as they do so within the methodology set by our founding documents. The left believes that everyone should be forced to live in a way that the left sees fit and that anything else makes you a bigot.
Okay, but America wasn't founded by abolitionists though. 🤷♂️ lol
Like, you can't just run away from your own foundations. If you keep the name and you keep the government, you keep the legacy. The sinful, white supremacist legacy.
11.4K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
They are pissed off that people who are not pure white (as if there were such a thing) occasionally get treated as well as they do - and they cannot stand that. Racists through and through, every single fucking miserable one of them.
26.4K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
Right wingers believe that America belongs to the Americans. Not the Chinese, not the South Americans and not the Russians nad not the Biden crime family.
-He preferred stronger state government -He was for free market and pro-industry -He was for tariffs -He was against federal intervention in economy
Heck, even by his own words he was conservative:
“But you say you are conservative - eminently conservative - while we are revolutionary, destructive, or something of the sort. What is conservatism? Is it not adherence to the old and tried, against the new and untried? We stick to, contend for, the identical old policy on the point in controversy which was adopted by "our fathers who framed the Government under which we live;" while you with one accord reject, and scout, and spit upon that old policy, and insist upon substituting something new. True, you disagree among yourselves as to what that substitute shall be. You are divided on new propositions and plans, but you are unanimous in rejecting and denouncing the old policy of the fathers."
"Some of you are for reviving the foreign slave trade; some for a Congressional Slave-Code for the Territories; some for Congress forbidding the Territories to prohibit Slavery within their limits; some for maintaining Slavery in the Territories through the judiciary; some for the "gur-reat pur-rinciple" that "if one man would enslave another, no third man should object," fantastically called "Popular Sovereignty;" but never a man among you is in favor of federal prohibition of slavery in federal territories, according to the practice of "our fathers who framed the Government under which we live." Not one of all your various plans can show a precedent or an advocate in the century within which our Government originated. Consider, then, whether your claim of conservatism for yourselves, and your charge or destructiveness against us, are based on the most clear and stable foundations.”
At one of his speeches:
"The chief and real purpose of the Republican Party is eminently conservative. It proposes nothing save and except to restore this government to its original tone in regard to this element of slavery, and there to maintain it, looking for no further change... than that which the original framers of the government themselves expected and looked forward to."
-He was a strict constitutionalist -Christian (meaning he would be pro-life if lived in modern day)
Per the usage in political science he was a liberal.
And both align him with US conservatives. Even Lincoln had that concept of himself, that he was seeking to conserve our founding principles.
In common parlance, a liberal is one seeking to change the status quo while a conservative is one seeking to preserve it. Lincoln was very much seeking to change American society to more closely match its founding ideals.
In political science, a liberal is one guided by the principles that arose in the Age of Enlightenment, among which is the equality of all individuals (a sentiment incompatible with slavery). These ideas too motivated Lincoln, as they did our founding fathers, making him a liberal in that sense as well."
"In common parlance, a conservative is one seeking to conserve a tradition, and the tradition that US "conservatives" revere is Enlightenment liberalism, which was opposed to tradition. That makes US conservatives unique in all the world. They are conservative about liberalism, which is why...
... anywhere else in the Anglosphere, the Republican Party would be known as the Liberal Party, that is, a center, center-right party founded on the principles of the Enlightenment. In political science, a conservative party is one founded on monarchy or theocracy. The US has no true conservative politics.
There is a left tradition within liberalism too, one that traces back primarily to Thomas Paine. That too was expressed mostly within the Republican Party, mostly during the 19th century. The Democratic Party has had only one, brief flirtation with true liberalism--the Kennedy (and not Bobby or Teddy)-Humphrey northern and western liberals during the Cold War while the "red menace" marginalized ideologies further left. That experiment lasted basically one generation. The only sense in which the Democratic Party is liberal is in the commonplace one--they are seeking to change the status quo here away from our liberal heritage."
As the Constitution was written slavery should have never occurred. It was not an American tradition, it was a tradition of the most un-American among us. The Confederates were treasonous, they always were even before the civil war.
Yes, yes. Read a book about him like Team of Rivals. Just like Obama trying to appeal to the tea party, Lincoln was trying to keep more states from seceding.
But you still haven't asnwered the question. Is slavery a tradition?
Like other people I quoted have argued, part of being an American conservative is protecting enlightenment age liberalism.
The little shit weasels that say America is a Christian nation and so on aren't liberal in respect towards enlightenment age liberalism that founded this country.
How nice of the police to let them keep their masks on….
0
0 Reply
Anonymous
(25-29)
+1 y
Because they are citizens. I just want the government to actually practice what the preach. All the wokies just want to violate the 14th and the 1964 civil rights act just satisfy their precious groupthink.
1
0 Reply
Anonymous
(25-29)
+1 y
America belongs to the natives, which you exterminated, raped and enslaved.
Girl's Behavior 
Guy's Behavior 
Flirting 
Dating 
Relationships 
Fashion & Beauty 
Health & Fitness 
Marriage & Weddings 
Shopping & Gifts 
Technology & Internet 
Break Up & Divorce 
Education & Career 
Entertainment & Arts 
Family & Friends 
Food & Beverage 
Hobbies & Leisure 
Other 
Religion & Spirituality 
Society & Politics 
Sports 
Travel 
Trending & News 
