This is a very classic question. "In order to pursue the truth, one must doubt everything as much as possible, even a dogma like "God exists", doubting it will not produce ideological contradictions", this is Cartesian doubt. Essentially the question is: how do humans know that what we see is not a luxurious illusion but real? Is there some great unseen force controlling us? In recent years this question has been reformulated as the "brain in a bucket" problem, or "simulation argument". These two conjectures are simply that humans are the product of a carefully arranged simulated environment. I believe that many people have thought about this question in their childhood and adolescence. But this question will lead to deeper thinking-is human civilization part of this simulation? Including what we think in our hearts now, do our logical thinking values all come from the counterattack of supercomputers? Plus, we might not be who we think we are. Assuming that the people who run the entire simulated environment are also involved, then any one of us may be the leader behind the scenes, which means that our current identity is temporary and temporarily suppressed, and the purpose Just to enhance the realism of the simulated environment.
This philosophical riddle also requires us to rethink our definition of "truth." The view of Modal realists is that since the universe seems reasonable to humans (compared to the illogical, incoherent nature of our dreams, and the "real universe" has physical laws), then we have nothing but There is no alternative to thinking that the world is real.
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News