
How many women died underground to build the subways in New York?

Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News 
How many man give birth to this underground workers? 0? hey take some load you guys!!
How many man give milk for there brests to help this man grow to adulthood strong? 0? come on really?
How many...
Ya we can keep making stupid things and asking why someone did not do something they be kicked out from doing all you want, but that be trolling and nothing more, like this qruestion
Now here is a little thats missing
Undeground build started around 1900 ended 4 years later in 1904
World War 2 started 1939
Till World War 2 there where very few woman that worked outside of there household, out of them it dose cut pretty clearly, most of the once that did work where unmarried, devorcied, widowed or did not have kids, or there husband was unemployed and this is the case for woman that worked outside of home, most of the woman that did work do so from jobs they can do from there home
But lets roll back time a little, to when "work life balance" was an aline conspet and work hours where above and beyond what they are today
So someone had to watch over the kids, and babies, and remmber most work was not safe orhealthy at all, even office work be on hard chairs with bad posture in a stuffing outfit that bearly let you breath
Overall woman where not encraged to work over all at the time socially, that is not to say its the fault of man or woman, its a roll of hiatory and slow evlotion till something hits the gears
Come 1939 War, and not any war the second world war, after factoris and the like have been around for a while
Man go to war, woman restrected from doing the same for the most part, and even if did got back end jobs
At that time, workers where needed and the posters of "Yes we can" showing working woman show, and that is where the real turn happen in the US, woman where encraged finally to fo work, to break the social stigma of the poor family and father that can't feed his family and his woman has to work
And you know the intresting part? after that it did not drop, woman keep working and the present rise over going down, showing given the option and opritonity a woman will pick to work
It also created the spy and action movies for the poor demestic man, but I guess il put that subject on the side for now 🤓
Anyway get of your imageniery high troll and get back to learn history and reality, thanks
How did those women become pregnant?
Also you’re saying they were able to work
I see what you trying to say
And this is my answer
Someone near you has a really nice car, why don't you murder them and take it? clearly you don't want to, not because anything to do with social pressure right?
Its easy to look now back and put up blinders on and say "look.. assholes" but everyone around you roll there eyes at how dumb you look with the blinders on
That is your answer
Take the blinders off, and get out from under the bridge, we want to clean the filifh you got piling up there
Go do the dishes
This is a cacaphony of failure; a veritable smorgasbord of spelling errors, grammatical errors and faulty logic. Reset hardware; system crash
I don’t care how you do it as long as you do it
Men thinking they will gotcha women asking how do we get pregnant when Jesus himself was born from a virgin is probably the funniest thing ever
@ISendNuttVidz when you run out of logic track, but still got no flight
@ManAndBunkrupt Thanks for caring
@TopTier I guess depends on where you live, and if its possible to find someone to partner with if its how they swing, carrying single is pretty dam hard if you have not heard, and if there hetero that most are, finding a fitting partner can be pretty hard with the product on the market (Ya I am joking :) don't worry I know some good out there)
How is pointing out your obvious egregious spelling grammar and logic errors “running out of track?” Do tell how your screwups reflect poorly on me.
@ISendNuttVidz its called "Ad Hominem Fallacy"
Your not attacking the discussion points your attacking the second person, that's an action most take that mostly is taken when the track is over and there nothing but imagination to hold it up
Kind of like a cartoon where they run off the cliff and then try to keep going on nothing.. that is the idea
Regardless I know my grammer is bad, will not disagree on it there, but its readable, and if it really bother you and not just an "Ad Hominem Fallacy" please help me and tell me what grammer I did badly so I can improve
Regardless cute name
Ha. Ok fair enough, though I did mention I thought your logic is faulty as well. If you’d like me to explain send a DM so I’m not dumping all over your thread 🤠
@CubsterShura how is that funny exactly?
Jesus aka Son of God
Women still can't give birth without men so if you like to say zero men got pregnant and give birth to those workers, then I can also say zero women just got impregnated by other women or themselves. I love how it's so easy to overlook that it takes a mother and a father to conceive a child. You can't make children alone.
@Aiko_E_Lara I do agree, and I think you missed the point
That was an example for cherry picking an example, ignoring the environment around it
Hope that help to explaine that
Well, he's just asking a question so if you like to give a long speech about something, you should at least try to realize that what you're gonna bring up just falls a part if anyone just brings up the other side of the story.
@Aiko_E_Lara i think we should just kick her ass..
I got a bat👀
@Aiko_E_Lara...🤔 so my example for why the post was bad is falls apart, its almost like that is exactly why it was there, its like that was the reason I put it there, its almost like it should be so obvious that I will be just straight up 🤦♀️ if someone show how silly it is thinking it was meant to be taken seriously
I hope now you get it, because going on this beyond this point will feel to me like I am down talking to you that is just not nice, except if you got some issue understanding sarcasm and stuff, that then will explain why your missing it
I hate comedians so I would take as a compliment
Yeah exactly it is bad because anyone can just simply bring up what i said. And also, now it's a joke i see. I can easily just say i'm joking as well and you're not getting it. But you see, this website is isn't really a comedy website but more of a question-and-answer website so you can't really blame anyone for not expecting you to be sarcastic. If that is the case then no question should be taken seriously. Ask if you need some advice then of course now i will know you're just kidding around.
@Aiko_E_Lara Ok.. so do you think my answer was just the first line? because its more then one line long
That one part was a basic "Seriously?" so showing how silly the question it self is, as you, your self show on the example I have given, not all the answer is like that, and most of it is not joking or sarcasm
And again its suppose to be bad, because like you can do that, anyone can bring the point that at the time woman where looked down for working while man where looking highly for holding a job and there for the very point of the post is silly, as it dose not hold water when you put.. you know facts into it
So are you just saying you agreeing? or are you just trying to create a fight and was thinking it was an easy target, the idea of it being a easy target being the very point of that line there going completely over your head?
Because at this point I don't understand what you trying to say
Yeah I did read everything you said but the rest of what you said has nothing to do with taking back what you said in your first line so meaning to say you just left it hanging. Oh now it's not joking nor sarcasm. So you're basically just doing it just because. Well, I was just simply arguing at your level but now you see, you don't realize how ironic it is when you complain about it. It doesn't matter if you're an easy target or not. The fact that you're just being ironic about it just made me expose your hypocrisy. And it doesn't take a genius.
You know what, I reread my reply.. I completely forgot I made so sure its clear because I even wrote after it why its there, so your just trolling aren't you?
I mean if you think that was a point you are just trying to push it.. sorry hope you had a good feed, if you really want to talk and stop trying to dismiss me with this stuff please show some understanding that is not trolling
Thanks
That's just your way of contradicting things when you realize you're in the wrong. It doesn't matter if "made it clear" in the replies. The damage is already done. That's basically saying "I just said i'm wrong so there for now I'm right" So yeah go ahead and whine "troll" like as if that's gonna change anything.
@Aiko_E_Lara I wish I didn’t comment here now you guys are blowing my notifications..
@Aiko_E_Lara I don't think tis going to change anything, you made 0 points beside trying to dismiss something that was meant to be dismissed
I mean I agree on that, yes the weak point that is the same as the main question here is weak, that is the point of it
And I am not sure what you trying to say in the end, are you just saying "I agree" so ok if you just saying "I am going to keep pushing its weak" then ya.. ok... why? I mean I made it clear that is what its there for to be weak and show how the very main question is weak and makes no sense and breaks on the first stance of thinking with a little logic and knowledge
But you keep going on it... so are you not trolling? if so what are you trying to say, because from my side it seems like you trying to dismiss my point by fighting a point that is not even my point at all
Block you!
Never.
Except exposing your flaws and hypocrisy. And if you like to see i made 0 points then i can easily see you also made 0 points bringing up the giving birth part. And you know it's the very same reason why you also keep going with it when you know you are wrong. I can also assume you're trolling. Because it's just so easy for anyone to accuse someone of trolling
So I did the same thing. And the reason why I didn't bother with your other statements is because the moment you said it's neither the fault of men nor women, i agree. How you brought up the topic about birthing is the flawed one. So there for i pointed it out. It easy tho, don't want people to think you're stupid then don't post stupid things.
Who made your clothes and how are they so affordable? What percentage of people dead from the Rana Plaza building collapse were women?
Who made your tea, and again, how is it so affordable?
And perhaps the worst of all questions I can ask you, who supplied the raw materials for your technological devices? Gaming devices? You know, the things you men have so much pride about?
I could go on and on but these two examples shall suffice for now.
Your clothes are made in garment factories in countries in Asia with mostly WOMEN working in those factories and you can afford them because THEY get paid less. 80% of the people who died from the collapse of Rana Plaza ten years ago were women, and this is given that not the entire building was a garments factory and women make up only 0.5% of those in management of the garment industry, aka there were male employees of other business working in there. So considering garment factory workers alone the percentage of women who died would have been much higher.
Your tea comes from mass-produced tea gardens with very underpaid women plucking out every tea leaf. It's majorly women working in the tea gardens getting horribly treated by the owners. Before you call bullshit, I come from a part of the world with a lot of tea production, so not only do I have an idea of how the tea industry treats its laborers but also have taken botany courses with educators who have traveled around the world and taught us where tea comes from.
But the former two doesn't sound half as bad as child labor, right? From supplies of metals like cobalt to production of the phones themselves the industry is entirely tainted with child labor.
You can talk all about how men have built the world and what not, but we need clothes, tea and phone/laptops more than we need subways. You may want to argue that tea isn't such an essential commodity but it still stands as the most consumed beverage just after water and coffee and it's been around since almost 3000BC and it had a massive contribution in trade throughout history. Technological advances have led us to the third industrial revolution and we can't imagine living without phones now, especially since the pandemic hit us. Subway, in comparison, is a much newer invention and certainly not a big requirement. I was born and raised in a city with no subways, and I moved to another city with no subways. You are probably wearing something you got from a fast fashion brand, sipping on your beverages drink while typing this with your device possibly on your mother's basement. Thinking that asking this question you will "gotcha" feminism, a very established school of thought that people study for longer than you have been alive, is simply audacious.
There are men who are absolutely risking their lives daily to make us all comfortable and so are women, and you are not getting credit for either.
So are you going to answer the question or not?
No. You asked this question because you already know this answer. In case you really don't, this isn't Google.
1. 90%+ of military deaths - male
2. 90%+ workplace deaths - male
3. Majority of college grads - female
4. super majority of incarcerated people - male
5. super majority of murder victims - male
6. higher unemployment - male
7. Majority of homeless - male
8. Affirmative action beneficiaries - female
9. Win child custody 90% of the time - female
Yet feminists crying victim and asking for more free rides all the time
Don’t stop there.. give the fullest statistics. Here I’ll bring it further:
Give us the statistics for
1.) how many men willingly signed up for the military / which gender wanted world domination to encourage or provoke war
3.) percentage of professors who abuse their profession, and the percentage of girl students who are not out at parties
4.) percentage of girls who resort of Believe in violence
5.) would need credit on this, and even so, percentage of gangs that are male based
6.) percentage of stay at home moms and women in relationships that are abusive or impoverished
9.) the measurement of the bond between a mother and her baby/ the sexual activity of a mother vs the sexual activity of men and further the percentages of male fathers who abuse their children sexually or sexually abuse their spouse
Yeah, men could use helping hands, not all are bad, but these problems are man-made, the struggles of men are male encouraged and induced.
@painusndeeanus you’re a “man” yet you’re dealing in *emotion*
because of the implicates complaints you’re underlying in the question. The ones that fuel the gender wars.
You know what it really is though, right?
It’s not even gender wars
It’s men who failed wars with men
And now they’re picking on women and blaming women for their own failures to fit the male society built before us all.
Ah well.
Get out of your emotions and let’s solve real world issues.
@Rosexøxø
Don’t stop there.. give the fullest statistics. Here I’ll bring it further:
Give us the statistics for
1.) how many men willingly signed up for the military / which gender wanted world domination to encourage or provoke war - WOW< WE SHOULD BE GRATEFUL< HUH?
3.) percentage of professors who abuse their profession, and the percentage of girl students who are not out at parties - I WOULD HAEV TO IMAGINE THE PERCENT OF ABUSIVE PROFESSORS WOULD BE VERY SMALL - AND THEY SHOULD BE HELD RESPONSIBLE
4.) percentage of girls who resort of Believe in violence - I DONT UNDERSTAND THIS STATEMENT
5.) would need credit on this, and even so, percentage of gangs that are male based - 100%, BUT STILL A VERY SMALL % OF MEN
6.) percentage of stay at home moms and women in relationships that are abusive or impoverished - AGAIN A VERY SMALL %, IMPOVEREISHED? WHOS FAULT IS THAT?
9.) the measurement of the bond between a mother and her baby/ the sexual activity of a mother vs the sexual activity of men and further the percentages of male fathers who abuse their children sexually or sexually abuse their spouse. MEN NEED A FEMALE PARTNER TO HAVE SEX SO... % CHILD ABUSERS? AGAIN, I WOULD EXPECAT A VERY SMALL % - AND SHOULD EB PUNISHED
Yeah, men could use helping hands, not all are bad, but these problems are man-made, the struggles of men are male encouraged and induced.
Exactly the same number (0) as the women who died building the Hoover dam, which generates 4 billion kilowatt-hours of hydroelectric power each year for use in Nevada, Arizona, and California - enough to serve 1.3 million people, half of whom are female. But 112 men died building the dam. Of course, if women did jobs like that, they would earn as much as men. It's a choice, not sexism.
I was gonna do that one next but I’ll just do highways I saw in a book once the men who built the roads we all drive on with a shovel, an axe and a mule think about how long our roads are they stretch all the way across the country do people not realize how many people had to die so we could have this maybe I’m just weird I think about stuff like that and I feel very grateful
Agreed. We should all be grateful. There are not many women who are, though.
Opinion
10Opinion
Since this is a schematic question, I’ll give the appropriate answer:
how many people live forever.
how many..
and now,
how many die in general.
Men want to push women out of the society and are wishing to argue with women for their “lack of assurance.”
as if back then women didn’t play a part to help married men live simple lives with food and maintenance,
and furthermore-
mall of this society and the countries built were from men trying to advance it, and some of them were willing to take from others, kill others for what they wanted, and so on.
Any unfortunate men today can thank the men before them who made the rules.
Women didn’t make these rules.
Understand that. 👌
So none? Got it. 😂
Everyone already knows the answer to this question
But you women today have such low self-esteem are so weak and fragile that you completely deny facts to justify your beliefs and actions because you’re unable to cope with being wrong
Hello? 👋
Welcome back to reality- no, don’t walk back that way…
Listen:
This is not about esteem. This is about professionalism. This is about being humane.
The Society of men is failing and I won’t need another economic recession or world war to understand this.
War and economics DO NOT affect my esteem. It does pose itself as a trivial problem for now.. should things escalate where
Hurting men become violent towards women
FOR THEIR OWN FAILURE in dating and society, etc.
Then that would be more concerning to me.
For now, I think these problems can be resolved.
You and the men on here will just continue to complain or rally together as if this is high school spewing toxicity of how bad women are and how ungrateful-
When like you say-
Men are dying— THEIR MEN THEY CARE ABOUT: husbands and sons
And when they and those men they love are still struggling no financially.
I don’t know if anybody cares about you..
That’s probably why you’re so upset with this and trying to push a point…
Yeah, maybe you should just turn back from reality. Who’d want to come back to it painted in such a heavy way?
👋☺️
Wow ! you rather say all of this than admit when you’re beat
Arguing with objective truth and I’m the one who has turned from reality? Ok. 🤣
Only 6% of women worked in the 1900s... Those that did worked because their husbands didn't... Is this supposed to be a gotcha moment because it's not a good one. Women didn't die because they weren't allowed to work those jobs.
Weren’t allowed to or didn’t want to? Because we were still building the country and a lot of the work was physically demanding and deadly
No they literally weren't allowed to, it wasn't considered respectable and a woman would be laughed at if she tried to get the job.
So again they could they just didn’t want to 😂
Maybe you should reread what I said. Seems like you didn't understand it.
You said only 6% worked then turned around and said “They literally weren’t allowed to” 😂
You’re LITERALLY not making sense🤣
You can try again though because this is a bad argument for whatever point you’re trying to make 👎
Oh your poor poor brain. 6% of the entire working class was women in the 1900s. They weren't allowed to work manual labor jobs, the vast majority (79%) worked one of these ten jobs 1. servants 2. Factory workers 3. Laundress 4. Teachers 5. Seamstress 6. Typist 7. Housekeeper 8. Bookkeeper 9. Saleswomen 10. Boarding housekeeper.
Married women who worked were considered secondary, they earned half as much as men and worked what were considered secondary "unimportant" jobs. The other 21% of womens jobs weren't listed because they weren't considered gainful workers.
In 1900 half the people lived on farms. Men, women, and children had to work on family farms. In 1900 there was no washing machines or dryers. Clothes had to be washed by hand and hung out on a clothesline to dry. There were few if any house appliances, there was very little prepared food so taking care of children, washing clothes, cleaning, and cooking was a full time job.
So they did in fact WORK?🤣
@Adaeva there was very little prepared food on farms? 🤣 what year are you talking about because in 1990s less than 40% of U. S households were farms
Even if they were allowed to, majority of them didn't want to. If you like to say that women didn't had the rights to work, it's also the same for men who didn't had the rights to not work. And FYI, making fun of workers in the work place happens to anyone and even a guy being a wimp gets laughed at. That's because the workers want the job done earlier. And also, why even let men not allow women to work in such environment in the first place? You know, a lot of men undergo a lot of harsh judgement and doubts to get qualified. But workers laughing at you for taking the job? How about you man up and just continue anyways? But you don't have to which is why you it proves most women just don't want to and make those excuses. However, they're just excused.
@Aiko_E_Lara thank you.
And that's another way to prove the power of leverage is a must back then. There are guys who'd rather just do that job than having to climb buildings without any elevators while carrying tons of cements. It's just that now, people just have it easier that you women now wanna work anywhere else other than in the house with running water, electricity, stoves and other equipment you can use. It's the options that liberated everyone not a movement.
@Adaeva and they weren’t on any drugs or antidepressants
So tell me how they managed to be happier with less?
You both really just try everything to skip over the point and change the subject to completely irrelevant shit omfg
Ok, you're talking about jobs, i'm talking about jobs. You're talking about how men not allowing women, i'm talking about most women would refuse anyways. So where's the "skipping over the point and change the subject" part? Unless the argument just didn't really favor you.
@Aiko_E_Lara you've changed it to modern day, which is irrelevant in this discussion. if you want people to argue with join a debate club.
You know, there's a difference between referring to something to changing the topic. But what you didn't see is the rest of what I said. I guess you're just cherry picking on one reference I was talking about to give you an excuse to change the topic yourself talking about me instead of continuing the argument.
difference between referring to something *and changing the topic. So if you're not really changing the topic yourself, what's your take on what I said previously? What's your take about what I said about women would refuse anyways even if they're allowed to? You clearly overlooked that part just to talk about me.
"if you want people to argue with join a debate club." <-- What do you think this site is? Not a forum site? You don't have no real point in making a claim or argument if you don't want any of it. You should just stay away from this question if it triggers you so much and not wanting a proper discussion.
@Aiko_E_Lara there is no argument to be had. I said my part, which isn't incorrect so there is nothing to argue. You can choose to hypothesize about why things were the way they were, but since we have very limited information on the time (inaccurate information too) that is all it is going to be. I can't talk for individual people who are beyond dead and neither can you.
Then you have no real point in bringing up something when you know you are just wrong. And what i am basing it on is a common human behavior that no humans like to be burdened. Which is exactly why we keep adopting by inventing things to make our lives easier. If everyone is given the choice not to do anything while being rich, well fed and healthy, majority of people would like that and it's not surprising. Men in the past just have to do what they do because they just didn't have a choice. Meaning they cannot just go home and whine just because someone is laughing at them.
That is also why even if you ask women today if they have to be drafted, majority of them would not be agree. And it doesn't matter what time are you in, nobody just likes to die and that's a common instinct every species on earth have.
Silo is just angry because women are getting more attention than him. Ignore him.
*Aiko
@snowboarder720 yeah you can ignore facts but that doesn't change anything.
@snowboarder720 also, according to you, Facts and logic = angry. I guess that's what make you a drop out. You don't like learning.
@Adaeva Not surprised they'd document that because they always address women's issues. No one would ever document a man's harsh life in the work place.
@Aiko because men don’t have it hard. Seriously get over yourself. 😆
@snowboarder720 Then i can easily say women don't have it hard and you get over yourself. If that's how you wanna argue, then how is it any different if I do the same?
Aiko being a whine baby in comment sections really proves to me and everyone else how you want to draw attention to yourself.
If you feel that men are segregated, that’s fine, make your own post for further discussion but making a total ass out of yourself in all comment sections shows you want to make everyone’s post about you. That’s what’s being selfish is about.
@snowboarder720 And if you're not whining yourself, prove it. And look how you whine "making a total ass about yourself in all comment sections". That's pretty much your way of saying "Oh no im just so triggered, he's being an ass for proving a point" well fuck you feelings. Facts don't care about those.
This is incredibly entertaining bahahahaha
@Razp_Sorbet Yeah your failure is incredibly entertaining
Which is exactly why Im not backing out. It just feel good to roast morons here.
@Aiko well you could’ve fooled me 🤣
@snowboarder720
So yeah it's clear you're just being air headed while not knowing what you're laughing at lol
Thanks for clarifying that Aiko. Keep up the good work. You’re doing big things.
@Aiko_E_Lara There are plenty of movies about men's harsh working conditions such as Cesar Chavez, Mutiny on the Bounty, and F. I. S. T.
@Adaeva Titanic, 300 , Das Boot , Saving Private Ryan
@Adaeva is thats what you're going to cherry pick then you're just going to prove that it goes both ways. The only difference is that no matter how hard the workplace can get, men had lesser choice. Harassment cannot stop a man from working because if he stops, no shelter would take him as society don't fund for it
@snowboarder720 that's because i don't do stupid things like you do. You know i would have actually respected you better if you actually make a point
@Aiko_E_Lara In modern USA there is more shelters and money for women than men. It hasn't always been that way, nor is it that way in all countries. Furthermore, you claim that there is no support for men or than no shelter will take a man is false and you are intelligent enough not to make such absolute 100% vs. 0% statements. https://hhmission.org/shelter/shelter-men/
Before medicine became more advanced, one in ten women would die giving birth. Now less than 5 in 10,000 North American births end in the death of the mother during labour and they have epidurals to reduce pain, even if it’s not always performed, such as scenarios where the mother is too early giving birth, the hospital does not have room to receive her, or the administration of medication is botched and only effective on one side of the body etc…
Um okay.

Scary to think about I'd imagine it's a similar number in London it's crazy to think how things we take for granted were actually made
Exactly.
None. I'm still waiting for hundreds of millions of women to willingly die and have their limbs blown off defending their families and society.
Asking why women didn't work as much as men in a time they couldn't even vote is like asking why jewish business didn't grew in Nazi Germany.
No it isn’t because they actually could work
Just like Jews could try to open business, but there were several difficulties for them to do so. Those days were far to conservative. For society women's place was at home.
No it was easier for them to stay in the home I don’t know what you know about life but good things come to those who work it’s not supposed to be easy but being a housewife is and that’s what the women chose to do
Chose to do? In those days? Don't fool yourself. Look around. Women today are doing what they want and they represent most of the working force now. This is what they want and chose to.
@Adaeva I'll just say it here because that snowflake opinion owner just think she's valid for blocking anyone. Yeah sure they exist but it's only a matter of time before they get shut down due to the lack of funding.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0kt_A4_J4tU&t=160s&ab_channel=DrShaymThis is from the thread of @Razp_Sorbet by the way right here in this opinion section
I suppose this is just another men good women bad poke at equality. remember this was a time in America when it was illegal for a woman to be seen in public wearing trousers up until 1923
Dude aren’t you from the UK?
Thankfully I live in a nice safe country, but I do like to come here and educate you people
You know people in the UK love to tell Americans how dangerous their country is to ours? And I always laugh. They be like "we shank yalls bruv" "yea innit m8" "so you better crack on cuhz" loloolol so I don't know it's must not be as safe as you say if we git over thousands of y'all saying something different lol
Ofc men did it, but I really don't expect women to be doing this. But when they wanna ask for the same type of equality is like... there is a huge difference between us that the 🤡 🌎 lefties need to accept
If sources are correct, there were 16 fatalities and 115 injuries. Don’t know of any breakdown by gender, age, race, etc.
Ahh but it's irrelevant to this dude if it's not broken down by gender. I'm afraid you didn't get the..."joke."
The joke is that 0 women died. Because women aren't really "people" (at least, not in the way "feminism" has brainwashed them into believing they are).
It's hilarious (to a very specific, particular type of guy).
@SteveSmith1985 thank you
@SteveSmith1985 But I do get the joke, just didn't go where asker wanted to go. by the way, how many men died from childbirth, giving birth to men destined to go online and ask pointless questions?
I don't know the numbers of women even involved in building them (if any did) . considering the era in which that work was done, there is s very high chance of zero being the number of both how msny participated and how many died.
Well that wasn't all men so let's not make this about gender.
But it was though
Everything we have today came at the cost of our ancestors blood and sweat literally everything
I don’t know, how many? I’m not really up to date with these things.
how about how many women died in the "Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire".
How many men died from giving birth?
It’s impolite to answer a question with a question
First day on the internet?
No but I was born yesterday
I bet so 🤣
16 people died and none of us were one of them.
zero? I don't know?
DING DING DING!
do i win something?
Probably more than what was said.
Probably none.