Do you consider this to be ideological indoctrination?

[SolitarySolace]

Parents furious after elementary school students were shown video discussing gender ideology and were sent home with puberty kits without parents knowledge of the “pride month programming.” - www.msn.com/.../ar-AA1ccDTp?ocid=sapphireappshare

Yes, this is absolutely ideological indoctrination!

No, this is not indoctrination. Kids must learn these things

[Lliam]

Absolutely. It's social engineering. And who are "experts" who decide to push this agenda? What makes them experts and why should we trust them?

[Avicenna]

That’s completely inappropriate and is obviously an attempt to groom the kids

[WalnutButter]

I would consider it more of a crime. If government schools were optional, they would not exist.

[John_Doesnt]

Why would anybody be against their kids learning something? They're not telling the kids to become something or force them to be something, they're educating the kids on different lifestyles.

[DarkWinterNights]

A teacher was arrested just a short time ago for giving a banned book to her middle students which detailed sexual acts and how to sign up and meet adult men on sex sites.

There is a pretty clear difference between teaching them basic knowledge and indoctrinating them into kink with adults.

[DarkWinterNights]

Also you could argue that particular case was borderline sex trafficking.

[John_Doesnt]

@DarkWinterNights even if that story was true, I doubt your sources, that was likely an isolated incident. Giving kids illegal material is different from giving them an educational book. You're probably a MAGA supporter though who thinks that any books about gays or black people is indoctrination.

[DarkWinterNights]

@John_Doesnt, “Even if that story were true”? That is a lot of excuses and deflection for someone who didn’t even bother to Google the story.

nypost.com/.../

www.snopes.com/fact-check/tampa-school-sex-book/

[John_Doesnt]

@DarkWinterNights I knew your story was BS. Did you bother to read the entire NY Post? It was about a book given to kids after they had already taken sex ed and learned about heterosexual intercourse and heterosexual oral sex. Even your other post admits that parents were not outraged by the pictures of the girl on girl sex page, they were only concerned about the boy on boy page. You either didn't read it or maybe you need to go back to school to learn how to read properly.

[DarkWinterNights]

@John_Doesnt, Oh I see the problem. You just don’t see anything wrong with teaching kids about lewd sex acts and kink.

[John_Doesnt]

@DarkWinterNights it was a sex ed class. They teach the kids about sex. Apparently you're one of those "abstinence" only people. Probably because you're an incel.

[DarkWinterNights]

@John_Doesnt, So am I purposefully abstinent or an Incel? And how did a discussion about not sexualizing kids turn into you assuming private things about me?

[John_Doesnt]

@DarkWinterNights you tell me. And you didn't read the whole story. Like I said, I knew your claim was BS. I read the entire news article, you did not.

[gorydetails]

I’m so glad I have no kids in the public school system.

[Nikki1989]

No, religion is 1000 times more damaging to children.