I keep seeing ILLEGAL vs legal. Why should a piece of paper make a fck all difference? Especially how hard we’ve made it to be a legal immigrant.
It’s just a way for them hate, right?
I keep seeing ILLEGAL vs legal. Why should a piece of paper make a fck all difference? Especially how hard we’ve made it to be a legal immigrant.
It’s just a way for them hate, right?
First of all, let's get one thing straight: being anti-illegal is not about racism, it's about protecting our country and our citizens from dangerous and criminal elements. Those illegal aliens are like a bunch of demons trying to invade our world, and we need to fight them off with our righteous cocks.
And as for the whole "legal" vs "illegal" thing, it's like a bunch of tentacled monsters trying to confuse the issue. Of course a piece of paper makes a difference! It's like a magical talisman that keeps the demons at bay. And sure, it's tough to be a legal immigrant, but that's just the price you pay for being on the right side of the law. It's like a test of your worthiness, and only the strong and the righteous will survive.
But you know what? We don't need to hate those illegal aliens. We can love them with our erotic epees, and show them the way to the light. We can welcome them into our country, as long as they come in through the proper channels and submit to our righteous laws. And if they refuse to comply, well, we'll just have to show them the error of their ways with our throbbing, pulsating, meat muffins.
How many Norwegian illegals are their.
@findacure4wokeness shrugs…but why aren’t you protesting at airports? Where 70% at least come through?
I find it funny how POC want less white people around yet will follow us to the ends of the earth.
Playing the racism card if white only areas won't except them etc.
Immigrants in general seems to be a problem to this Democrat
Speaking of racism, Biden is one
https://www.youtube.com/embed/eQbmyBhy9wk
Unless of course Kamala lied and those who have used "lies" as an excuse to attack conservatives should do the same to dems for the sake of equality.
How in the world did you end up believing that people who don’t want illegal immigrants in their country are racist?
I am not racist and never will be. I just don’t want more criminals in my city. The world is already a dangerous place. We don’t need more people who don’t care about the law to make it more so.
yes.
Opinion
12Opinion
The kind of people who are gonna climb over a 20 feet wall and walk trough the desert for dozens of miles is totally the same as the kind of person who's gonna spend months and thousands of dollars on coming here with 'just a piece of paper'. On top of that, illegal aliens already don't respect the law, who's to say that's the only law they're going to break.
So yes, those who traverse fences, walk miles in the desert, elude ICE, all so their family can live safely from cartels and sex traffickers would be the best citizens for America.
The worst citizens are those who already are, know they have rights to fall back on and just burp their way through unemployment checks.
Those who traverse fences, walk miles in the desert, elude ICE often are cartel members and sex traffickers. And when they aren't violent criminals they are poor, uneducated criminals with very limited marketable skills. Illegal aliens don't tend to be doctors and lawyers.
> The worst citizens are those who already are, know they have rights to fall back on and just burp their way through unemployment checks.
Oh, you you're in favor of not having unemployment benefits for able bodied people who are given multiple decent job opportunities but reject every single one of them?
And you fail to see that a lot of criminals, drug and sex traffickers, cartel members, and possible terrorists, also walz over the border. You seem to forget about 9/11, when the whole nation rallied against people being let into the US unimpeded. Seems Biden has forgotten too, but then he's just an idiot.
That piece of paper is one of many that make a difference. Driver's license. Social security card, picture ID. Selective service card when that was still printed.
It's not actually hard to become a U. S. citizen. It's lengthy sure, but it's not like you have to build a fort and defend it from invaders.
Haha, do you have locks on your doors or do you keep them open all night?
either all the laws should be enforced or else none of them. If the government is going to selectively decide what laws will be enforced depending on what best serves their purpose regardless if it puts people in danger of causes a financial penalty on everyone that pays taxes then why the hell should anybody obey any of the laws. We should drive 100 MPH, stop paying taxes, go into stores and walk out with our paying (oh yeh, that is already going on in most democrat cities).
Here - my AI decided to answer you -
Prioritization: Law enforcement agencies have limited resources, including personnel, time, and funding. They must prioritize certain crimes or violations based on factors such as public safety, severity, and available resources. As a result, they may focus more on certain types of offenses while deprioritizing others.
Discretion: Law enforcement officers and prosecutors often have discretion in enforcing laws. They make judgment calls based on their interpretation of the law, the circumstances of the case, available evidence, and their own priorities. This discretion can lead to variations in enforcement, as different individuals may interpret and apply the law differently.
Bias and discrimination: Bias and discrimination can influence law enforcement practices, leading to unequal enforcement. Prejudices based on factors such as race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, or gender can result in certain communities being disproportionately targeted or neglected by law enforcement. This can create disparities in how laws are enforced and who is subject to legal consequences.
Legal loopholes and complexity: Some laws may have loopholes or lack clarity, making them difficult to enforce consistently. Additionally, legal systems can be complex, and interpreting and applying laws accurately can be challenging. These factors can lead to inconsistencies in enforcement, with some individuals or entities exploiting legal loopholes or benefiting from uncertainties in the law.
Resource disparities: Communities with fewer resources may experience limited access to legal representation, which can impact the enforcement of laws. Affluent individuals or corporations may have more resources to navigate the legal system effectively, potentially leading to unequal outcomes.
Political and societal factors: Political and societal dynamics can also influence law enforcement priorities. Public opinion, media attention, and political pressure can shape which laws are emphasized or neglected. This can result in certain laws receiving more attention and enforcement than others, regardless of their inherent importance or impact.
Regenerate response
Prioritization: Law enforcement agencies have limited resources, including personnel, time, and funding. They must prioritize certain crimes or violations based on factors such as public safety, severity, and available resources. As a result, they may focus more on certain types of offenses while deprioritizing others.
Discretion: Law enforcement officers and prosecutors often have discretion in enforcing laws. They make judgment calls based on their interpretation of the law, the circumstances of the case, available evidence, and their own priorities. This discretion can lead to variations in enforcement, as different individuals may interpret and apply the law differently.
Bias and discrimination: Bias and discrimination can influence law enforcement practices, leading to unequal enforcement. Prejudices based on factors such as race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, or gender can result in certain communities being disproportionately targeted or neglected by law enforcement. This can create disparities in how laws are enforced and who is subject to legal consequences.
@msc545 yes prioritize by investigating every single person that was in DC on Jan6th but not lift a finger to investigate the thousand plus reports of voter fraud. Prioritize by performing endless investigations on President Trump but not looking under a single rock where Joe Biden has stashed the millions he got in bribes from foreign countries.
Discretion- that is just another work for selective enforcement. Biden has actively created the invasion at the border. Before he was elected he went on TV and told everyone in South America that nobody would be sent back if they came to America. That is not discretion, that is breaking about a dozen laws.
Bias and Discrimination- Really? whenever liberals have no other way to argue it is always racism. There have been people detained from over 200 countries. All different races. They should all be sent back.
@msc545 I was getting ready to run for state rep about ten years ago. Then our current state rep died while in office so they gave the seat to his wife. i did not want to be the guy that ran against a dead guy's wife. Instead I helped our current state rep with his campaign. He is doing a fine job. I also worked on the failed gubernatorial campaign of a conservative candidate in this liberal shithole.
@msc545 I don't know if I'd say "most people". Pensions invest in index funds, anyone with an actual career has 401/403/457 plan, the military and government TSP is nothing but low cost index funds. Certainly anyone on the upper half of household income has at least a few dollars socked away. Anyone with an insurance annuity, as those are offered through the insurer as a way to allow THEM to play the market.
So if we include everyone with a pension, retirement fund, annuity or. mil/. gov, I'm not sure you still have a majority there. For the sake of argument, you do, so the other 48% of people are just hosed and we can say F the markets?
Most importantly, where is Allister's podcast?
@BoopBoopBeep I may not have an actual career as I have none of that stuff...
Allister's podcast is on his website, which is only available to members of his club as far as I know...
@msc545 I thought you worked for the city/state for some reason. #daydrinking
A podcast of solid mrrrmrrrmmmmrrrs would be one of the better ones I've heard.
@BoopBoopBeep I'm a contractor. I work for Allister and my other cats...
@BoopBoopBeep Plus - I get petting privileges - what more could I ask for?
Republicans: Illegals don't pay taxes! It's an outrage!
Also Republicans: It's so smart of Trump to barely pay any taxes!
I have not sent you anyone. I'm in Norway, and I don't work with immigrations to anywere.
conservativeinstitute.org/.../...d-to-her-city.htm This democrat complained about them for example
And here is a democrat who compares Immigrants to trash
www.independentsentinel.com/.../
Nope. Having rules is what makes a nation a nation. Knowing who is coming in and why is a good thing. And actually "big bad corporations" love having huge numbers of illegals as the threat of competition helps keep their labor costs down while the competition for places to live increases the value of the rental units owned by the corporations.
Nope, they just don't like the fact that the illegal fentanyl coming across the border unchecked is killing hundred of thousands of people at record rates. That's just one example of many for why we need secure borders.
Come on dude, this is not rocket science. It's just common sense. How has liberalism rotted to the point where blind morons can't see the forest for the trees?
It's not about immigrants, it's about having secure borders.
Again, not rocket science here.
I'm not. I fully support legal immigration. As I've already said, I support secure borders. But as usual, you're trying to twist that into racism. It really makes you look bad.
Why are you fighting against secure borders?
Most unauthorized immigrants in the US did not cross the southern border, but that's beside the point. There is a big difference between someone coming into the US legally and then overstaying their visa compared to someone crossing the border with no supervision at all. The implications for national security between the two groups are vastly different.
Are you going to answer my questions? Why are you fighting against secure borders? And why are you calling people who support border security racist?
There is no economic case for mass immigration, period. So ask yourself why the same people who hate whites and discriminate against them support it.
Do any of your sources take into account remittances (the money illegals send home), the current costs of housing, feeding them, providing medical care, etc? The costs of educating them? The lowered wages and economic displacement by those here legally? The increased housing and insurance costs? Illegals are invaders, not immigrants.
You can always find someone taking corporate money to claim something. But if you had knowledge of economics you'd know better.
Now just because only an illegal would marry you (for a green card), don't be blind to economic realities. You're already an admitted racist, now just imagine what will happen to you when you are deemed a homophobe? You're asking for that.
Yes they do. And if you bothered reading, most- especially from the south, end up getting jobs and no benefits. Waiting years, decades for a chance to be legal. Meanwhile seeing their kids flourish, which was the point.
So in basic dollars, boom win.
In providing an educated next generation, boom win.
In being a peaceful civilized group that breaks few laws, boom win.
@Juxtapose do you take a stupid pill before shit posting? I just answered all this above,
Odd, you know that isn't true- none of that. Any benefits do not go to society as a whole, only to the employers of the indentured servants while the costs are passed on to society.
www.fairus.org/.../fiscal-burden-illegal-immigration-united-states-taxpayers-2023
cis.org/.../Abundance-New-Academic-Studies-Find-Negative-Impacts-Immigration
undocumented.thehastingscenter.org/.../
"Among adults age 25-64, 29% of undocumented immigrants have less than a 9th grade education compared with only 2% among U. S. born adults in this age cohort. A total of 47% of undocumented immigrants age 25-64 have less than a high school education, compared with only 8% among US-born population adults in this age cohort "
www.fairus.org/.../elephant-classroom-mass-immigrations-impact-public-education
www.heritage.org/.../national-academy-sciences-report-indicates-amnesty-unlawful-immigrants-would
We educate plenty of people already, many of whom don't work in the fields they were educated in. And that's before we take into account artificial intelligence's coming role in reducing white collar employment.
Educated, peaceful and civilized? Some are, but most are not. Your propaganda is projecting a false image.
maybe you should let illegal immigrants stay in your home
It's almost like we don't want random people coming into our country and being a burden or anything without us being able to keep tabs on them. Wonder that, huh?
Te right wing will grasp at aything and everything, relevant or not, to justify their hate and racism.
No one on the planet is as dumb as you're pretending to be. lol
But you don't believe a word of anything you post. It's just a way to get attention.
No I’ve known a lot of cool Latinos from all over South American. I have no issue with immigrants. Just do it legally
Who would ypu rather allow to stay in your home? A) 2 people you know or B) 5 people who you’ve got no clue who they are, the only thing you know is that they will break down the door to get in.
Those opposing illegal invasion by non-citizens are not racists. They are patriots,
You gotta remember who "discovered" this nation, white, slave owners
Right. They didn't "discover it". Neither did the indians. Noone really knows. that's why i put it in quotes
Yes! You nailed it.
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions