Here is what is happening in some American cities who take in migrants.
Back in the day, Democrats were all about unions and protecting the workers. Those days are long gone. Now it's all about hating Trump. They don't know why they hate him, but they're following orders. A bunch of mindless lemmings.
Because of new laws, illegals can now take American jobs.
Democrats are OK with this, because they hate Trump.56 Reply- 1 mo
They should be wary as maybe some will take their jobs too when they are allowed to vote.
- 1 mo
Right if it destroys Trump they are ok with it
- 1 mo
@exitseven
And people vote for this.
Most Helpful Opinions
13K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. It is hilarious that the democrats that run these places (and they are always democrats) thought that since the Mexican border was 1500 miles away they could claim to be sanctuary cities with no repercussions. They did not count on Gov Greg Abbott sending hundreds of busloads of illegals to Northern sanctuary cities. Places like New York , boston and Chicago are like magnets to every illegal freeloader from any one of over 200 countries. New York Mayor Adams has pleaded with President Biden to close the border or send him some money to support hundreds of thousands of them. He is waving the white flag. The other sanctuary cites will follow suit. The people in Boston have had a large recreation center turned into a home for hundreds of illegal aliens. The young people that rec center served are just out of luck. The citizens are angry and hopefully it is bad enough so they will vote these morons out of office.
01 Reply
- 1 mo
Here's a few things:
a) it's moer dangerous on mass transportation, and crowded
b) govt is working to force through zoning changes so more housing can be built. not enough capacity as so many in shelters and hotels.
c) budgets have to be rearranged/cut, taxes increased.
d) modifying laws to accomodate them... see my prior post about ID's
rest... not sure, I'm not around it that much.
01 Reply- 1 mo
and are these illegals or legals, I can't tell.
finance.yahoo.com/.../...rying-keep-210000522.html
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
5Opinion
5.1K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Nothing, really. This is consumed content, not news. And it's purpose it to be noise to distract from the fact that trump sabotaged the republican border bill by whining that he would have nothing to campaign on if it passed.
046 Reply- 1 mo
So Massachusetts calling in the national guard to handle to migrant issues isn't news? 🤣
- 1 mo
@normalice Yes, yes, and NYC doesn’t need the Army National Guard to patrol its subways.
And the governor of NY totally didn’t call in the national guard. It’s aaaalllll YouTube right wing shock content. 🙄
- 1 mo
there's nothing normal about what you think. a little examination works... if the left is reporting it and the right, it's probably close to true...
www.msn.com/.../ar-AA1heQX9 - 1 mo
Republicans aren't the ones that dismiss facts that don't validate their feelings though. That is purely a left leaning approach. Deny deny deny, ignore ignore, refuse the evidence, twist what is being said, manipulate. It has made widely circulated headlines that numerous cities have been calling for help over the massive flood of illegals. These are things that have hit all major news sites as such extremely easy things to verify. The only one denying, refusing the accept those facts, mocking those facts because they go against your feelings is you. In addition look at how you immediately respond by insulting people with things like "ragetard" despite you being factually wrong. It is what we call a woke bitch fit. Most commonly seen by a woke person when prevented with facts that they can no longer deny they immediately begin to insult and try and manipulate the conversation away from those facts.
- 1 mo
@lightbulb27 I didn't say it was normal to view YouTube as content rather than information. It's simply accurate to view it that way. YouTube does nothing to establish credibility.
- 1 mo
@JacobJordan oh, no its 100% republicans.
- 1 mo
Then you must be a republican. Because you are the type of person to deny facts that don't validate your feelings. But you see it is democrats and the left that deny facts. Here are some examples. Trans women are not women they are men. Trans women can not get pregnant. Trans women can not have periods. Children should not be subjected to LGBT information when they still believe Santa Claus and unicorns are real. It was several Democrats that created the kkk, it was democrats that created affirmative action in an effort to further divide people by ethnicity. It was democrats that gave addictive and deadly drugs to minorities in the late 60s. It is democrats that support the murder and mutilation of children through abortion or "gender affirming care". It is democrats that are flooding the country with illegals and refusing to protect the borders. All of these and many more are facts about democrats and yet they routinely deny them and blame them on everyone else. So welcome to facts you can't deny we all await the response we know you will drop.
- 1 mo
@JacobJordan nope. Pointing out the facts, not denying them. Sorry if this is your first time being exposed to them. Sounds like that would suck 😔
- 1 mo
And yet I did point all the facts of dems you have yet to point out any that would apply to Republicans 🤣
- 1 mo
@JacobJordan everything I've pointed out was a fact about republicans.
- 1 mo
Except Massachusetts is run by democrats and they have called in the guard to deal with the flood of illegals and yet you are denying that is happening. Every time I have dealt with you on any issue that effects Americans you firmly lodge your head up your ass and deny what I am saying is true even when I link sources 🤣🤣🤣 you are the definition of the woke left. Worse still I don't support either party I support facts and I keep dropping them while you deny and try and manipulate the truth
- 1 mo
@JacobJordan again, the fact is, this is noise to cover for the additional fact that trump killed the republican border bill by whining about having nothing to campaign on if it passed. You have nothing to say about that, despite purporting to care about immigration, because you also want Trump to campaign on this and are well aware he can't do that if it's fixed. You are, in so many words, fake.
- 1 mo
I have yet to see any evidence he did what you claim. Meanwhile the evidence that dems are calling for national guard to help to deal with illegals has already been shown
- 1 mo
@JacobJordan republicans openly admitted trump had them kill the bill by whining that he would have nothing to campaign on if it passed. If you "didn't see" that, it's because you didn't want to.
- 1 mo
Please share your source for this information.
- 1 mo
@JacobJordan well, first let's make sure you are asking in good faith. If I show you republicans admitting they killed the bill because trump whined about having nothing to campaign on if it passed will you commit to either rejecting Trump or deciding border issues are actually not a high priority?
- 1 mo
Mate I don't support either party. I support facts and evidence So if you have a decent source (CNN and msnbc are not great sources for anything they have too many false news reports under their belt) then I will certainly have a look at it. I also have no intention to vote on a president anyways I haven't voted in nearly 22 years I am not changing that this year
- 1 mo
@JacobJordan that isn't what I asked. Try again.
- 1 mo
Well regardless of who is at fault for border issues it is an issue that needs to be addressed. You claim it is trumps fault. Which if the case is problematic. I have seen many sources saying it is biden who is trying to stop Texas from sealing the border so that would work against such claims if what you claim is true. I can't reject or accept trump since I don't support either biden or trump personally I think we need someone like vivek but he is 7 years to young to run for president.
- 1 mo
@JacobJordan so, no commitment to reject Trump. So predictable..
- 1 mo
Can't reject someone you don't accept mate. I would need to have an accepting stance of trump to reject him. But as I have no accepting stance their is nothing to reject.
- 1 mo
@JacobJordan of course you can. There is a long distance between rejection and apathy. Apathy is easy and safe. But rejection means when you're in your far righ fake news bubbles online and, for example, some stranger praises Trump you step in and tell him trump is a liar who sabotaged the border bill because he needed a campaign topic. That's rejection.
- 1 mo
Mate I call out bullshit regardless of what it is lol. Someone said dems were bringing in illegals to vote I said that it would take years for them to achieve the required status to do that. Bullshit is bullshit regardless of who says it and of all the people I am one of few that call out ALL the bullshit. I haven't seen you condemning things democrats do and did. So let's not try and force others to do something you yourself won't do especially when the person you are trying to force already calls out bullshit.
- 1 mo
@JacobJordan It isn't like I would stand over you and make sure you do it. It would be on your honor.
But as you have spent the last five comments dodging, that honor is pretty much spent. So, you can just Google "republicans respond to border deal failure" and it will probably come up. Multiple reporters were present so if you are afraid of a CNN chevron you can instead click on the exact same interview with a Fox chevron, if it makes you feel more comfortable - assuming anything in the far right bubble actually covered it. - 1 mo
And I am very open on the fact I always call out bullshit mate so you were being facetious and thinking I wouldn't notice. If you don't have a source just say that. Would have saved me a fuck ton of time if you had admitted that upfront so I could see what I could find on my own. But I figured since you have a source it would be faster than trying to Google it myself.
- 1 mo
@JacobJordan I have multiple sources. You simply failed to convince me you are asking in good faith.
- 1 mo
www.google.com/.../ you mean this bill right? Looks like it has more than just border security in fact the democrat senator from my home state of VT voted against it because of a $10b fund that would be going to Israel. Looks like it also has Ukraine funding as well. We'll see what we can find regarding the failed vote.
- 1 mo
@JacobJordan right, because republicans insisted they would not vote for aid to allies without appropriations for fixing the border. I suspect republicans were bluffing but Biden called their bluff and basically said yes, you can attach whatever you want concerning the border. They did. And then they killed it because trump whined about having nothing to to campaign on if it passed.
And so now they are passing an aid package to allies without appropriations for the border, so that trump has something to campaign on.. - 1 mo
After reading several different sources on the subject it does seem like democrats benefit more from the current border thing than trump does. Though both trump and Biden have made it clear they think the other benefits more. What is interesting for me is that trump has stated if biden wants more border control all he has to do is tell the border agents to do their jobs. He implies that the president doesn't need additional powers and cites his success with the border during the presidency as evidence. I wonder how many votes were against it for the israel/ukraine portions and how many were against it for the border portion also several major democrats did vote against it. According to current stance many Republicans claim they would be fine if the ukraine/israel stuff was not part of it. So if presented with a just border influence bill I would expect to see all or most for the bill. It is unclear how much was influenced by Ukraine/israel portions. Meaning take a blanket stance would be objectively wrong. Trump does freely admit to being against it. So that claim is at least accurate. Though finding information as to precisely why is harder. Same with what benefits democrats gain or Republicans gain. Most of the sources I was reading all state the same thing. The bill being turned down is not good for trump so question is why would it be turned down if it doesn't benefit him especially if he plans to campaign on it. Generally you campaign on things that bring you support. This is not one of those so this is a bit counterintuitive to his goal.
- 1 mo
@JacobJordan I'm guessing all your "sources" are far right entertainers that want to help get Trump elected. If that's what you need, take a look at what Sen. Lankford said about it. He is a far right republican who mostly wrote the bill. And the Oklahoma GOP censured him when he called republicans out on killing it because trump whined about having nothing to campaign on.
- 1 mo
Honestly I have no idea if they are. I read the CNN website article was not terribly informative. Did the Washington post, BBC, Hill, New York times, a handful of others. Was looking specifically for benefits to either party or candidate
- 1 mo
@JacobJordan the far right border union endorsed it. The benefit to Biden would have been because fixing something republicans campaign on would have cut their entire campaign strategy off at the knees. But then it would have been fixed, and so the unavoidable explanation is that's just not as important to republicans as they pretend.
The lady they had do the response to Bidens state of the union helped write the bill. Yet had nothing nice to say about her own work, instead acting like she had nothing to domwith it. These people are grifters and performers, not serious about fixing the problems they get you riled up with. - 1 mo
And yet most people were for that bill so how does denying the majority of people something they want benefit trump? He already is guaranteed to win given biden has a 36% approval rating which is a literal American first. No president has ever had an approval rating that low. Biden also does not have the black minority vote that he needs for the election nor does he have the Jewish vote which he also needs for the election. While both jews and blacks are smaller portions of the population the target that they vote for becomes the president without either it is game over. All past elections showcase this
- 1 mo
@JacobJordan again, because trump wanted to campaign on the border and so fixing it would cripple his entire campaign strategy.
- 1 mo
Which would make sense if he actually benefitted from it. Most sources say it was akin to shooting himself in the foot. He could do nothing and still win the election so self sabotaging by pushing something like refusing a border bill doesn't make sense
- 1 mo
@JacobJordan It makes a lot of sense from where I'm sitting. Consider the fact that this is apparently your first time hearing about all this despite it having happened a month ago. You think you're the only one in the dark? No. Everyone in the right wing misinformation bubble is just as unaware as you were an hour ago.
- 1 mo
Sure but again he is not gaining a benefit from such a stance. Biden condemning trumps approach however is getting biden some support. So trump is shooting himself in the foot with his stance. Also the borderbill doesn't include just border issues it includes Israel and Ukraine funding which vastly changes how people view it. So that is a huge unknown for everyone because the left is against supporting Israel but is for supporting Ukraine and against the border aspect in large parts. Where as the right are for all 3. And those who don't care about the president are typically for all or most of it. So again trump is shooting himself in the foot with this one.
- 1 mo
@JacobJordan he gets to campaign on it. Thats a benefit. All the campaign ads and attack lines he and right wing media had planned to attack Biden on the border ((like the video posted by the asker!!)) would not be possible if the border bill had passed, because the problems would be fixed.
- 1 mo
Except most sources state it will hurt his campaign several of which are right media sources. So how do you explain that?
- 1 mo
@JacobJordan check the dates on your sources. He is still polling relatively even with Biden so they are wrong - it hasn't hurt him at all. Not that I want them to be wrong, mind. But it's clear Trump was of the opinion right wing media would eventually play along and stop reminding its viewers that he killed the border bill that would fix ~99% of what he complains about. And I agree with Trump on that one.
- 1 mo
All of them are last couple weeks
- 1 mo
@JacobJordan yeah, I expect that will taper off.
Also, keep in mind there are a handful of right-wing sources that have specifically become anti-trump. They may be willing to be honest about this particular issue because they want him to lose. However, that doesn't make them friendly to Biden except as a lesser of two evils. But that's beside the point..
That doesn't mean Trump knew right wing media would turn on him. Of course he thought all right wing media was in on his con - they usually are. I do hope it bites him but I'm not going to hold my breath. - 1 mo
He has a lot of stuff to campaign on, even without the border. I would suspect Biden is letting them all in so they can vote for him. All they need is a driver's license in order to vote. And Biden is making sure they do.
2.2K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. The exact things that they deserve when they voted for their president to sign executive orders to throw open the border! Biden should have stayed in his basement and most of these things would not have happened
10 Reply- 1 mo
Migrants aren't the problem. The problem is illegal IMmigrants.
00 Reply 437 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Yup I will be attending a friends funeral on Thursday thanks to this administration’s policies.
01 Reply- 1 mo
😯😔
migrants from where
00 Reply- 1 mo
Yikes
00 Reply
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!