If a driver injures or unalives someone in a crash, should it be mandatory they go to their funeral as a part of their bond condition?

[smahala1991]

I have been watching some Prom and graduation season mock accidents on YouTube where the story line was drunk driving. I was thinking watching that, should drunk drivers have be made to go to the funerals of their victims in order for them to be like “see what you did” and to seep in the reality of something that can never be undone. What do you think?

Yes

No

It should be up to the judge/magistrate

[OlderAndWiser]

1. "Unalive?" Say what you mean. "If a driver injures or kills someone in a crash. . ."

2. People who are only injured don't have funerals.

3. I doubt the family would want to see the person who killed their loved one.

[Agape93]

No. If you accidentally killed someone special to me, and came to the funeral at minimum I'd be pissed, at most I'd probably kill you. Accident or not, I don't care. They're gone, and you come over just to get bonded out of prison.

[LazerBean]

I don't think so, that would only be more stressful for the family

[GoodGuyBreakingBad]

It should be up to the judge / magistrate

[GoodGuyBreakingBad]

Thanks for MHO :)

[Fireguy17]

the family of the victim would most likely not want to see them there.

[dreamstar72]

Maybe,, hopefully he/she/it will come up missing after the funeral

[Anonymous]

Unalives! Who the heck says unalives instead of kills?

[DeeDeeDeVour]

Mandatory? Absolutely not.

[FunkyMonkee]

Unalives? Get serious, would ya?

[smahala1991]

Most social media platforms you can’t say kill

[FunkyMonkee]

You just did. Nothing happened!
Besides, are you gonna CAVE to the whims of the woke? FUCK THEM!! WE are the majority!! NOT them!!

[msc545]

Funerals should not be used as punishment.

[jahaims]

Wtf no