
Yes
No
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Please select your age
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News 
It's aparently legal and capitalism to make the most, my former mayor would agree with that.
but its also ok for a bunch of people that need the meds to beat the crap out of him.
that's life... it's not fair...
we are a society, we purge the ones that are crap..
what he did is wrong... but it just exposes the system is jacked up if noone else can produce insulin at lower price.
Price increases cannot be pulled out your ass, like he was trying. He is also a felon, so hardly any sort of yardstick.
As for insulin, it costs about $4 to make, but the USA is the worst place to get it.
Walk the plank, bastard. I bet he still sleeps at night.
He's wrong and the system that rewards it is wrong too.
Opinion
7Opinion
First of all, he didn't raise the price of insulin. His company didn't even make insulin that I know of.
He raised the price of a completely different and FAR less common drug.
In capitalism, he can raise the price of drugs all he wants. What he CAN'T do is monopolize it. A possible exception is when the drug is new. Patents and exclusivity rights are what drives innovation. Without it, those drugs would probably not exist at all, which is far worse than being expensive.
On top of that, look what happened when he raised the price. All hell broke lose including from the shareholders. The price of the stock fell. The company lost an anti-trust suit and eventually went bankrupt. The drug was then declared generic.
That's what is supposed to happen. Working as intended. Capitalism doesn't mean you can get by doing WTF you want. There are consequences, and sometimes those consequences are harsh.
Yeah he's wrong, that shouldn't be legal. That's like jacking up the price of basic drinking water to the point where people can barely afford it and it affects society as a whole. I dated a girl with diabetes and it sucks because she was never fat or anything, just runs in her family. The insulin is not cheap and it's a constant factor of her life.
These drug companies could use some competition to lower the prices or if necessary, regulation.
I'm not completely against regulation as a whole but society is overregulated right now so I am cautious with regulations.
I already lived the golden spoon lifestyle homie. I actively turned down money given to me by my mother in a shopping mall because I felt like it was unnecessary to spend it. My dad has a home that is worth over a million dollars and I lived in a town by the coast with a fucking lighthouse. I could walk to the ocean and hang out by a lighthouse by properties that pay millions of dollars per year in property taxes and have elevators in their mansions.
My classmates would tell me how they "earned" their porsches.
It was also overrated.
This guy took relatively inexpensive drug and inflated the price to the point that nobody could actually afford it and then decided that he was a genius. He got a lot of blow back because of this luckily and wound up in a lot of legal trouble. Apparently there's even a limit to capitalism
only to a point. he relied on the insurance companies to make that money for him and they didn't. how do you not cover a drug that saves lives? i don't know if he asked for too much, but did they give him a chance?
Is this 13 cents to 750 cents? I would hope not $13 to $750.
Diabetes is a pervasive condition and there are a lot of savings to gov't to supply free. Our diabetics get it for zero.
I agree. I'm just wondering why we elect a billionaire and then cheer a CEO murder and demand free Healthcare. #stupidity
There is always a degree of stupidity.
A person I know has pancreatic cancer but despite an immunological drug being known to be useful, that drug is not subsidized for that cancer but is for other cancers. You would think if the oncologist considered it the best treatment for the particular patient and it is a subsidized drug it they should be able to get it at a subsidized price. In this case they can manage but most wouldn't.
But no, there are rules covering it that can't be broken. I would think one of the rules should be if a suitably qualified doctor considers it necessary, the credence be given to that. Maybe with second opinions concurring?
It is never going to be a rose garden sadly.
I still think he should get shot
The healthcare system is not capitalism.
It absolutely is not. Can you buy prescription drugs from England?
So as I said, not capitalism.
Someone should’ve probably shot him.
Morally wrong or it should be to people
You can also add your opinion below!