Even if someone commits a crime with direct evidence they still are afforded due process in a court of law. agree or disagree?

[Still-alive]

So lets say there's a thief that was caught red handed. should they still receive due process in court of law and judged by a jury of their peers? or should we skip all that and just throw them in prison straight up?

Agree. we should still adhere to the constitution and afford a suspect due process no matter how guilty they seem

Disagree. if its totally obvious with unimpeachable that they committed the crime they should just be thrown in prison without the usual constitutional procedure

I'm not sure

Updates

1 y

Good we all still agree that due process is something everyone on U. S. soil should have regardless of how open and shut a case seems.

[MisterWack]

You are given certain unalienable rights under jurisdiction of The United States of America, whether citizen or not and ‘Due Process’ is one. The majority opinion of ‘SCOTUS’ states otherwise!

[MisterWack]

Supreme Court of The United States Majority Opinion means they are entitled to due process, “For all the rhetoric of the dissents, today’s order and per curium confirm that the detainees subject to removal orders under the (Alien Enemies Act) are entitled to notice and an opportunity to challenge their removal. The only question is which court will resolve that challenge,”. So yes due process seems to be allowed for those of non-citizenship.
Another point which I could be missing or misinformed of is from a basic surface level, You are also entitled by the US Constitution of due process, regardless of citizenship or noncitizenship. Could be wrong, just adding this here.

[matchrestore]

Pleasantly surprised that everyone is agreeing with this. Given our current political climate there's some nut job ideas out there...

[princeofromance]

I agree.