Are threats against Supreme Court justices quietly influencing major rulings?

Justice Amy Coney Barrett recently gave an emotional account of her son discovering the bulletproof vest she had been issued because of threats against her. Tim Pool argues that this kind of intimidation may be influencing how Supreme Court justices rule in politically controversial cases, including birthright citizenship.

There is no public evidence proving that any justice changed a specific vote because of threats. However, do you believe the growing climate of intimidation against Supreme Court justices could be affecting their decisions, or do you believe they remain completely independent regardless of the danger?

Amy Coney Barrett Gives Emotional Account of the Moment Her Son Saw Her Bulletproof Vest - https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/amy-coney-barrett-gives-emotional-account-of-the-moment-her-son-saw-her-bullet-proof-vest/

This explains EVERYTHING - https://youtu.be/6-axH2Tou8I?is=10dOGmmpfHj6yaFP

Yes
No
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Are threats against Supreme Court justices quietly influencing major rulings?
Post Opinion