3-0 Trump loses 9th Circuit of Appeals Bid on Ban

sjoes006
3-0 Trump loses 9th Circuit of Appeals Bid on Ban

Hats really should be off for Bob Ferguson, Washington's AG for masterminding this action. Reaching out to tech companies harmed by the Executive Order and having those companies immediately and aggressively rally around it really gave the courts the backing they needed.

The fake news journalists, who have been reporting on the Supreme Court for decades and know it well, today weighed in with reasonable doubt that the court will want to hear the case in the current political environment.

The reference a few reasons but the main one being that the ban is limited to 90 days so what's the point. But also the president's negative public remarks on 'so-called judge' isn't something they'll be excited to have extended to them. The Supreme Court doesn't want to rule on this.

But assuming they are forced to it is very likely to be a 4-4 vote at best which would leave the order not in force.

3-0 Trump loses 9th Circuit of Appeals Bid on Ban
6
1
Add Opinion

Most Helpful Girl

  • 1truekhaleesi
    Welcome to the checks and balances system, Trump. You would've known about it before if you actually read the Constitution before you took up politics as a hobby.
    Is this still revelant?
    • jacquesvol

      Drumpf: "A billionaire has no time to read such pieces of paper, pff."

      Harry S. Truman (1884–1972):
      When contemplating General Eisenhower winning the Presidential election, Truman said, “He’ll sit here, and he’ll say, ‘Do this! Do that!’ And nothing will happen. Poor Ike—it won’t be a bit like the Army. He’ll find it very frustrating.”
      ATTRIBUTION: HARRY S. TRUMAN.—Richard E. Neustadt, Presidential Power, the Politics of Leadership, p. 9 (1960).
      "Very bad" would it be in Trumpian language.

Most Helpful Guy

  • capturemyheartnow
    The ban is a bad idea.
    Is this still revelant?
    • sjoes006

      I mean of course it is as it gives ISIS/ ISIL/ Daesh promotional tools.

      I love that the suit filed for two detainees at JFK involved a bonified war hero as far as anyone is concerned from Iraq. These are people that literally put their lives on the line for this country and now being denied entrance. An interpreter who has no choice to flee because he was aiding the US.

      The Supreme Court won't touch this it's too political.

    • Suppose a US citizen takes citizenship of Iraq or Iran , he may no longer be able to visit US due to ban.

    • jacquesvol

      @sjoes006 indeed. ISIS MIGHT use it that way but has it done so yet? www.politifact.com/.../

      May in mouth to ear arguments.

    • Show All

Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions

What Girls & Guys Said

05
  • RedThread
    You gotta love the systems of checks and balances that prevents any branch from assuming too much power. Bloody brilliant.
  • Prof_Don
    The United States of America has a "checks and balances" system with three separate branches, for situations like Trump when the President tries to act like a dictator.
  • jacquesvol
    If you have flimsy case you should expect setbacks.
  • GraveTruth
    It's so funny to watch the people of America. They are so stupid. It's all just a giant setup. The gov't owns the court system and the law. If there was a law to stop trump then the law was enforced on purpose and planned by the gov't (and trump).

    It keeps the immigrant haters happy and it gives the immigrants hope. Damn, people are stupid.
    In the past there has been cases where to gov't has broken all regulations and bill of rights and just did what they wanted in a day.

    Your country is screwed. Your president is a loud mouth obnoxious celebrity with a gold digger 1st lady. There is no need to care anymore.
  • Waffles731
    Trump the failure
Loading...