- 3 mo
Well let’s be honest here. If you were rich and has the means to protect your house with private fire fighters would you let your house burn to the ground or would use your resources to prevent that from happening?
Anyway this is still a full demonstration of gross hypocrisy of Hollywood leftist elitists. They voted in and endorsed incompetent politicians and policies that left LA residents unprotected and unprepared. And wild fires have been a long time well known threat to this area.
BUT I want to be considerate of the local residents who are losing their homes (and few of them lost their lives) to this natural disaster. I do not wish that on anyone including people I ideologically disagree with.
I have friends in that area and I’m very concerned about them. So let’s be considerate about making this a political issue (although it really is) and bring up that up AFTER the fires are under control and finally put out.
I do have much more to say but again it’s rude to the people who are in the thick of right now to go off on politics.
20 Reply
Most Helpful Opinions
- 3 mo
Which is why Proposition 13, now a half-century old, led to this disgusting inequity. Since taxes must be approved by referanda (though frankly, I don't know if Proposition 13 is still on the books as law), and the rich racist oldsters of the Ronnie Ray-Guns gubernatorial era weren't about to aid people of colour through their taxes, infrastructure and schools, including universities slowly eroded. I read in "The USA Today" that, despite 40% more Angelinos in the past 65 years, there are six fewer fire stations and fewer actual and FAR FEWER proportionally fire fighters, so the idea of the rich having to hire professional firefighters while everyone else loses their life or property comes into horrific play in a city with 212,000 millionaires (just 20,000 fewer than Windsor's total population, and 43 billionaires) and 75,000 homeless people.
00 Reply
If you could, and had the money, are you saying you wouldn't?
01 Reply- 3 mo
I'm purposely not saying anything. but it does raise questions. You can see some of the ones i listed in my reply to @msc545
I have zero problem with how anyone lives thier lives. They can spend money how they see fit, so long as it doesn't infringe on others ability to do the same. That's my take.








What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
21Opinion
- 3 mo
That shows how horrible the mismanagement is. They shouldn't NEED TO.
It is not like putting a lock on your bike because fire fighters were supposed to be arranged including water pressure in hydro hydrants!
Obviously some can and did but they shouldn't NEED TO.
10 Reply 423 opinions shared on Trending & News topic. It’s unsurprising when you consider the leftists’ abject and utter failure to provide decent public goods (something typical of a Communist country) and actually benefits all of us who own property nationwide- if more expensive real estate is destroyed, our premiums will be even higher (they’re going up as a result of these fires anyway),.
10 Reply- 3 mo
I feel the same as our rich hiring private police… the public failed them. But it was their decision.
I feel like they should rethink their public decisions ir stay where they are and not pollute some other area with their flawed thinking.10 Reply 602 opinions shared on Trending & News topic. If I was that rich then I'd probably do the same thing to be honest so I can't really fault them for protecting their property. We all would if we could anyone who say's differently is lying.
My heart goes out to the folks affected by the fires but at the same thing it needs to be realized that they kind of brought this upon themselves by voting in incompetent politicians who left the state and everyone in it vulnerable.
00 Reply- 3 mo
Honestly, good for them.. The rich pay most of the taxes, so if they found a way to protect their property and not leave the state, that's a plus for everyone else.. Plus, that's the way it should be.. A free market for fire fighters would make the world a safe place..
00 Reply 864 opinions shared on Trending & News topic. The town I live in is having budgetary issues. The selectmen decided that they would "privatize" the transfer station. This means that they will charge $350 bucks a year and it will only be open 3 days a week instead of 5. Maybe they will start charging by the bag too. I wonder what gets "privatized" next. Maybe the fire dept? This is what happens when democrats run the town.
00 Reply- 3 mo
i feel like if that result of dei bullshit doesn't convince you that dei is bullshit, you're lost in life. like why do you think the professionals aren't succeeding in actually fighting the fire? you know the one job they have. well look at the people who got hired to be the heads of the LA fire departement...
10 Reply Sensible to say the least. If you, the reader 🫵 had the money and a wildfire threat is on it's way to burn down your house to ruins, you too would do that.
This further proves, that being broke is shit.
00 Reply- Anonymous(36-45)3 mo
Fine with me. That's money the city didn't spend on its fire department. Its also generally saving the more valuable and less replaceable property over the less valuable and more easily replaceable property.
As a rule anyone putting out any house file helps reduce the spread of the same fire.If that house needed to burn down the city should have had the military do it.
00 Reply It's a free market and a worthwhile investment, fire fighters live on average 10 years less , they need some money making ventures.
Morally it completely sucks , but that's the USA system at work.10 Reply- 3 mo
Not going to do much good. L. A. is under constant threat of fire. Most places in the world are, but, especially in L. A.
They'll wind up spending more money on something, that's inevitable
10 Reply How do you feel having your brand new mountain bike parked out in front of the 7-Eleven without a lock on it
02 Reply- 3 mo
Exactly you have too much money into it so they're going to do whatever they have to do to protect their house even though they have insurance but it's still the loss of a house. I personally wouldn't do it because I would do it myself protect my house myself but there are people that have acres of property in buildings so I understand why they're doing it my sons of fireman paramedic and he was talking about it a couple days ago but he's in Nevada
- 3 mo
One of the perks of being wealthy... but it doesn't always work. Several wealthy people have lost their homes, burned to the ground.
00 Reply - 3 mo
Good luck to the. Is it any different to private security or private doctors. If you have the resources, use them
10 Reply - 3 mo
I don't but it's the way things used to be hundreds and even thousands of years ago look at Georgian Britain and Marcus Licinius Crassus
00 Reply Eeh,🥕, they should pay to bring in enough to end the whole thing.🐰
00 Reply- 3 mo
I feel like if they pay me $100 an hour I'll do it.
00 Reply - 3 mo
not an issue, used to be called fire insurance
00 Reply 762 opinions shared on Trending & News topic. It is very disturbing.
14 Reply- 3 mo
My question is are they trucking in thier own resources to fight it. I'm assume so at this point. And are they getting in the way of fire fighters already on the ground. And since fire fighters appropriate things like people's pool water. Can fire fighters already on the ground do that to thier equipment and or resources. Know what I mean.
- 3 mo
Here is a good article that may help with you questions:
www.nytimes.com/.../...efighters-la-wildfires.html
- 3 mo
If i had the money to do it, I 100% would
10 Reply I don't care what happens to the rich.
00 Reply- 3 mo
On their off time then fine.
00 Reply That’s craaazzzzyyyy
20 Reply
Learn more