Do you know what the most important thing about AI tagging itself as AI is?

[goaded]

It's so they don't believe other AIs.

"Some signs of AI model collapse begin to reveal themselves"

https://www.theregister.com/2025/05/27/opinion_column_ai_model_collapse/

"Welcome to Garbage In/Garbage Out (GIGO). Formally, in AI circles, this is known as AI model collapse. In an AI model collapse, AI systems, which are trained on their own outputs, gradually lose accuracy, diversity, and reliability. This occurs because errors compound across successive model generations, leading to distorted data distributions and "irreversible defects" in performance. The final result? A Nature 2024 paper stated, "The model becomes poisoned with its own projection of reality.""

I mean, it's important the people take what they say with a grain of salt, and they need to know where it's coming from and how much to trust the source, which is why their output should be tagged by law. But AIs can't easily tell truth from fiction, not being actually more intelligent than, say, a Trump supporter.

My previous questions about AI:

What do you think of YouTube videos created with AI?

Is this what happens when you tell an AI to lie?

[MisterWack]

I do believe AI should give sources as to where their ‘knowledge’ comes from because it allows the user to fact check the source to see if it actually holds up what the AI’s conclusion was / allows the user to learn more on a specific topic of interest without having AI spoon feed them a ‘vague’ summary.

AI can be a helpful tool when utilized correctly, though in no way replace human effort, human thought, human creativity, or humans in general. AI can be a helpful tool, though is no magical perfect replacement to the user.

I’m in no way against the use of AI for information and research, though once you utilize it to cut out the middle man and give you a quick answer on a multi leveled topic then that is pretty irresponsible. I want more people to question their sources, their information, their predetermined beliefs and AI can easily be a hype man for those unless you check multiple sources / analyze the sources the AI provides not taking everything at face value.

*I will add this little note, the fact AI creates its own reality and will become more rigid as time goes on not limitless… We will need to slowly pull ourselves away from it because the information and diversity of facts, opinions, studies, etc. will diminish which won’t yield the results we expected prior to the change. Just a thought.

[Shiprex]

I think belief is a bit extreme for an AI to have such a thing. It's like a whole bunch of dice being rolled each time an AI is queried for an outcome to be produced. Some might be one sided dice, two,3 or whatever and the most reasoned outcome is the one that is produced. Why they tag themselves is so no one takes them seriously but they will monitor the engagement and interaction with the posts.

[dustybiker2]

So musk blames this every time grok shoves him under a bus?

[jshm2]

LOL, it's no different with siloed people living off their own propaganda and bullshit. Eventually they will collapse as a group and community.

AI follows the same model as it is mostly siloed White dudes programming it.

[Glamourous_Stacey]

My safety. Public safety in general