- With20% (75)14% (51)17% (126)Vote
- Without80% (297)86% (308)83% (605)Vote
Most Helpful Guy
Generally speaking, I'd say "without".
There have been a very rare set of exceptional cases I've seen where a woman with a tattoo actually seemed more "feminine" to me as a result of it because it was accentuating her figure in such a beautiful way.
An example might be tattoos on an indigenous woman. In such a case, the markings on her body are not tacky decals but an elaborate set of markings signifying her culture and traditions.
Another would be like the markings of a Yakuza mistress. In that case, her markings signify her as the mistress of a feared gang leader, and the markings reflect an ancient tradition. I find these to be quite beautiful sometimes.
There are also some really elaborate designs. I imagine if I saw this woman in person wearing a dress, she'd be quite stunning.
Most Helpful Girl
It depends on the woman to be honest, Alessandra Ambrosio is going to look super hawt even with a million skulls on her body.
I think a lot of tattoo models are just unattractive, and the tattoos do them no justice, but if Aishwarya Rai and Alessandra were covered in tattoos, they'd still be 10:10.
Wow, how manly. What a rough chick.