I'm curious to question and challenge attitudes.
Women like to trot out that their man should love them unconditionally if they put a significant amount of weight on. As we know, men are known as the more visual, physically orientated creatures.
But evolutionary speaking, we could say there is an equivalence in women wanting men of some socio-economic standing, or at least being able to provide. That is what women find attractive in terms of their deep biology. They always say they like a man with ambition, which is like a more socially acceptable way of framing it. So in that case would you be happy to unconditionally keep loving your jobless or lazy boyfriend?
Not trying to piss people off with a controversial question, believe it or not, I'm just wondering if there's a bit of a hypocrisy there!
L-dawg here, challenging attitudes!
Ta very much!
Women like to trot out that their man should love them unconditionally if they put a significant amount of weight on. As we know, men are known as the more visual, physically orientated creatures.
But evolutionary speaking, we could say there is an equivalence in women wanting men of some socio-economic standing, or at least being able to provide. That is what women find attractive in terms of their deep biology. They always say they like a man with ambition, which is like a more socially acceptable way of framing it. So in that case would you be happy to unconditionally keep loving your jobless or lazy boyfriend?
Not trying to piss people off with a controversial question, believe it or not, I'm just wondering if there's a bit of a hypocrisy there!
L-dawg here, challenging attitudes!
Ta very much!
