It means that both woman and men should step up so that we can all be attractive to one another. Imagine if everyone looked good, then no one would give a fuck about how one looked and people could find their real soulmates, people who are perfect for them in mind and soul.
It means plenty of things. One also needs to understand women. For them, most men are invisible. Men don't notice ugly girls, obese girls, etc. So only about what, half of women are truly noticed by men?
For women, it's very different. Only about 10% of men are actually "visible."
It means most women in a relationship arn't attracted to their partner. It means that some women prefer solitude or toys over being with somone. It means women who have found somone they like are stupid to divorce.
Mostly it means a whole lot of men will pretend to be more than they are to experiance a romantic relationship.
Its something men who can't find random women to bang will say to make them feel like they are part of a collective of victims instead of just being singularly inadequate.
And since women will be voluntarily single in greater numbers going forward it is a great time for men to invest in and cash in on companies associated with box wine and pet products, the demand for which will surely rise in years to come.
0
0 Reply
Anonymous
(30-35)
1 y
I would argue they are only superficially attracted to the top 20 percent. Many of us base long term relationship potential on factors other than superficial attraction.
A lot of young women say "men are all the same" about the top 20% of men. Which is hilarious. Because there's nice guys out there that would treat them like queens (far better than they deserve) but they would be bored to tears.
That most people are unhappy and single I would guess
1
0 Reply
Anonymous
(36-45)
1 y
For women, it just means that if you want one of the top most attractive guys, chances are pretty good you're going to have to share.
I think the big thing for most women to figure out is "how important is it to me to have a top 20% guy" versus "how important is it to me to have a guy to myself"
I am not sure. But the thing is every woman has her own standards. So the 20 percent of men that you would date might not be the same 20 percent of another woman's
Well A, C, and D all equate to B. A is not going to happen in terms of lower standards so ends up as B. C and D mean they aren't in a relationship so it all ends up at B.
I agree but he might want to sleep with all thosr women instead of marrying only one. But then again this depends on his own values whether he prefers sleeping around or getting married.
"I agree but he might want to sleep with all those women instead of marrying only one.". Wrong. He will only sleep with three of them. The high value woman will not sleep with him.
People also need to use something more than "I've seen so and so with this person" or "i see plenty of men dating this person". These are weak counter arguments
@amandat94132 I think you may be making the mistake of believing that because it has not been proven means its not true. To do a "study" like that would be impossible because attraction is a subjective term. However you can infer from some data that is probably an acurate theory. 80% of divorces are initiated by women. Less than 1/3 of all men in the history of the world have procreated. 60% of men under 30 identify themselves as virgins. Women found 90% of men on dating apps as unattractive in a recent tender study. So yes the data is out there.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
92Opinion
It means that both woman and men should step up so that we can all be attractive to one another. Imagine if everyone looked good, then no one would give a fuck about how one looked and people could find their real soulmates, people who are perfect for them in mind and soul.
It means plenty of things. One also needs to understand women. For them, most men are invisible. Men don't notice ugly girls, obese girls, etc. So only about what, half of women are truly noticed by men?
For women, it's very different. Only about 10% of men are actually "visible."
It means most women in a relationship arn't attracted to their partner. It means that some women prefer solitude or toys over being with somone. It means women who have found somone they like are stupid to divorce.
Mostly it means a whole lot of men will pretend to be more than they are to experiance a romantic relationship.
It means that many women would be toys of the 20% of men and then complain about that.
it means violence towards women will increase
and eventually lead to societal issues
cause money will not full fill lots of men
and the men will have no reason to work
and when men have no reason to work
well!!! (I think you know were this is going)
type this in
THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN MEN DO NOT GET SEX
Riley Whitelaw THATS HER NAME
Its something men who can't find random women to bang will say to make them feel like they are part of a collective of victims instead of just being singularly inadequate.
And since women will be voluntarily single in greater numbers going forward it is a great time for men to invest in and cash in on companies associated with box wine and pet products, the demand for which will surely rise in years to come.
I would argue they are only superficially attracted to the top 20 percent. Many of us base long term relationship potential on factors other than superficial attraction.
A lot of young women say "men are all the same" about the top 20% of men. Which is hilarious. Because there's nice guys out there that would treat them like queens (far better than they deserve) but they would be bored to tears.
That most people are unhappy and single I would guess
For women, it just means that if you want one of the top most attractive guys, chances are pretty good you're going to have to share.
I think the big thing for most women to figure out is "how important is it to me to have a top 20% guy" versus "how important is it to me to have a guy to myself"
It means absolutely nothing outside the United States, where they tend to overthink and overanalyze everything under the sun… 🙄🙄🙄
I am not sure. But the thing is every woman has her own standards. So the 20 percent of men that you would date might not be the same 20 percent of another woman's
Seems it's time to lower your standards. What's really sad here, the same wen thst go after this top 20% become miserable single mothers in life.
Well A, C, and D all equate to B. A is not going to happen in terms of lower standards so ends up as B. C and D mean they aren't in a relationship so it all ends up at B.
it means the vast marjority of men don't get to procreate unless the vast majority of women lower their standards.
also: it means that women are by far the more superficial gender. quite rich for them to always claim it's men who sexually objectify women.
Or maybe those single women could just be better quality women and get the man they want.
Every 4 women can get only 1 hot man.
And which of those 4 women are is the going to choose? The one of highest marriage value.
I agree but he might want to sleep with all thosr women instead of marrying only one.
But then again this depends on his own values whether he prefers sleeping around or getting married.
Well then we are attracted to a different 20% of men, because I don't even want to associate with manhoes lmao
Me too. I even feel disgust imagining touching a used up body no matter how attractive it is.
Absolutely
And I'm not even talking about how disgusted I would be listening to their views on relationships. Definitely not fun.
That's for sure lmao I waited for marriage with another virgin and everything about him is 👌👌👌👌👌👌
@LazerBean happy im not alone
"I agree but he might want to sleep with all those women instead of marrying only one.". Wrong. He will only sleep with three of them. The high value woman will not sleep with him.
It means the vast majority of women will choose to be the toys of the 20% of men and then cry about it on social media
That a lot of people (both men and women) will be single... which is the case. Just look on this site and how many are single and "can't find anyone".
People keep saying that, but I cannot find the actual study that says it.
@Dinklex3 Lol, its not based on a "study" because there is no way to scientifically prove that. It's more based on a theory.
@Vegasrunner Exactly! All of this nonsense is from online blogs full of assumptions/theories
from cherry pickering outdated relationship books.
Unfortunately this all took on a life of its own.
People also need to use something more than "I've seen so and so with this person" or "i see plenty of men dating this person". These are weak counter arguments
@amandat94132 I think you may be making the mistake of believing that because it has not been proven means its not true. To do a "study" like that would be impossible because attraction is a subjective term. However you can infer from some data that is probably an acurate theory. 80% of divorces are initiated by women. Less than 1/3 of all men in the history of the world have procreated. 60% of men under 30 identify themselves as virgins. Women found 90% of men on dating apps as unattractive in a recent tender study. So yes the data is out there.