Do you think an inexperienced person's first relationship should always be with someone who's inexperienced too?

[Rockstarrrrr]

If someone is a late bloomer, say 23 and up and never dated or have been in a relationship... And they're yet to have their very first relationship... Do you think they must go with someone who's inexperienced too? because if they didn't, the other side.. Even if they don't show it... Would definitely look down on them and exploit it somehow to always have the upper hand? Or do you think going for someone who's similar and inexperienced would be bad too because it would be much more difficult and awkward? What do you think is the better option?

[ManOnFire]

Honestly, I believe that's probably the best thing deep down, yeah. Because you both can learn and grow together. I wish my first relationship way back when had've been with someone who was inexperienced too, but like a young idiot I looked down on that and got with someone who had plenty of experience alright. And at that time it was not a good fit for me.

I'm sure there are some relationships out there that work with an inexperienced person being with someone experienced, but I think it really is better for two inexperienced folks to be together, to grow and learn, and there would be no judgment from either of you. And if you feel like it'll be awkward, then you'll both be awkward together and have a great bond.

Also 23 is not a late start. By a long shot.

[Rockstarrrrr]

I see...

[Berethor]

If both inexperienced it's more special, but technically it easier to do nasty stuff with a ho.

[Monalisa77]

No god no. I need someone at least midly experienced so they can teach me what to do.

[LazerBean]

It always seems to me that it is better when two equals get together.