Whenever this is commented, women have the last word to say thatthey have it the same or worse than men. But it is not true, at least in dating. I do not say that women have it easy but yes that men have it more difficult.
For example: Women can ascend from social class and it has always been that way throughout history. A woman who works at the minimum wage can go with a man, not only to earn double, but almost a hundred more or a millionaire or super ambitious person regardless of money, Freddie Mercury's girlfriend worked in a shop... Women are not judged by ambition, it is a plus, but if they are affectionate, support and care for the man... I do not defend vagueness.
Do not come with comparisons of attractiveness and status because a person of any condition can be hot or not, it is not even 1% the effort to be hot with studying, having a great job or being of a certain class. You can , regardless of social class, for both sexes, become hot in weeks, months. It is even much more difficult (at least today) to be attractive to a man, for example the height or size of the penis, an attractive man but then with a very micropenis... and the height I do not say of Tyrion Lannister but 160 -170cm, there are women who would not go with someone of similar height because they are insecure (some men are insecure but not that much), but then men are the ones that confidence. How can a man have security with so many expectations?
Tinder: Many women do not want men , they are very selective and match 1/50 1/300, 1/5 if they are not very much... later people surprise that incels and so on (i dont defend mass murder or rudeness, dont get me wrong), some men might wish to be treated as sexual objects. 100 bad suitors is better than 0.
In the animal world it is worse, the males are the ones that have everything worse, even in some species that the female is bigger, does not take care of the male but kills him or he dies in reproduction.
For example: Women can ascend from social class and it has always been that way throughout history. A woman who works at the minimum wage can go with a man, not only to earn double, but almost a hundred more or a millionaire or super ambitious person regardless of money, Freddie Mercury's girlfriend worked in a shop... Women are not judged by ambition, it is a plus, but if they are affectionate, support and care for the man... I do not defend vagueness.
Do not come with comparisons of attractiveness and status because a person of any condition can be hot or not, it is not even 1% the effort to be hot with studying, having a great job or being of a certain class. You can , regardless of social class, for both sexes, become hot in weeks, months. It is even much more difficult (at least today) to be attractive to a man, for example the height or size of the penis, an attractive man but then with a very micropenis... and the height I do not say of Tyrion Lannister but 160 -170cm, there are women who would not go with someone of similar height because they are insecure (some men are insecure but not that much), but then men are the ones that confidence. How can a man have security with so many expectations?
Tinder: Many women do not want men , they are very selective and match 1/50 1/300, 1/5 if they are not very much... later people surprise that incels and so on (i dont defend mass murder or rudeness, dont get me wrong), some men might wish to be treated as sexual objects. 100 bad suitors is better than 0.
In the animal world it is worse, the males are the ones that have everything worse, even in some species that the female is bigger, does not take care of the male but kills him or he dies in reproduction.
Most Helpful Opinions