I was looking into the Andrew tate case and it seem like the way he convinced women to work for him was to promise to marry him, kinda of the same thing with the tinder swindler.
If a woman is willing to do anything for a lifestyle shouldn't she be held accountable for only going after money. Or should the men who know that a way to manipulate women only be responsible.
If a woman is willing to do anything for a lifestyle shouldn't she be held accountable for only going after money. Or should the men who know that a way to manipulate women only be responsible.
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
2Opinion
No because under law it is fraud if someone pays for u to ply to a cou try promising you something and when u get there u are told u will work for me or fuck off thats pretty illigal yes the person is stupid for falling for it but that literally written into law as being illigal
That he attempted to claim he was just playing up a character shows even he knows how bad it looks in the eyes of the law
The Tinder scammer is a hero who scammed hypergamous women.
Wasn't Tate doing the same thing
Be the first girl to share an opinion
and earn 3 more Xper points!