It depends on the situation:
Yes if he's;
Living with/engaged to her - then that's just household costs not child support
If there's reasonable doubt that the kid is his. But it's probably better to find out for sure.
No if:
The kid really isn't his
You're not living with each other/engaged
The boy/girlfriend didn't adopt this child together
I those are really the only logical reasons to pay child support. Any parent should always be responsible for their own kid whether they wanted them or not but child support should be for parents only (natural or adoptive). But if you're part of a household, there are overall costs that need to be covered and putting money towards those costs is different from child support. Buut if you're not living together and you're not married then of course not. You're not part of the household.
Most Helpful Opinions
The only time I think he becomes obligated is when he agrees to, and pays for several years, because then he has entered into a good faith contract.
But now that we have paternity tests, I think that men should just make a habit of quietly having it done right after their babies are born if they have even the slightest reason to doubt their paternity. I don't think men get trapped all that often, but it just doesn't hurt anything to send in some cells and know for sure.
I know a lot of women would be hurt by that. But I think something like knowingly or accidentally making the wrong guy pay child support is a big deal. So, like I said, be stealth about it.
I mean, I wouldn’t call it slavery, unless he is literally being forced to do it against his will. Correct me if I’m wrong, but I don’t think is what’s happening here. But if guys are being pressured to do so, or made to feel obligated or expected to do so, then that is absolutely wrong and incredibly unfair to the boyfriend. That is not his responsibility. Any girlfriend who puts that pressure on her boyfriend is using and abusing him. There are times when couples choose willingly to help support each other, and that is okay. But it should never be an obligation.
The real father should support the child, not the boyfriend. Just because a guy dates a girl, it should not mean he is responsible for the child, financially, or any other way!
No. Not unless he has adopted the child as the childs father is a deadbeat or dead and has been its father for many years and has full visitation rights or some custody rights.
It's tough for men these days, I know feminists are pushing for alimony from boyfriend's if a woman has lived with a guy for a year or two.
If you both live togather the kid is apart of the deal.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
4Opinion
i'm a girl who fits in the case you're asking about.
my boyfriend why should pay?
i have my ex who helps with $ n cares about his little girl & visits when can.
if my boyfriend becomes my husband then we're going to be family so ofc everything gonna be shared.
about the poll, you didn't give a normal answer to choose from. simple cos the fact that it wouldn't be slavery, you might call it "using out"I agree with the girl that said the poll options are too dumb to vote. No, men shouldn't have to be cuckolded - but as long as you put a reference to "muh slavery" in the no option - I can't vote for it.
I think no, but your poll options are so dumb that I can't bring myself to vote.
If it's not his child he shouldn't pay, let the real guy who impregnated her pay.
Lol "men r being oppressed" said no intelligent person ever
If the boyfriend signed the birth certificate he will have to pay. It’s not right at all. I don’t believe in child support. Lazy moms wanting to take the easy way out.
Only exception would be couple with unfertile husband that use artificial insemination...
It depends if he's on the birth certificate cause if so, he has an obligation to the child
You're saying this boyfriend isn't the childs father?
He shouldn't pay child support but if it's his girlfriend I think it would be nice if he buy some stuff for the baby.
I don't think it's slavery but if it's not his, until they get married he shouldn't have to pay child support
I don't think it's slabery but I think if it's not his kid then he doesn't have to pay anything
He's not obligated to pay, for one it's not his and child support isn't an option. He can choose to support his girlfriend and her baby.
Yea its his kid he shiuld support it any way he can
No, this is slavery all over again and just f*cking dumb.
He should help her, but he's not obliged to do so
I'm waiting until marriage, so why would I?
Of course not.
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions