Why do women who spend their prime years on the cock riding carousel fool themselves by thinking a qualify guy will marry them at 30+?

[Anonymous]

Updates

+1 y

Update

[WhiteSteve]

I never understand this. First off, are you living by that same standard? Are you, as a guy, only sleeping with like 0-2 people for your entire fucking youth, and on purpose, not through inability to pull? Like if you could get laid by different chicks with the same ability and relative ease that a decent looking woman could, WOULD you? Seems like 9 times out of 10, people with this attitude aren't part of the Cock Carousel cock donor constituent, they're the other guys who are watching from the sideline, and your "revenge" is to shun these women and act like its you who doesn't want them, when clearly that's not how it's shaking out in reality. It just makes you seem bitter and thusly unattractive. I know plenty of guys who weren't "ladies' men", who knew they were coming home alone from the bar because they had weak game or didn't make themselves a viable candidate in some other ways. They didn't quit and "go their own way", they didn't turn irrationally bitter and angry towards literally half of earth's population, they just kept plugging, and they are mostly married now, have kids in some cases, all that happy horseshit. They didn't make it their life's mission to wait until "settling down age" to punish all women who had the audacity to fuck guys who weren't them. That's Elliott Rogers shit right there. And not for nothing, there are probably a million amazing women out there for you right now, some of whom don't ride this supposed Cock Carousel you speak of, that you won't give the time of day because they don't meet some standard of YOURS, likely physical. I hear bullshit about the 80/20 thing, 80% of women go after the top 20% of men, etc... gtfoh. Go to Walmart, you'll see average and below average looking people partnered up everywhere, it's not like 80% of the male population is just sitting their with their dicks in their hands. It might be that YOU feel entitled to a Top 20% chick. Shit, I want to fuck Sofia Vergara but I'm not Leo DiCaprio or Zac Efron... them's the breaks, work with what you have. Most chicks aren't Sofia Vergara either, js. Honestly not even trying to clown you here, I'm trying to grab your shoulders and shake you out of this defeatist mindset. This question comes from some kind of bitterness or anger or sadness... change your approach, change your life. No one says you have to wife up a chick who fucked half the town, but you're doing yourself a disservice by ruling out all these women.

[WhiteSteve]

*sitting there

[Asker]

Women and men have different standards.

[WhiteSteve]

Okayyyy... and you think this is justifiable? For what reason?

[Asker]

Does biologically and people's prefrences need justifying? Do you want homosexuals to justify discriminating against the opposite sex?

[WhiteSteve]

So your contention is that --BIOLOGICALLY- it's ok for dudes to sleep around, but it's not ok for chicks? Like on a modern societal level, not prehistoric "males spread their seed, women choose their worthiest possible mate." Because if that's the game you want to play, then only the most alpha Khal Drogo dudes on the planet will get laid. But that's not reality, man.

[Asker]

Well for some reason most women I know find Khal Droggo sexy as he'll despite all the rape. Women like an experienced man who knows what he's doing. Women are attracted to life's winners, the alpha males always have been. Even the most radical feminist doesn't want a man who's a pussy.

[Asker]

"it's ok for dudes to sleep around, but it's not ok for chicks?" Its not about right or wrong people have their own dating and sexual prefrences

[WhiteSteve]

Yeah, I mean I think humans are just naturally visually attracted to fit bodies, but it's not so black and white that you're either jacked or you're assed out with the ladies. I'm in pretty decent shape but you won't catch me on the cover of Men's Fitness, and still my girlfriend isn't into it at all, she liked me better when I was fatter, haha. She thinks Kevin James is hot, bro. And by most people's accounts, she qualifies as a hot chick, the point being that there's someone out there who's into anything, whatever it is. I don't know what, if anything, you feel is holding you back from being perceived as a winner in the eyes of some women, if that's the issue. But what's holding you back from winning? We all have our built in obstacles but you work around them and use and/or develop other attractive attributes. Identify what you think is holding you back, figure out what can be changed or worked to your favor, and be disciplined in your follow-through. Walk out the door thinking you'll win👍

[Asker]

Lol in my book im a winner, I certainly feel like it with my fiancee.

[WhiteSteve]

Bro, if you have a fiancée, then what's the problem? Why do you have so much animosity towards women you don't have to even have anything to do with?

[IHateLife]

Ah MGTOW, you gloriously pathetic fools you. You're every bit as bad as feminists. The next season of survivor should be you vs them. The catch is both groups can never come back to America.

[Asker]

Quite a few years ago, I had the pleasure of watching the Dutch version of Survivor (Expeditie Robinson) with my feminist roommate. That particular season would have two islands, one populated by men and one populated by women. My roommate had been promoting that particular series to me and the other students in the house for weeks because it would show us, according to her, what a society run by women – free from the evils of patriarchy – would be like.
And it did. Oh it did.
Here is what happened: initially both groups were dropped on their respective islands, given some supplies to get started and left to fend for themselves. In both groups there was some initial squabbling as people tried to figure out a local hierarchy. The men pretty much did whatever they felt was necessary – there was no leader giving orders. Men who felt like hunting, foraging or fishing did so. Another guy decided he was fed up with sitting on sand and started making benches.

[Asker]

Others built a hut that gradually grew and evolved. Another guy cooked every night. Within days a neat little civilization was thriving, each day being slightly more prosperous than the previous one.
The women settled into a routine as well. The hung up a clothesline to dry their towels, then proceeded to sunbathe and squabble. Because unlike men, women were unable to do anything without consensus of the whole group. And because it was a group of at least a dozen women, consensus was never reached. During the next few episodes, the women ate all their initial supplies, got drenched by tropical storms several times, were eaten alive by sand fleas and were generally miserable. The men on the other hand, were quite content. There were disagreements of course, but they were generally resolved.
Eventually, the people running the program decided something had to change. In order to help the women out, three men would be selected to go to their island.

[Asker]

In return, three women would take their place at the men’s island. The look on my feminist roommates face during this episode was priceless.
Initially, the three men selected for the women’s island were ecstatic, for obvious reason. But then they arrived at the island and were greeted by the women.
‘Where is your hut?’, they asked.
‘We have no hut’
‘Where are your supplies?’ they asked, dismayed
‘We ate all the rice’
And so on. The three men ended up working like dogs, using all the skills developed by trial and error in their first few weeks – building a hut, fish, trying to get the women to forage. The women continued to bitch and sunbathe. The three women who were sent to the men’s island were delighted – food, shelter and plenty of male attention was freely available. They too continued to sunbathe.
And that my friends, is what patriarchy is. My former roommate, unsurprisingly, is no longer a feminist.

[Asker]

Now this might all be a fluke, a white raven, an exceptional case not representative of society as whole. But that particular season of Dutch Survivor is not unique. CBS broadcast several Survivor seasons in the US, where men and women started off in separate groups. In most cases (the Amazon and One World), the result was the same. The men quickly got their act together, getting access to food, fire and shelter while the women spent a lot of time and energy on petty little squabbles, eating their meager supplies, getting drenched in storms and generally being pathetic. The opposite situation, where men didn’t get their act together while women quickly built a functional micro society, has not yet been observed outside of feminist fiction, and it probably never will.

[IHateLife]

See, you're just as retarded as feminists. You site a scripted TV show as "proof" of something. When some feminist media outlet produces their "proof" from some biased experiments would you believe it? Of course you wouldn't so why believe this example? Just go your own way on your OWN. I am. I don't need some shit ideology to tell me how to do things.

[Asker]

I've experienced it myself, if you've ever gone outdoors where there were large numbers of women you'd see this. It's funny how quickly feminists fall back into the patriarchy when things get tough.

[Bon-Bon]

Because at this age some of the guys are also tired of random girls riding their dicks so they are ready to settle down.

[Kkaos]

It doesn't quite work like that though. Men in their early thirties are still attractive to younger girls. Younger guys generally aren't attracted to older women for relationships. Therefore a guy in his early thirties is less likely to go with a woman in her early thirties who's already slept around tons if he can get with a younger, more attractive girl who hasn't, especially if the older woman doesn't have much going for her.

[Bon-Bon]

@Kkaos not all guys feel that way. I know a lot of men ages from 29-35 who are still single and attractive. They want a serious girlfriend and don't go for the younger cute ones since they are not mature, they don't know what they want in life, very scattered. They go for the girls in their 30s who are attractive, you're 21 so you may not think so. They are interesting, they can challenge a man mentally, and they have their life together so don't expect a man to do everything for them

[Asker]

@Kkaos I agree with you. There's a difference between the girls a guy hooks up with for sex and the girl he marries. Younger women who haven't slept around are in the marraige material category.

[Anonymous]

this is hilarious! thanks for sharing, I needed a laugh

[fktheworld]

Last thing a real man wants is left overs from the carousel

[Anonymous]

because they are delusional

[Anonymous]

Sloppy seconds... no thanks!

[Asker]

Same straight. Don't want to dip your laddle into a lot full of another man's soup.