May happen for some. But I bet it works the same in reverse. It’s a blanket statement basically enforcing a stereotype. People who are the stereotype are way fewer in numbers that the “ stereotype would suggest.
I disagree. I'm sure there are quite a few instances where the girl tears the guy down the guy to feed her fragile ego and then cheats on him for no other reason than because she can.
I don’t what the fuck you’re talking about honestly. I’m seriously lost on this one. I will say labeling all men or women with one thing or another is misguided. Either or could make a toxic partner.
It was completely reversed for me. I built her up and helped her get to a better place and be a better person. She did nothing but put me down and make me feel like I was nothing. I should have been working on making myself a better person.
Men naturally get confidence from having been with many chicks but girls get confidence from one loyal partner only. Men get confidence from a loyal partner too but it's not the same as women
If a rule of thumb is true for both genders, why specify men and women in these specific positions if the opposite is also true. Although it's not false technically, it's kind of implying a message or misleading in my humble opinion.
Can you agree this statement is true without having to defend the other side of the coin? Seems like a knee jerk reaction... I never said it only happens to one gender... just currently tackling this side of the coin tonight? So?
Yes it's true in my opinion, but for both genders. I'll admit though, I think it's more common this way around because women seem to be more caring and less self-preserving in general.
My point is people can agree that this happens without having to say " It happens to both genders" because nobody is saying it doesn't. Agreeing doesn't automatically say you feel it's only ONE GENDER SIDED!
For me, personally, I was probably negatively affected by being rejected. But this was when I was a kid. 10 years old, 13 years old. But it wasn't their fault. It wasn't the girl's fault at all, in either case. They just either weren't interested in boys yet, or they just weren't interested in me. But it's all good; I learned my lesson. I guess the only downside for me was that I became very, very cautious, and it took me many years before I could summon the courage to express my feelings to a girl again. But I don't blame women for that. It just was, and it just is. What happened happened. (Or I should say, what didn't happen didn't happen.) It's life.
I'm not saying they damaged me at all. Again, it wasn't anything they did. I was just damaged by the experience. The women are not to blame in any way whatsoever.
You said: Though in a lot of cases women do damage men.
Then I said: women damage men in what way?
Then you said: A lot of ways, I'm sure.
Then I said: Ha Ha Ha oh no no no I am asking you Jamie OH 5 R H S... lol
Then you said: Nothing that came remotely to answering the question "how women damage men"
So I appreciate the story and I get "the women are not to blame" in any way... I guess my question is to your question... "When are they to blame?" of course going back to your original statement..." a lot of cases women do damage men"
That was a lot... I know but I hope you can feel my sense of confusion on the answer you given me? Yes? No?
Doesn't mean it's offensive.. could just mean you didn't deliver the goods!
She was probably hoping and praying like me that you would have a good explanation on "how women damage men" but to both our disappointment... YOU didn't!
Honestly it's dependent on the relationship it can swing either way. I would say it's pretty ignorant to try and categorise that kind of behavior under a single gender.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
41Opinion
I'd like to see the evidence of that. So far as I can tell I would say its the exact opposite.
I feel low key attacked 😂
low key attacked? what does that mean lol
It means I somewhat relate to this scenario
Oh okay gotcha!
May happen for some. But I bet it works the same in reverse. It’s a blanket statement basically enforcing a stereotype. People who are the stereotype are way fewer in numbers that the “ stereotype would suggest.
I disagree. I'm sure there are quite a few instances where the girl tears the guy down the guy to feed her fragile ego and then cheats on him for no other reason than because she can.
I don’t what the fuck you’re talking about honestly. I’m seriously lost on this one. I will say labeling all men or women with one thing or another is misguided. Either or could make a toxic partner.
It's confusing for some! Sorry dude!
What are you trying to ask?
Best answer is read through some of the comments! Probably help! check out leahzrc comment thread.
I am too harsh. So I might say thing but. It more then one cents.
That doesn't make cents.
It was completely reversed for me. I built her up and helped her get to a better place and be a better person. She did nothing but put me down and make me feel like I was nothing. I should have been working on making myself a better person.
No, because I don't deal with men who try to damage me.
Only if most women treat their men well, and most men treat their women badly.
Omg totally agree! That's what makes me furious and frustrated even more aaaaghhhhh
What kind of damage and it’s depends how much damages is it?
Sortabht more like if you are with someone that works well with you you won't have problems
It should be too many men are building themselves up so the next woman can tear him down.
Unfortunately, yes..
It's sad to see how most people lack any respect for themselves and other people, nowadays
Men naturally get confidence from having been with many chicks but girls get confidence from one loyal partner only. Men get confidence from a loyal partner too but it's not the same as women
This seems very one sided. Women are capable of great damage to men. The thing is that unless you take the risk of getting hurt, nothing ever happens.
Too many bad choices by both genders damage them for the next one because of the incorrect mindset held by so many that says "all are like that."
No, you can switch the genders and that happens too?
Why is that a no? I didn't say it couldn't happen the other way around.
If a rule of thumb is true for both genders, why specify men and women in these specific positions if the opposite is also true. Although it's not false technically, it's kind of implying a message or misleading in my humble opinion.
Can you agree this statement is true without having to defend the other side of the coin? Seems like a knee jerk reaction... I never said it only happens to one gender... just currently tackling this side of the coin tonight? So?
Yes it's true in my opinion, but for both genders. I'll admit though, I think it's more common this way around because women seem to be more caring and less self-preserving in general.
My point is people can agree that this happens without having to say " It happens to both genders" because nobody is saying it doesn't. Agreeing doesn't automatically say you feel it's only ONE GENDER SIDED!
Probably true, unfortunately.
Though in a lot of cases women do damage men.
women damage men in what way?
A lot of ways, I'm sure. Ask that as a question on here and you're sure to get plenty of answers.
Ha Ha Ha oh no no no I am asking you Jamie OH 5 R H S... lol
For me, personally, I was probably negatively affected by being rejected. But this was when I was a kid. 10 years old, 13 years old. But it wasn't their fault. It wasn't the girl's fault at all, in either case. They just either weren't interested in boys yet, or they just weren't interested in me. But it's all good; I learned my lesson. I guess the only downside for me was that I became very, very cautious, and it took me many years before I could summon the courage to express my feelings to a girl again. But I don't blame women for that. It just was, and it just is. What happened happened. (Or I should say, what didn't happen didn't happen.) It's life.
There ya go, @coachTanthony. I answered. :)
So you are saying "women" damaged you "unintentionally'?
I'm not saying they damaged me at all. Again, it wasn't anything they did. I was just damaged by the experience. The women are not to blame in any way whatsoever.
Okay.. . let's try this again.
You said: Though in a lot of cases women do damage men.
Then I said: women damage men in what way?
Then you said: A lot of ways, I'm sure.
Then I said: Ha Ha Ha oh no no no I am asking you Jamie OH 5 R H S... lol
Then you said: Nothing that came remotely to answering the question "how women damage men"
So I appreciate the story and I get "the women are not to blame" in any way... I guess my question is to your question... "When are they to blame?" of course going back to your original statement..." a lot of cases women do damage men"
That was a lot... I know but I hope you can feel my sense of confusion on the answer you given me? Yes? No?
I feel like I'm testifying before Congress in a committee hearing right now. I think I would like to invoke executive privilege.
You got me on a weird night of " I can't stand answers that are generalized with no reasonable explanation."
congratulations!
Lol. Thanks.
Also, what's with the pink downvote? What did I say that was offensive? I'm genuinely curious to know. I will apologize if an apology I warranted.
"is"
Doesn't mean it's offensive.. could just mean you didn't deliver the goods!
She was probably hoping and praying like me that you would have a good explanation on "how women damage men" but to both our disappointment... YOU didn't!
You know what? 🙄
https://youtu.be/cDWgs2cnga0
Ha Ha Ha okay dude.. have a good night!
I was just joking, Coach. 😜
That's not cool man! lol
Lol.
Honestly it's dependent on the relationship it can swing either way. I would say it's pretty ignorant to try and categorise that kind of behavior under a single gender.