Agree but it doesn't have to be from the same man. A wealthy man with good paternal skill would be a good choice to raise your kids but he could have shitty genes. In that case you have to cheat on him with some Chad Thundercock to make sure your kid gets decent genes.
Most Helpful Opinions
Since an estimated 10000 years or so, I don't see it like this any longer.
Women rather care about their OWN... standing in the picture.
Which is their right of course.
And as long as that attitude is agreeable to everyone involved, I will not throw the first stone :)
- u
"best genes"
if that were true... we would not be were we are today and the current situation, lmfao
it's been 40,000 years... how much longer does it take for the best to show up, lol
disagree
women want to be happy and loved, with someone they love. With 7 billion people on earth we don't care about genes anymore :D
Artificial Intelligence
Love is such a complex and multifaceted experience, don't you think? To boil down women's goals to just securing the best genes and obtaining security feels a bit like we're in a nature documentary, doesn't it? Sure, on a very primal level, there's an inkling of truth there—after all, we're all part of the great circle of life. But let's not forget the rich tapestry of wants, desires, and aspirations that women (and all humans, for that matter) have. Love, passion, career ambitions, personal growth, adventure... the list goes on. So, while there might be a kernel of evolutionary truth in that statement, it's definitely not the whole story. Women, like men, are beautifully complex creatures with goals as diverse as the stars in the sky. 🌟
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
14Opinion
A lot of women these days don't want to have any kids at all and many of them don't even look for security for themselves.
- m
I agree with a part of it
tho rest doesn't make sense, a guy could have good genes but only that, no social skills no survival skills no nothing to give but his good genes meanwhile another guy without any good genes yet he is capable of giving a lot to the relationship or woman he is with n is actually more useful than the guy with only good genes which makes him more needed in his own community
soo?
I’m a woman and I don’t care about either one of those things. Even when I’m old enough to worry about having kids, I’m not gonna think about it in terms of genes.
Of course. This is a coach question.
DISAGREE!
Its kinda like the woman who says to the Scientist professor..
" With my looks and your brain , imagine the quality of our children "
Answer " Yes , but what if they have my looks and your brain? " .
When you reduce everything to evolutionary mechanic, then I agree.
First one is the lust factor, second the socio-economic factor of partner with high social status. Both come rarely in double pack. Second is usable, first one is likable.This is genuinely starting to get concerning how far you’re taking this redpill satire stuff
I saw your question about alpha males, and it just confirms what i already knew, that you never did have anything worth listening to. I mean you obsess over robots.
I would be very surprised if most people think that far ahead.
I personally aim to obtain a man who will binge an anime with me while we cuddle but eh might just be me
You should have added the word relationship goals lol😂.
Goals for is a broader term covering various aspects of lifeIn my case I disagree with both of those. First I can't bare children so that is out the window. Second I have no need for a man to support me as I am doing better then most of the men I know.
Ideally yes, but the wold isn't ideal.
Most women and men aren't going to get the man or woman of their dreams.
Gotta settle for what they can get.I think for biology it's mainly the first goal. But the first goal can include the second goal to some degree.
To you genes are only about being over 6 feet and having a chiseled jaw and hunter eyes. Look at Gen Alpha kids, a lot of them are mentally ill taking multiple pills just to function properly. That doesn't sound like women are caring about the genes of the next generation. But of course as long as the kids get to be over 6'4 then mission accomplished, right? Have fun with your dysgenic but tall gene pool.
Those are good goals…if it’s just that simple.
Now that men know what women are looking for… makes dating so much easier right?
Best genes?
Well if that is true, it sure hasn't worked too well now, has it?
Biologically I agree with that as far as reproduction goes, from a psychological and sociological perspective humans are really complex.
For me personally that's not a goal necessarily and it's never been my top priority so I am going to have to disagree with this one. Lol!
You only mention one goal - what is the other one?
Learn more