No that's edited and if you do get a video I promise it will be a fish eye lens it always is, its the only way to show the curve fisheye lens like on gopro
I am not in the position to prove myth. The fact that the earth is round is well established, three ways: 1 Satellite orbits wouldn't work in you're world model 2 Distances between two points on a sphere vs on a flat surface are different so the polar shortcut used by airplanes just wouldn't work 3 the fact that on sea the first point you see on an incoming mass is the top structure (instead of the front structure).
Now I will not argue that the planet is a hyper sphere, as most angelic and Biblical sources claim that the world is actually flat (Dee and Kelly specifically addressed this question to the Enochian Angels and they stated emphatically that the earth was flat) therefore the only way I can reconcile the two in my head is if they were looking at the world from a higher dimensional perspective. Just as we see a circle on a flat piece of paper as flat, so would someone who was looking at a sphere from a 4th dimensional perspective see the sphere as flat).
1) satellites are up in question there someone people think there not real, others say there real but there attached to a balloon and not floating in space, I believe they are attached to a balloon cause that what the evidence shows, ( Brazil satellite balloon). 2) no its fine cause the air current rotates in a circle on a flat disc not hard, especially since the pole is in the center while Antarctica circles the whole area we live in 3) just pull out your phone zoom in and the whole boat comes back into view, everyone is buying P90X cameras to test how far they can see, plus the Pythagorean circle earth which dictates how much curve the earth has per mile 8 inches per mile square, so at 50 miles the boat should be unsee able, cause of the 1600 foot curve of the earth so why does everyone still see the boat,? And how about you take the text literally, and see if NASA is telling the truth
You misunderstand, I have used satellite imagery, and know the tech behind it. Yes their are some high altitude balloons, but when we are talking many thousands of miles up (geosynchronous equatorial orbit (GEO) is a circular orbit 35,786 kilometres (22,236 mi) above the Earth's equator and following the direction of the Earth's rotation.) and dealing with signal strength and noise ratio at those distances is a beast. Much easier to deal with high altitude balloons 18,000 to 37,000 metres (59,000 to 121,000 ft; 11 to 23 mi). which are easy to track and communicate with. But they don't stay in place unlike satellites. How do I know that the distances are correct? Due to signal strength and yes I've seen signal tests on the ground before launch, there is no reason to lie (why spend the money, and weight of a powerful transmitter just to throttle the signal to try and fool, who, and why?).
To say they are not real is to say that many peoples TV in the west aren't working, and certain types of cellphones wouldn't work. Again I've spent time tracking, and communicating with satellites. play with this for a moment, and see what I mean. Again you are dealing with distances of several thousand miles. www.directv.com/DTVAPP/customer/dishPointer.jsp
How can they go thousands of miles up when the Dome is only 100 miles high? Its in the video, I put up you can see for yourself or watch on YouTube ( rocket hits dome)
I told you signal strength of satellites is the best proof I can give. That and tracking of geosynchronous orbits of those satellites, distance of a given radio signal can easily be calculated and extremely difficult (if not impossible) to fake. as two separate receivers can triangulate the location of a given signal. I gave you the tool that Direct TV uses to allow their members to set Azimuth and direction, so you can easily triangulate it yourself using simple Trig. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DirecTV_satellite_fleet gives you the name and location of their satellites and the tool to set your dish would allow you to take any two points on a map and set triangulation coordinators
As the given angle of attack falls into Trig the distance of the C leg can be calculated by any high school advanced math student here's an online calculator to do it yourself www.symbolab.com/.../trigonometric-equation-calculator Just take two points a few hundred miles apart and get the angles involved then calculate the top of the triangle.
Their is virtually no way to fake this (nor any economic reason to do so)
Both, there are high altitude balloons used for weather tracking and other scientific research en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-altitude_balloon Satellites certainly sexist, again I've seen them on the ground and communicated with them in space. I've tracked them, and a company I once owned looked into buying one. I've used satellite imagery for business, and have been in a room where real time satellite tracking of ground vehicles was performed. I've been around for ground testing of transmitters etc. There are satellites. And yes they sit several thousand miles above the surface of the planet (I gave you the tools to be able to calculate their height yourself.)
That video was of a solar powered high altitude weather station. Yes it was connected to a balloon, they're used all of the time. There's a big difference between that and a space based communications package over 2000 miles up.
No I want to see it, I don't believe anything without visual evidence, there are too many issues with satellite's, supposedly there are rocks constantly coming into the earths atmosphere going at the speed of 20,000 mph one rock can destroy a satellite, for over 50+ years over 13,000+ satellite's, and not a single report of a satellite crash until 2015 and Flat earth came out 2014, I don't believe that to be possible that for 50 years in a random spot in space not a single satellite crash, when there is constant rocks coming in supposedly, and over 13,000 satellite, so if there are satellite's up there I don't believe there thousands of miles up like I said I go based off physical evidence alone
Here's Boeing's satellite catalog take a look at the size difference. www.boeing.com/space/boeing-satellite-family/ These things are HUGE compared to that little thing. Standing next to one (I have) is just awe inspiring.
13,000 + satellites let's say that the majority are on a geosynchronous orbit thats' a circle (most satellites are circling the equate's) of roughly 1,500,000,000 miles in other words 1 sat for every 119,000 miles that's a lot of empty space, add into that that the rocks you are talking about are covering the entire surface not just a band of a few hundred miles and the odds become more in the favor of the sats rather then the rocks.
As for seeing it yourself you can buy and launch your own satellite for between about $50,000.00 US for a pico LEO sat to several hundred million for a full sized com sat. put your own package on and prove it to yourself. Again the best proof is simply doing the math on a transmitter triangulation.
You are assuming you know there that high, and even if they where there would still be a crash in 50 years hands down, but let's be honest the government lies all the time, not just that but the rockets never go straight up, they always turn to the side, one rocket ship got caught turning going towards the ocean and landing on an Island, on the same day, lol NASA got caught now there trying to hide it, the fact that the challenger rocket exploded supposedly killing 7 people 6 of them where found a few years later, its a giant lie, but people don't believe that there government would lie to them which is stupid
Again no assumption, it can easily be worked out with basic trig. Take an antenna point it at the radio source, move a set distance away take the same antenna find the dame radio source and calculate the distance of the source. Simple radio triangulation the math is high school trig, even pre-trig. The antenna and receiver can both be made at home with a basic understanding of electronics and virtually impossible to fake.
No is it physically up in space!!! getting a signal means very little, I have gotten plenty of signals I WANT TO SEE IT, I want to see it launch and if it goes side ways I'm discrediting it immediately
Then you are doomed to forever believe what you will. Rockets don't go straight up for a reason, why waste fuel when using the curvature of the earth to your advantage is more economical? But as you don't believe in the curved surface we are at an impasse.
I discredit it because we have one Rocket going side ways, then another going straight up and hitting something, WHO IS TELLING THE TRUTH? You say its the government I say there lying, choice
it's a square because: "Revelation 7:1 And after these things I saw four angels standing on the four corners of the earth, holding the four winds of the earth"
No that is not the shadow of the earth on the moon, the moon has been proven to be its own light source, so its part of its function, and no the sun does not reflect its light off the moon, the moon light is colder than the shade itself
You need to understand scientist say the sun reflects its light off the moon, so that would make the moon light warm cause of the sun rays, and it should not be colder than the shade, which means this picture is fake it does not happen in real life, https://www.visuallearningsys.com/ds/images/18.jpg
@razor97 you are 16 I spent the last 3 to 4 years studying science, on my own accord, I wasn't forced like you in High School so shut up you sound stupid
No I don't believe in gravity anymore, there are too many Issues with the theory, no I just believe what GOD said the stars and planets are living entities that move around at GODS order
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
36Opinion
you can even see the curve from eyes. Dude, you dont need to do that. Get a life.
Show me the curve
You could see it from great heights. I had.
I have been in planes thousands of feet in the air never seen the curve
I have been too and I have seen.
Show me
Come to India.
flatearthscienceandbible.files.wordpress.com/.../img_9950.jpeg
erezmarom.deviantart.com/.../Curvature-of-the-Earth-165243474
No that's edited and if you do get a video I promise it will be a fish eye lens it always is, its the only way to show the curve fisheye lens like on gopro
but it ain't a fish eye. When I am telling I have seen myself.
No you fucking retard.
Ok then disprove it
It is a common mistake to look at myth, and allegory as absolute truth. Don't be that person.
Who told you it was myth and how can you prove that
I am not in the position to prove myth. The fact that the earth is round is well established, three ways:
1 Satellite orbits wouldn't work in you're world model
2 Distances between two points on a sphere vs on a flat surface are different so the polar shortcut used by airplanes just wouldn't work
3 the fact that on sea the first point you see on an incoming mass is the top structure (instead of the front structure).
Now I will not argue that the planet is a hyper sphere, as most angelic and Biblical sources claim that the world is actually flat (Dee and Kelly specifically addressed this question to the Enochian Angels and they stated emphatically that the earth was flat) therefore the only way I can reconcile the two in my head is if they were looking at the world from a higher dimensional perspective. Just as we see a circle on a flat piece of paper as flat, so would someone who was looking at a sphere from a 4th dimensional perspective see the sphere as flat).
1) satellites are up in question there someone people think there not real, others say there real but there attached to a balloon and not floating in space, I believe they are attached to a balloon cause that what the evidence shows, ( Brazil satellite balloon). 2) no its fine cause the air current rotates in a circle on a flat disc not hard, especially since the pole is in the center while Antarctica circles the whole area we live in 3) just pull out your phone zoom in and the whole boat comes back into view, everyone is buying P90X cameras to test how far they can see, plus the Pythagorean circle earth which dictates how much curve the earth has per mile 8 inches per mile square, so at 50 miles the boat should be unsee able, cause of the 1600 foot curve of the earth so why does everyone still see the boat,? And how about you take the text literally, and see if NASA is telling the truth
You misunderstand, I have used satellite imagery, and know the tech behind it. Yes their are some high altitude balloons, but when we are talking many thousands of miles up (geosynchronous equatorial orbit (GEO) is a circular orbit 35,786 kilometres (22,236 mi) above the Earth's equator and following the direction of the Earth's rotation.) and dealing with signal strength and noise ratio at those distances is a beast. Much easier to deal with high altitude balloons 18,000 to 37,000 metres (59,000 to 121,000 ft; 11 to 23 mi). which are easy to track and communicate with. But they don't stay in place unlike satellites. How do I know that the distances are correct? Due to signal strength and yes I've seen signal tests on the ground before launch, there is no reason to lie (why spend the money, and weight of a powerful transmitter just to throttle the signal to try and fool, who, and why?).
To say they are not real is to say that many peoples TV in the west aren't working, and certain types of cellphones wouldn't work. Again I've spent time tracking, and communicating with satellites. play with this for a moment, and see what I mean. Again you are dealing with distances of several thousand miles. www.directv.com/DTVAPP/customer/dishPointer.jsp
How can they go thousands of miles up when the Dome is only 100 miles high? Its in the video, I put up you can see for yourself or watch on YouTube ( rocket hits dome)
No it hit's the stratosphere, part of the atmosphere around the planet. Things have certainly gone higher then the 100 mile mark.
Prove it
I told you signal strength of satellites is the best proof I can give. That and tracking of geosynchronous orbits of those satellites, distance of a given radio signal can easily be calculated and extremely difficult (if not impossible) to fake. as two separate receivers can triangulate the location of a given signal. I gave you the tool that Direct TV uses to allow their members to set Azimuth and direction, so you can easily triangulate it yourself using simple Trig. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DirecTV_satellite_fleet gives you the name and location of their satellites and the tool to set your dish would allow you to take any two points on a map and set triangulation coordinators
As the given angle of attack falls into Trig the distance of the C leg can be calculated by any high school advanced math student here's an online calculator to do it yourself www.symbolab.com/.../trigonometric-equation-calculator Just take two points a few hundred miles apart and get the angles involved then calculate the top of the triangle.
Their is virtually no way to fake this (nor any economic reason to do so)
So are satellite's in space or hanging by balloons or do they exist at all. https://youtu.be/WAiq6Pggfy4
Both, there are high altitude balloons used for weather tracking and other scientific research en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-altitude_balloon Satellites certainly sexist, again I've seen them on the ground and communicated with them in space. I've tracked them, and a company I once owned looked into buying one. I've used satellite imagery for business, and have been in a room where real time satellite tracking of ground vehicles was performed. I've been around for ground testing of transmitters etc. There are satellites. And yes they sit several thousand miles above the surface of the planet (I gave you the tools to be able to calculate their height yourself.)
That video was of a solar powered high altitude weather station. Yes it was connected to a balloon, they're used all of the time. There's a big difference between that and a space based communications package over 2000 miles up.
No I want to see it, I don't believe anything without visual evidence, there are too many issues with satellite's, supposedly there are rocks constantly coming into the earths atmosphere going at the speed of 20,000 mph one rock can destroy a satellite, for over 50+ years over 13,000+ satellite's, and not a single report of a satellite crash until 2015 and Flat earth came out 2014, I don't believe that to be possible that for 50 years in a random spot in space not a single satellite crash, when there is constant rocks coming in supposedly, and over 13,000 satellite, so if there are satellite's up there I don't believe there thousands of miles up like I said I go based off physical evidence alone
Here's Boeing's satellite catalog take a look at the size difference. www.boeing.com/space/boeing-satellite-family/
These things are HUGE compared to that little thing. Standing next to one (I have) is just awe inspiring.
13,000 + satellites let's say that the majority are on a geosynchronous orbit thats' a circle (most satellites are circling the equate's) of roughly 1,500,000,000 miles in other words 1 sat for every 119,000 miles that's a lot of empty space, add into that that the rocks you are talking about are covering the entire surface not just a band of a few hundred miles and the odds become more in the favor of the sats rather then the rocks.
As for seeing it yourself you can buy and launch your own satellite for between about $50,000.00 US for a pico LEO sat to several hundred million for a full sized com sat. put your own package on and prove it to yourself. Again the best proof is simply doing the math on a transmitter triangulation.
You are assuming you know there that high, and even if they where there would still be a crash in 50 years hands down, but let's be honest the government lies all the time, not just that but the rockets never go straight up, they always turn to the side, one rocket ship got caught turning going towards the ocean and landing on an Island, on the same day, lol NASA got caught now there trying to hide it, the fact that the challenger rocket exploded supposedly killing 7 people 6 of them where found a few years later, its a giant lie, but people don't believe that there government would lie to them which is stupid
Alive
Again no assumption, it can easily be worked out with basic trig. Take an antenna point it at the radio source, move a set distance away take the same antenna find the dame radio source and calculate the distance of the source. Simple radio triangulation the math is high school trig, even pre-trig. The antenna and receiver can both be made at home with a basic understanding of electronics and virtually impossible to fake.
No is it physically up in space!!! getting a signal means very little, I have gotten plenty of signals I WANT TO SEE IT, I want to see it launch and if it goes side ways I'm discrediting it immediately
Then you are doomed to forever believe what you will. Rockets don't go straight up for a reason, why waste fuel when using the curvature of the earth to your advantage is more economical? But as you don't believe in the curved surface we are at an impasse.
I discredit it because we have one Rocket going side ways, then another going straight up and hitting something, WHO IS TELLING THE TRUTH? You say its the government I say there lying, choice
https://youtu.be/IAcp3BFBYw4
It's triangular
Prove it
Because I said so. That's all the proof that's needed.
Ohh you are one of those bye
I like this answer 😂😂
The irony, it hurts haha
it's a square because: "Revelation 7:1
And after these things I saw four angels standing on the four corners of the earth, holding the four winds of the earth"
the fact that the discussion of the world being flat versus it being a sphere even exists makes me want to go jump off a bridge
To bad more and more people are coming to the truth
Can you spell "M-O-R-O-N?"
This is really reaching right now.
So what is an eclipse then?
No that is not the shadow of the earth on the moon, the moon has been proven to be its own light source, so its part of its function, and no the sun does not reflect its light off the moon, the moon light is colder than the shade itself
I have no words...
Its all over the internet they found out the moon is giving off cold light, that's a fact now, and that alone changes a ton of science
So because it's all over the Internet it's fact?
You need to understand scientist say the sun reflects its light off the moon, so that would make the moon light warm cause of the sun rays, and it should not be colder than the shade, which means this picture is fake it does not happen in real life, https://www.visuallearningsys.com/ds/images/18.jpg
are you serious...
Yes prove the earth is a ball and you win thousands of dollars everyone has failed,
so pictures from space stations and satlites not good enough
the fact you can't sail a boat into nothingness and you keep going around or a plane or any mode of transport
that there is studies doen showing the complete curvature of the earth...
all the other planets you see through telescopes are round...
No you assume those things go look into it before you judge it, cause you have no idea what's real and what's fake, you assume its the truth
he doesn't believe in science
@razor97 you are 16 I spent the last 3 to 4 years studying science, on my own accord, I wasn't forced like you in High School so shut up you sound stupid
you didn't. you denied science and evidence. the scientists discovered it, not you.
and now what, you call me stupid. idiot
@razor97 show me physical evidence that hasn't been disproven
get a telescope
@razor97 yeah I'll see a bunch of lights now prove what they are
Welcome back
nope
Prove its a ball
i never said it was or wasn't a ball
do you believe in gravity?
You believe its a ball so prove it
first prove i said it was a ball
exactly
does the sky double as a lcd screen that broadcasts different constelations to make us believe its round?
No I don't believe in gravity anymore, there are too many Issues with the theory, no I just believe what GOD said the stars and planets are living entities that move around at GODS order
then why dont be float away when we jump? is there a invisible rope keeping me to the ground?
You only need gravity on a globe earth, you don't need it in a flat enclosed earth, look into it a study it out
It's a Klein bottle.
I agree
Hnmm
If the Earth is flat, jump off the edges lol
There is no edge only the dome
No its round.
Prove it
get on a plane and look out the window while flying to another country
I did and its flat, for 8 hours literally
get your eyes checked
Go look for yourself so you know I'm telling the truth
i am not sure
Lol.