Search Results: negative feelings

The last time I ever the word “slut” being used consistently was way back in HS in the late 90s. I realize it might have been a zeitgeist a the time. However I do remember girls having their own set of negative labels for men like “creep” readily available back then too.

However ever since college I’ve noticed more and more women liberally using the word “creep” with no justification other than just getting a bad “feeling” from a guy. The even worse insult “pedo” is becoming more common too. Just today a woman on GAG suspected that her “virtual friend” might be a potential pedo/rapist just because the guy mentioned his stepdad abused his stepbrothers. She seriously thinks that pedophilia might be genetic.

Anyway I hear fewer and fewer men throw out gender specific insults to women nowadays. Especially if they unprovoked. Men know women usually get most upset when they are unfairly labeled promiscuous. Feminists have gone one/way ape shit when men (and other women) used this insult. I think it’s working because I’ve noticed fewer and fewer female specific insults like “slut, whore and cunt” being consistently used nowadays

However I do hear women call men (and even call other women) nasty insults like “creep” or worse “pedo” with no proof other than a “feeling” they have.

It also seems that when men are unfairly labeled something they almost zero recourse. If they get angry they just look more guilty or something.

Even when one of the worst of the worst insults like “pedo” used more often against me nowadays against men and there is a double standard attitude about it. Like the man is somehow justifiably labeled that due to “a feeling” a woman has (different story if there is solid proof). Like her feeling in itself justifies and vindicates whatever “feeling” she has as absolute truth or some insanity.

Is it just me observing this societal trend?

I believe that 95% of people are lying if they say that race has absolutely no negative connotations when perceiving an individual. It’s think it just happens, whether they think it’s wrong or not. And by negative, this could mean a superiority complex, or just feeling like their foreign, and not in a particularly positive way. Creates a sense of unspoken separation that can only be felt.
This does not mean that they support lynching or slavery, just a connotation that could be intrusive.

I've seen this done in terms of missionary support for 3rd world country children who often have nothing. Given the financial divide in the USA and risks to the country if that continues, would you consider doing something similar for under-privileged kids in your country?

Would you engage in a program to support under privileged kids in terms of mentorship, financial contribution, material goods? It is by your choice and good will.

Example: Sponsor a kid... place $ (even if it's $1 a month) in savings account for their education, check in on grades and progress, provide guidance, wisdom and support. In effect... support other peoples children. Kids may need more than one sponsor until realistic goals are met. Kids are held to standards by community.

Possibly... your contributions to this are directly deductible to your taxes? maybe...

Additional details:

You are giving $ to people today, via the government... section 8 housing, free education, welfare, food stamps, etc.. In my view, it's inefficient and loses a lot of the value to "community connection".. because you are not directly involved, nor are you feeling the results of your investment, personal rewards from your hard work. It feels like a negative because taxation and govt theft via inflation feels bad. It's an "indirect model" of distribution. The other option, is to give directly to someone you know... even if you've only met them on "facetime" or a few times.