Search Results: arguing with mother

The Vances oppose abortion for religious reasons, but tends not to mix that subject with the birthrate conversation except to say that with all the new restrictions on reproductive choice, it would make sense to do more for young mothers financially.

Rather than religious belief, Musks supporters are motivated by a fear that humanity will not replace itself. They dismiss immigration as a remedy, arguing that it can weaken the culture of the receiving country.

This Musk aligned group, which embraces assisted reproduction, is most visibly identified with Malcolm & Simone Collins, a media-friendly couple with 4 children born through IVF. They favor using genetic selection to pick embryos with desirable characteristics, an approach that Christian groups typically oppose. The Collinses said they recently composed a suite of suggested executive orders and sent them to allies in the White House. They include deregulating child care businesses to bring down the cost, and loosening car seat laws, which can now require buying larger vehicles to accommodate more than two children. Another would create an award for women who have six or more children, versions of which exist in a handful of countries, including France.

An agenda that prioritizes large families makes plenty of people queasy. Groups like Population Connection worry that the tactics required to raise birthrates can verge on authoritarianism, and believe that the consequences of population loss aren’t as catastrophic as pronatalists make them out to be. And increasing numbers of young people do not want to burden the planet by having children of their own.

Nevertheless, pro-natalists want the administration to establish a commission to elevate and study the subject, as well as to infuse their priorities across the federal government. The Biden administration screened many policies and grant applications for their impact on climate change and racial equity, they point out; the same could be done for procreation.

I was on social media watching a funny skit it was talking about age gaps and in it someone made a joke about this generation making certain age gaps weird which I fully agree with. The gap that was mentioned in the skit was 19 and 17 dating wise. The guy making the skit said that that’s not a weird gap at all which I agreed with and so I went to the comments mostly by accident but I saw that there were actually people in the comments trying to argue that it’s weird for a 19yr old to date a 17 yr old or that it depends on on if the girl is 17 turning 18 or if she had just turned 17. I’ll post a pic down below for reference. Now I’ve had my own fair share of problems dealing with dating I’m a bit older but I do often get girls quit a few years younger then me that take interest. Which I’ve given these girls a shot the gap is bigger then 17 and 19 but I still got some flack for it. But seriously since when did 17/19 become a weird thing they are literally within the same age bracket and the people that argue against these age gaps never make any sense with their arguments cause it’s always contradictory one I’ve heard for bigger age gaps for girls who are 18 dating older guys is that oh just cause it’s legal doesn’t mean it’s right and that 18 to 19 is still a child. But then in this context they are fully treating the age of 19 as an adult and saying 17 is a minor which it is but if 19 is still widely considered the age of a child then this gap shouldn’t be an issue. You see what I mean they pick and choose when someone gets to be an adult based on their own agenda and it’s really freakin weird. Makes me wonder what’s gonna happen in future generations ratings already shit just seems like it’s getting worse with these weird age restrictions especially since most girls within that range tend to date up woman in general tend to date guys a great deal older then them from what I seen. My mother and father have a 10 year gap. I don't know maybe I’m crazy.