Hey, someone needed to make a take like this, so congrats. However, I feel just a smidge sorry for you. After all, you're going to get so much hate in your inbox.
I just make it a point to point out inaccuracies and ignorance when it comes up, i don't cherry pick. I care about everybody. Egalitarians are pro feminism, not anti.
Most people who complain about egalitarianism just want to be free to spout their hate speech while convinced they're super cool and special cuz they're black/white/male/female/whatever.
4
7 Reply
myTake Owner
+1 y
Thanks for posting. Helps me get around listing user names.
Equalitarians are suppose to be pro-feminism but aren't as shown on GAG daily. Instead of admitting equalitarians are guilty of this you just write off people who point this out as being "convinced they're super cool and special cuz they're black/white/male/female/whatever".
No i was talking about the usual people who attack egalitarianism. I wasn't directing that toward you as I don't see the people you described as true egalitarians. I wouldn't refer to them that way. And for the same reason i wouldn't say "man hating feminists are only the minority" because i feel man hating is so out of line with the philosophy that it's destructive to the cause with feminism (as is feminism hating with egalitarianism) that it's unfair to the actual movement to give those people validation with the title.
The main point i disagree with is that. I don't believe it's constructive or mature to demonize an entire movement because of title-stealing radicals. Can't you see you're doing exactly what those men are doing with feminism? It completely invalidates any point you're trying to make.
Some guy says "i hate ladies" Some lady says "some guy said this, i hate guys, that's why I'm a feminist" Some guy says "some feminist said this, i hate feminists, that's why I'm an egalitarian" You say "some egalitarian said this, i hate egalitarians"
Can't you see the fallacy and hypocrisy of your statement, and the destructive tangent you're playing part to?
I don't hate equalitarians. I think the view is very noble if done as the meaning implies, but I do get what you're saying. Just like how some equalitarians judge feminism based on a select few I've let my view of the select users on GAG skew my view of Equalitarians.
"the advocacy of women's rights on the grounds of political, social, and economic equality to men". Yes an "advocacy of women's rights" created by women who assume they completely understand men's lives.
better than learning from your liberal teachers and ultra liberal college professors. I'll give you about 10 years to realize how much feminism has insidiously manipulated the public education system.
Well more like YOU are the example of so called hypocritical "equalist" by going by the name "feminist". I don't hate feminism because it helps women. I hate feminism because it ultimately HURTS BOTH WOMEN AND MEN. If you ever escape your circle of liberal man haters you may discover that many women actually WANT a traditional lifestyle where the man takes the LEAD. Feminism is responsible for creating a generation of passive, pleasing sensitive nice guys that most women DON'T WANT. You women shame and blame masculinity. Being raised by a dominate mother, public high school and ultra liberal college I found this out the hard way. However now that I'm older and I'm past all that PC bullshit I understand the real culprit. It's women like you that are manipulating politics. It's women like you controlling public education, the media and influencing hollywood. You are not beyond reproach and this is not how mother nature intended things to be. That's why I'm speaking up.
I'm neither an equalist or feminist so your statement is invalid. You're so frustrated that you're trying to label me in order to justify your attacks. It's amazing that some users said they read this yet use the same examples I gave of the most common attacks used by users that aren't happy when you display a different opinion from them.
My apologies though. You aren't an example of a equalitarian. You are an example of a misogynist based on your latest response. Not only do you have a problem with women but you also take issue with liberals.
well why are you co-mingling separate issues in your take such as racism/homophobia when feminism is supposed to be (as Google defined) a "advocacy towards women's rights"? I didn't see any definition on Google saying it was outside of gender. You brought up separate issues like gay rights/racism to further assault the "evil" white man. It's not that simple, it never will be. That's why I went after you for being liberal because I find these so called "activists" tend to emotionally dictate what is and what is not morally right/wrong and treat their beliefs as a science.
Feminist fight for equal rights for everyone. Did I say white men were evil, racist, and homophobic? No I listed who equalitarian so cater to and mentioned that a true equalitarian doesn'the go attacking any group whether they are feminist, mra, , lgbt or etc.
Sorry but I have never met a feminist who fights for the equal rights of men (especially straight men). Also about me being a "misogynist". I have always tried to look at things objectively. In college I volunteered at a women's homeless shelter. I had a long term relationship with a moderate liberal girlfriend (but she was thoughtful). I'm a former professional fighter and I used to help teach women self-defense. I don't disagree that sexism against women doesn't exist. However in our western culture I feel that sexism is colloquially defined as "prejudice as women". Discrimination against men DOES exist and is not justified because we live in a traditional "patriarchal" society.
I'm not a feminist nor a equalitarian and one resion why I'm not a feminist is because feminism is a group that hates men and its also about how that group thinks men are rapists and not all men aren't like that
This is so funny take owner. The majority of both the men and women responding to your piece disagree with you and you keep telling every one is "misjudging" you.
@sdistotallyme how are they misjudging me? The only one misjudging me right now is you by assuming I'm a feminist. If some insinuates that feminist purpose is to hate men and accuse them of horrific crimes then that is a misrepresentation.
@Anonymous what you wrote is an inaccurate represenation of what feminist do.
mytake owner I read on Wikipedia about what feminism is and what it dose and what I read is all true if you look feminism on Wikipedia and read more about it you'll see what I'm talking about
I bet you have a single digit IQ and couldn't get into Uni, or maybe you're too poor and trailer-trash to attend college. You don't sound very educated.
I've ran out of terms, they're all poisoned. From now on if people ask what I am I'll explain what I think. Also, humanism is not part of any of those groups, it's something different, but apparently people misused that term too. It's a shame.
The kitchen and their chambers of course. And collar? It's called jewellery.
Your take is quite feminist in its outlook and vocabulary, but I agree with a few points like freedom of women being a symptom of a decadent society and that equal opportunities for women will just lead them to choose the easy/manipulative stuff and leave all the hard work for men.
Might I add, all while making men look like demons for not allowing them in science. Bitches
Thank you! This is pretty much all I see from these so-called equalist
1
0 Reply
Anonymous
(36-45)
+1 y
LOL You know how much hate you're gonna get posting that kind of opinion on a site like this one? It's like throwing yourself into the lion's den. You're a brave girl, my dear, a brave girl indeed :D
0
1 Reply
myTake Owner
+1 y
Lol. I knew that when I posted this. Tired of the same things posted over and over again by the same group of users.
Why do they highlight men's issues? Simple, people dismiss them without even thinking about it like you did. To paraphrase " how can people in power oppress themselves (males)."
0
1 Reply
myTake Owner
+1 y
Pretty much gave examples in the myTake on how it is done on GAG.
I AM a better person because of it. My religion is the belief that humans can be good not because of a God but just because we want to be good. And so we do kind acts of service. What's so bad about believing that humans have a say in their lives?
Anthropological evidence suggests that most prehistoric hunter-gatherer societies were egalitarian, and that patriarchy did not develop until many... BREAK
What patriarchy?
1
0 Reply
Anonymous
(36-45)
+1 y
I just wanted to point out that your grasp of the English language (you're/your, accept/except, etc.) is atrocious. You should feel bad.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
53Opinion
By 'truth' you mean your opinion.
If that is what you think.
Feminism, despite it's misleading name, is actually the stance for gender - equality, and is just as much for men as it is for women.
Tell that to James Deen because he is being presumed guilty before a fair trial
Ever heard actions speaks much louder then words? It is especially important in this case.
You've got some learning to do, kid. It'll become more apparent as you age, me thinks.
Hey, someone needed to make a take like this, so congrats. However, I feel just a smidge sorry for you. After all, you're going to get so much hate in your inbox.
Thanks and it's okay. I'm used to it.
I just make it a point to point out inaccuracies and ignorance when it comes up, i don't cherry pick. I care about everybody. Egalitarians are pro feminism, not anti.
Most people who complain about egalitarianism just want to be free to spout their hate speech while convinced they're super cool and special cuz they're black/white/male/female/whatever.
Thanks for posting. Helps me get around listing user names.
Haha i didn't realize what i said was outlandish enough to get on a list?
I think you were so anxious to jump on anyone in sight that you were blind to someone who agreed with you on more than half of the points.
Equalitarians are suppose to be pro-feminism but aren't as shown on GAG daily. Instead of admitting equalitarians are guilty of this you just write off people who point this out as being "convinced they're super cool and special cuz they're black/white/male/female/whatever".
No i was talking about the usual people who attack egalitarianism. I wasn't directing that toward you as I don't see the people you described as true egalitarians. I wouldn't refer to them that way. And for the same reason i wouldn't say "man hating feminists are only the minority" because i feel man hating is so out of line with the philosophy that it's destructive to the cause with feminism (as is feminism hating with egalitarianism) that it's unfair to the actual movement to give those people validation with the title.
The main point i disagree with is that. I don't believe it's constructive or mature to demonize an entire movement because of title-stealing radicals. Can't you see you're doing exactly what those men are doing with feminism? It completely invalidates any point you're trying to make.
Some guy says "i hate ladies"
Some lady says "some guy said this, i hate guys, that's why I'm a feminist"
Some guy says "some feminist said this, i hate feminists, that's why I'm an egalitarian"
You say "some egalitarian said this, i hate egalitarians"
Can't you see the fallacy and hypocrisy of your statement, and the destructive tangent you're playing part to?
I don't hate equalitarians. I think the view is very noble if done as the meaning implies, but I do get what you're saying. Just like how some equalitarians judge feminism based on a select few I've let my view of the select users on GAG skew my view of Equalitarians.
If "feminism" is about equality between both genders than why does it contain the latin sub root "fem"?
Google it.
"the advocacy of women's rights on the grounds of political, social, and economic equality to men". Yes an "advocacy of women's rights" created by women who assume they completely understand men's lives.
I think this guy has a better definition of feminism https://youtu.be/onNBxynagXE
Yes please, i learn all my info about men and women from stand ups -_-
better than learning from your liberal teachers and ultra liberal college professors. I'll give you about 10 years to realize how much feminism has insidiously manipulated the public education system.
Thank you for being another prime example.
yep anybody who disagrees with you is a troll...
I didn't call you a troll. I called you an example.
Well more like YOU are the example of so called hypocritical "equalist" by going by the name "feminist". I don't hate feminism because it helps women. I hate feminism because it ultimately HURTS BOTH WOMEN AND MEN. If you ever escape your circle of liberal man haters you may discover that many women actually WANT a traditional lifestyle where the man takes the LEAD. Feminism is responsible for creating a generation of passive, pleasing sensitive nice guys that most women DON'T WANT. You women shame and blame masculinity. Being raised by a dominate mother, public high school and ultra liberal college I found this out the hard way. However now that I'm older and I'm past all that PC bullshit I understand the real culprit. It's women like you that are manipulating politics. It's women like you controlling public education, the media and influencing hollywood. You are not beyond reproach and this is not how mother nature intended things to be. That's why I'm speaking up.
I'm neither an equalist or feminist so your statement is invalid. You're so frustrated that you're trying to label me in order to justify your attacks. It's amazing that some users said they read this yet use the same examples I gave of the most common attacks used by users that aren't happy when you display a different opinion from them.
My apologies though. You aren't an example of a equalitarian. You are an example of a misogynist based on your latest response. Not only do you have a problem with women but you also take issue with liberals.
well why are you co-mingling separate issues in your take such as racism/homophobia when feminism is supposed to be (as Google defined) a "advocacy towards women's rights"? I didn't see any definition on Google saying it was outside of gender. You brought up separate issues like gay rights/racism to further assault the "evil" white man. It's not that simple, it never will be. That's why I went after you for being liberal because I find these so called "activists" tend to emotionally dictate what is and what is not morally right/wrong and treat their beliefs as a science.
Feminist fight for equal rights for everyone. Did I say white men were evil, racist, and homophobic? No I listed who equalitarian so cater to and mentioned that a true equalitarian doesn'the go attacking any group whether they are feminist, mra, , lgbt or etc.
Sorry but I have never met a feminist who fights for the equal rights of men (especially straight men). Also about me being a "misogynist". I have always tried to look at things objectively. In college I volunteered at a women's homeless shelter. I had a long term relationship with a moderate liberal girlfriend (but she was thoughtful). I'm a former professional fighter and I used to help teach women self-defense. I don't disagree that sexism against women doesn't exist. However in our western culture I feel that sexism is colloquially defined as "prejudice as women". Discrimination against men DOES exist and is not justified because we live in a traditional "patriarchal" society.
I'm not a feminist nor a equalitarian and one resion why I'm not a feminist is because feminism is a group that hates men and its also about how that group thinks men are rapists and not all men aren't like that
Thanks for continuing to misjudge feminist.
I'm not judging
This is so funny take owner. The majority of both the men and women responding to your piece disagree with you and you keep telling every one is "misjudging" you.
@sdistotallyme how are they misjudging me? The only one misjudging me right now is you by assuming I'm a feminist. If some insinuates that feminist purpose is to hate men and accuse them of horrific crimes then that is a misrepresentation.
@Anonymous what you wrote is an inaccurate represenation of what feminist do.
mytake owner I read on Wikipedia about what feminism is and what it dose and what I read is all true if you look feminism on Wikipedia and read more about it you'll see what I'm talking about
I bet you have a single digit IQ and couldn't get into Uni, or maybe you're too poor and trailer-trash to attend college. You don't sound very educated.
@Loligirl I don't kno my iQ and I never went to high school or college because I wanted to avoid drama and bullying
At least they aren't feminists. The most hypocritical and uneducated of all the groups.
I'm thinking there should actually be a "Too Stupid" option under the report button...
@xHoneyxBeex @RedRain
Think about it for a while ;)
Never thought about it until now.
I was pleasantly surprised by this take. Thank you for your point of view.
i know, right?
;-)
I've ran out of terms, they're all poisoned. From now on if people ask what I am I'll explain what I think. Also, humanism is not part of any of those groups, it's something different, but apparently people misused that term too. It's a shame.
Glad I am not an equalitarian either since I find it dysfunctional. So I am not a hypocrite. Phew *SmearsSweatDropOffOfForehead*
So you support oppression of men or women?
Why do I have a feeling its MEN?
@imaginetouch
Yes, I think a woman should be stuck in the kitchen. Preferably chained to the fridge and have a collar around her neck so she knows her place.
In all honesty though, I have no idea how you made the jump to said conclusion. In case you are really interested though you can read here: www.girlsaskguys.com/.../a22687-why-i-don-t-believe-in-equality
The kitchen and their chambers of course. And collar? It's called jewellery.
Your take is quite feminist in its outlook and vocabulary, but I agree with a few points like freedom of women being a symptom of a decadent society and that equal opportunities for women will just lead them to choose the easy/manipulative stuff and leave all the hard work for men.
Might I add, all while making men look like demons for not allowing them in science. Bitches
Thank you! This is pretty much all I see from these so-called equalist
LOL You know how much hate you're gonna get posting that kind of opinion on a site like this one? It's like throwing yourself into the lion's den. You're a brave girl, my dear, a brave girl indeed :D
Lol. I knew that when I posted this. Tired of the same things posted over and over again by the same group of users.
Why do they highlight men's issues? Simple, people dismiss them without even thinking about it like you did. To paraphrase " how can people in power oppress themselves (males)."
Pretty much gave examples in the myTake on how it is done on GAG.
That's funky, but I have nothing to do with it as I don't actually think everyone is equal. I just want to erase gender-based preconceptions.
My religion is Ethical Humanist and I do not like the negative light u put to the word Humanist or Equality
Well start being a better person and it won't happen.
I AM a better person because of it. My religion is the belief that humans can be good not because of a God but just because we want to be good. And so we do kind acts of service. What's so bad about believing that humans have a say in their lives?
Never said humans can't have a say in their lives. I just said you could start becoming a better person.
I think I am as good a person as I need to be
Mytake owner, how do you know he should be a better person? Do you know him personally? Can you cite precedent of things he has done wrong to others?
@jjmarvin There is this thing called "opinion" history. I've seen his posts before.
Just because I'm a sarcastic person on the internet does not mean my religion is bad
I don't attack peoples religion.
i like the tits on that meme
I like that tummy, too.
well if you make women EQUAL men
then women will be counted as supperior
already they're f*cking our lives even if they aren't equal
imagine if they were equal
They are socially superior in every way.
"Socially superior in every way"? Do me a favor and grow a pair of balls before posting, thank you.
Anthropological evidence suggests that most prehistoric hunter-gatherer societies were egalitarian, and that patriarchy did not develop until many...
BREAK
What patriarchy?
I just wanted to point out that your grasp of the English language (you're/your, accept/except, etc.) is atrocious. You should feel bad.
Same with your grammar.