Nope, there would be an absence of genetic difference if every single man had the same mindset. The species would die off before enough random mutations could occur. Besides that would go against your hypothetical situation anyway. You placed all men the same as you. If they drifted, your question is no longer relevant.
Well of course you think that. You think very highly of yourself obviously. That fact remains that all the variation between us is what makes us strong and resilient as a species. Taking that away disables us which would inevitably lead to a nose dive. Even in bottle neck events where your gene poll is just reduced not turned completely homogenous to only one set of alleles that account for all of your mental attributes in all males you still end up with reductions in robustness and survivability against selection and have a very large chance of extinction. Basically any breading that occurred in your scenario would be inbreeding which would cause unfavorable alleles to accumulate at a rapid rate. This would result in the expression of deleterious recessive alleles at a much higher rate. All second generation progeny (due to the fact that you didn't say anything about women being the same) following your scenario would be far more likely to show physical and health defects. This would
lead to lower fertility rates and higher infant mortality. These alone are enough to crash a population growth curve, but you still get to also carry genetic disorders, loss of immune system functions, small adult size (women love short men, especially in events of disaster lol), and less symmetrical faces (ugly)… So basically you're fuck on a grand scale.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
19Opinion
Thank god I'm not a beta.
Lol kidding. I liked it. It was genuine and creative. I support your views too.
Thank you.
Cool idea! Can I make one do?
(Can I take that thumbs up as a yes?)
Yes, probably a lot of people will make similar takes one day.
Yayyy!
One of the strangest posts I've ever seen on GAG.
The human race would go extinct.
The population would decrease but not extinct. Extinction is too far fetched even for this scenario.
Nope, we'd plummet into a nose dive and then go into an irreversible tailspin...
How would that happen?
Survival depends on diversity.
Men wouldn't be physically the same, they would still be different.
Human's strength as a species is our brain... We'd totally be dead.
Humans might be able to adapt to it.
Nope, there would be an absence of genetic difference if every single man had the same mindset. The species would die off before enough random mutations could occur. Besides that would go against your hypothetical situation anyway. You placed all men the same as you. If they drifted, your question is no longer relevant.
By adapt I mean get use to, are you implying that women aren't visual when it comes to attraction?
I'm not implying anything. I'm flat out telling you if all men were like you, the species would die.
There are many possibilities in a world like that.
Sure, just without humans.
I'm skeptical about that.
What that the planet would continue without humans?
No, that humans would go extinct in that scenario.
Well of course you think that. You think very highly of yourself obviously. That fact remains that all the variation between us is what makes us strong and resilient as a species. Taking that away disables us which would inevitably lead to a nose dive. Even in bottle neck events where your gene poll is just reduced not turned completely homogenous to only one set of alleles that account for all of your mental attributes in all males you still end up with reductions in robustness and survivability against selection and have a very large chance of extinction. Basically any breading that occurred in your scenario would be inbreeding which would cause unfavorable alleles to accumulate at a rapid rate. This would result in the expression of deleterious recessive alleles at a much higher rate. All second generation progeny (due to the fact that you didn't say anything about women being the same) following your scenario would be far more likely to show physical and health defects. This would
lead to lower fertility rates and higher infant mortality. These alone are enough to crash a population growth curve, but you still get to also carry genetic disorders, loss of immune system functions, small adult size (women love short men, especially in events of disaster lol), and less symmetrical faces (ugly)… So basically you're fuck on a grand scale.
Slippery slope fallacy
Every one would be white