well, I don't know the exact measurements but I think that an average height, size 16 model is roughly 10 stone which is considered a 'healthy weight' according to UK medical BMI (body mass index) charts:
Number 2 is perfect. Not crazy about her face which is like a 7 but her body is absolutely perfect. Number 3 needs more boob and slightly less tummy, but still good.
that is a valid point because I did not account for photoshopping when I posted this question. but if they were not photoshopped, I would personally consider those girls within a healthy range.
I find a lot of curvy models ideal to be honest although I would not want them to gain more weight. I am honestly surprised at a lot of people's reactions (men AND women, lol).
number two does have some unnecessary make-up but still I think she would be very facially attractive without that and focusing on her curves alone, to me she looks like she has a good figure.
well with fat rolls, there are normally wrinkles/creases in the skin from the extra baggage, I can't really see that. the very last girl is hayley hasselhoff and looks a bit thinner from different angles (I purposefully chose an angle that looked a little bit larger just to have a conservative estimation):
Well you can't see em on the pics you just posted but anyway I said that no.4 and no.5 had fat rolls, anyway they are fat and I would never consider them attractive that's my opinion.
ok that's fair enough because attraction is subjective anyway. I was trying to look at this more objectively in terms of BMI and what is considered medically healthy or not by professionals.
In terms of BMI there's no way these girls aren't overweight I used to look a lot thinner than that when my BMI was 23 now I'm even more fit and healthy.
I realise that the question is ambiguous because it deals with the overlap between attractiveness and healthiness (the former is subjective / an idiosyncratic preference while the latter can only be determined by a medical or nutrition expert with information about measurements, diet and exercise). However I just want people to casually / informally chip in with their own subjective tastes (attraction) and approximate eyeballing (healthiness).
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
29Opinion
Definitely not curvy. Those women are fat. Except for the 2nd one, that woman is curvy.
Fun fact, the 4th girl is normal-looking and not overweight, but the others are all either Photoshopped from fat, or just overweight.
Outside of number 2 they're all overweight. Their weight didn't end up anywhere too unflattering but they're well, fat.
And number 2 is looking very weird somehow... Proportions all strange, a slight blur some places. Photoshop?
I mean they are obviously overweight ofc, the question is does that thick-curvy look appeal to you or not. Does for some, not for others.
well, I don't know the exact measurements but I think that an average height, size 16 model is roughly 10 stone which is considered a 'healthy weight' according to UK medical BMI (body mass index) charts:
www.nhs.uk/.../height-weight-chart.aspx
as for 'attractiveness', yes it was subjective opinions I was looking for.
Ya but the average in a sample size from a population of overweight people is saying what exactly lol
It's average weight for a size 16 average height woman. The BMI itself is not based on averages but medical opinion.
Number 2 is perfect. Not crazy about her face which is like a 7 but her body is absolutely perfect. Number 3 needs more boob and slightly less tummy, but still good.
these are very attractive and freakin hot models iv'e ever seen.
some extra weight but also curvy... a mix of both I guess
1, 2: photoshoped
3-5: chubby
they are all curvy but really on the edge of overweight in my opinion.
that is a valid point because I did not account for photoshopping when I posted this question. but if they were not photoshopped, I would personally consider those girls within a healthy range.
well if one was to argue with BMI, i bet they are all above of what is considered "normal weight" by BMI.
but yeah they look fine because of their proportions.
ok cool
Number 2 is perfection.
I find a lot of curvy models ideal to be honest although I would not want them to gain more weight. I am honestly surprised at a lot of people's reactions (men AND women, lol).
I wish I had her shape lol. I'm assuming she's got a flat tummy.
I don't care what it's called. They're all fine af.
Actually, they are on the slim side, compared to what i tend to like..
One and two are curvaceous and not overweight or fat. the rest though...
In 1-2 of the pictures it's kind of hard to tell but the 2nd and 3rd pictures are pretty good examples of curvy women.
Number 3 is fuckin' awesome I tell ya... I'd bang her...
As for number 2... she looks like a doll really... is she for real? Her picture seems to be totally fake...
number two does have some unnecessary make-up but still I think she would be very facially attractive without that and focusing on her curves alone, to me she looks like she has a good figure.
Personally I prefer 3...
3 is not my favourite personally, but I can see where you are coming from. She is Ashley Graham by the way.
They ain't curvy lmfao, That's not what curvy means. Second one is tho.
They're perfect for me!
good man
Technically yes they probably are overweight, but no they aren't unattractive
The third, fourth and fifth are all just fat.
interesting because I thought the first two were a little bit larger than the last three.
No way there's no visible curves in five and you can see fat rolls on the other two it's disgusting.
well with fat rolls, there are normally wrinkles/creases in the skin from the extra baggage, I can't really see that. the very last girl is hayley hasselhoff and looks a bit thinner from different angles (I purposefully chose an angle that looked a little bit larger just to have a conservative estimation):
cdn.posh24.com/.../hayley_hasselhoff
www.assignmentx.com/.../...sselhoff_SS_MG_8459.jpg
metrouk2.files.wordpress.com/.../ad_126369570.jpg
Well you can't see em on the pics you just posted but anyway I said that no.4 and no.5 had fat rolls, anyway they are fat and I would never consider them attractive that's my opinion.
ok that's fair enough because attraction is subjective anyway. I was trying to look at this more objectively in terms of BMI and what is considered medically healthy or not by professionals.
In terms of BMI there's no way these girls aren't overweight I used to look a lot thinner than that when my BMI was 23 now I'm even more fit and healthy.
They are overweight. Curvy has nothing to do with carrying extra weight.
To me they are all pretty
Which of these eat well and exercise?
I don't know what their diet and exercise regiment consists of.
I could tell: part is genetic, but is triggered by their life habits.
How many Olympic girls have you seen curvy?
(https://www. google. es/search? q=olympic+girl&tbm=isch)
they are more athletic / toned.
I realise that the question is ambiguous because it deals with the overlap between attractiveness and healthiness (the former is subjective / an idiosyncratic preference while the latter can only be determined by a medical or nutrition expert with information about measurements, diet and exercise). However I just want people to casually / informally chip in with their own subjective tastes (attraction) and approximate eyeballing (healthiness).
How frequently someone who is healthy looks unattractive?
1 private opinion(s)Only the asker and the opinion owner can see it. Learn more