The dichotomy isn't necessarily between classic and strong male archetypes and delicate, emotional ones.
The heroic male archetype is usually boring and one-dimensional anyway. They're too flawless. I often found the villains more interesting than the heroes in stories like that since the villain might actually be easier to relate to than the hero.
An example of a very delicate and emotional type of male character I can relate to in some degree is Joffrey Baratheon from Game of Thrones:
typeset-beta.imgix.net/...54-9880-aeed9fea6d30.png
Even though it's set in a totally fantasy universe, he's the type of character you can see traces of in real males growing up (perhaps not that extreme, but enough to relate to him in some way and believe a character like this could actually exist). Because of that, it's actually rather easy to strongly dislike him in a very vivid way as though he actually exists. He's basically a spoiled and egotistical bully: highly emotional, highly sensitive, but not the slightest bit empathetic towards others with a sadistic side.
A character that's much more difficult to relate to whatsoever is Ramsay Snow. He's just completely psychotic and sadistic. He doesn't seem sensitive in any way whatsoever. He barely feels emotions of a kind that a normal person can actually relate towards with the exception of perhaps his complex of being a bastard.
static.thefrisky.com/.../Ramsay-Bolton.jpg
As a result, he's too extreme of a character for most of us to empathize with in any way. Few have probably met anyone even remotely resembling him. He's not monstrous, he's just a monster. There's little resembling "humanity" in him. He's very different from Joffrey in this regard, though not necessarily a poorly-written character since he's just meant to be this terrifying force of chaos. The point isn't necessarily for us to relate to him in any way.
If you take a male and give him no fighting skills whatsoever, that doesn't necessarily alienate audiences. A majority of real males fit this criteria. However, to survive in a harsh world, they might develop other skills that allow them to thrive.
They might become humorous pacifists that everyone likes or manipulative people who get others to fight on their behalf. They might spread rumors, become masters of deceit, something to this effect. There's usually something they develop to compensate for their lack of fighting skills if they grew up in a hostile environment.02 Reply- +1 y
Examples of such males, still sticking to GoT, would include Tyrion Lannister:
pbs.twimg.com/.../8sUE9d4C.jpg
Littlefinger:
qph.ec.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-0c8c7540509baf623b5397b8a564f36c
Lord Varys:
pbs.twimg.com/.../...6fda6e428c5dbf106e7161fa.jpeg
These thrive in hostile environments through skills other than fighting, and can get others to fight on their behalf. I tend to find such characters really interesting, but they are arguably just as strong-minded or more than those who fight on their behalf. They're often calculating/strategic people or people who are very charismatic and well-liked.
If we make a character who is all-around weak though who can't fight, isn't likable/popular, isn't cunning/strategic, etc., then the character is usually going to be unlikable.
It tends to be worse if they're male since males are generally praised for their ability to protect others. Those who can't even stand up for themselves in any way are usually bound to be run over by society. - +1 y
Making a guy love flowers is a little bit strange. It might make sense if he grew up with a botanist, or mainly hung out with girls. I'm not sure such a character will ever be so well-received by male audiences, but with enough exposition, it might be possible to relate to such a character.
Most Helpful Opinions
+1 yI like diversity, though it has to be within the realm of reality.
I find that most really masculine characters are very "cookie-cutter" in how they're shaped. For example, I don't see a whole lot of laid-back and easy going "alpha male" types. Most of those alpha male characters are extremely serious, always business, always so uptight.
If there's an alpha male who DOES have a more "go with the flow" style, he's usually falling into the "Damon Salvatore" category of killing this person and that person at a whim "just because, boredom."
And I think that's a real shame because I can potentially think up plenty of ways a very dominant male character can be created without falling into the perceived "masculine extremes." When it comes to male heroes in literature, I feel there's definitely a lot of unexplored grey area that really should be covered.
----------------------------
So, to answer your question, do I hate weak male characters? Honestly, I kinda do. I'm not going to pretend that I look at really weak guys and not get a little disgusted inside.
But I also don't like the current idea of what the masculine hero is "supposed to" be. There's a fine line between "simply having a formula to it" and "having a mile-long list of, often quite conditional, regulations that must be followed to the letter."11 Reply- +1 y
Thank for MHO. I hope I helped at least a little.
OP i'm going to tell you something different.
The fact that you're asking this is a sign of bad writing. Yes, you have to be self aware, yes snowflake characters are dull and hateable-limpwristed-villain number 1066# characters are boring but overall its your job as a creative writer to find the balance. This isn't a vote A / vote B answer, its a up to you to weight everything down and criticize yourself if you're going overboard.
"Most people like reading about more masculine men or a basketball player."
I don't even believe this but giving you the benefit of the doubt i'd say you're absolutely missing the point. People who read usually have a non-interest for sports, its nothing to do with being a basketball player its ALWAYS about the players backstory, his struggles or his luxury life. Your black friends probably don't give a shit about reading in all honestly.
You don't make characters based on what others like to see, make it based on what you think is interesting or the story you want to tell. People don't know what they want sadly.
"but I mainly notice that black people tend to hate characters like this and prefer either violent stupid characters"
Again, don't take this the wrong way but i find it hard to believe this is your audience. It really takes a rare, and i mean RARE friend to actually critic another's writing. Those are what comics are for, real readers fucking HATE stupid characters and unnecessary violence without meaning. You shouldn't ask you friends to read your work because its very likely wouldn't ever pick up a book themselves and are forcing themselves to get interested in reading for the sake of doing you a favor.22 Reply
4.3K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. I like male character that are strong but weak at the same time. It's hard to explain but like he have a very hard past, show weakness (is confuse, have identity crisis stuff like that) or the bullied / rejected guy who go savage.
I like character like Red hood, Arkham Knight, the son of Sammo Law in the show Martial law, Green Goblin / Harry Osborn (They're strong physically but have weakness, mental ill problem).
Andrew Detmer too in Chronicle is cool, he's the bullied kids who after get his power get a bit insane.
I like reading about "weak" male character but generally when it's about their mental more then their body. I don't really know if we can call that "weak" I think it's more of a "broken" "disturbed" mind than really weak.20 Reply
I don't like reading books where the female character is the strongest one. I enjoyed Hunger Games though but because even though she was strong, the guys were also strong.
I prefer the male character to be protective one even if he is weak.12 Reply
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
14Opinion
1.1K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. That depends. Most people hate weak willed characters rather than physically weak characters.
You know, in Japanese stereotype characters, you can have a slick, long hair, womanizer who is extremely feminine. It's a normal side kick character. Usually there would be a story to why a guy could end up like that.
I think the perfect example of a seemingly weak guy with a strong heart would be Waldo Butters in The Dresden Files. The guy is a nerd who is so shy he has a doctor's degree but ended up as a mortician. Short, bald, fat and likes polka. Has a cartridge with a MEEP MEEP plate. He is a normal human in a world of supernatural. Zombies, wizards, werewolves, dragons and all the terror. Somehow, this guy makes it even though he cries, fainted, get beaten and peed himself but he didn't give up. He would hold his ground against a zombie horde for a friend.
The guy ended up with a sexy, kick ass werewolf girlfriend and holds the most terrifying skull of knowledge (even though they only talk about starswars since they are both nerds).10 ReplyPersonally I like reading about them all. And could find all likeable as individuals.
Your key observation was 'female characters can have a bunch of different personalities and nobody cares". I think this is true and doesn't pertain to just stories.
The rules for masculinity are much stricter on personality than are the rules for femininity. The rules for women regarding appearance are stricter.
Women can be strong or weak, feminine or tomboys, sarcastic or delicate. As long as they are -ultimately- good hearted and pretty they are liked.
Men have lower requirements for looks and good heartedness but better be emotionally tough and capable of handling difficult situations or they're garbage.15 Reply- +1 y
Dude, ok. First, credit where credit is due, you managed to write this WITHOUT sounding like a whiny "mgtow" bitch boy. So, good on you there.
Buttttt
"Women can be strong or weak, feminine or tomboys, sarcastic or delicate. As long as they are -ultimately- good hearted and pretty they are liked"
^^ I can tell you don't socialize with women much. And/or at least not extensively, anw.
Women lose a LOT of favor and a LOT of friends VERY quickly if they have **any** degree of the "shake things up" or "rock the boat" personality... whereas that same thing is almost essential for a man to be considered any kind of "leader".
The standard of "emotional toughness" levied upon men is EXACTLY equivalent to the standard of "diplomacy" and/or "maintaining group harmony" levied upon women. Neither is worse or more oppressive than the other. Both constrain a whole wide huge variety of behaviors. It ain't a contest.
... And I'm not even going to tough the whole child care thing. I mean, my - +1 y
man has the patience of a saint with babies and small children, and this is no disrespect to him... but, I'm a little sick of how the entire world fangirls all over his ass for just doing something like changing a nappy. Whereas no matter what **I'm** doing with babies -- no matter how long, and even if it's 3 babies at once -- is just taken for granted by everyone. Because, hey, women are MADE for that, right?
Roll eyes.
__
Ironically, I think you have it backward when it comes to appearance. Like way way way backward.
Think of how men in some corporations can literally **own** just three or four days' worth of suits... and... that's it. And they can work there for YEARS -- as long as they've got more neckties than shirts and suits -- and no one will know they've been literalyl wearing the same 3 or 4 outfits for YEARS.
And male haircuts, and even the way boys dress on their days off... yeah.
I mean, lol. I spend half the day walking around in fitness gear that's at least - +1 y
1/2 blindingly hot neon pink. But, as long as (1) it's sort of matchy, and (2) I *TALK* like a professional... I will absolutely be treated as a professional person, in mah hot pink workout duds.
I mean, I'm not talking about going to court, or to meet a new client, or anything else. But, any other situation? Yeah.
Boys in workout clothes? Not in the least slightest.
Also... I wear weird colored ombré lipstick most days. (Today it's a fade from dark purple on the outside, through magenta, to red on the inside.) And shit like hair glitter ahah. And leopard print is my spirit animal.
Do these thinsg make anyone take me less seriously? ahah not even. Not after I open my mouth, anyway.
Boys ahha... at least over age 25 or whatever. If they don't have a short haircut... they're less professional. If tehy don't wear a VERY strictly circumscribed sort of wardrobe... less professional. And gawd I don't even know what the equivalent of wild colored metallic lippies is, but, the complete - +1 y
*lack* of such an equivalent pretty much makes the poitn already.
If by "appearance" you mean that guys can get away with getting FAT... then... yes. At least guys with a certain personality type, and appearance.
Like, no one would give someone like Donald Trump the time of day if he weren't at least a LITTLE fat, especially once he's north of 50 years old.
With everything else -- literally EVERYTHING else -- that statement is exactly the opposite of the actual truth. - +1 y
@redeyemindtricks I pretty much agree with all that you wrote. I was just being brief.
The key was that men and women are judged on -different- factors.
And yeah women are hit on some personality factors as well. i probably didn't sound whiny because both are judged almost the same amount. I mean really it's more like we all get judged on a bunch of factors that add to 100%. You can notice that some factor is bigger or smaller for men or women but the factors still add to 100 for each.
Well, I'm French.
We had Marcel Proust and Chateaubriand. Both wrote about the inner ramblings of weak and romantic males mostly worried about the first world problems of the time. And both created masterpieces of literature.12 Reply
+1 yif the development is there for it and it makes sense then go for it. I think the gender construct that men are strong is hard for people to get over in books and movies so kudos for trying because it's hard.
11 Reply1.7K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Good question. I'd assume it's because they want to be able to relate to the character, and don't like to see themselves as being "weak". Personaly, I prefer an adventure in which the protagonist starts with nothing, or close to nothing and has to work his or her way up. But then again, my favourite books has female leads.
05 Reply- +1 y
If the plot appeals to me. I tend to look for story/adventure books written with a fantasy genre but keeping it realistic even then. My two favourite books, 1st is of a witches daughter who lose her mother, and now have to fight a kingdom alone, even though she has nothing and nobody to rely on. 2nd one being the daughter of a wealthy family being forced into marriage, but she doesn't want to.. as she'd rather follow in her grandparents footsteps as spirit whisperers.
If your book only portrays a self biography of this 13 year old boys thoughts and battles with the aftermath of being raped, I probably wouldn't, but the lead character would not be the cause. If the setting was akin to the aforementioned, but with this boy in the lead, I probably would read it. - +1 y
- +1 y
Would you read a book about a man who's in prison.
He feels worthless, horrible, and scared. He's bullied in prison. Ge wants to stab one of the inmates in the chest with a fork but is too scared to do so. Instead he vomits and cries in front of them. The man eventually starts hearing voices. - would you read something like this - +1 y
@SteppingOnRoses 1st is called "Kiss of the Dragon". 2nd is a trilogy called "The Mira Chronicles" The author of both is Josefine Ottesen. I'm not sure if you can find them in English however.
I may read it, but if it's not an adventure like the two I mentioned, I may not get through it. Depends on how well you go into detail as to his thoughts, because that's among the selling points of the books I like. If you're good at describing what he thinks and the details of why he thinks so, then it may. :)
5.3K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Yes.
Blocked One, hun, Recently on Here who had Blue Balls and All, but also a Big Mouth... He went South. xx12 ReplyHere's why. The male hero archetype is exciting and it's usually not common in real life. People want stories about things that excite them and things that are out of this world. Nobody wants a boring ordinary type of person. Unless that boring ordinary type of person goes through a tradegdy or obstacle, that helps him develop and grow stronger.
10 ReplyIt depends on the story. The character has to fit the story. say for a action based story you might want a strong manly man type. however for another story a shy more feminine male character might work better. as a writer you want your stories to be interesting and believeable. for example if you have a weak male character attempting to save the world it wouldn't work very well.
10 Reply
Anonymous(25-29)+1 yIt has nothing to do with masculinity. I don't like weak and whiny characters period.
31 Reply
+1 yI like your Arthur character. He's different and like you stated above, that makes him more interesting.
10 Reply
+1 yIt's all about preferences Because it looks pathetic for a guy to be like that in my opinion. A girl should have her strengths but i prefer the guy to do most of the savings and stuff. it's just how I like it.
09 Reply- +1 y
it's fine if she saves the guy but the whole meltdown and sobs it's a huge turnoff. it's better if he's shocked and without breath you know. but tbh it all falls down to how well written it is and the reason as to why he's crying and having a meltdown, not just because i love books. and anyone who can do it very well it's good to me.
- +1 y
if it's someone close to him then yes if not then no. and i don't think it should just be the guy affected. the girl should be too
- +1 y
seems a bit cold hearted. should be affected some how maybe not crying but shocked at least.
- +1 y
whatever you say
- +1 y
and more like chuckles. works better for the male gender
I think it depends on the story really, but if you can pull it off and make it work then I'm not against it at all. It almost creates an underdog story. The only trouble is actually making it work.
12 Reply- 2.5K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yI dislike weak and boring characters, regardless of gender.
10 Reply 946 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. As long as your character is portrayed well it is fine by me
10 ReplyAs long as a character is well written ans likable, everyone should like that character it's their problem if they don't.
10 ReplyI don't hate weak male characters. Frodo Baggins from LOTR was weak but he had a different kind of strength in him.
10 ReplyEvery single person has strong & lovable side. I find that and love all the creature.
00 ReplyI like the mysterious kind or bad boy, but I wouldn't mind him being quiet or shy.
00 Reply
+1 yWeakness isn't necessarily a bad thing for a character. It leaves room for empowerment and becoming who the book wants him to be
00 ReplyNah... I'm actually into guys that can be protected or needs help constantly. I think they are cute.
10 Reply
Anonymous(30-35)+1 yi dont like weak male characters due to virtue signalling reasons.
03 Reply
Opinion Owner+1 yi dont hate them, i just dont like them. i dont like it if authors do this whole girl power thing and put men on the back burner.
Anonymous(30-35)+1 yi don't hate nor like it
10 Reply
+1 yStrong is the best
10 Reply- 11.2K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yI don't hate.
00 Reply no <3
00 Reply
Ladies, why don't you like weak men?
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News
Most Helpful Opinions