Because at the lowest levels we are still animals and fight for territory and food and family but since we are more advanced its on a bigger scale and hide behind religion and politics
I'd say no, there would be the same amount of war, just the reason behind them would be different. Maybe even the extent of how vicious the wars are, would be different too.
In my opinion no. Humans gravitate to violence. Doesn't matter male or female. We're a totally fucked species. Our intelligence will one day be our downfall. There will always be hate for things that are different.
i have no doubt America would be at War if Hilary goes in. Which debunks this to a degree.
The point is War to a large degree driven by $$$$$$$$. People in power profit through suffering. As well as using it as a means to divert from real issues. This would be the same for both men/women. For it is an inherent flaw in the human race
And answers like this are why I wish men would throw women out into wars and not be that wall that protects them. Earn your sisters and mother's and daughters right to freedom and peace.
Rag on the men who keep you safe like that rather than cherish their sacrifice. You are entitled and ignorant and you don't deserve to live in the safety you do when you belittle even one human lige that was lost so you could have it.
War would come with women or men in power and being a Pacifist would only mean the destruction of your culture and civilization.
If this is not a rhetorical question, I shall answer it. Men have traditionally gone to war to protect their loved ones. Often at the behest of those loved ones. The propaganda that is most effective in starting wars is to say that some group is coming after your groups women and children. This was used in virtually every war in history to good effect. Women have often pushed their men into battle, and have done so with great enthusiasm. Further when women have been battle leaders it has been to great effect, think Budacia and Joan of Arc as a few examples of this. So to answer your question, the gender that has caused more wars is probably women, while men are the ones who go and do the fighting. This is called violence by proxy, and is the most common form of violence that women do. Want some guy beat up, tell another guy that he wronged you, etc. This is how many wars were started.
True and true. My son will be joining the navy here. I personally wish he wouldn't. I want my son safe but he believes he will be able to best help people that way. By nature my son is not violent he has never been in a fight but he comes from a long line of family members that serve and protect.
Considering there was more war and death in the middle ages when a female monarch was in control vs a male monarch in Britain is say it's the opposite.
If you look through history 99.999999% of the World's atrocities have been committed by men. Personally, i think testosterone and a world leader aren't necessarily the best mix.
Women are human with the same ability to make bad decisions, just like men. Good leaders aren't good leaders because of their gender. They're good leaders because of their character.
People talk about men and women as if they're two different species, but that can't be farther from the truth. The fact is, humans will always be at war with one another
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
227Opinion
Nearly every advancement of civilization has been a result of the efforts of men.
I don't see that changing.
Because at the lowest levels we are still animals and fight for territory and food and family but since we are more advanced its on a bigger scale and hide behind religion and politics
Probably. I'm not sure but we should find out. Angela Merkel seems to be doing a good job as the leader of the free world.
Tell me any powerful civilization ruled in a matriarchal convention. the answer will tell you everything
And don't put this men vs women that is shitty feminism mentality that is dividing our world. Men and women have their important roles
I'd say no, there would be the same amount of war, just the reason behind them would be different. Maybe even the extent of how vicious the wars are, would be different too.
Which reasons do you think it would be instead behind them? And how would it be differently when it comes to vicious?
In my opinion no. Humans gravitate to violence. Doesn't matter male or female. We're a totally fucked species. Our intelligence will one day be our downfall. There will always be hate for things that are different.
Women or men, it doesn't matter. It depends on the person who is ruling the world
It would be more war. girls are very catty that's why I only have male friends literally
People are very catty thats why I dont have friends in general. XF
True but from my experience girls are entirely worse. i have better relationships with men
i have no doubt America would be at War if Hilary goes in. Which debunks this to a degree.
The point is War to a large degree driven by $$$$$$$$. People in power profit through suffering. As well as using it as a means to divert from real issues. This would be the same for both men/women. For it is an inherent flaw in the human race
There would be no wars PERIOD if humans NEVER came into existence to this world!
@Unit1 ?
That's not the question here. 🤨
When England had Queen it still was in many wars, also Russia, Netherlands, Spain etc.
So yeah, there would still be as many wars.
Women are just as greedy and power hungry as men are.
Probably less war in my opinion... But peace.. Hell naw.. LOL.. They would be a women's equivalent to war..
There will be no wars
Only a bunch of countries that dont talk to each others 😂😂
And makeups will be sold only in the black market 😂
Just ask yourself, which gender is the cause for wars? Which gender goes out to battles to fight? Just saying... not pointing any fingers 💅🏼 lol
And answers like this are why I wish men would throw women out into wars and not be that wall that protects them. Earn your sisters and mother's and daughters right to freedom and peace.
Rag on the men who keep you safe like that rather than cherish their sacrifice. You are entitled and ignorant and you don't deserve to live in the safety you do when you belittle even one human lige that was lost so you could have it.
War would come with women or men in power and being a Pacifist would only mean the destruction of your culture and civilization.
It definitely was a rhetorical question.
You must not have read Art of war...
If this is not a rhetorical question, I shall answer it. Men have traditionally gone to war to protect their loved ones. Often at the behest of those loved ones. The propaganda that is most effective in starting wars is to say that some group is coming after your groups women and children. This was used in virtually every war in history to good effect. Women have often pushed their men into battle, and have done so with great enthusiasm. Further when women have been battle leaders it has been to great effect, think Budacia and Joan of Arc as a few examples of this. So to answer your question, the gender that has caused more wars is probably women, while men are the ones who go and do the fighting. This is called violence by proxy, and is the most common form of violence that women do. Want some guy beat up, tell another guy that he wronged you, etc. This is how many wars were started.
True and true. My son will be joining the navy here. I personally wish he wouldn't. I want my son safe but he believes he will be able to best help people that way. By nature my son is not violent he has never been in a fight but he comes from a long line of family members that serve and protect.
Would be the same or worse.
Imagine reading in the history books:
"Panties War", "He cheated on Me War", "Battle for the Last Make Up"
Siege of (insert clothing store name here)"
Lol.
Considering there was more war and death in the middle ages when a female monarch was in control vs a male monarch in Britain is say it's the opposite.
If you look through history 99.999999% of the World's atrocities have been committed by men. Personally, i think testosterone and a world leader aren't necessarily the best mix.
Women are human with the same ability to make bad decisions, just like men. Good leaders aren't good leaders because of their gender. They're good leaders because of their character.
People talk about men and women as if they're two different species, but that can't be farther from the truth. The fact is, humans will always be at war with one another