- 437 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yI think at that point... provided we survive that long... 1000 years from now, maybe. I highly doubt there will be anything like that in the next 100 years, so none of us would experience anything like this.
I think the first step would be in something like the movie "Her"- intelligent operating systems.
But, if they had the emotions, and we knew they couldn't kill, and they could somehow produce babies... etc... past whatever issues humanity might develop with "robosexuality" (yeah, Futurama reference) or some kind of classism or whatever... then ok... but I think most guys would still prefer flesh and blood, even if robot women were just about indistinguishable from the real deal. Maybe a "training" robot? Lol. Like no one would KNOW it was a robot (or care), and guys would learn how to date from the robo-girlfriend... but then moving on to human...
There'd be the guys who wouldn't want kids, so not an issue for them. But then if the robots had realistic emotions like real women, then... why would those same guys that don't want real women or say there's too much hassle with real women want something that would be indistinguishable from real women?
I'd assume there'd have to be some changes in how they think, what those emotions were, in order for there to be any interest from the more militant "anti-woman" or "anti (westernized society) women" type guys. Like if you could special order a personality and knew how to manipulate the Robo-girlfriend, an off button, a mute button, I might understand it. And if you COULD control it... where's the challenge or potential for personal growth or... "fun"? Do they want a girlfriend... or "a sometimes sexy" housekeeper you could sleep with? There'd be Robo-rights, fights for "robo-mixed" marriages, etc.
Of course, this gets into philosophy and all that, but I still think most guys would want the quirks and would be ok with some of those annoyances for the chance at real love or a good relationship.10 Reply
Most Helpful Opinions
- 1.8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yIt's interesting reading articles about this and women's reactions. Could this become widespread? Hm. I think it would alter the paradigm as much as the birth control pill and abortion did, possibly.
1. How affordable and lifelike would it be? That's the single biggest factor I think. If they were several grand and actually seemed similar to a person they could possibly become a thing.
2. This would definitely appeal to a lot of the guys who lack the looks/status/social skills to actually pursue and have sex with women. The other interesting factor would be celebrities. Could they get male celebrities to go with it and basically have harems of these androids?
3. The funny thing is these robots would be designed to be 10/10's. It wouldn't be a regular chubby girl competing with a weird robot. It would be competing with whatever porn star or actress licensed or had her likeness copied for one of these.
It would probably encourage women to hit the gym more often.20 Reply
461 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. When will they be producing a male version?
I mean a man that can be a couch buddy, gets things done when asked once without complaining and has the ability to learn adapt to a woman’s sex style moves sounds good.
All joking aside it sounds like a stepford wife.
I could see some benefit for people without partners especially people with physical disabilities who might have a harder time finding a partner but long it sounds like it could create some mental health issues. Part of being an adult is learning how to handle every day interactions and you don’t like your partner enough move on.23 Reply- +1 y
- +1 y
@KrakenAttackin you have problems...
I think this is an awesome idea for everyone. No more searching for love when you can make your cyborg lifetime mate just the way you want them. Robots are so cool! 😎 Mine would look like an anime guy.
43 Reply- +1 y
I think there could be very good business opportunities with that. Think of the money that could be made!
- +1 y
The market would be far to saturated to bring upon an individualistic revolution or make money/much money as a startup.
- +1 y
@Truthatanycost We've already done the first half by commoditizing and comercializing sexual relationships, so why the heck not!
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
77Opinion
895 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. I doubt it, they're more a niche market thing, no matter how much they approximate humans. Even if they did saturate the market, the components to make them would get more expensive as demand rises, making real women more desirable again anyway.
Just think about how much more expensive IPhones become with each iteration, less because each new one requires some new, special parts or labor, and more because demand for the phone itself rises with each new one to come out.
If it was just about the cost of the technology, than androids would be comparably expensive that have the same features... but they're not. Some people will always prefer the real, and some will prefer the artificial, that's not going to change much no matter how good the technology gets. The only thing that could make that change would be a drastic shift in how men in general are, or women. Such as the flip side, if women start preferring robot sex, and not men so much, then there isn't much choice in preferance for women, and more sex robots get purchased.10 Reply4.5K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Any man interested in a robot never had any business trying to have a relationship with a real woman to begin with. Go for it and stay out of the way.
1260 Reply- +1 y
You're not God and don't have the final word on everything. There can certainly be other reasons for doing so. Your privilege can only take you so far. Your shaming tactics are a typical response to it.
- +1 y
It's a manner of inserting a defilade preemptive strike on your statement or opinion (whichever you take it as) so as to prevent any backtracking.
Indeed, I started this discussion, so I'm in the right to oppose or counterargue any views I deem fit to. - +1 y
Because I'd rather not deal with the baggage and headache of the work. From what I understand, most people wouldn't either. The difference here is that I'd rather skip the bullshit and be blunt about it. I don't see it as being morally or ethically wrong, but just socially so, and you must remember that perspectives can change after decades of progress. Just like with the Heliocentric model back in the middle ages. Now... That's my reason... There could be others, like bad experiences such as divorce or how disadvantaged men are in the dating world. So I don't agree with your judgment of men who would prefer robots as something being inherently wrong with them such as mental derangement or possibly being utter undesirables.
- +1 y
So you want the benefits of having a relationship with a woman without the responsibility of having to earn it. There is a lot that could be said about that but I’ll skip that for now and just say that it runs the risk of enabling very toxic and dangerous relationships with family, and coworkers as well.
- +1 y
I don't have any relationship problems stemming from my attitudes with friends, family, and co-workers. Romantic/Sexual love and everything else are on two different wavelengths for me. Once again, it's socially, but not morally or ethically wrong, and it isn't hurting anybody.
- +1 y
I already told you it has no effect. You're not living my life and have no magical crystal ball... Or do you?
What behavior do you espouse of? - +1 y
Much of my shaming of others originates on an entirely different premise of feelings over facts, which is what many, but not all, of the left tend to subscribe to. While I won't claim to be neutral all the time on emotional quandaries in all situations because no one is perfect, I do my best to keep it grounded in truth. The COVID-19 hysteria is just so, we hadn't seen this level of panic with arguably more lethal and infectious maladies, but here we were closing everything down and draining the toilet paper reservoirs off the shelves. If we didn't respond to that in this ridiculous way and everything turned out fine, why would I behave differently? The media is the enemy of the people.
Your shaming is based off subjective thought per societal norms. My shaming is more grounded on the objectivity of hard evidence. - +1 y
I think the reaction to COVID in regards to panic buying were pretty unfortunate but I believe people are the enemy of the people, and individuals are their own worst enemy. I can tell you as a writer I can’t make up some of the stupid and fucked up things people are doing in reality. The truth about humans is sickening sometimes, but that certainly isn’t exclusive to journalists.
- +1 y
Fair enough. I don't see anything here to rebut or that I can rebut.
- +1 y
There will be many more viruses in coming years and it will only get worse because we see how unfit society is for being responsible enough to do their part in protecting themselves and others. This misanthropes will call it natural selection as the weak, the unintelligent, and the selfish will be the ones I be taken out by them. At this point, who am I to argue with that?
- +1 y
If coming ailments and pandemics are decidedly more infectious or more lethal than SARS or Swine Flu, then you have a great point. But I don't buy into this CoVid hysteria. I don't know anyone who has it and I live in Los Angeles. If it comes to such a level of lethality then I will obey social distancing.
- +1 y
I don't know Ms. Ash the therapist. Perhaps you may suggest what my ailments may be, and I'll confirm or dismiss them through the process of elimination.
- +1 y
With regard to being unable to get laid or form a relationship with a woman.
- +1 y
Damn I read some of your comments and your toxic your one of the women who confirm my statement
- +1 y
lol women used to say the same about porn but look where we are today 😁
- +1 y
- +1 y
That's like all of them though! Only uptight religious weirdos and asexuals abstain from porn lol
- +1 y
Are you guys serious?
Do you really prefer something that just lays there and does nothing?
I don't want that. Besides to change sexual positions must be a chore!
You don't touch real... well anything!
The dam thing just stares at you with an emotionless expression with a recorded voice moaning because she was programmed to.
What about this sounds appealing? - +1 y
"Stay out of the way"? Way of who?
- +1 y
- +1 y
Mam. . . in this forum, you got ten downvotes.
Think about that. - +1 y
@Wozarella Uhm, you don't see the difference between a life size robot and a vibrator?
Interesting.
- +1 y
@RolandCuthbert I do see the difference. On the other hand, I can't see why there isn't a similarity in their function. Currently, guys use porn, and some guys use prostitutes. This does not mean that no guys are dating women - it's more of a supplement - an additional option. Women can get artificially inseminated - this does not mean that no women are having kids "naturally" with guys they are in a relationship with. And some women use vibrators. This does not mean they never fuck guys. So why would sex robots be the only technology to supplant women, and why should the guys who use them be written off as unworthy of women?
- +1 y
@Wozarella Right. Find the thread where women are discussing robots to supplant men.
You made the comparison, then pretended like you didn't. I have no problem discussing the differences between men and women. I think that is a healthy conversation. But many in this generation of men are walking around with this weird guilt behind wanting to have sex. Tell the people who make you feel guilty over wanting sex to go to hell.
As the same time though, you are not entitled to it. We are men, put together a plan, get what you need, and live your life.
- +1 y
@RolandCuthbert I haven't seen women discussing that. But quite a significant proportion of any given cohort of men will fail to procreate. And some women are choosing to have kids without the involvement of a father (beyond his sperm). I don't want to judge that, but I could understand if some men feel threatened by or dismayed with that. And I can understand if women are annoyed by incels dreaming about sex robots to replace women. They way I see it, this is incels clinging to something resembling dignity, because their underlying feeling that they are simply surplus to requirements is too terrible to contemplate.
I suppose I just found the "good riddance" vibe in the opinion a bit unnecessary. Knowing how much most men value sex, I don't think any men make a conscious decision to become an incel. I think they end up in a dark place and lash out. - +1 y
I think it is too easy for women to accuse men of entitlement when it comes to sex. Partly, men's sex drive is different from women's - not necessarily stronger, but different. Partly, all else being equal, it is much easier for a woman to get laid than it is for a man. Much easier. So I do feel it's a bit like a rich person telling a poor person not to beg.
That being said, I don't agree with someone refusing to work on themselves and then to expect a so-called "10" to fall into their lap.
On the other hand, I do think sometimes guys HAVE worked on themselves and seen little reward for their efforts, and they get tired of being told to self-improve, when a lot of attraction boils down to the genetic lottery. - +1 y
@Wozarella Well, when it comes to my masculinity and how I define it, I don't really care what women have to say. I am a man. There are qualities I feel that are masculine and I seek to embody those qualities as best as I can.
As for incels, no buying a robot is not retaining your dignity. It is a concession that you cannot deal with another human being in a meaningful relationship. And that's the point. If they were just buying some sexual aid to help out, that would be one thing. But that's not what is happening. They are seeking to replace women with something they can control.
Because this was never about sex. This was not about feminism. This is about control. - +1 y
@RolandCuthbert What I meant about incels is that they cling to the idea of the sex robot as an "I don't need you" way to flip off women. I don't see it as actual dignity, more as a way of avoiding the unfortunate fact that maybe not a lot of women are interested in them or care about their fate either way. I see it as part tantrum, basically.
That being said, I think their loneliness and sexual frustration and longing for validation is often real. I don't buy the feminist narrative about control and I think it demonizes and dehumanizes men unnecessarily. Granted, some men are sadistic jerks who want to control women. But I don't think they feature heavily amongst incels. Those kinds of guys tend to have little trouble finding willing victims, sadly. - +1 y
@Wozarella Well, it might be. But so is a sex aid, right? If I just said I am cool with whatever it gets me off, that would be one thing. Which is what many men and women do. The point is women have never been in a situation where they control this society. They have never run the government, major corporations, the military, our institutions, etc.
So now that they have shown the ability to do these things at least as well as men can, there is this fear. And the men who have this fear can't even speak directly to it. They distract and deflect.
The issue as I see is this complete lack of self-confidence and self-esteem. It is a complete abandonment of what makes us masculine in the first place, our confidence. And rather than doing the hard work of self-discovery, they look for a shortcut.
You don't buy the feminist narrative of control? To me that is a masculine narrative. This is a question of masculinity. It has nothing to do with women or feminism.
We are supposed to be proud of who we are. Not ashamed. And men like sex. I like sex, I don't have an issue saying that to a woman. If she tries to make me feel bad about that, I will tell her to fuck herself.
- +1 y
@MzAsh Do you feel the same about the homeless, mentally ill, those with learning disabilities, those with significant social anxiety disorders? I bet you don't.
Do you know why you are so repulsed by sex robots? Because women now hold the keys to sex and it is the only thing women have to control men. The idea that sex could be available to any man without having to succumb to the torments of women like you, drives you wild. - +1 y
@RolandCuthbert I am not sure I buy the feminist claim that men control or have always controlled society. Granted, a minority of the top men have. But what about the men at the bottom? If men as a group controlled society, why did they build a society where a significant number of them fail to procreate or partner up? Why did they build a society where men were the ones who went to war and frequently died young as a result? Why did they build a society where far more men are locked up than women? Why did they build a society where men have all the disadvantages that men have? It doesn't make sense to me, unless viewed through an evolutionary lens. As in many other species, men compete for mates. Competition can be fierce, and anything that raises your profile is worthwhile doing. That includes building armies, nations, corporations, and technology. Whatever gives you an edge. Men compete for glory, for power, for fame. And a minority of men end out on top. They have the pick of the litter. But most men fail. More men die alone than women. More men don't pass on their genes. More men are homeless, in prison, or working in a dangerous occupation. More men struggle with addiction. Men are unhealthier.
None of that smacks of privilege or power to me. To me it sounds like ruthless competition that produces winners and losers. - +1 y
@MzAsh "Stay out of my way". My, aren't we the little gynocentric crusader?
I still contend that any diminution of your sexual power over men is what really pisses you off. Feminist have successfully killed the male birth control pill. Why? Because of sex and sexual reproduction has been deemed to be the holy power of women and women alone.
I hope a "male pill" is developed and I hope sex robots become available at Walmart. - +1 y
Are men interested in synth sex IN the way? Why do they have to get out of the way?
- +1 y
@Wozarella This is the thing that strikes me as odd. Every single leader of this nation has been "White" and male. . . with one exception. I don't buy the argument that incels have always existed. I think incelism is a very new development. Historically, some men have been shy. Historically, some men have had low self-esteem. But historically, they never blamed society because it was felt that men, especially "White" men, could look to a power structure that reflected their image in the mirror.
This is not a claim.
This is simple fact.
As to why would men build a society were the vast majority would not have success. . . well, it isn't like they built it for that purpose right. But even you know the feeling. I have had the pleasure of watching the Boston Celtics play the Chicago Bulls from a private suite with a private chef for my team, big screen televisions and a balcony to view the game. We had our own private entrance away from the. . . peasants who had to use the regular exits.
We all know the pleasure of being one of the few on occasion. And you can't feel special in being one of the few unless there is a huge number of people who are part of the many.
That is what we derive our specialness from. That is American society. And if you were one of the few, you would mock those who are considered to be one of the many. You would divide them into hierarchical groups. You would pit those groups against one another. All just so you could maintain your status.
The point is that things have changed. And I submit it is because women have access to more power and control over their own lives.
- +1 y
@Wozarella I want to address the second part of your post. What you talk about has always been the case. We always competed against each other. We have always tried to "win" women. A defining moment in my youth was win my best friend and I competed for the affections of a young sista. And she picked him over me. It was devastating. But it taught me that life was a competition.
This is the society men have built. This is what we have decided.
Now if you want to say, you think masculinity should be different. That is a conversation worth having. But if you notice. That conversation does not involve women. They are not the reason for having the conversation. They do not belong in a discussion about what it takes to be a man or to be masculine. We have to define it for ourselves and figure out what is the best path forward.
- +1 y
+1 yThey may for a short short very sorry time until women realize that their replacement means that real women ARE replaceable and that if the options are to date women that will not have a man or her family's best interests in mind not will they genuinely just be themselves, an artificial fuck toy is a viable replacement.
We are in a very strange time where women think they hold the upper hand but wouldn't be able to program a clock on a microwave if men decided to stop helping them. We are watching as demand special treatment and equal inclusion in spaces based off of who they are, not the skills they possess. This will eventually blow up in their faces and return them to second class citizens of they don't cut the bullshit. If this happens, it could be hundreds of years before women get the chances they have right now again. Nobody wants that, but points are being proven buy major political movements that are based in feeling not in fact. All it will take is a few bits of skin texture polymer, some engineering, and basic programming for most men to be longer buy into women's shit.11 Reply- +1 y
Right on.
+1 yReplacing women with robots?
I've never heard of this before. I'm guessing the idea behind this is so that you can buy a girlfriend, and she can be your cook, cleaner, slave, basically submit to whatever you want. And yes I suppose I see the appeal... whatever. However I also think that that would be the great failure of the human race.
As a woman... obviously I feel insulted. I could never even contemplate doing the same with men, it's awful. It's disrespectful, it's rude, it's demeaning. Robots could not replace the men in my life. Only a narrow minded angry person would feel the need.
Everyone is flawed, and when you get closer to someone you find those flaws exasperating, but also oddly beautiful because they are a part of the person. You learn that person's history and you can start to see why those flaws are there. You can never change them, you can only appreciate them, and that's the beauty of getting to know someone on a huge level of depth.
We are animals, we are not perfectly rational robots. We are irrational, sensitive, emotional... and that's the beauty of life. Obviously I get that life is hard, and finding partner is hard. It's particularly hard for average and below looking men because of the way in which women judge men for reproduction is an unforgiving judging system designed to pass on the best genes. It's probably exasperating, it's probably tiring. But replacing women with robots sounds an awful lot like failing and giving up.
So yeah, I see the reasoning, but I also think it's quite ridiculous. It's like when a man or a woman has two bad relationships and goes 'where are all the good men!!!' that always makes me laugh. It takes two to tango, nothing's ever one person's responsibility. If men/women feel like the other gender has failed them, this individual is also likely also to blame.10 Reply
+1 yI mean I'd much rather have sex with a synth than a human.. I'm talking synth though like in Fallout or channel 4's Humans or Detroit: Become Human y'know, like they actually look like people but without all the complications. Because robots like in that above picture freak me the fuck out.
I'm high functioning autistic. I don't really dig any of the relationship shit. Some of my friends can't seem to understand why I'm content to just enjoy porn once in a while and keep away from relationships. They have the audacity to judge me "you've paid for porn? Oh nooo dude!" Like as if it's shameful and pathetic.. meanwhile I'm thinking "You've not paid for porn?" Because from my perspective I'm thinking they're douchebags for only seeing the cheapskate free porn which is like watching clips from a movie.. well it kind of is the same thing. And I'm just thinking "you don't know what you're missing out on", but from their perspective they think I'm a douchebag for paying for porn like some pathetic loser.. but they don't get that I only really have an interest in sex.. and prefer porn to sex anyway. .. mostly because there's no emotional involvement, hence why a sex synth would be great.11 Reply- +1 y
Shit I didn't answer your question sorry.
No I don't think they will replace women. Not completely, and not solely in sex. There will probably be a large number of men like me who would rather have sex with synths, however that large number would probably still only be a small percentage of the population.
I don't think artificial intelligence would likely eradicate any one sex.. more likely at some point in the future it might just eradicate all human life.
I voted incorrectly though. I voted yes because I started answering the question of would I want a synth woman instead of a real one, quickly voted yes, then realised "oh shit that's not the question, the question is would they replace women".. too late, voted. I think I have undiagnosed ADD along with my autism it's err.. fuckin' attention span somewhere between a goldfish and a field mouse over here.
+1 ythough out history the Feminist movement and MGTOW movement. have both happened multiple times. they tend to resurface when they is to much of an in-balance of power leaning either way.
sex robots might take of the role for some peoples partners. but I do not believe everyone will use them. at least not at first that is.
what is a bit more worrying are these issues.
What are your thoughts on artificial sperm using stem cells
What are your thoughts on artificial sperm using stem cells?
Guys, Thoughts on girl who Spurglers (steal a guys baby juice)
Guys, Thoughts on girl who Spurglers (steal a guys baby juice)?10 Reply
Anonymous(25-29)+1 yOh really? Then I want fairness.
I would like to replace real male interaction with MY IDEAL MALE ROBOT PARTNER.
I will design his looks the way I want. I'll program that he will ONLY STAY WITH ME, be calm, devoted, romantic, CUDDLY and SEXY , handle my tantrums and also be like an obedient cute doggo, He would NEVER IMAGINE life without me and make me the centre of his world. Muuaahahaha and he will actually be the one whom I'll genuinely LOVE FOREVER.613 Reply- +1 y
Fair enough.
- +1 y
Sounds awesome! But as we've all learned from lived or shared experience, that kind of certainty and predictability bores women straight into another man's arms.
Opinion Owner+1 y@DonCachondo yeah I'm a little retard, because I prefer unconventional love then only it will LAST FOREVER. I don't know how to fix this flaw in me.
- +1 y
I present to you 'Henry'
![Do you agree with the MGTOW crew, that intelligent female robots will replace women?]()
And he's being taught to hold an actual conversation. I'd love to have one of these cleaning the house while I watch tv 🤣
www.wired.com/.../amp - +1 y
"Love that will last forever"... like in a romantic comedy? How has your search for "love that will last forever" going?
- +1 y
I just hope he is as energetic as you xD
Opinion Owner+1 y@ThisIsMyOpinion he will be, I'll train him
Opinion Owner+1 y@KrakenAttackin lol I'm not searching anyone right now
- +1 y
- +1 y
@KrakenAttackin How would that even be possible? It's just a talking piece of rubber. I'd want a robot to clean the house, I don't talk to appliances
- +1 y
- +1 y
@KrakenAttackin You sure have a warped view of reality
I think eventually they will become an option alongside women. Like porn is an option right now. Like visiting a prostitute is an option. Etc.
I think replicating the interaction you can have with an actual flesh-and-blood human, the relationship you can build, is going to be challenging to say the least.
But technology is being developed at such a dizzying pace that why not, someday?
Women can already get artificially inseminated and have a baby that way.
Brave new world.10 Reply
Anonymous(30-35)+1 yIt would be amazing, incels would stop existing, introverts would have someone to practice with, freaks would be able to explore their kinks and even assholes
who would rather sodomize a doll than to accept they can't maintain a real relationship because they're too narrow-minded and can't take on responsibilities will be happy. Everybody wins, even me as I am bisexual and the sex robots would weed out the men and I'd have more women for myself. The industry is growing although I don't see any AI sex robots in the near future for ethical reasons and the fear of skynet attacking with dildos lol they're getting more realistic tho and I think it's great
35 Reply
Opinion Owner+1 y@chris_987 Yes, my boyfriend got a tiny bullet vibrator for me so we can finish at the same time but the question is about the possibility of intelligent robots replacing women, and it's not like I can hold a meaningful conversation with a bullet vibrator so I don't really get your point...
- +1 y
Lol you really think men will but intelligent in a female robot? At best he’ll just program her to make dirty talk and just be always down for sex. If we want meaningful conversation we can just interact with other humans. The robots is like your vibrator it just the to stimulate your dick in ways a woman can’t.
- +1 y
What Chris doesn't get is that real women are the ones that can make us feel like no robot ever will. I mean I guess I can see why he wouldn't know that...
Opinion Owner+1 y@chris_987 Well, if there wasn't a market
adult toy companies would stop trying to develop interactive sex robots and resort to flesh lights and prostate stimulators, don't you think? But there IS a market for this, that's why they're being manufactured and constantly improved to meet their clients needs
@TisIsMyOpinion Thank you, I did mean that a vibrator cannot replace a man by that. But I do think for some people a robot or toy it's the next best thing so why not 🤷🏼♀️
- 3.6K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yNo, but not because they couldn't. I mean most women are not living up to their potential, and are basically phoning it in (when they are not belittling men that is), however the moment those robots start getting to that degree of quality women will suddenly realize that they will have nothing if they don't clean up their act and will eventually change for the better (some day I hope).
137 Reply- +1 y
Excellent response! Finally someone who gets it!
If women become endangered and feel like they're threatened by competition from near perfect robots, they'll hopefully change for the better. - +1 y
@Isten Because unlike women men are not telling women that they are not needed, that they are worthless, that they don't contribute anything that they don't matter as parents, they are not the ones initiating the majority of divorces, stealing the children away from them, then taking everything they have all while claiming to be the victim. They are not the ones violently attacking their spouses (70% of all nonreciprocal violence perpetrated between intimate partners is perpetrated by women against men), they are not the ones demanding that we be equal while demanding that only the other gender should have to stick to their traditional gender roles.
Women contribute next to nothing to relationships while men give everything (yes they do. They initiate everything, pay for everything, then women say we are so equal that men also have to do half the house work even though they are the ones paying the bills and doing the majority of the paid work (based upon statistical data), they claim that "motherhood is the hardest job in the world" while turning around and telling fathers that they are not needed and are not doing enough even though statistically men actually work slightly more then women when all things are tallied up (but again, get no credit for anything they do ever as you are showing.).
On top of that when men point out the inequities and inequalities and down right toxic sexism that is rampant in our relationships today, women flip out and attack them and claim they are worthless and they can prove it because the man is not of value to the woman (thus proving that women do not see men as having inherent value but rather a mans value exists solely on his ability to be useful to a woman i. e. he has value as a tool not as a person.). - +1 y
@Isten Men are not perfect, no one claimed that and no one ever will because unlike women society had expectations of men. We are not allowed to be selfish assholes because women will not allow it and society will not allow it. We cannot violently attack our spouse if we are angry unlike women because society will not allow it, we cannot abandon our families as women do (70% divorces are filed by women, most cited reason being no fault. 18% are filed by men due to their wifes infidelity. Meaning that nearly 90% of all divorces are filed either by the woman or because of her. Part of this is because custody laws favor women.
Men can only get better then even custody about 9% of the time vs. women's 61%(equal custody occurs about 30% of the time).
Men pay child support 80% of the time and out of those men about 80% actually do pay (those that don't are usually caught in a debtors prison (but not all obviously, some are just assholes)). Out of the 20% of women who are expected to pay, only about 20% do (because their are no expectations placed on women to act like decent human beings)). - +1 y
@Isten Then if you look at the data you will see that after she steals his children from him (perfectly protected by the law), after she steals his money from him (encouraged by the legal system), after she defames him in court to gain extra resources out of him (80% of all accusations of spousal rape occur during child custody battles were no evidence is needed (and almost never is sited as a reason for the divorce) i. e. they are false accusations), he is left with absolutely nothing. This is why male suicide, which is already four times greater then women's rates, doubles after divorce.
Women also lie about rape to destroy the lives of men. Multiple studies have shown upwards of 40% of accusations are PROVABLY false, that is their is no question that they are false. Who knows how many are false that no one knows about. Despite this women are not punished for this in anyway. Three women accused a taxi driver of rape, what they didn't know is that he had a camera in his taxi due to having been robbed before. What it showed is them spouting off racist rhetoric at him and then refusing to pay him when he demanded they do so. The police then freed the man from jail after revuing the recording and told him they would not persue charges against the women despite him wanting to press charges.
Legally women are exempt from the law being 160% less likely to be charged and when they are they get only a third of the sentencing men do. Despite this women claim to be victims and oppressed and blame men for it (despite having more rights then men do). - +1 y
@Isten By law, thanks to hermsman vs. seyer, no matter the circumstances a man is always obligated to pay child support (this was applauded by women in general and feminists in particular). The court found that the 12 year old boy in this case, who was raped by his babysitter, was legally responsible for the child that resulted from that rape and mandated he pay child support to his rapist. Its been upheld in Arizona with a 14 year old boy who was raped by his 28 year old neighbor, New York (if memory serves) when a woman stole her ex boyfriends sperm from a used condom he had thrown away, and in if memory serves florida where a mans ex stole his sperm from the sperm bank (he had gotten a visectomy in order to avoid just such an occasion but had some frozen just in case he changed his mind later). In all cases they were punished and the women were not.
It is legal for a woman to knowingly lie about the paternity of her child and garnish a mans wages as a result. In most cases those lost wages even when found to be wrongfully taken, are not required to be paid back. Women have supported this system and defend it.
In every scenario women have pushed for these rules, endorsed them, and celebrated them with very few attempting to point out how descriminatory this is (and how it destroys relationships as men are essentially forced to live with a gun to their head when they are with women as they can destroy them utterly with no effort on their part and with little to no recourse all of which women are perfectly comfortable with). - +1 y
@Isten So men are held to a standard women are not, women have wanted it this way fought for it and accused men of sexism and of being sexually inept, unwanted and generally worthless if they try to point out these discepencies. Would you like me to continue down the list of things women have fought tooth and nail for that have harmed men to the benefit of women? To the rules women put in place and exploit to harm men for the benefits of the woman? Or do you want to just tell me I'm bitter and no woman wants me as a way of trying to justify this gross injustice?
- +1 y
That's quite the blitzkrieg of facts brother! I wonder how she'll be able to debate herself out of that minefield!
- +1 y
@Physics-Man precisely. Its not that women are inherently bad or anything but rather they have had no competition and are generally exempt from rules so they have become their worse selves instead of their best selves. With competition and men being fed up of women refusing to listen to them when they have issues and having an alternate source, that will force women to actually compete and have something to offer men other then just sex.
- +1 y
I won't read all that monologue, but as far as I can see, you used statistics which weren't even proven. So in short: source or it didn't happen. 🙃
And nope, fox news doesn't scream creditable source.
Aside of that women are notoriously known for competing with each other, so if you decide to go for trailer trash, that's not my issue. And women are very much held accountable for their mistakes. The world doesn't work like men=bad, women=good, no matter how much MGTOW stuff wants to make you believe. - +1 y
Oh please. Isn't is AMAZING that men who actually get women DON'T want robots? It's only the ones who can't get a woman who use this. So... We don't want you now, so what makes you think we will want you when you make yourself laughable by having a robotic partner lol? Especially when the guys we want still prefer us lmao
- +1 y
And I won't bother reading your rant, but your first part "Because unlike women men are not telling women that they are not needed" totally contradicts you being for the robot. I read that, and since it was completely hypocritical and ironic, knew you were just ranting here and are (probably) another guy who can't get a woman, which makes sense in all of this.
- +1 y
@hellionthesagereborn If you think we are going to fight for your attention with a robot, you are insane. First of all, if you're even okay with having a robotic partner then obviously we don't want you anyway. Secondly, while you have a robotic partner lmao we have it narrowed down to the men who are desirable to us. You are really doing us a favor and only hurting the men.
- +1 y
@MissMovinOn I know. This just shows you how mentally ill a lot of men have become. It's sad.
- +1 y
@Yads_Is_Back Its not a rant, its a list of issues that women endorsed pushed for and then treat men like shit for brining up also I know you won't read it, you said precisely what I said you would do to a T (you could go back and read it to see if that is true, but you won't because your happier bitching and whining instead of trying to understand my and many mens perspective).
- +1 y
She won't, they never do. That's why I called her out and said she would immediately try to attack me and any man that criticizes women with the claim that we cannot get women which itself proves they only see men as tools as our only value in their eyes is in what we can provide them. All the other commenters proved my point to, rather sad really since I was pointing out real issues that could be resolved and fix everything if they were willing to own up to what women as a whole did (can't take individual blame for what the group did unless you endorsed it which these women clearly have done.).
- +1 y
@MissMovinOn I never said I wanted a robot. In fact I was quite clear I see that as a waste of money. What I stated is that men are checking out of relationships as can be seen by the statistical data, women are pretty shitty as your attitude and these other women's attitude shows (I pointed out statistical facts, not opinions, in response I am being insulted (well, they are trying I preempted them on that) and belittled for suggesting that women were not perfect (that should show you just how bad things are as it pertains to women's behavior. You can claim all men are assholes (women do all the time), that their are no good men left (most women do), or that men "aren't really men anymore"(which plenty of women do) but the second men turn around and start looking at your flaws, that's where the line must be crossed? How fragile must your ego be for that to be this big of an issue. Japan is already seeing a huge drop in men who are willing to date and marry to the point where its actually adversely affecting their population growth. Eventually it will get to this.
- +1 y
@Yads_Is_Back Because as we all know (because women tell us this at every opportunity), only men are worthless pieces of shit, women are perfect in every way and can never ever be questioned. How dare I suggest that their are things women need to work on, after all your angry outburst isn't due to an incredibly fragile ego, but rather the knowledge of your own perfection because you know. . . vagina.
- +1 y
@Isten As for the statistics, yes, they are verified. In fact all of them are but why would you bother asking for sources if we both know you won't read them (you couldn't even get through the list of them, how are you going to read through all those articles and papers)? Are you trying to waste my time out of spite?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermesmann_v._Seyer
buncherlaw.com/.../
Here is an article (you'll have to use a translator) talking about how after alimony reform was set to take affect in the Netherlands, divorces skyrocketed (alimony requirements were being reduced the next year so they saw a surge in divorces being filed right before that point so these women could still get the old higher alimony pay out):
www.ad.nl/.../q3996666-dutch-divorce-rate-skyrockets-in-response-to-alimony-reform-thoughts
https://youtu.be/vaTanxWCkcg
Here is abuse data:
http://www.newscastmedia.com/domestic-violence.htm
www.medicaldaily.com/domestic-violence-against-men-women-more-likely-be-intimate-terrorists-controlling-behavior-290662
http://www.fact.on.ca/Info/dom/george94.htm
Here is one showing that men are raped by women at comparable rates:
https://time.com/3393442/cdc-rape-numbers/ - +1 y
I haven't said anything disrespectful to men on this thread. The closest it came was when I said that a lot of men have become mentally ill with this stuff, which is true. You want stats? Look at the male suicide rates and the reasons.
No, I didn't read what you said in all of those replies and don't really want to - I may eventually - but if I disrespected you and that's your take then I'll be the first to say I'm sorry. I value men for the things they are masculine about. (I don't like those men who let women turn them into girls, but that's another story.) I want kids, and I want them to have a good dad. I can't fix a car, but most men know a lot more about it than I do. Most men are more willing to do manual jobs that are things we need every day apart from academics. Look, I like men for being men; otherwise I'd be either a feminist or a lesbian, and I'm neither. So I'm sorry if I offended you or any man for that matter. - +1 y
@Isten www.propublica.org/.../boys-in-custody-and-the-women-who-abuse-them
www.elitedaily.com/.../1106317
jezebel.com/why-shameless-objectification-can-be-a-good-thing-5572097
www.bellanaija.com/.../
www.mirror.co.uk/.../women-nagging-husbands-death-research-3517119
Here are the sources for the false rape accusations:
www.ipt-forensics.com/journal/volume6/j6_2_4.htm
www.mediaradar.org/...n_false_rape_allegations.php
Here are the ones that show the paternity laws are bias:
www.mommyish.com/.../
www.irp.wisc.edu/.../...S_09-11_Final_revi2012.pdf
www.dailymail.co.uk/.../...sponge-ex-husbands.html - +1 y
@Isten Data showing that women abuse children more then men (one of the excuses given for greater custody rights for women):
www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/cb/cm06.pdf
Here is one showing that men pay more in taxes then women despite women using more tax money as well as various other gender benefits:
https://femoid.com/its-true-only-men-pay-tax/
https://hbr.org/2009/09/the-female-economy
www.telegraph.co.uk/.../
www.nerdwallet.com/.../
This shows descrimination against boys in school:
http://ftp.iza.org/dp5973.pdf
www.educationnews.org/.../
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMEPlcYDn3s
Here is the source for men working slightly more then women (another excuse used to justify women divorcing and robbing men blind):
www.usatoday.com/.../ - +1 y
@Isten https://youtu.be/HeVKCj9_-Xc
Here is the legal issues:
www.telegraph.co.uk/.../
www.law.umich.edu/.../...r_gender_disparities.aspx
So I'm sure your going to go through all of those sources and acknowledge that what I said was in fact accurate as you said you would (you won't. Your probably not even going to read this. The others won't either, your all highly predictable that way.) - +1 y
@Yads_Is_Back I have looked at the stats, I have provided them, your more then welcome to look up any of the links I have provided. But thank you for reminding me I forgot to add those statistics as well.
- +1 y
@Isten Suicide stats:
https://hashimashi.com/suicide-after-divorce/
mensdivorce.com/suicide-rates-high-divorced-men/
www.theglobeandmail.com/.../
goodmenproject.com/.../
also here is an interesting experiment done by a woman (she gained a new found respect for what men go through):
https://youtu.be/0-uv8gT9Kxw - +1 y
@hellionthesagereborn
T-T-T-T-TRIPLE KILL! M-M-MONSTER KILL! FATALITY! FLAWLESS VICTORY! - +1 y
@Physics-Man what can I say, I come prepared.
- +1 y
@hellionthesagereborn "Change for the better?"
How is a thing that doesn't move, doesn't touch you back, doesn't feel like real skin and won't even blik if a fly lands on her eyeball while you are fucking it better? Even changing sex positions must be a chore since you have to put ther there yourself. - +1 y
@hellionthesagereborn
Oh look we meet again! This will be fun...
I read your little rant and:
Women never told men they are not needed.
About those 70% of all nonreciprocal violence, verbal violence counts as violence to those stats. So if a man beats the living hell out of his partner and she calls him a piece of shit it already counts as reciprocal violence. That and majority of murder domestic victims are women.
"Women contribute next to nothing to relationships" if you never had a woman iniciating sex once, pay for anything, do any of the housework, pay any bills and not value your role as a father, congratulations of getting a sex robot and not a woman.
Actually when you said she reduced mens value to tools, she did that after you reduced their value to sex.
Women have no expectations for us to be perfect.
You really have to tell me since when society did not allowed us to be selfish assholes.
"We cannot violently attack our spouse" since women still get killed way more at the hands of their partner it looks like we can and do. Maybe that's why they divorce us more.
Do you have something agaist paying child support for you own child? If do you have a problem. Child support is you giving money to your son or daugther!
By the way in 51% of costody battles both sides agrree that the kids should be with their mother.
False rape accusations are less than 5% of all accusations. AND less then 30% of accusation end in jail time.
If a man his raped he has to pay child support, not only does this not apply in every US state it doesn't aplly to the rest of the world.
Yes I want you to continue the list where you forget some of the information. By the way funny how you just spill all of that out of a simple argument. Yu have that in a doc in you PC ready to be copy pasted here at any moment don't you? Wow how angry and frustrated must you be... - +1 y
@ThisIsMyOpinion Oh look, the women are saved now that the white knight has appeared (what would they have done without you). As for everything you have stated, you are wrong, go look at my 30 plus sources I used (no point in rebutting your statements as I have already done that before you even showed up and lets be honest, from every other interaction we have had you have done nothing but waste my time (because you lack the ability to self reflect which means speaking to you is less productive then speaking to a brick wall).
- +1 y
@hellionthesagereborn if you have an issue with someone not agreeing with you in a site made to exchange ideas that is your problem.
Your sorces are not more valid than mine. Besides I never said that women don't abuse men or that men don't get longer sentences in jail for the same crime. That is real.
What I said was we are far, very far from being women's victims. We murder, rape and abuse them at a much larger scale. This is a fact.
You have all that victim mentality and I am the one that has no hability to reflect? Sure... - +1 y
@ThisIsMyOpinion You keep trying to attack me, I don't know why (don't much care either). I have no issue with you disagreeing with me, that is what this site is about after all. What I have an issue with is some one who disagrees with reality, aggressively, ignores everything that has been stated, the multiple scientific studies and statistics purely because it doesn't align with their world view. I'm all for discussion, but your not and that's the problem. I already addressed everything you could possibly claim, I provided scientific papers on it, federal statistics on it, and your ignoring that because your an ideolog. You wouldn't have commented to begin with because you ignored all of my sources right from the start). Your an ideolog, its like talking to an NPC, you don't have any capacity to learn or adapt.
As stated, if you cannot accept the truth, and you have shown numerous times you cannot, then what point is their in talking because your obviously not listening? - +1 y
@hellionthesagereborn
Attack you? In what way? Did I insulted you? Or do you consider pepole who have different stances an attack on you? You know like the crazy feminazis you dislike so much do.
You saying something does not make it a reality. I didn't said that women didn't iniciated most of the divorces. I stated why. Most of what you said I didn't desagree with, I simply added more information.
Another example, regarding costody battles I told that in most cases both parents agree that the kids should be with the mother. I did not said anything about women getting the majority of costodies.
See? Didn't said your stats were wrong.
Question for you... Who does rape the other side more? Who murders the other side more? Who assaults the other side more? Go see stats and answer me then.
As you can see I didn't attacked you or your numbers. You are the one refusing to hear pass what you know. - +1 y
@ThisIsMyOpinion See, your doing it again. Your getting hyper aggressive and then intentionally misrepresent what is stated to frame it in the worse light you can (and an incorrect one) in order to create a strawman argument that attacks me rather then the arguments (because you keep trying to act as if my problem is with disagreeing with me which is not the case @Physics-Man will tell you, I disagree with him some times but I don't have a problem discussing things with him because its a back and forth exchange, with you it is not, that is the problem).
You are asking questions that have been answered thus proving that you did not read my statements. Women rape men at comparable rates (I linked it). 70% of all violent crime victims are male, the more violent the crime the more likely the victim is to be male. Again, 70% of domestic violence is perpetrated by women against men and in addition to that women are more likely to be verbally and emotionally abusive and controlling as per the data. Again, all the questions you ask have already been answered so why did you ask them unless you have no intention of listening? I will give you one more chance and then we are done, why speak if you have no intention of listening? - +1 y
@hellionthesagereborn
Women rape men at close rates? On the article that you sent says that only 7% of men report being sexually forced to penetrate someone. Most of that someone were women yes, but come on, 7%? Do you think that is a lot?
www.nsvrc.org/.../...s-about-sexual-violence_0.pdf
"70% of all violent crime victims are male" yes done to men mostly by other men.
"70% of domestic violence is perpetrated by women" You are contradicting yourself. You put this stat before, but as nonreciprocal. I told you that verbal abuse still counts to those stats, so if a man beats his partner and she insults him still counts as reciprocal violence.
By the way most domestic violence victims are still women no matter where you look. At close rates, fine, but how can you paint us as the victims here when we still do it more often and women die due to it far more? - +1 y
@ThisIsMyOpinion Why do you lie when the article is right their? To quote the article: "And now the real surprise: when asked about experiences in the last 12 months, men reported being “made to penetrate”—either by physical force or due to intoxication—at virtually the same rates as women reported rape (both 1.1 percent in 2010, and 1.7 and 1.6 respectively in 2011)."
As it states they are comparable. So your lying and your intentionally lying. This is why I am done speaking to you, that is why I said your not worth the effort because for you this isn't a discussion that is about getting to the truth, its about you being right even when your provably wrong. You don't care about the facts, you don't care about the truth so that is why you don't listen, you just preach and yell at those who you disagree with without providing anything of value, without providing any real argument. That is why I stated you are a waste of my time because the data is all their and your intentionally trying to manipulate it to say what you want, maliciously so. Now I gave you multiple chances to fix this, to discuss this as a reasonable human being would discuss any other topic and you chose not to do that, you chose to lie and manipulate and ignore the truth and then accuse me of doing what you yourself have been doing from the start. So we are done now, all the data is available that disproves every single one of your claims, I am no longer needed in this conversation so I'm done with you. - +1 y
@hellionthesagereborn I did read the article.
"Nearly 7 percent of men, however, reported that at some point in their lives, they were “made to penetrate” another person"- This is a part of the Times article that you posted. See? Not lying.
Also I posted an articles too with far diferent stats than the ones you showed just now.
Again most things about what you said I just added some more information. Me not agreeing with you is a big problem to you.
I am fine with having a discutions, but I don't think you change your views. No matter where you look, even assuming that your data is the correct one and not mine, women are still raped and harrassed more.
So how can you act ike men are some victims of women and society?
The idea that women would be replaced in this fashion would be ludicrous. If this robot was exactly the same as a woman, why imagine a robot? If these robots were designed to replace women who would design them? Men? Our flawed perceptions would make an even more flawed creation. Women are in no way perfect, but they are complimentary in ways that can't be perfectly predicted. Now a cyborg chick with a weaponized robotic arm, I might find that attractive. However, the perfect woman is unimaginable, because doing so is the first flaw. Some key attributes can be applied, but these will always be generalities.
10 Reply
+1 yI don't think they'll replace women, but I'll be honest, I would consider getting one who can at least pretend like she has free-will (although obviously if she did, she wouldn't choose me, so I kind of run into a wall there). It doesn't even have to be a "robot", it can be a fucking hologram, I just want someone to talk to, and I've been alive long enough to know that women are not going to give me that chance.
Judge me if you want, there are definitely women for whom vibrators have already replaced men, and that's just a big robot penis.10 Reply
Anonymous(36-45)+1 yIf men were intelligent enough to stop having relationships and marriages with women who have nothing to offer but pussy and an attitude, this wouldn't even have made it past the imaginary stage.
I'd rather have an intelligent robot that can cook, clean, and do other menial tasks so life would be easier and I could enjoy my woman's company instead of being so busy all the time. It would be better than hiring someone to do it, too, because everything it does would be right the first time with no supervision.
But women still wouldn't like it. Mainly because intelligent men who could afford one would only be selecting women based on looks, personality, and what kind of effort she puts into herself and the relationship.33 Reply- +1 y
Agreed... except those guys at the top are gonna have all the real women even more, because the unwanted guys moved out of the way for robots. Those high men are gonna end up with all the real women, so they’ll end up being the ones benefitted. Plenty of real women to choose from to get those same benefits but even better, along with the woman actually loving him instead of being programmed. Those will be the guys who win in the whole scenario
Opinion Owner+1 y@Yads_Is_Back you're right, but that whole "plenty of real women to choose from" aspect has a good chance of backfiring, as well
- +1 y
True enough
Anonymous(45 Plus)+1 yWho knows, but it's already happening to sex workers..
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/world-news/prostitute-warns-sex-robot-takeover-21391568
''A legal prostitute has warned of a " sex robot takeover" after a brothel staffed entirely by dolls opened its door. ''
''This sex doll brothel could be a stepping stone to a sex robot takeover of the Las Vegas area sex industry," she said.''
"While human prostitutes are mired in legal red tape, doll brothels don't have to worry about complying with any restrictive legislation.''
There was also a case of a brothel introducing just one doll, and it made more money than the real ones.10 Reply341 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. They will replace women who only bring sex to a relationship. Women who make good mothers, who are loving, compassionate, driven, positive, and want to be on the same team as their man have nothing to fear.
Women who bring only sex to the table in a relationship probably can and will be replaced by robots.61 Reply- +1 y
Best answer!!!
Anonymous(30-35)+1 yYes and no. Robots will replace women for many men, but not all. But they will change things in some important ways. They will force women to be better women.
Women have slowly but surely reduced their value to men over the last 5 decades or so. Today, women offer men much less than their counterparts did back then. They don't cook, they pay other people to raise their kids, they expect men to do all the things women used to do in the past like cleaning, housekeeping, etc.
In short, these days the primary thing women bring to the table is sex, and it comes with a lot of costs and risks. Many men will undoubtedly forgo costs and risks and opt for the robots instead. I think we will reach a point where women will need to step up and begin offering more value again, like they did in the past.20 ReplyOnly those would buy it who can't get women. In all seriousness, we are a species that relies on interaction with each other and we work better together than individually. The robot can only do so much, as in it lessens the feeling of being alone, but doesn't replace it.
639 Reply- +1 y
“Only those would buy it who can't get women.” TRUE.
It’s not going to affect us, since the guys who can get women still have our attention. The robot girlfriends would only make the desperate guys look pathetic and laughable. What a great thing for high school bullies to make fun of lmao - +1 y
Does this guy look like he can't get women?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PU0LqzBKZvU - +1 y
@Truthatanycost the thing your kind doesn't want to aknowledge that it's not about looks. This dude has some issues, he is projecting personality attributes to a sex doll.
- +1 y
- +1 y
Perhaps, but I also see some comments in the source website. A guy says his friend is good looking, smart, good career, big brain. Made some bad choices in relationships then got himself a doll as a surprise. Apparently he's been with it for 2 years and looks happy LOL.
The bodybuilder could just be an expert troll though... - +1 y
@Truthatanycost I can say I’m actually Donald Trump right here behind this screen but that doesn’t make it true. So he could be lying. Even if it’s true though, that doesn’t mean there’s nothing wrong with the guy. And honestly, if he’s sleeping with a robot, there’s plenty wrong with him 😂
If you’re trying to make it look like men who are able to get women actually go for robots, your effort is pointless. The whole thing about robots in this case is for guys who can’t get laid. Guys who easily get real women will never go for a robot. - +1 y
The statement always like amazes me men who can't get women is so frequently used like women are some trophy you win after proving your worth like such an entitlement of thinking that you are above and some magical being i just want a view why is that so? With all respect I ask this
- +1 y
I think this one of the reasons people are going behind such robots or it was always a fantasy of man perhaps
- +1 y
@Aakash_Hangargi The phrase is a defense mechanism that allows them to avoid looking deeper into why any men are even contemplating robots. If you just say ''they can't get real women'' then you can rationalize away any other potential reasons.
- +1 y
Yeah i also made that deduction but they say it in so mean way that instead of assuming I wanted to know what are there real thoughts behind thd term I would like to know it from them
- +1 y
@Truthatanycost Yeah, you could get down into it and really look deep at WHY those guys can’t get women - whether that the guy just isn’t desirable or that women are too picky, etc. But the fact remains the same: only the guys who can’t get women go for this. That’s the general idea and the only part that matters.
- +1 y
@Aakash_Hangargi The ego will not allow such a thing, but it's not important. We will see how things unfold in the future. it will be interesting for sure! These are putting brothels out of business which begs the question why.
- +1 y
@Truthatanycost agreed
- +1 y
Well honestly, either way you look at it - whether it’s that the women are too picky or that the guy just isn’t desirable - it’s not going to bother us that he doesn’t measure up and sleeps with a robot lol
But it WILL give us a laugh. So if either of you ever gets a robot as a girlfriend, make a comedy show or something 😂 - +1 y
@Yads_Is_Back Either that or men who simply don't want to bother putting in the effort. To a certain point, there's really no such thing as a guy who CAN'T get laid but simply different degrees of effort he may have to put into meeting the preferences of a woman who meets his own preferences.
- +1 y
@DonCachondo Should I say men who give up due to not being so desired by women then? Maybe that’s more fitting, but it’s still the same thing. Still, either way, it leaves us without those and with the ones we find desirable, hence why the desirable ones don’t get robots lol
- +1 y
@Yads_Is_Back There isn't necessarily a correlation. Lots of guys, particularly smart ones, preemptively prospect the field and observe how men around them fare in relationships, marriage, etc. and find that they want nothing to do with any of it. And the internet makes it easier than ever! Any average, moderately reasonable guy could easily conclude that the myriad of foreseeable disappointments that men risk with women and relationships totally invalidates the disproportionate investments men have to put in upfront.
- +1 y
We will only know once such thing occurs in reality to an extent but I really see this as buisness opportunity feeding on shallowness of people who are so much entitled but the point I notice is only the rich or richiss people can afford it so the desirable men are the once who will be ordering such robotic toys because they would get more time to focus on goals and less distraction while so called undesirable men will have no choice
- +1 y
@Aakash_Hangargi I would bet you my life plus everything I have that those most desired men wouldn’t get the robots for themselves. Because I know it for a fact. Tbh they’d love and leave the women, but it would still be the real women. Then again, having sex with s robot is definitely something to get yourself made fun of.
- +1 y
Hmm i partial agree with that desired men would go for women ofcourse initially, but if i see it from corporate angle they will engrave things into the brain for example take Facebook it started as an social media show me someone educated who has not created an account and utilies/wastes time on it.
It was slow in the beginning them boom then most got addicted and nobody can replace a women I sure nothing beats real deal, but if they brain wash you we might start believing it.
Another example would be tooth paste earlier in Asian countries they used to brush with salt and baboon sticks for brushing teeth in some parts
Then Colgate came they told its not good for health and hurts thd oral hygine now the same Colgate company advertises the same thing is there salt in your toothpaste and they talk about its benifits
It's all in psychological game - +1 y
They will make it a status symbol like your iPhone then nobody will laugh but would desire it more
- +1 y
@Aakash_Hangargi I honnestly think people will still judge you for using it. It's a machine and not a huma being. It's a oversized flashlight. Paying more for one doesn't make you look rich makes you look weird.
- +1 y
I do agree with you as I said there could not be replacement of real things but if put onto agenda they will look like make it the new cool thing todo
Video games were largely critiscied earlier and looked as weird and most people were called nerds for playing it or something else but now see its more than a billion dollar industry and look how many of children teenage youth oldies are hooked to it - +1 y
And also they make adult games sure it is way beyond weird to stimulate oneself with virtual figures and images but people still do that hence the popularity
- +1 y
@Aakash_Hangargi It’s only something that will provoke criticism. What the new “status” thing will be is a more extreme version of what already is - the ability of a man to get lots of women. The difference will be that being asexual for a man will then be seen as better instead of worse. Now it’s looked down upon, but when you bring robots into the picture, it’ll be more like “At least he doesn’t need a robot and takes the rejection like a man.”
Don’t forget that status is seen by everyone else around you - both men and women... well, except for robots 😂 - +1 y
That would be seen by men as jealous women and not considerate it not me but as what would people might think later on if this Hypothetical thing which has only 10% chance of possibility but it seems like a defense mechanism to counter and value themselves getting competition by robots but if there is lady robot ofcourse there will be a man robot aswell so it will negate it then it will be a choice as robots vs humans personally it's stupid I guess but it will be a reality to small extent like a kink kinda thing
- +1 y
@Aakash_Hangargi More like mental issues 😂 We have no desire to compete with robots. If he needs a robotic partner then, like someone else said, he has no business with real women anyway. No wonder he has a robot! Now if the men we WANT were to start having robots... THEN your point would be valid. But that won’t happen
- +1 y
And honestly, it’s the same thing with MGTOW. It would make a lot of progress if the guys we desire were part of it. But that won’t happen because they’re getting all the women so what would they be complaining about?
The MGTOW guys and the ones who would have robots are the undesired men, for the most part, and that’s why they’re still undesired and almost nothing has changed. The things that have changed even had nothing to do with them. - +1 y
@Aakash_Hangargi I honestly can imagine robots replacing women.
Who the hell wants a super expensive sex fool that just lays there and does nothing!
Doesn't touch you back and doesn't responds to stimulus like a human being.
Imagine that you having sex with it and a fly lands on her eyeball. The dam thing isn't even going to blink to take the fly off!
To change sexual position it must be a chore since you have to be the one that puts her in the new position and it kills the mood.
Kinky sex like bondage and roleplay that you didn't had to program into her are off the table...
No. Just no. - +1 y
As I said that's not a fact that can't get girl so, then I would say girls who use dildo are the once who don't get men 😂 and it would be false
- +1 y
There just toys as consider them it won't and can't replace human touch
- +1 y
@thisismyopinion you have seen the robot named Sophia which was shown all over the world with AI technology it uses sarcastic comments like a person asked will you kill us all and take over world she said Yes but still there is time and it was on its own like logic works in human minds they encoded in chioset I do agree humans are irreplaceable
- +1 y
@Aakash_Hangargi If the robots were meant just as a sex toy then that would make 100% sense and be right. But they’re not only wanting it for a sex toy but also as a partner. Even read the responses on this question. It’s hilarious, and it’s a self-explanatory way of a man saying he can’t be loved by a woman.
- +1 y
MGTOW and Feminists these are the agendas for extrimits groups with something a alterior motive nowadays they don't make much sense.
- +1 y
@Aakash_Hangargi Very true. But it doesn’t change the fact that their actions are representational
- +1 y
Agreed
- +1 y
@Aakash_Hangargi no question that some must be really realistic. Still at least for me there would always be that thinking that it's not really alive and I am fucking it...
- +1 y
Yes i do agree with you same for me I was just curious about the point that was highlighted people who were not getting a girl will go for it but that could only be partially true
No, I think men want a soft and sweet woman who makes their house a home, makes a family with them. I don't think these robots will be good for much more than sex, people need care and comfort and love as well. Even if they can show emotion, I don't think it'll be nearly enough the same.
23 Reply- +1 y
- +1 y
@KrakenAttackin Not if you look in the right place. Go find yourself a good southern woman
- +1 y
I live in the South.
+1 yHow can you be okay with sticking your penis into a machine? Even if it is lifelike it is still not even your own species but a machine. That's disturbing! If you even have to adopt a mindset of being okay with having a robotic partner then you need mental help. I also find it interesting how men who get a lot of females would laugh at this.
218 Reply- +1 y
Something similar could be said about the millions of plastic penises women stick into themselves...
- +1 y
@Truthatanycost You mean in comparison to male sex toys? Yeah sex toys are sex toys but you're talking about making an actual robot partner here and not only a sex toy. Making a robot partner to show you emotions like he even specified in the update is pathetic.
- +1 y
@Jack9949 I forgot that some guys just fuck anything that moves.
- +1 y
@Jack9949 That's good. Keep your robots then that way you don't bring more autistic kids to the earth.
- +1 y
Your response's soullessness and lack of compassion is ironic given the subject...
- +1 y
@Truthatanycost I mean I’m not one to play the victim here but nobody seems to give a fuck about the socially challenged anymore. It’s only racial minorities that matter, not physically or intellectually disabled ones.
- +1 y
@Jack9949 Expecting a little compassion has nothing to do with playing a victim, it's supposed to be basic human nature.
And some of the most famous inventors and inspiring people, were considered by experts, to be on the autism spectrum. - +1 y
@Truthatanycost If you look at Stephen Hawking for example, at first sight he appears absolutely useless and retarted to most ordinary people, but beneath it all the man is an absolute genius.
- +1 y
@Jack9949 Exactly! Every single one of us can contribute to this world in a positive way, and in our own unique way.
- +1 y
@Truthatanycost True. Some people just need direction, or the opportunity to do something.
- +1 y
I’m against the idea. Some men would end up trying to marry a step ford wife. One “beta tester” ended up screwing one of the “sex bots” ended up breaking the damn thing. To some it would sound funny/disturbing, it is disturbing. Women have made it so hard for men to win them over, setting impossible expectations of what they want, or how much money a guy should make. In the end there may be a time when some men end up buying a JOI hologram girlfriend, or a sexbot, and even finding a surrogate artificial womb because in the end, one of them, not all will eventually being less hassle, less heartbreak (no emotions or someone to yell that they are fucking up constantly), less expensive than a real woman. But the stigma by society alone and family would be enough for some to be excommunicated possibly.
- +1 y
What the fuck? Did you just bash autism and tell them not to be born? Worthless dickhead
- +1 y
I already stick my penis into machines! They got some nice little sex toys for men now :D
- +1 y
@Cocacolaaddict Oh shit I missed that! That's some ableism holy fuck
I can’t vote “yes” or “no” because there is no definite answer. I believe that it would stay as is. What I mean is that we, as men, would have more plethora of choosing. If we couldn’t tell the difference from the two, it would come down to each individual and his criteria. Just like today, I may like a blonde girl and you a dark haired. It depends on what you want
10 Reply- 405 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yNon- flesh is probably unlikely but the human women robot version seems to be taking shape. They are becoming slaves to their own egos and follow the Marx path so easily. If you notice, many don’t even possess personalities anymore. I would say that the human ones will become fully robotic to the government first.
10 Reply
Anonymous(30-35)+1 yOnly for the low-class suckers. that's more real pussy for me :P I won't ever have sex with a robot. A robot can't replace a real woman I don't care how good you make it. That's just fucking weird, sorry for the language.
Hey, as men we should be taking up for our gender. Do you not see how much control you are giving them when you have a SO whose is not even a real human? You are making them laugh at us!
Well, you desperate brothers can have robot hoes and just tell the real women where I'm at. I'll take all that real pussy :P Won't ever catch me in bed with a robot but I bang real women 24/740 ReplyI have heard about this actually being a thing. No, I don't think robots are going to replace either sex. That will never happen. Robots are not capable of true human emotion. It's just a mechanical crutch that some could use to fulfill an empty sad, and very pathetic life.
10 Reply😂 this woman robots are made for replacement of real woman. We haven't heard man robot replacement lol. Bet is going to be adjustable somewhere at their preference. Definitely 100% Faithful. Until robot decides enough is enough of being controlled next thing you know it becomes piccalo won't be adjustable 😂.
10 Reply- 700 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yMost relationships exist because you know what, if they could make it advanced enough I would pressume they won't be that unpopular. Logically there is no downside to it from an individualistic prespective but depends on how advanced things like these are, and considering the state of ai's too they just might be indistinguishable from woman.
16 Reply- +1 y
There is something called consciousness that Ai doesn't have they just work on logic defined you would have to upgrade them now and then
- +1 y
Doesn't matter, you could make them pretend and nobody would be able to distinguish for the most parts. It's odd to say someone/something can't have consciousness when you/no one really understands what conciousness is. What you can say is whatever is happening is inside the body (more or less). And something that isolated can't be that hard to study, if it can be created by random nature it can be created by us trying, eventually. Do squirrels have conciousness? Maybe, I would think so. You do realise we have already mapped and replicated the entire neural structure of some organisms right?
- +1 y
Yeah they say that they did and maybe they did but it could be just limited or manipulated information but I do get your point to most extent its possible and can be achieved by time I forgot that lady robot they have created sofy I guess like they had build it on Ai and it could answer for itself but it needed lot more improvement the way it spoke
- +1 y
Yeah, what? They didn't say they did, they did. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=eYS7UIUM_SQ
- +1 y
Helpful
- +1 y
Nice.
No. Those obviously aren't normal men. They're geeky men who can't get laid, never leave the house, and don't live in the real world. The reason they can't get laid in the first place is because they're so weird. That's why they come up with such ridiculous ideas.
51 Reply- +1 y
👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻Well said
1.1K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. No. But I do find it disturbing how they find thus appealing. They basically want women but without any possible challenge. That screams immature and a liiiiitttlleee raped to me 😂🤷🏾♀️ But whatever.
I think men have this ridiculous attitude of always wanting to impress and feel useful. Robots aren’t going to scratch that itch, at least not for long.31 ReplyI been mgtow since before mgtow ever existed, therefore I agree.
robots will replace almost every duty and purpose women have in the house for a better price and less stressful inconvenience in the long run.21 Reply- +1 y
Right on!
+1 yNo fucking way, it may look human, but it's nothing more than a computer with tits. Something more to spy on us with. I know for a fact it would come with internet.
I'm fighting a loosing battle now? Smart phones, smart TVs, smart cars and more. Whats next a G-man (old word for government argent) living in your home with you and they calling to base to report that you took a shit a 1:17 in the afternoon11 Reply- +1 y
Tits are the only thing computers were missing LOL!
+1 yIntelligent female robots still wouldn't date me :)
If you can't tell the difference between a robot and a human, you couldn't know if you were dating a real person or a robot. A real person could claim to be a robot or a robot could claim to be human.10 Reply4.5K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. I'd put them in the incel category because actual MGTOW members are doing exactly that, going away from relationships, countering feminism, and living lives separate from them. Incels are the ones like him that memes are made from. Regardless, I don't feel like I even have to say how stupid that sounds, and this is assuming any of them could afford a robotic girlfriend considering that they can't seem to afford an escort either, so I don't think it even matters 😂
10 Reply
Anonymous(30-35)+1 yDon't listen to crazy MGTOW shit. The only MGTOW i respect is jerry liu because he doesn't gather together an echo chamber and scream take women's right's away like Turd flinging monkey. Jerry Liu is the only mgtow that does his own thing and not bitch about women 24/7.
30 Reply
+1 ySex robots, yes. That's a woman that has feels and emotions but is only used for satisfaction, with the benifits of no accidental pregnancies, periods or disagreements. I'll promise you that'll become a thing one day. Heck, in 290, i bet every man in his 20s will own his own sex robot.
20 Reply
+1 yI'm glad MGTOW doesn't exist in my country, men don't embarrass themselves with it, they are conservative and manly and don't whine, they speak with actions. They know how to work together with their woman so both are happy and thrive, while they get what they want too. I'm proud of men in my country/ region and hope all MGTOW stay in their attics, with their robots. :)
134 Reply- +1 y
What is your country?
- +1 y
@KrakenAttackin I'm from one of Balkan's countries ( in Eastern Europe)
- +1 y
I have not been to the Balkans, but what I do know about Eastern Europe, women are still real women. In the U. S. and Canada, we do not have "women", we have men with vaginas.
- +1 y
@KrakenAttackin Depends what you consider real women. We took advantage of all good aspects of feminism. Our women all go to college/ have a job, some earn a lot. But on the other hand, their goal is to be a mom and have a husband, and most do, well every single woman I know does, or the ones who are young like me will one day. So on one hand we don't hate men we love them (we love two men our husband and our dad xD) but on the other hand we love ourselves too and explore with different hobbies or careers or studies in our youth. We aren't the quiet stay at home bear children women by any means, if that is what you thought. I didn't mean to make any assumptions. But I know some western men think "real women" are all about their family, husband children, they use sentences such as "most fertile years are 18-24" but like for example, here women get married in late 20s, here abortion rate is very high, but not because women aren't womanly usually because a couple doesn't have enough money yet.
Sorry, I know the west is full of these conservative assumptions about women and how it should be, but here everyone is very chill and we just do whatever we think is best, no one judges anyone, there are no debates or division between people disagreeing so badly on things such as abortion, no MGTOW, no hatered between genders etc.. - +1 y
@bilyanasbeach. By comparison American women are a total disaster.
- +1 y
@KrakenAttackin Why?
- +1 y
LOL WRONG! MGTOW today is in very single country in the world and growing rapidly with millions of men now MGTOW. Russia, Ukraine, England, Australia, the US, Mexico, Honduras, Japan, Italy, Spain, you name it. MGTOW is growing in every part of the world and you have western hatred of men aka feminism to thank for it. https://www.facebook.com/mgtowhungary/
- +1 y
@ThisAndThat I believe that it is growing. Still is not not, and it will never be, a significant portion of men.
- +1 y
@ThisIsMyOpinion Oh yes it will. It's Prophecy in fact. Isaiah 4:1 In that day seven women will take hold of one man and say, "We will eat our own food and provide our own clothes; only let us be called by your name. Take away our disgrace!"
- +1 y
@ThisAndThat You sound crazy do you know that? You sound obsessed and no one wants to hear a person like that talk. You are from one country so speak for it only. In my country MGTOW doesn't exist PERIOD, you CAN NOT prove me wrong. Give up and get lost, many other comment sections welcome an obsessed self proclaimed smartass but not here sis, you won't do anything here :)
- +1 y
@ThisAndThat Oh I just saw the link, I'm not from Hungary actually. I don't know how things are in Hungary, it's much bigger country so yes, I can admit that I think MGTOW could exist there. Still, what I said for my own country is true. :)
- +1 y
@ThisAndThat sure because everything that is written in the bible is true... Sure!
- +1 y
MGTOW doesn't exist in your country, so you say. And I posted a facebook like that proves you're wrong, you still deny it. Do you think I made that group up? Do you think I even speak your language and have many facebook accounts to keep joining that group and responding to myself? Keep denying it, yeah that makes it untrue doesn't it. https://www.facebook.com/mgtowhungary/
- +1 y
@ThisAndThat again a small group of men. If me or her go outside and ask 30 people if they know what mgtow is no one will.
- +1 y
@ThisIsMyOpinion Yeah no one will know what MGTOW is, yet I pass men with MGTOW stickers in their windows with the MGTOW sticker in mine. You don't really know anything to do with what goes on in the US and any guy can look at your comments and if he has one ounce of truth and reality in him he knows right off you don't know what you're talking about, it's very obvious.
- +1 y
@ThisAndThat if you actually think mgtow will ever be a big thing you are the one who does not know what you are talking about.
The group is a joke and so are it's members. - +1 y
@ThisAndThat Once again, didn't you read my other reply? I'm not from Hungary, it's just a country I put on this website, I'm from a smaller country in Balkan south of it. So it exist in Hungary, I didn't know honestly since I know very little about Hungary, but for my country it's still true what I originally said.
- +1 y
@ThisIsMyOpinion Well, again, you are wrong. You evidently don't believe in Prophecy which is actually happening before the eyes in real time. I do. And I see can the Biblical Prophecies are 100% accurate and you are 100% inaccurate. I'm not a fool, I can see it and I don't deny it.
Isaiah 44:18 Such stupidity and ignorance! Their eyes are closed, and they cannot see. Their minds are shut, and they cannot think. - +1 y
@ThisAndThat What does that prophecy have to do with MGTOW? I hate self-conceited people like you I don't even know why I'm wasting my time here, but go on let me see what you will say. All people like you are good for is internet debates, in real life you don't have a presence.
- +1 y
Hold up, you are from eastern Europe and you're calling MGTOW stupid without experience to know what you're talking about? If you don't know what our situation IE the actual situation is here, then why are you weighing in on it? Why are you calling MGTOW stupid when you have no idea what you're talking about? Do you think we western men one day suddenly woke up and said to ourselves, hey, I think I'll leave women and go my own way? NO! IT DIDN'T HAPPEN THAT WAY! The cause was WOMEN themselves. You don't watch our media, those hollywood whores preaching hate on men each and every day and see the women in the audience high fiving each other saying yeah you go girl. You don't see the hatred for men from where you are you said that yourself. BUT WE DO! WE DO HERE! It's promoted in every way. And yes Isaiah is referencing MGTOW, not the acronym itself but the outcome it's about to have.
Isaiah 4:1 On that day seven women will seize one man, saying, "We will eat our own bread and provide our own clothing. Just let us be called by your name. Take away our disgrace."
If you can't see somebody being crapped on, then don't make false witness against them when they speak out. - +1 y
@ThisAndThat Lol nice book full of assumption you just wrote there. I know a lot about MGTOW and their reasons. I know about celebrities in hollywood and them preaching false facts to spread hatered between genders. But I still think MGTOW is an embarrassment for your gender. Not the part where you choose to not have a relationship with women, that is your choice and theirs and I'm no one to go against it, but the part where you act as if all women are bad, not a single one is good, because you were either hurt a few times or are too focused on the bad ones such as celebs. Female robots replacing real women? How louder can you scream "I have a lot of mental issues"? Being loud on the internet about women being bad and men leaving them, there is no batter way than that to say "I give up on my masculinity and women's femininity because I'm hurt/ I'm not getting any women/ Im annoyed by what's media preaching and now my life will be focused on posting comments on internet about why my choice is soo gooodd" I wish you fulfillment even though that way you won't get it
- +1 y
And do you think feminism ( the cause of it all ), is an embarrassment for your gender for your gender? I don't hear you speaking out against them. No, instead of attacking the action, you attack the reaction. It don't matter if all women are bad or not when it's fact that ( an entire system both criminal and family courts ) are against and hate men and 99% of the women are a risk. That's equal to play Russian Roulette with a fully loaded gun. And you talk about these men that have been hurt, YOU DAMN RIGHT THEY'VE BEEN HURT! Many have had their children stolen from them and used as a tool to exploit them with. Not only have men lost their children due to false allegations the courts themselves teach women to make against men, the men have been criminalized and sent to prison because they can't possibly physically pay the money a family court and state demands they pay. Men are shooting themselves committing suicide and you don't hear a f**king word about it. Instead they have the nerve to call the men they stole children from deadbeat dads. You don't see or hear anything about the mistreatment of men or boys here or over there, because they don't want you to know that. They only want you to know what they tell you. There is a reason I walked away from women almost 34 years ago as a MGTOW Monk. There is a reason I never had children (my dream). Now all you need to do is ask yourself what could have went so wrong to cause that. The answer? WOMEN WENT WRONG. You blaming MGTOW is blaming the reaction, not the cause. Why aren't you attacking feminism that pushes hate on men, IE #KillAllMen #AllMenAreRapist #RecudeThePopulationOfMen #BeleiveAllWomen. I don't see you speaking out against any of that and that's by far worse than anything I see in MGTOW.
- +1 y
@ThisAndThat I don't have a platform to speak out against it. This question gave me the platform to say my opinion about MGTOW so I did. Your other replies sounded very very crazy and obsessed, but I must say I'm glad to see this one and I'm taking it, you seriously now. You are not whining you are giving me valid reasons. I know that these things that happen to men are bad and no man deserves to go through them. I know there is a very mean side to today's feminism, it's certainly not what it was, and all those hashtags you put do more harm, and.. well NO good. I do have a lot of critisism for that type of feminists, but I can't support MGTOW either. If it was what you last comment to me is (pointing out the flaws in a system that benefits women and critisizing the ridiculous and harmful things they stand for, while standing by your opinion to never have a relationship again) instead of what most MGTOW are (Whining that all women are bad and going even against the reasonable ones just to have a internet dabate and feel right, while ignoring that there are good women too and while telling other men that this is the right way when it isn't, MGTOW is against nature and against God (but as is 3rd wave feminism) , especially in a world where good women still exist, maybe in a minority in western countries, but they exist).
This however is completely off topic but I hope we understand each other. The last time I asked why your prophecy is supporting MGTOW, I didn't get an answer, and the original comment of mine said I'm glad MGTOW doesn't exist in my country and it doesn't. The most I can do is say you were right that it exists in Hungary, but that isn't MY true country... :) Though you don't have to answer, I'm going to eat now and will visit GAG tomorrow or at night, and I'm not sure I want to hear more about MGTOW, this whole topic, and the hatered and division of genders on GAG is making me want to leave it. It's too negative to read about and deal with every day. - +1 y
And now you know what I'm planing on moving to Russia. I will most likely never try another relationship again knowing how the cards are stacked against men simply because of being born a he and not a she. But the way I look at it is this. If I'm hated in Russia, then it's justified because there I will be a foreigner. But being hated there is a lot better than being hated in the country from where I came that turned its back on me and threw me aside. MGTOW is very much justified here in the US where men are persecuted as targets. Once I leave the US, I will never step another foot in it again for any reason. I will be buried in Russia too.
- +1 y
@ThisAndThat No I don't believe in biblical prophecy. Even if I did in a time where people didn't even had electricity and women were just used to clean the house and bear children I am sure mgtow was not something in their minds.
I am from Portugal by the way. I have no idea how things are in the US, but I really doubt that it is as bad for men as you claim. - +1 y
@ThisIsMyOpinion Yes you have doubts it's a bad for men as I've claimed because you haven't watched any of the video evidence that MGTOW's provide. And going by your given option or answer rather. You may not believe in the Bible, but if you actually did like I said, studied the evidence MGTOW provides, you would see the Prophecies of Isaiah are unfolding before our eyes and that it is MGTOW. You can lead a horse to the water but you can't make it drink.
- +1 y
@ThisAndThat Anyone that actually believes anythings, prophecie or not, coming out of mgtow youtube channels is a fool.
Their thing is getting away from women afraid of being cheated on or runned over by them. Be smart about the women that you pick and you will be fine. - +1 y
@ThisIsMyOpinion Be smart about women I pick? Have you even ever been to the US, at all? Man you have no idea what you're talking about. The entire system here is against men, hates men, it's in unholywood TV shows, it's in the media, it's on the talk shows, it's everywhere you look over here and men are targets of false accusations. Women make false accusations against men to steal child custody and that's pushed by the courts for women to do so. And you sit there and blame men aka MGTOW for trying to protect themselves. You have no idea what you're talking about. You are making yourself look like a fool.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usq-IHT5ARc
Step By Step How To Divorce Rape Men
https://www.bitchute.com/video/M-Dtcvqcjc8/ - +1 y
@ThisAndThat from what I hear yes there are some bias in the US against men. But we are men! We don't go down. We keep it strong and say fuck you to however wants to put us down.
To actually be scared if women shows mgtow aren't real men. - +1 y
@ThisIsMyOpinion OK, I appreciate your sentiment, BUT; the bias against men in the U. S. is enforced by the government and can be life destroying. Simply "being a man" does not help you when the government is systematically stripping you of your home, children, savings, livelihood, and potentially even putting you in prison for merely displeasing your wife.
Seriously, in some U. S. states a simple argument with a female is enough to get a man arrested for "domestic violence", which is considered a crime of "moral turpitude" which has HUGE ramifications.
Where I worked as a police officer a simple argument where the woman said she was "in fear" of the man, he can be arrested and charged with domestic violence. Any woman who:
1) Is a current spouse, or former spouse.
2) If you have a child in common with her.
3) If you have lived together within the past three years.
No reasonable woman would do this you say --- WRONG, Domestic Violence was our #1 charge. TONS of men were arrested simply because they displeased a woman or had the tenacity to talk back to her.
This is not about "manning up", it is about returning sanity to the legal system. - +1 y
@KrakenAttackin I wish this forum had a like button per every comment made. Yours would get the A+++ gold button. Absolutely and the whole western system is the work of the antichrist, it's Babylon especially the US where it all started. I'm planning a move to Russia. I know Russia isn't perfect, but at least a man isn't hated for simply being a man.
- +1 y
@ThisAndThat Thank you sir!
- +1 y
@KrakenAttackin You're welcome and thank you too for the excellent info!
- +1 y
@KrakenAttackin all of that sounds so out of this world to me. "Being arrested by just displeasing my wife" that simply does not happen here. And it sounds so stupid that I have a hard time believing that it's that easy and linear.
Last year in my country we actually had a record in women dying at the hands on their husbands in the first three months if the year. Most of them had already pressed charges before being killed, but the police always told them that there was nothing they could do since they didn't had ear evidences.
If I go and do a search about the actual stats of domestic violence in the US am I going to find the same information you are giving me?
Won't the majority of murder victims at the hands of a spouse be women?
- 372 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yI have a very hard time wrapping my head around the idea of a robot having actual emotions (and I think that if that's really possible, it will likely be well after the end of all of our lifetimes), so I don't think so.
14 Reply- +1 y
Yeah but doesn't that work in the synths favour? Them not having emotions.. isn't that the point? Y'know, it's for people to have sex without emotional intimacy.. so if sex synths don't have actual emotions then that means they fulfil their purpose well I'd think?
- +1 y
@Electric_Dreams I read this question as one of whether these robots would replace women in general. In that case, I don't think so. In the case of people who want sex with no strings attached, maybe.
- +1 y
Ohhhh okay.. oh shit yeah that's what it is about. I keep thinking he's referring to them being used solely as sex synths and forgetting he's talking about everything beyond that.
- +1 y
@Electric_Dreams Yeah, he said something about that robots might someday have emotions too, so I figured he also meant that they'd replace women as a whole, even for those who want a serious relationship. Honestly though, I think if it ever does happen, it will not be in any of our lifetimes, but I still can't imagine it.
+1 yEw!
The whole essence of a woman's body is lost. A robot? LOL! SMH...
Just goes to show people do not know how to have and enjoy sex. It's all about the lust, the pleasure and cum. It's the mental and physical foreplay.
No, thank you... no male robot for me.12 Reply- +1 y
"Lust, pleasure, and cum," you say? Sign me up!!! Romantic novels can go in the trash 😂
Anonymous(45 Plus)+1 yI'm not sure, but... men who are undesirable for women will have at least three options in the future:
- Female androids (in the nearby future);
- Some kind of organic replicants, produced by Bio-engineering: Cloning combined with customized genetic modification (in the later future);
- I presume that in the distant future, lonely men will also have the option of purchasing tangible female holograms, programmable for any man's needs.10 Reply- 2.5K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yIf you think they're going to make bots that act just like women you're in la-la-land.
Besides, no one would want them then. LOL21 Reply- +1 y
You never know what the future may bring Sir.
+1 yI sure hope not. But maybe its for the best because let's be honest. women these days are just nasty people. not everyone there are some exeptions and some really nice women out there but the majority are bad at least a robot won't cheat lie or use you for money
20 ReplyNo, they won't replace women. Instead, the final robot must be implanted with AI and they turned up as another species. For example,David from the film Prometheus. They are hardly distinguishable from real human. David thinks he's better than human because he's immortal. What will the future robot be look like, will they take over human? Can't predict, but I know that is too far to concern. By the time female robot can replace women, highly probable there will have robot can replace men too.
10 Reply
+1 yOnly if you're interested in sex... Otherwise you'd have a mental problem to want something that is only with you because it was programmed to do so and has no real personality or consciousness.
Also, then robots will replace men too.520 Reply- +1 y
But you can get 'personality' from so many other sources. Friends, family, community, colleagues, pets, heck even a therapist if you're desperate! Sex is something much less abundant, at least to straight men, so these robots would give them every opportunity to compartmentalize between their source of sexual satisfaction and that of social satisfaction.
- +1 y
@DonCachondo Yes, that is very desperate 🤣and as she said, mentally impaired
- +1 y
@Yads_Is_Back lol you don't get it because you're a woman. It's typical of women to take sex for granted and pedestalize personality in the context of romantic relationships as if that's the only social context in which personality applies.
- +1 y
@DonCachondo I am a guy and I don't get it.
- +1 y
@ThisIsMyOpinion You're from Portugal. Women from English-speaking countries (Anglophones) are a unique animal, especially the American ones-Insufferable, entitled, narcissistic princesses!
- +1 y
@DonCachondo Can't really talk about that since I don't know them, but still do you want to have sex with something that doesn't move an touches you back?
Imagine that you have fucking it in missionary and a fly comes and lands on her eyeball! She is not even going to blink to take it out. That is creepy as hell. - +1 y
@ThisIsMyOpinion oh hell no, I'm not buying into this sex "robot" craze until they can get on top of my cowgirl style without getting "tired" LOL! I don't even like a starfish when she's a real woman, let alone a robot!
- +1 y
Dude, you can't have a relationship with a robot. Only someone wrong in the head would want that. And thequestion was about replacing women, I told you why you can't.
And we can make robots to replace men more than replace women. We don't need many men to keep the species alive. We can just keep a few as sperm donors and have robots for sex then as the robots will most likely be better at sex than you or the average man. Lol. It doesn't work the same for men though. It's easier to keep the species alive and in big numbers when you have more women than men. So I suppose we don't need you as much. Does it slund nice to you now?
As long as people want love and familiea robots won't replace anything. Only the lonely desperate ones with too much money will use them becuse they can't have a proper relationship with a real person. These robots are more useful for people who had accidents and just want sex because their condition prevents them from getting a real partner - +1 y
@DonCachondo Well said.
- +1 y
Relationship with a robot is definitely a stretch, I agree, but I'm talking about sex. If a man is in a situation where he can have consistent and reliable sex without a relationship indefinitely, the entire prospect of having a relationship becomes totally optional for him. Lots of men would even consider that an enviable position, having sex without the obligation of a relationship attached as some sort of package deal. Oftentimes, long-term commitment--and even having kids--is the price a man pays upfront to secure (even a chance at) consistent, reliable sex.
- +1 y
@KrakenAttackin Thank you sir ^.^
- +1 y
@DonCachondo Reliable, yes. But if I was the guy, I’d just be ashamed that I can’t be loved by a good woman who will do for me and treat me right. I’m not saying you shouldn’t get the robots, but I am saying it’s hilarious and definitely will get you laughed at 🤣
- +1 y
@Yads_Is_Back Why? What if man wants to be single but still wants to fuck?
- +1 y
@KrakenAttackin There are women who share that same casual idea. The “need” (notice the quotation marks) for robotic partners is just desperate and hilarious
- +1 y
Nope, most people will still want the real thing in the end. Mostly those with problems will use robots
- +1 y
A sec robot can't go to work and make more than a real man.
- +1 y
@DonCachondo Spot on correct sir! People who are not from the U. S. or Canada simply cannot understand what our women are like. There is a reason the term "Americunts" came into being.
- +1 y
@KrakenAttackin @DonCachondo I’m so glad both of you just clarified that, because those of us from Latin America and other more cultural places are not raised to be entitled.
- +1 y
@Yads_Is_Back Latin American women are amazing.
- +1 y
@KrakenAttackin Agreed! People always say they're submissive but they're actually tender and sweet where it matters AND super fiery and assertive where it matters :D
No of course not lol they are robots. No heart or soul. Now if you can't get a real women then sure it will work for you lool.
62 Reply- +1 y
I agree with your statement but what is a real woman?
+1 yUntil they short circuit on you and you wind up with a burnt to the crisp weinie🤣🤣
1011 Reply- +1 y
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣don’t forget having to change the batteries or recharge
- +1 y
@Yads_Is_Back specially in the middle of orgasm goes from ", dead fuck" to "dead charge" fuck 🤣🤣
- +1 y
Wow girls can use dildo but it's wrong for a man to have blow up doll?
- +1 y
@Aakash_Hangargi Wait.. This is about female robot to replace real women... That's not a blow up doll
- +1 y
That robot wouldn't do more than a blow up doll job i had read an article these were developed because women had more demands and standards and men had to work hard in office and to court and handle with pressure of job was tough hence theh came into existence what do you think?
- +1 y
@Aakash_Hangargi exactly what I said above... Good luck with that 🤣
- +1 y
Nah I am good with my hand I rather be alone than with doll 😂✋
- +1 y
😂😂😂
- +1 y
It's a different kind of "blow up" doll 😂
- +1 y
- +1 y
😂😂😂
The problem with MGTOW is that they only view women as sexual objects
The problem with many women nowadays is that they think their worth is their sexuality.
the reality is, women are more than sex objects and can't be replaced with robots20 ReplyI would have to understand Mgtow more just googled it preety confusing but it kind of seems like a little bit of a offensive thing to discuss on here mgtow because this site has a lot !!! A lot !!! A lot !!! A lot!!! A lot!!! A lot!!! A lot!!! A lot !!! a lot!!! A lot!!! a lot!!! A lot!!! Of females on it
10 Reply5.8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. I doubt you'd be able to fully replace them unless the AI in the robots was for all intents and purposes indistinguishable from an actual human.
Reproduction and biology issues aside...10 Reply
+1 ywe should be more human if we dont want this to happen.
61 Reply- +1 y
It's truly the nuclear option. Nobody wants to use it, but it's going to be in the back pocket and it will get used and it will be effective when it is.
+1 yI don't think anybody needs an entire robot just to replace women.
10 Reply5.4K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. I can't imagine that ever happening. I don't care how much technology advances, you're very aware you're dealing with a cold robot. And a robot can't love and hate like a human, sometimes at the same time. Lol
10 Reply
+1 yWhy would we prefer robots?
They just lay there and do nothing! I don't want that. To change sexual positions must be a chore!
On top of that we get no real skin, no real boobs, butt or pussy, no real conversations and emotions, no nothing.
Those robots are oversized flashlights.10 Reply- 5.7K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yWow. . male victimhood is alive and well at GaG.
Why is it a supermodel's fault that she isn't attracted to you?10 Reply - 3.9K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yThe reason why female robots will not take over is because society will shame men for using such device. People already shame men for having adult toys.
10 Reply 2.4K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Let's just say, that quite a number of women have put themselves below the sex robots and prostitutes. Replacement is potentially possible. But the good women will always stand out.
21 Reply- +1 y
Thank you ^
we might as well become extinctic as a human race unless we, women, become hermaphrodites and find our own island.
15 Reply- +1 y
TheMascera?
503 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Who knows. Gender relations are becoming increasingly damaged and technology provides all forms of escapism. I can't see it happening just yet though.
30 Reply- 5K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yIt might replace prostitution as a safer alternative, but relationship, families, things like that.. No..
30 Reply certainly possible for a few women to be replaced, there are more than a few women on this site alone that replaced men with a battery powered friend of their own.
10 Reply
+1 yUm... no.
If we replace real women with female robots then I'm gonna become straight.
These robots are only good for desperate people who don't know how to get a girl.35 Reply- +1 y
No not all girls have implants or like to wear makeup.
- +1 y
Lol I never said anything like this about men
1.3K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Pretty sure we're still many years away from making all those things happen.
So.. no as of right now I don't see it happening.10 Reply
+1 yOnly when they get autonomous mobility. It's not like starfish sex suddenly becomes more enjoyable when the lifeless lump of plastic is artificial! 😂😂😂
10 Reply- Show More (45)
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News 
Most Helpful Opinions