

Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News 

Going to insert an extract that came up in latin class that some of the guys were really touched by:
"To possess Roman virility, was to radiate not just sexual power but “virtue, accomplishment.” He wasn’t just sexually “assertive,” “powerfully built,” and “procreative,” but intellectually and emotionally “levelheaded, vigorous yet controlled, courageous yet restrained”
The Romans made virility complex. He had to be clever, energetic, confident, politically engaged. The defining quality of virilitas was self-control. Virilitas was an ethic of moderation, strong or “vigorous” powers were kept deliberately reined in, in the manner of a standing army. If a man was too aggressive, too emotional, or too brawny—too manly—his virilitas would be lost. Therefore, giving in too often to the charms of women is effeminate. To be sexually powerful, you had to be in control of your desires."
I think at times we do feel like we're pushing against the world. With all the breaking down of identity and what 'something should be' today it's getting harder and harder for young men - and young women - to do what's natural for them. Of course this benefits and downgrades us, it's really difficult. I hope you will be able to stop feeling the pressure of the world and do what is natural to you.
Liberals
Libtards
Toxic masculinity doesn't exist. Its a lack of masculinity. When men behave feminine as women is when they are acting up.
For example its masculine to confront someone to their face you have a problem with and solve it directly. Its feminine to not say you have a problem and just let it continue until its out of hand.
This happens with school shootings. If a male bully picks on a male peer. The correct thing is for the one being pushed around to punch the other one in the face defensively. Violence in response to violence is the appropriate masculine behavior.
The problem is this is scary for women to comprehend and so they dont "allow" it with 0 tolerance fighting rules at most schools so even the guy in the right will face suspension and punishment.
So the boys act like women and just submit to the rules and therefore also the bullying. And now you have raised either a wimp who allows people to walk all over him OR one who bottles it up until he explodes and does something ridiculous like school shooting or some other crazy behavior.
The problem is men attempting to behave as women. Not too much like men. Toxic masculinity is in fact a synonym for male femininity.
@bamesjond0069 I thought, I smelled testosterone.
Yes unfortunately there is a war being waged upon both masculine men and feminine women. SocJus is so adamant on trying to reverse the gender roles. Quite hypocritical for a movement that constantly speaks against authoritarianism.
Pointing out their hypocrisy is useless. Their arguments against authoritarianism only apply to right-wing authoritarianism. Their arguments for freedom only apply to the freedom for people to do what they want people to do. They choose their words carefully and it works to convince gullible people who can't see through their manipulative bullshit.
Aren't those a small group of idiots that do nothing more besides bitch on social media? Why does anyone gives value to what they say? How can they stop a man from acting manly?
Thanks for most helpful opinion
@ThisIsMyOpinion
It’s the political panderers who give platforms to spew their propaganda.
Opinion
59Opinion
We really need to distinguish between healthy, positive masculinity and it’s opposite. There should absolutely be a war on the unhealthy and abusive behavior by men and how it ties to the idea of masculinity.
I completely agree with you. I see the abusive behavior being encouraged more and more these days which a lot of guys seem to think makes them seem more manly. And the “beta male” label that they put on guys who don’t act like this, is actually the type of guy I’m more attracted to.
We need to distinguish between (like you said) positive masculinity and abusive.
or you could just refer to them as "immature" and not make it some grand quest against an overarching ideology
every valid complaint feminists seem to have at first could better be explained with "that particular guy was immature"
Agree 100%
And when I say that here I get accused of being a chick posing as a dude XD
@Ad_Quid_Orator how?
@Ad_Quid_Orator your jaw and rest of your phenotype says your not. That's crazy dude
@Ad_Quid_Orator people are strange
What is unhealthy about masculinity? People define what masculinity means differently, and I really don't think women should have a say, as to what is and isn't masculine. + there are lots of toxic things women do. Shoudl men start defining what these things are for women and start telling women how they should act to fix it. Lol
But the only men conflating masculinity with abusiveness are the men DOING the abuse. The rest of us already know its wrong, so what's to be gained by preaching to the converted?
I do agree too
@Juxtapose You wake up completely naked in a strangers bed how do you react to the situation? ↗
That's toxic not being a man
@Juxtapose he's a rapist
It needs seen
@Juxtapose telling me
So what "bad behaviour" in particular do you think is tangled up with society's concept of masculinity? Growing up I was taught that a man should be true to his word and treat people with respect. So I clearly never absorbed this bad behavior mentality you allude to. I know there are men out there who act overly macho, but so long as they're not hurting anyone i pretty much leave them to their own devices
SomeGuyCalledTom, I am thankful for men who grew up and advocate for healthy masculine behavior, and it sounds like that applies to you as well. Maybe I watch too many red pill YouTube channels. These men who call themselves the manosphere are mentoring each other on how men shouldn’t take women’s “no” for an answer because they believe women largely say no to test men or to not seem slutty. This is so not the case for the most of us ladies. One guy who admits to having intermittent explosive disorder often brags about how he demands sex on demand, disallowed his girlfriend to use social media, or to go to bars or clubs, demands access to her phone so he can look through it, puts tracking on her phone and in her car, and how HE dictates what she spends. They think that’s how all men should run their relationships with women, all the while refusing to marry any of these ladies. These ladies are supposed to submit to these demands and accept that they’ll never get a ring on it. There’s a whole convention of men advocating for this kind of behavior.
I see. My issue with the manosphere guys is that the problems they describe are taken as blanket justification to treat women like shit and manipulate them. I actually agree with some aspects of their analysis of those problems. For example, hypergamy can indeed be an unspoken motivator for certain women to act out certain things, infidelity being the most notorious example. But I don't agree with what they consider the "solution" to such problems. The issue of hypergamy is a complex one, and needs to be accounted for in a proper multi-causal analysis of women's behavioural motivations. The problem is, these guys blow up the problem to make it seem like it applies to ALL women, ALL the time. But i see mo basis for such assumptions. What's more likely is that certain kinds of women are already predisposed to hypergamous behaviors (and the infidelity that follows), and so only those women are accounted for in the red pill community's analysis of "female nature". So it's a confirmation bias on their part. Women who DON'T fit into those hypergamous behavioral patterns are just discounted from the data set altogether. Or their behaviors will be dismissed on the presupposition that "oh they just haven't shown their hypergamous nature YET, but they will do so the moment it's advantageous to them". How can a woman defend herself from an accusation of a "crime" she has yet to commit, on the presumption that the crime is a predetermined event in the future? I'll always judge people on their actions, not on some flawed predictive model of what they theoretically MIGHT do in the future
These are two separate issues. Gender identity has nothing to do with femininity or masculinity.
Now, there is no “war on masculinity”. It’s naturally evolving. In the distant past - the “alpha male” was the biggest, toughest, burliest man who could kill a boar, make a fire and wrestle with the other males for potential mates and win.
Our ways have changed. Now the alphas are the guys who are intellectual tech savy billionaires. Personality wise, they’re pretty different from the old age alphas because high intellect brings with it a different set of traits. That doesn’t make the current alpha wimpy or less masculine.
Masculinity isn’t about how big your muscles are, how aggressive and confrontational you are, how well you can pose in a military uniform for a health magazine, how many kcals you’re eating today and how many power meals you ordered your girlfriend or mom to cook for you. In fact - everything about this is very not manly.
Masculinity is about being there for your loved ones, providing for your loved ones, being able to take care of yourself without relying on a woman for basic life skills, being able to resolve conflict without a fist fight, not being emotionally stunted, not being sexist etc
So, is there a war on masculinity? Well, if one’s idea of masculinity is getting drunk with the boys, getting into a fist fight at a sportsbar because x team lost, then coming home and beating the shit out of your wife because the soup is too cold, and then kicking your gay or trans son out of the house - yeah, there’s a war on that.
Otherwise no. Women still appreciate men who are dominant in a healthy way, men who can make good decisions on their own, men who are handy around the house, men who are courageous etc
Well, the answer is no.
You can’t wage war on something you can’t even tangibly grasp. You can be mad at it. You can object the status quo and yell or make changes to your life or maybe even influence people to join your side. But the way some people view masculinity and femininity is just so bizarre.
There is a visible disdain for the way certain people choose to express themselves. If you honestly in your heart and soul feel that every person who is a guy should learn combat, become pick up artists, and shove themselves into a breadwinner box then you have some problems. No matter who you are. Same thing applies in the reverse. If you truly, like in your SOUL feel like women are meant to be docile baby making machines only good for making sandwiches and sucking dick... baby you’ve got some problems 🤷🏾♀️
Simple as that. Even when we are dealing with folks who are non-binary or trans.
You have got to be SO insecure, SO shallow, sad, and one dimensional that you just can’t function without ruining someone else’s day and disturbing their peace when all they wanted to do was to live fluidly.
Men have passed down some outrageously harmful AND DARE I SAY TOXIC ideologies and try to slap a label on it justifying that it’s just how men are supposed to be. Women are not and will never be exempt from this FOOLERY. Women are shit bags too.
But generally, is humans have not been on this planet very long at all. You can try to chalk it up and say we gotta fit into this box because x, y, z animals do this and that but at the end of the day we are too damn social with too much free will with too many compliments added to our brains to not take any accountability or personal autonomy when it comes to our decision making. We will evolve like all things. Ideologies will be challenged. Civilizations and empires will fall. Get the fuck over it.
There is no “war” on masculinity.
You’re just mad because the social climate changed.
What would a woman know about masculinity?
@DeltaCharlieEcho Beats me, I never claimed to know everything about it. I just said the way some or we (As a collective) think of masculinity and femininity is bizarre.
Only men and male energy are a threat to tyrants, so when you see masculinity coming under attack, that's when you know some tyrant or other is gearing up to crown themselves God Emperor for Life and slaughter anyone who disagrees.



Any men out there who don't want to be slaves, time to get yourself into fighting shape because the wheel of History is turning and the Hard Times are on their way. I'd say we have months, not years.
Nevermind the chickenheads, they're fucking worthless and besides, whichever side wins will have the pick of the litter.
Well sort off, the problem becomes in defining masculinity or femininity for that matter. So the argument then becomes feminine/masculine are artificial or social constructs. Without clear parameters it becomes more challenging to debunk. However despite all that Masculinity is not under attack to the extent its portrayed to be, men simply became less masculine themselves. Sure feminism and single mothers also played a role, but so did video games and porn.
You can see this in dating, regardless, women still go for masculine men first same way men go for feminine. Even in romance novels men are portrayed Masculine, feminist romance novels made no impact because women wouldn't read them.
Yes, Its on the list of everything currently under attack during this culture war.
The purpose is to weaken the group under attack and size power from them instead of doing it through competition.
We should make a list of everything that is under attack to get an accurate picture of what is happening and what is at stake. The is what the FBI does. They report out on all types of issues that may seem unrelated but when you see them all together you realize that there is a pattern behind them and that they might be linked
Toxic masculinity exists according to many people but I have to disagree. Bad people who happen to have a Y chromosome isn’t proof of toxic masculinity they just simply not masculine just as how being a bad person who happens to have two X chromosomes isn’t proof of toxic femininity.
Whether using brute strength or manipulation to ruin someone, you are engaging in neither of these characteristics nor should these characteristics be blamed for something that they are not socially constructed to represent.
Oh yes! Social medias, people in the streets, The news, it's all over the place. Then you have the "ALPHA" DUM DUMS speak and everything goes from shit to more shit, it becomes the shittiest 🤣.
I just mind my business and people can say what ever they wanna say, i don't have to listen when people talk shit, am berded and I get a lot hate but it's not my problem.
Has been for quite some time. Just look at the statisics of how male children are treated, what we say about masculinity (no one talks about toxic femininity, why is that?) etc. etc. So yes, feminists started this war, the progressives carried it, and the ignorant have endorsed it.
It's just another tool of the propaganda system to keep everyone divided. Think about it - the mass media and corporate marketing departments focus only on divisional content - Race, religion, gender, guns, crime, politics, etc... They NEED us to be fighting among ourselves, otherwise if everyone woke up to the BS and saw the real problem, a lotta lotta top 10%ers would probably be taken to the guillotines. They know this too.
Yes, it is the current social trend supported by The Left: Government, schools, lawyers, mass media, Hollywood, etc. But all trends come to an end and this one is about to. There is a coming civil war in the USA (Europe is already lost) and one product of that war will be the restoration of more traditional roles for men and women. For those on the Left (blue pill) side of the argument. Enjoy the current scene while it lasts. Your Titanic is about to sink.
I see masculinity being attacked by the "progressive" media and by the people who play identity politics/ groupthink. But i also think any reasonable woman with her head screwed on straight will see through the media bias and misandrist ideologies, and will value the men in her family/ community/ workplace etc.
If there is a war, I’m indifferent to it. I mean, I hear and see this ridiculousness and the only ones getting worked up over it are bizarre extremes that media seems to enjoy pandering too. Probably because they are the loudest. The rest of us could give two squirts of shit about this stuff. I really am all out of fucks to give. So I shall scratch the balls I still possess and carry on with my day.
Yes very much so, launched in the 1960's, you could argue it was during the 1940's or 1800's technically. It's a war that can't be won logically. It's a complete loss for all mankind aka humans. And it is why MGTOW exist and millions of men are now MGTOW.
i wouldn't say it's a "war on masculinity" per se. i would say tha this "women in the workforce" situation is still something we have huge struggles dealing with. and i think women tend to not see why things are how they are. they just point fingers at men and don't see the bigger picture, cause that's easier.
Here definitely is.
To say there is toxic masculinity you have to consider thst there exists, toxic femininity. It is just accept under the guise of current year feminism. There is no college classes for like this for men.
Feminism today is not about equality.
I think there has been for a long time. You know what is funny though?
There is also a war on femininity, TRUE femininity, the kind most women these days wouldn't recognize if it slapped them right across the face. What we are seeing is the unholy feminine and the unholy masculine, in sacred union, just further destroying eachother day by day
@Shamalien I am asking this around, maybe you can answer me.
Why do you say there is a war on masculinity?
I am genuinely asking. I mean sure there are some people who go on about it being toxic but aren't those a small group of idiots that do nothing more besides bitch on social media? Why does anyone gives value to what they say? How can they stop a man from acting manly?
No the war was over years ago. The idea you can solve an argument with another guy by having a punch up is over, you can't beat your wife for being late with dinne. and here's the news, the little guy can be right. The age of guys all trying to see who can piss the highest is over, its time learn to be civilized and not behave like animals.
The problem with this mentality is that if two men are having it out over something, the situation itself gets ignored entirely and BOTH sides are treated as being in the wrong
@FýrdracaDócincel that's only true In school , once you finish that horseshit system nobody gives you flack for defending yourself
@Killingmoon
You know the law has something called "provocation," right?
If that's not getting flack for defense, I don't know what is.
I was reared up with masculine, bully, abusive, apathetic father, but I looked up to media personalities like Captain Kangaroo, Mister Rogers, Sesame Street male role models which is more Christlike attributes of masculine social norms than those in the world and of the world as written in Holy Bible. Hollywood still emphasizes on muscular and impulsive, naive type for male role models of masculinity.
When many of these feminists want sameness to all regards to men, I would consider that a war on masculinity. The other undesirable consequence to this is that women lose their feminine identity to be us.
The war began years ago and is only now coming into fruition (pun intended). You have schooling and society blaming male aggression for war and the world's ills. So they sought to eliminate it. However, in doing so they made the country at large more vulnerable to attack from countries who have not.
There is obviously a war against masculinity and it is driven by feminism. The goal of feminism is to control men, and to do that they must be competitive against them. Feminists recognize the fact that women will never effectively compete with men who are masculine, so their goal is to feminize and emasculate men in order to achieve power over them. It's part of the whole "the future is female" thing.
Yes the white male and the White feminists have been fighting for the last 60 years. Which birthed new groups such as Lgbt Incels Minorty feminist Red pill men etc
Ofcourse the oligarchy, the freemasons, the bankers and the politicians of the world want and need men to be faggies... Faggies don't start revolutions and like to be submissive and taxed illegally, you can spit in their faces and like good LGBT degenerate cowards they won't do anything...
Don’t let it happen. The articles, opinions, ideas, etc... about ending masculinity will never work if you ignore the people who bitch about it all. Instead tell people like bill gates that it’s them who are supposed to raise their children the way they tell us how to.
I don't think so.
I also don't believe in "masculinity" and "femininity" because these are social constructs.
Just be you and that's it.
When in doubt - Money helps in everything and send the haters back to the holes, that they crawled out from.
This war on masculinity will end soon. As chaos erupts, people will call upon the hyper-masculine men to defend them.
Insane on so many levels. I will keep my opinion to myself on this one. It could get ugly. I'll sit back and read the replies.
YES THEY ARE TRYING TO MAKE MEN WEAK
and its working
most men and women are stupid
and cannot see that satan is the ruler of this world
AND HE IS TRYING TO REVERSE GODS WORK
Yes! Exactly.
😂🤣😅
I mostly see a war against biology, common sense and logic 🤦🏻♂️ A war the liberals won’t win in the end, so why won’t they quit?
There is, and there has been for a long time. I think that recent events will cause a shift however.
There definitely is and we, men, therefore, ought to stop being snowflakes and put women back in the kitchen.
yeah. strong, smart, brave and courageous men do no good for the capitalist minded globalists that run the world. unless that masculinity favors them in a way
Those numnuts trying to make the male society to little pussys.
These women don't know how they hurting themselves
In order for women to actually BE equal to men, men have to become sensitive little weak bitches in every way. So the only path to equality is to bring men down to their level. A truly masculine man has few equals.
I actually thought there was a war on femininity. The feminine way is often better I think. I don’t mean like being gay I mean like being diplomatic and peaceful...
Maybe? I wouldn't call it a war cause people do what they want.
I'd say more like a brainwashing.
Considering the term 'toxic masculinity' coexist, It's unquestionable that hatred is fueled towards males.
The term "toxic masculinity" was actually coined by a men's rights organization... albeit a bunch of weirdos, but it's definitely not meant to hate on men.
@WhistleForTheChoir Did not know that. Either way, that argument is commonly used by radical feminists to spew hate.
The word was actually invented to refer to the way Macho Culture can affect males negatively, most people I have seen use it use it to refer to stuff like boys getting beaten up for not being masculine enough in school
@WhistleForTheChoir That's not true at all, it was coined by the Mythopoetic men's movement, which is another thing entirely, that focused on male therapy and masculinity, but ultimately was and still is an inconsequential movement. It's mentality of "toxic masculinity" was that of harmful gender roles that hurt men. Of course those same roles help men in another context, and it's that same context they considered healthy masculinity.
Feminism in Academia very quickly coopted that idea, and misappropriated it by applying it to all masculinity, regardless of context. There is no concept "positive masculinity" in feminism, and if anyone claims otherwise then they're lying. Not even male feminists are allowed to wear the label of "good man"; instead they must bow their head and accept that deep down they're a potential rapist because they are a man, and women aren't.
It makes fuck all difference if they claim that "it's definitely not meant to hate on men", because actions speak louder than words, and the actions say this is dictionary definition dehumanisation of the male sex.
@David_Kek So what you mean to say is that it IS true (mythopoetic's were a bunch of weirdos who advocated for the betterment of men and men's rights), and then it was co-opted by feminists. I'm missing the part where you contradicted me, which is generally what happens after you say someone is totally wrong..
@WhistleForTheChoir You said they were a men's right group, and that is factually incorrect.
Moreover, mythopoetic men's movement practically hasn't existed for decades, so saying they came up with the term in response to the OP is pretty irrelevant, given what it means now. The only people on the planet in the present time that use that term, are feminists in the context of how it was coopted, ie, to dehumanise men.
@WhistleForTheChoir yup Michael Kimmel I believe
@David_Kek From the Wikipedia page: "Major components of the [mythopoetic] men's movement include the men's liberation movement, profeminist men's movement, mythopoetic men's movement, men's rights movement, and the Christian men's movement"
Moreover, Isaac Newton hasn't exists for hundreds of years, so I guess the laws he came up with mean something different now too. I don't even know what point you're trying to make there. I don't think that "toxic masculinity" dehumanizes men, any more than saying "rabid dog" implies that all dogs have rabies. I think that you saw feminists or liberals or some group you disapprove of use the word, and so you just took the opposite side without really trying to understand what they were saying, and YOU are actually the one redefining the word so that you will seem reasonable when you take offense to it.
@WhistleForTheChoir it's unsurprising you would tell such bold faced lies.
en.m.wikipedia.org/.../Mythopoetic_men%27s_movement
No where on that entire page does it say that, though it does say a number of times how the movement had no interest in rights or politics.
They were not a men's rights group, and they had nothing to do with politics of any kind. To claim they was a men's rights group is factually incorrect.
As for your pathetic attempt to defend the undefendable; Newton's laws haven't changed, while "toxic masculinity" very much has.
As I have already say, there practically isn't anyone left of Mythopoetic men's movement that still use that term. The only people that still use it are feminists, minus any notion of positive masculinity.
I don't really care what you think, all I care about is that you're spreading lies, to cover up a lie.
@David_Kek Well, it seems like I struck a little to close to the center. I literally copy-pasted the quote and then added the bracketed part. But here's the thing, you're determined to feel like a victim of big, mean feminists. So you're going to put words in their mouth. I'm kind of done with this, you feel free to argue with yourself.
@WhistleForTheChoir You lied; that quote is nowhere on that page.
You are a coward.
@WhistleForTheChoir the mythpotic men's movement and the men's rights movement may very well be both parts of the broader men's movement that no one identifies with, but that doesn't make them synonymous.
Yes most certainly
Being a man entails a lot of things that are shunned in contemporary society
Toxic masculinity doesn't exist, only toxic people. There is nothing wrong with alpha males with testosterone. Why being spinless weak male with 0 testosterone is encouraged?
No such thing as alpha males. Not in wolves. Not in humans. Google David Mech. He's the person responsible for popularizing the idea, and also the person who has been trying to discredit it for most of his professional career.
@WhistleForTheChoir Have you seen documentaries about animals? There is an alpha, especially in some mammals, they fight and the winner gets to lay the females, eats first the prey etc. In humans, alpha is a term of confidence, leader, stand up to himself, respect and sort of these.
I don’t think so. I think society has realized that saying man up or your a sissy, pussy, has hurt a lot of people and caused a lot of insecurity among a lot of men in the world.
I believe so. It won't affect me though. I'm firm in being a masculine man til death.
No but the definition is changing. New generation, new ideas. I’m sure the counterculture in the 60s went through the same questioning.
seeing how men are constantly encouraged to be cucks, I'd say yes. When is the society going to stop listening to broken women?
Toxic masculinity is just a way for feminists to politicise the term dickhead.
I mean technically yeah but it has very little steam, I'm not worried about it.
Only beta females want beta males. Sorry
They generally don’t either 🤣
It’s almost like people like their partner to have a spine...
There are no such things as Alphas and Betas in human social hierarchies. There aren't even alphas and betas in wolves. The reason you believe this is because of the research of a man called David Mech, you can google him. He spent twenty years trying to discredit his own research into the topic, because he realized he fucked up.
Spark Notes: He took wolves away from their pack, threw them in a cage and terrified them. The "Alphas" were the wolves who got violent toward the others. But that's not how they act in the wild. Wolves work together in the wild, and their social hierarchies are fluid. That's how they act when they're terrified, and they thought they would have to compete with a bunch of strangers for food. Basically, being an "alpha" is just putting on a tough-guy front when you're scared. That's true for wolves, and it's true for humans too.
There’s a dominance hierarchy but it’s situational. That said, those near the bottom/people who are bullied end up with lower serotonin levels which has real physiological effects.
So betas are kind of a thing, though most people use the term incorrectly to describe somewhat effeminate men.
@WhistleForTheChoir
There are though. Whenever someone wants to attempt to debunk the alpha vs beta thing they always bring up wolves because David Mech said that alpha male don't exist outside of captivity, but it's completely irrelevant.
There are alpha male lions right? In fact there are many other species that do have alpha males. That's why I say that bringing up wolves is irrelevant. Not only that, we're not closely related to wolves or lions.
The animal species which we're most closely related to are chimpanzees and bonobos - they do have alpha males. There are similarities between both of those species because they're very closely related, and there are some behavioural similarities between us and them too.
@Barbaric The reason I bring up David Mech, is because that's the pop culture version of "Alpha/Beta" that you're espousing. That's where people get that image that is constantly espoused, of a man who is an island and doesn't need anyone else, is aggressive when he needs to be, takes what he wants and is inherently at the top of the heap.
It's funny that you bring up bonobos though, because, yes, while they are our closest living relative, they're actually matriarchal and matrilineal. Chimpanzee alphas are more akin to human leadership rather than some intrinsic advantage, and chimpanzees can achieve "alpha status" through cunning, alliance-building, intimidation, brute-force or trade. Self-proclaimed human alpha males on the other hand really only respect physical advantages, intimidation and resource acquisition, which isn't even close to the same thing. They're never the brightest or friendliest guys around, and their entire concept of self-validation is based on how laid they get.
You’ve now taken the position that alphas both do and do not exist...
I think you’re confusing social dominance and physical dominance/tyranny. We don’t tend to accept bullies long as the next 2-3 males will form an alliance to take out the one bully. That said, social status determines your available alliances.
Dominance hierarchies go all the way down to lobsters and all other primates have one. For bonobos there’s a matriarch group and for chimps it’s a group of alpha males in a machevillian alliance. For gorillas it’s a father and sometimes a son as well who control the territory through physical displays/aggression.
The really important question is: if you feel like you’re alone at the bottom of the rung; what do you do?
@WhistleForTheChoir
I already knew that you'd say that bonobos are our closest relatives. That's your confirmation bias there. There are studies that show that they are... But there are also studies which show that we're more closely related to chimpanzees. Many others which show that we're equally related to both. You say that we're more closely related to bonobos so that you can say that alpha vs beta doesn't exist.
What's more, the differences between chimps and bonobos are heavily exaggerated, by people who wanted to do the same thing. There are only very slight differences between the two, and those differences only really have to do with the environment they're in. They like to pretend that bonobos are like peaceful hippies and chimps are like violent skinheads, but bonobos are violent too. They hunt other monkeys to eat and all that. They do use violence with each other too.
The mating behaviour is the same for both. Especially for the females. Chimps and bonobos go into heat. When they go into heat they tend to actively seek sex with alpha males over the beta males. And then they will have sex with beta males sometimes when not in heat, in exchange for resources and favours.
Human females do the same thing through their menstrual cycle, or at least have the same drive. Studies show that when they're ovulating they show a natural preference for typically masculine men with signs of high testosterone. But at other times in their cycle they prefer a softer man. When married, women with masculine husbands report higher sexual satisfaction during the ovulation phase, whereas those with less masculine husbands report the opposite. The birth control pill also, because it tricks their bodies into thinking that they're pregnant, makes those women choose less masculine men who are more soft and sensitive too.
That's all that alpha vs beta really means.
So a couple points as there are a few misunderstandings here:
We are equally related to both, they split off from us when the Rift Valley was formed 5mya. Bonobos were split from chimps by the Congo River 3mya. Bonobos had the better area with less competition from other primates and socially evolved to be pretty chill.
They do however, have a dominance hierarchy too. It’s just based upon who the females let close to the core of the group. Dominance is about controlling space/having authority over it. In chimps 1-3 males are the alphas, in bonobos it’s the matriarchs.
One big reason being chimp females have to transfer between groups. Another big one is there’s more food and sexual opportunity on the bonobo end since they don’t only mate during estrus.
Regardless dominance hierarchies exist all the way down to crustacean, just because it’s not immediately obvious who the boss is doesn’t mean there isn’t one.
Not directly. It's a media war against rationality, self preservation and common sense. Traits which are part of healthy masculinity.
Yes of course, you only notice that now? It is supported by the media for a reason.
i dont know but im gonna keep my masculinity, i dont give a shit how many girls try to encourage me to cry... i won't
don't have much masculinity so wouldn't know nor care enough to pay attention.
Yes and a war on every other traditional social norm.
Someone really needs to tell me why the hell do they think there is a war on masculinity!
@thisismyopinion It's basically becoming a crime to be masculine due to the demonization of it from the Left/Feminists type of media like CNN or MSNBC.
When you hate an entire sex, in this case with men, you'll naturally be criticizing every "problem" with "them." It's similar to a hard Left or hard Right individual would do!
@thisismyopinion becaues it's promoting toxic feminine behavior in boys. They are fighting men acting like men, by saying it's ok to act like a woman, look like a woman.
Both not okay
No boundaries , no backbones is what they want you men to have. They want to take your balls basically that's the War
@Inbox I don't believe that any masculine man would stop acting manly because of what a few idiots are saying on the news.
@thisismyopinion Men who are ALREADY masculine sure, but you have to look at it from a timeline POV. As those morons' voices got louder, more naive and ignorant people inevitably get involved, then spread their views, and as more and more people got involved, so did the media - then the politicians. In other words, the flow of information has been corrupted. It is similar to propaganda. Except it is ignorant forms of propaganda driven by misandry. Remember, your favorite movies, stars, politicians, businesses, etc are all in many ways slaves to the current fashion/trend.
@WowwGirl Thanks for being smart enough to see through all this BS.
@Inbox I see. Well let the ignorant and the fools fall for it.
Good fathers and role models will always exist to show boys what a man is made out of.
@thisismyopinion Yes, but those men are a dying breed because in every type of war there is always collateral damage. The damage is apparent well within the courts, schools, societal bias, and many others.
Long story short, the Feminists and now the Leftist politicians that support them don't realize that this collateral damage is planting the seeds for the next male revolution such as MGTOW. I don't agree with MGTOW, but it was inevitable as one extreme movement in history always creates a polar opposite extreme movement ;p
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tpy8NMonHE0
That's the thing, nobody stops men from being men if they really want to. I don't think that's really what the problem is.
The problem as I see it is children/teen boys being influenced to act more and more like girls/women, at a time when they're easily influenced and don't know any better. A feminist named Christina Hoff Sommers actually wrote a great book titled "The War On Boys: How Misguided Feminism Is Harming Our Young Men". She wrote a lot about how feminists basically became hostile towards natural male behaviours and began to push more and more to attempt to socialise boys to act more like girls as I said. Here's an old 20 minute video of her speaking about this to give you an idea:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wPgoyK_5KV0
Those boys once they grow up very often don't know how to act like men anymore, especially those without strong male role models in their lives of which there are many today. The smarter ones figure it out. Others do develop toxic behaviours and look to emulate the wrong role models e. g. by joining gangs. 80% of male prisoners are children of single mothers for that reason, as are most gang members/career criminals. Or they never get it, and they just struggle. You can see some of them in this comment section right now, and they're easy to notice if you've seen their other posts. They're the ones arguing that masculinity doesn't exist or something like that - because that's what they were taught growing up.
The point is that for many of them the damage is done by the time they reach adulthood, and this makes the guys who don't get it highly susceptible to the continued brainwashing even as adults.
@Inbox I am thankful I don't live in the US.
@thisismyopinion you do live in a good country I'm sure, beautiful to my knowledge.
Why do you think I brag on you so much for your beliefs? Becaues there's not guys like you hear except a few. I wasn't feeding your ego I meant the compliments I gave🙂 and thanks it's actually a bodysuit and a skirt.
that's what many dating and self-improvement coaches say, have been for some years now.
Yes there is for sure
omg those guys on the beta male cover 😂
Only since about 1968 or so - - - - - -
There is a war on men. Women treat men like shit.
A real man wouldn't whine about it.
@WhistleForTheChoir Right, just bend over, cuck.
I'm just saying, the "Defenders of Masculinity" are always throwing a temper tantrum about something.
@WhistleForTheChoir Stop whining like a little bitch
Your original comment: "Waaah! I'm a victim!"
Your 2nd comment: "You're gay!"
Your 3rd comment: "I know you are, but what am I?"
Not that I have seen.
Yes. People hate masculinity.
Why do you say there is a war on masculinity?
I am genuinely asking. I mean sure there are some people who go on about it being toxic but aren't those a small group of idiots that do nothing more besides bitch on social media? Why does anyone gives value to what they say? How can they stop a man from acting manly?
@Cryptic-Game
Masculinity isn't attacking females please remember. That's the opposite of a real man
Can women attack men and still be feminine?
Sometimes a man might have to defend himself against a woman too, like if she has a weapon.
I am not aware of your friend and your friend cussed at me and hinted my mom should have aborted me.
He is mean. He said my mom should have aborted me.
@Cryptic-Game I tried to tell you... look what happened again.
Why won't you talk to him like you do me?
I didn't say I'd hit you in the face.
Okay. Fine.
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions