





There are different kinds of communication problems: Too shy and quiet; lack of vocabulary; an inability to organize thoughts and express them; or a style of communication that is obnoxious and puts people off. The latter might include crudeness, loudness, bombast, pontification, dominance, threatening metacommunication, or other things.
I know people who are highly educated and capable of clearly expressing their thoughts who are obnoxious. I don't care to be around them, let alone hear what they have to say. Despite their education, they are ignorant.
Poor comprehension skills may be due to lack of education or cognition. You would have to communicate with someone like that as if talking to a child. Some comprehension problems stem from ideology or, basically, brainwashing. How do you discuss the state of government with a political partisan? How do you have a rational discussion with an ideologue? How do you discuss geology or anthropology with a Creationist? A person with a closed mind is a waste of time.
My conclusion is, poor communication skills can be improved upon with effort and practice. Communication skills are learned. But it may not always be possible to improve upon poor comprehension skills. Therefore, I'd say that poor comprehension skills are a bigger problem, generally speaking.
My wife and I have attended counseling in the past in order to strengthen our relationship and insure its ongoing health. In doing so, we learned a lot about each other but also about ourselves. One of the most important things we learned was healthy communication. It is invaluable for couples but also serves one well in communicating with others.
Once again love your answer πππ
Thank you ππ
Great question Toots... those two memes are well stated... many folks are horrible listeners and do not do what's known as "active listening"
"Active listening refers to a pattern of listening that keeps you engaged with your conversation partner in a positive way. It is the process of listening attentively while someone else speaks, paraphrasing and reflecting back what is said, and withholding judgment and advice."
Great advice and insights on this page too: https://positivepsychology.com/active-listening/
More so lately I've noticed many folks have bias in their ears and it's taken the old game of two people hear the same thing then try to play it back... if the two people have different biases on the topic, you'll get a wildly different playback...
Active listening helps eliminate that... it's not always easy to do but it is great for both personal and business conversations :)
Great great answer... Think you got AB excited with this one π€£π€£π€£
See sand you got it without any "favors" π€£π€£π€£
Opinion
51Opinion
Comprehension. is bigger Lucky my best friend can always tell what i am saying but i always screw up something due to my dyslexia but because my best-friend has good comprehension on what i say and how i act she understands it :)
The thing is tho people can say stuff then try change what they said. But you cannot tell if it really is communication thing or them trying to look like they were right. And then sometimes we say something than realize it was wrong lmao or we screwed up.
Or we take something to literally or too little. Like for example guy said mediating was helpful to sleep because there goals are the same thing so my comprehension thought he meant they both goal for sleep lol but wen he explained what he meant i got it afterwards.
I think Comprehension is a bigger issue tho cause even a person with bad communication problems let's say you screw up a word the other person should be able tell through common sense what word your trying to say. Or you should use your common sense think he meant something he didn't write at all. Not putting words in others mouths but honestly we all screw up here.
Well said πππ
I find that people don't really read everything, and then just respond to what they think I am saying, when I am not, as they DON'T READ THE WHOLE THING!!!
So many are just so quick to hate, and want to argue, that they don't really seem to care what the intent is.
Yeah, sometimes, you accidentally misread, and misunderstand, but some just seem to want DRAMA, and want to start an argument, without really knowing, or caring what the posted, REAL POINT, is.
It is much harder, to really know what the other is really saying, with just text, and not seeing their expressions, or hearing the 'sarcasm' sometimes.
True true
Most often, the communicator.
There's almost always a chance to clarify what you mean to your listener, if they're willing.
That said, especially online, sometimes it's impossible to bridge the gap as a communicator if your listener refuses to, well, listen.
Personally, I find text-based communication much harder than face-to-face (video calls count, since I can see the other person). Through tone, body language, and reading the other party, it's easier as a communicator to adjust your approach or clarify.
That said, the listener also has a chance to clarify and ensure they're understanding the points. But I'd favour the communicator as the bigger factor - they're the initiator, after all.
Exactly... But that doesn't always happen just online
Very true.
If we analyze the "communication loop", there is:
1. a message
2. the encoding of that message
3 the transmission of that encoding
4. the receiving of that transmission
5. the decoding of that transmission into - - -
6. the message
A breakdown at any point means the message will not get to its intended target.
If someone doesn't speak the language of a country he or she visits, the breakdown will be at point 1 or 2.
If a telegraph line breaks (ask your grandpa) the breakdown is at point 3 and/or 4.
If someone can't listen, the problem is at 4 and/or 5, and so on.
Like your answer πππ
My Bachelor's degree was in Communications and Visual Design. This was a core idea of what we learned in the first course. Some things, it turns out, are not well suited for a "graphic arts" means of communications. The first step is to determine if a visual/graphical solution is the best way to go. Kind of like that old parlor game where person 1 whispers something to person 2 who whispers it to person 3, etc. By the time the last person says it back to person 1, it's a jumbled up mess!
Ha right lol why don't like text as only means of communication, feel there's too many miscomprehending or assumptions that way
Right. Texting really is a rather poor way of comprehending the ESSENCE and CONTEXT of a message.
The Internet has greatly changed the way we communicate (or TRY to, at least). Since body language and verbal tone do not translate into our text messages or e-mails, weβve developed alternate ways to convey subtly nuanced meanings. The most prominent change to our online style has been the addition of two new-age hieroglyphic languages: emoticons and emoji.
Letβs start with the older of the two: the EMOTICON. Emoticons are punctuation marks, letters, and numbers used to create PICTORIAL ICONS that generally display an emotion or sentiment. :- ) (Thatβs actually where the portmanteau βemoticonβ comes from: emotional icon.) . Oh, and because of the limits of our keyboard, most emoticons need to be read sideways. : - (
The emoticon came into being after a joke went sideways at Carnegie Mellon University in 1982. A gag online message about a fake mercury spill sent the university into a tizzy, and because of this, Dr. Scott E. Fahlman suggested that jokes and NONjokes be marked by two sets of characters we now recognize as standard emoticons: the smiley face :-) and the frowning face :-(. After this, emoticons became a big hit.
Emoji (from the Japanese e, βpicture,β and moji, βcharacterβ) are a slightly more recent invention. Not to be confused with their predecessor, emoji are PICTOGRAPHS of faces, objects, and symbols. Youβre probably familiar with the distinct style of Appleβs emoji: yellow cartoony faces with various expressions, as well as buildings, animals, food objects, scenics, flags, etc.
My wife used to be a court reporter. The words get typed , but the context can NOT be so typed. There is a big difference from someone admitting, "I killed him" and someone being caught of guard and shouting out a surprised, "I KILLED him?" Same words- obviously different essence and context!
EXACTLY!!!
Personally, I cannot decide as to which is worse. It depends on the person, are they listening to comprehend or are they simply listening to respond?
Not everyone is good a communicating how they are feeling. Granted this ties into comprehension, if you don not quite understand, it would be important to ask questions to make sure you have an understanding.
However, if someone is not communicating, you cannot attempt to gain an understanding.
π great answer
I see comprehension as a subset of communication skills. In order to communicate well with someone else you have to listen and verify you understand what they said. Thatβs where skills of active listening, patience, and understanding venting/fixing come in handy. I hope over time that a couple focuses on improving their communication skills overall because that leads to each being more heard and validated. God gave us 2 ears and 1 mouth for a reason :)
Ha π love π this answer.. Although way done people gab without listening, you'd swear they got two mouths and only one ear, or none at all π€£
poor communication if you don't do that at all it will ruin a lot and don't wory about skills because you can't be skilled without any communication. i grow up with family that didn't communicat and when i had my first serious relationship with Jax i had a lot of problems with communication but now we are very good at talking and we learned a lot of skills
That's awesome. Good communication is key for a healthy relationship
A little from column A and a little from column B... In my life so far there's been occasions where I've been capable of being inarticulate and at the same time misunderstand the point , so I won't highlight either one of my faults, instead I'll give them both the credit they deserve lol I'm working on it, but it's a work in progress! LOL
Think we've all been there π
This girl from Texas is just a pen-pal and she's age 28 but she emailed me a few times but her emails are far and in between so I find her communication to be poor but we can't force people to email us... So I don't hold any promise or expect more from her.
Yeah true.
@Brainsbeforebeauty So true
It has to be comprehension, if you struggle to communicate at least if someones good at understand things you will eventually ease out what they are trying to say.
If you struggle at comprehending then it can be like banging your head against the wall. If someone can't comprehend what you are saying it's as good as not communicating.
Exactly! Very well said! Our great comprehension of the point I was making ππ€£π
*or gosh darn typos
The art of conversation is to be heard Not just to be heard but for the recipient to understand what you have aired the at 2 types of hearing when it comes to listening but not acting on the information this person has conveyed to you Or we have the active listener who takes on board what you have explained and can clarify what they have heard
That's so true
It lies on both ends, but I think the biggest breakdown is when one person anticipates what the other is going to say or mean and then doesn't listen because they think they know what is going to be said and their mind is already processing their response instead of comprehending the incoming communication.
Very astute and very true!!
π thanks for the great response π
Comprehension definitely. In fact I'd definitely say that the more heated debates between men and women in particular are all about the differences in perception and each completely misunderstanding the other.
I agree
poor communication. I have learned over 42 years no one listens to well. It sucks bc people can learn more about someone very well when you open one ear and listen.
Very true
It's both those are two pillars if say something and someone is not able to understand its frustrating, similarly if you don't say anything at all then no one can comprehend with it so yeah without both other will fail
That's very true π
Communication skills especially via text it is very easy to relay the wrong message or make it sound different than it is meant
Yeah I'm not big on texting
Yeah I know.. People don't know how to communicate other than by text these days... Maybe another reason more relationships are failing
"Comprehension skills" form the biggest obstacle.
Most people can communicate reasonably clearly.
Failure generally occurs when the receiver has an agenda that requires misunderstanding. No amount of logic or reason will get through to those who do not want to understand. For proof, try explaining the idiocy of theism to a religious type.
True. Many do not know how to listen. They take it as an insult or think you trying to control them but they do not stop to try to understand. Or maybe the person communicating does not know how to articulate in a tactful way to convey an idea.
Both can be true
Here's the thing about communication: if you're trying to convey some information or emotion to someone, and they don't understand... then you have't successfully conveyed that information. It is entirely the responsibility of the person initiating the communication to make sure the recipient (s) understand, because the initiator is the one who benefits from that comprehension.
That's not always true, if I say the same thing the same way to 5 people, 4 get it and 1 don't, is it me? Or them?
You have to tailor your communication to your audience. Whatever it is you're trying to communicate benefits you to do so. Therefore it's on you to make sure people understand, not the other way around. If that 5th person doesn't get it, make them understand.
Sometimes that's their failing not yours... Some people just can't comprehend things...
Well I guess it would be comprehension. Even if one comunicated to another if that person wasn't able to understand then comprehension seems like the weak link. A wink is as good as a nod to a blind horse
There you go, exactly...
Comprehension all day, if they are adequate or slightly better at comprehending they can make up for communication, but communication is hard to recover without it. People are more likely to have communication difficulties, that coupled with comprehension is an imminent disaster.
Comprehension. And the ability and willingness to accept that the speaker may have valid beliefs that do not correspond to your own.
Right... Only issue I have with others beliefs is when they resort to insults because you don't share the same... I can respect other's opinions but not the person if they can't respect mine
Right agree π―
It depends on the point your trying to make or get across like on here when I answer I never proof read I talk in a circle because there's not one answer there is something always deeper it's like when tslkingbto someone. And they are living to you if your quite and listen they will tell you the truth in the same sentence
I don't think there's a worthwhile delineation between the two. Either way, the message is going to be misunderstood.
That's true
Not only that, but imagine the "blame game" that would ensue !! We see that everyday, don't we?
Yep sure do
Maybe a bit of both, but for me it would mostly be a lack of comprehension. If someone can't understand what I'm saying I won't get a good reply.
Very true.
for guys its understanding for women its communicating you have too be simple and straight to the point with some guys or your begin to make there brains melt lol.
Poor communication is worse than poor comprehension.
Poor comprehension can be better, same as poor communication. But f I'm going to choose between the two. Poor communication is worse
Their are barriers in communication and we all know we can still communicate verbally, nonverbally or by written communication.
They go hand in hand. Making the other person understand is part of good communication skill. If it's not comprehended, they both fail.
I'm over exaggerating a little to make a point.
Both are equally bad but bad communication is a bit worse in my opinion.
πππ
Both, they go hand and hand. They are teammates in a argument
Right
Comprehension skills, because someone may speak and communicate well, but they may not understand and listen back to what others are expressing.
I agree and if someone can't communicate, you can tell them you can't understand, but not much you can do if someone just don't listen
I think it's a mixture of the 2. Which leads to confusion and frustration, at that point there is no clear communication or comprehension.
That can be so true π
i would say poor "communication" skills
how are you today?
Good, yourself?
@Brainsbeforebeauty good thanks for asking just bored
Comprehension. No matter what you say, if they don't understand, then it means nothing.
See that's my take on it... Agree π―
Exactly! Tried telling someone that once he didn't talk to me, he talked at me, cuz he never heard what anyone was saying past what "he" was... And that's not real communication, and then what's the point π€·πΌββοΈ
Poor listening and lack of questions asked, and assumptions made.
Very true
Sadly I have seen it more than once with my friends, and with my own relationships. It takes work to listen. Took me a while to figure that out.
Its not comprehension... its straight ip not listening.
Happens DAILY with my employees then i have to fix a fuq up
Ha right, that "selective hearing" ...
Comprehension. I understand not being able to communicate properly but you cannot comprehend something I tie it with emotional immaturity
True true
Poor comprehension. Poor communication can be fixed - poor comprehension can't.
Omg EXACTLY!
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 depends on wether you have brain damage or not 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Well, some people "really" do, and those have my sympathy... Then there's others that just "appear" to π€£π€£
I really do...π€£π€£π€£π€£
I know you do.. others just act like it or don't really have a brain π€£π€£
π€£π€£π€£π€£
Young and old. Men and women are great examples of both
Right
And relationships communication is a key because if you don't have communication followed by trust then you guys might as well kiss your relationship goodbye
In opposite-sex relationships the biggest communication problem is that guys neither speak nor understand "womanese", but women keep talking as if we do. Of course, failure to understand is always the guy's fault, never the woman doing the talking. (goes without saying.)
A little of both. I feel the communicator is probably more the breakdown though.
I would say more the listener, some people hear what they want to hear instead of what you're really saying
I've definitely experienced that.
I'd say communication. In my experience, most comprehension difficulties can be overcome by communication.
Men tend to be poor at communicating but much better at comprehending. "Guessing what you don't know based on what you do know."
Women on the other hand tend to be quite poor at comprehending, but much better at communicating at great length on subjects they utterly fail to comprehend, or, "guessing what you think you know based on what you don't know, but think you do."
Oh that's such sexist crap but okay thanks for your "opinion"
I swear, it's highly accurate.
Usually both in more or less equal measure I would say.
Comprehension I'd say
I'd think so
I'd say it's the lack of care or concern of proper communication overall but among your choices...
It's tough because they can be equals to me...
I'd say proper communication in the first place. Many are misunderstood but that's based on not having words that make sense in the first place. Given some do not understand college textbook terms but we all have a solid understanding of how to comprehend. However, jumping to conclusions or making assumptions can be a really huge problem too...
communication comes first, without communication there's not even anything to comprehend
But you can be communicating, it takes someone comprehending to keep the communication going tho
So assuming you're already communicating, how does comprehending come first as it's secondary to communication, as you had to communicate something for them to reach the stage of comprehending to begin with
it's like you want it to be comprehension, but you can't have comprehension without communication, but you can have communication without comprehension.
You have to build up communication before you can build up comprehension
Question wasn't what comes first. Was what breaks down communication more... If you don't understand the way I'm communicating, I can try to say it in a better way for you to understand, someone who just can't comprehend or who listens without really hearing what's being said if harder to fix...
well yes that wasn't the question, but it does factor into play. For example a couple with poor communication, but comprehend each other very well, is less healthy than a couple who has good communication and poor comprehension, because they are both invested into communicating each other, they can learn to understand one another. Where as the couple who barely communicates is not invested at all despite understanding each other 100%
for example, this music video is about a couple, the girl could not comprehend the guy at all because he's deaf, but their communication was great, and lead to them being able to understand each other better because of good communication.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=c4qgqNS_20s
Granted it's obviously a break up song, but aside that fact you can grow to comprehend each other but you can't do that without good communication
First love doesn't always just have to be said, love can be shown... We do communicate with more than just words... My husband barely said the words in 30 years, but he 'showed" me so the time with his actions... Second... You can be the greatest communicater in the world, but if someone doesn't comprehend "understand" what you're saying the communication breaks down... I do know the definitions π
*20 years not 30
I really don't think you're understanding what I'm saying, it's the communication between the individuals that is good, not being good at being a communicator. There are even different love languages that you learn to understand in your partner which works best.
there can be a couple let's say 5 years together, they comprehend each other very very well, but they got comfortable together and don't communicate like they once did, poor communication plants doubts of the relationship lasting long, and end up breaking up.
I understand you're trying to argue the point comprehension is what keeps communication alive, in a sense it does, but isn't as important as communication itself.
For example your husband learned how to comprehend you by communicating, and now that he comprehended which love you respond to the best, he can communicate that. HOWEVER, if he had poor communication skills, he wouldn't be able to love you effectively as he did even though he understood what worked best.
Women cannot communicate, they have their own definitions to words and say one thing but expect you to know what they really wanted to say.
being extremly closed minded.
Agree there
Comprehension. I can teach my employees communication skills. Comprehension skills? Go back to school.
Both. Each couple has a communication language, and you both have to learn it with each other.
I think it is a combination of both.
It can be,
People are stupid though right?
a lot seem to be π€£
Lololol
I think both of them are quite bad.
Yeah
either of which is lost in translation... not one or the other is at fault
Miscommunication for sure
I'm listening...
Anyone can listen, but does everyone "hear" or "really comprehend"?π€π€
Not everyone, for sure. That takes a bit of knowing tge other person/understanding them (or painfully plastic/oversimplified language in questions - which you kind of get used to in multinational settings because many people gave very different backgrounds, values, beliefs)
*the* and *have*
Poor communication skills.
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions