Joe Rogan calmly obliterates Jordan Peterson?

[Thatsamazing]

Jordan Peterson has a few relevant things to say that I've heard but his nonsense against "equality of outcome" (which he never actually defines himself, of course) renders moot many of his talking points, since he turns himself into a hypocrite as a result. Watch the whole video, and what do you think? He can do better.

[DonCachondo]

I fucking love Majority Report
RIP MICHAEL BROOKS

Anyway to your question, why is this middle-aged creepo worried about who's shagging on college campuses? LOL
I mean, I sympathize with incels' frustrations somewhat, but how you gonna say we need intervention to ensure everybody gets laid but NOT healthcare, food, or even the chance to end up on one of those college campuses?

[Thatsamazing]

I disagree with that idea that the age conversation matters, a discussion is a discussion no matter who is speaking; same rationale would suggest that college students aren't allowed to discuss Social Security because they aren't drawing from it yet. But yes, Peterson's premise here is absurd.

[DonCachondo]

I think it's valid to assess somebody's bona fides based on the subject matter they volunteer to the conversation. A good example of that is being able to detect 'whataboutism' and nipping it at the bud whenever it crops up.

[Thatsamazing]

Yes "whataboutism" is generally the last refuge of the incompetent. Other than violence, of course.

[joeldalton]

lol, no. Jordan wasn't "obliterated" and the whiny commentator in between the Rogan clips is insufferable.

[Thatsamazing]

True "obliterated" is clearly done in order to get you to click. They could have chosen a better word. And he is a little annoying. He's also correct. If you had actually watched the video, you would know that.

[joeldalton]

I wouldn't. Because from what I watched he didn't understand what Jordan was saying.

[Thatsamazing]

"Because from what I watched" You didn't watch it. Again, if you had, you would understand.

[Thatsamazing]

Watching three minutes or whatever of an 18-minute video isn't watching the video. I'm amazed that that needs to be explained.

[scetoaux]

couldnt watch the entire video because the sam seder guy that keeps interrupting for his own opinions completely misinterprets much of whats being said. The guy that made this video is just completely off base with much of what he is saying. Its bordering on the ridiculous.

Joe Rogan generally has some good points, Jordan Peterson has some good points, they agreed on many things.

[Thatsamazing]

The point of the clip here is that Peterson, in this interview, had no good points. As Joe Rogan calmly points out to him. Which you would know if you had actually watched it.

[scetoaux]

Actually no thats not what is pointed out at all, Joe starts at the very beginning by agreeing that Jordan has made a good point... did you not watch the video?

[Thatsamazing]

(squints and pinches the bridge of nose in obvious mental discomfort) ... Yes, gal. I watched the video. You didn't.

[scetoaux]

face palms; well obviously you didn't because you say that joe rogan "calmly points out that JP has no good points"

If you actually watched the first 10 seconds of the exchange between JR and JP JR says "thats a very good point" to JP. Clearly, you didn't watch it or you are mis-characterizing what actually is said in the video. I mean, ffs its right in the video and can't be more clear. Maybe you should pick a video that doesn't offer the exact opposite of what you said and doesn't include minutes of commentary by a comedian that can't understand basic English.

[Thatsamazing]

... I think you should watch the whole video, champ.

[scetoaux]

I think you should watch the first ten seconds of jr and jo talking
Then be accurate with your question
And pick a less shitty video

[Thatsamazing]

You're a fascinating creature. Can you explain to me how smart you are? I love hearing that stuff.

[scetoaux]

Ahhh that’s alright just correct your question to match the video n that’ll be good enough for today.

[Thatsamazing]

No no see, I need to know how smart you are. Can you tell me some, please?

[scetoaux]

Well, I appreciate your interest but I think what we all want to see is a demonstration of your mastery of the English language by correcting your question to match the video. It’ll be super easy if you just try.

[Thatsamazing]

(pats you on the head) Oh gal... you're so special. Please, continue. I love special people.

[scetoaux]

You should wait to pat yourself on the head until after you’ve achieved your correction

[Thatsamazing]

Hmm. It is possible that I'll have to devolve to memes in order to meet you on your level... Would you prefer that? In order to get you to understand that you should watch the whole video in order to know what you're talking about?

[scetoaux]

I think memes are probably your go to

[Thatsamazing]

Thankfully no, but I want to use a dumbed-down message here that you will be able to understand. I am flexible.
Here, for you. (pats you on the head)

[scetoaux]

You selected a very appropriate meme good job

[Thatsamazing]

Would you like more? I just want to help you.

[scetoaux]

You can only help yourself on this one.

[Thatsamazing]

(yawns) You're boring. Any further comments from you will be deleted. Perhaps next time you'll do better.

[OutdoorsForLife]

Equality of opportunity makes sense, equality of outcome doesn’t.

[Thatsamazing]

The video's about 18 minutes long. There's no way you've already watched the whole thing.

[OutdoorsForLife]

I didn’t watch the video, why should I?

[Thatsamazing]

You're not very smart, are you?

[OutdoorsForLife]

Actually I’m fairly smart. The fact that I’ve seen all the videos in their entirety when JP is on Rogans show means I don’t have to rewatch a shortened clip that you uploaded/linked in order to respond to the equality question.

How many JP videos have you see where he gives examples of equality of outcome and why that will never work in society? Sounds like not many based on the way you asked this question? Now if In fact you have seen other JP videos and are aware of those examples and his definition of equality of outcome then why not link to them?

[Thatsamazing]

... Sadly, you started off on the wrong foot in your last comment there bud.

Perhaps you would be well-served by... watching the rest of the video.

[OutdoorsForLife]

This video is a subset of a video I’ve already seen. Why should I rewatch a video? That seems like a waste of time to me.

[Thatsamazing]

It obviously isn't, because if it was, you wouldn't be writing what you're writing right now.

[OutdoorsForLife]

Clearly even though I answered your questions you are not answering mine. Kind of the bare minimum rule in having a civil conversation is answering each other’s questions. You are ignoring the rule so no point in continuing this discussion.

[Thatsamazing]

This isn't a discussion. You didn't watch the video.

[OutdoorsForLife]

Of course I watched the video

[Thatsamazing]

Have you finally watched it now? Because you didn't at first, yet claimed to know its content.

[OutdoorsForLife]

I just said I did. Let me again state I watched the entire video.

[Thatsamazing]

Brilliant.

[OutdoorsForLife]

Equality of opportunity makes sense, equality of outcome doesn’t.

[Thatsamazing]

Uh... sure... I guess. That's a very short soundbite for a very complex set of concepts.

[OutdoorsForLife]

Thanks

[BoredOfPlebs]

Equality of opportunity is for the logical thinkers who have grown up and who understand you have the freedom to choose your own path your way. Noone controls you. Equality of outcome is what racist, emotional thinkers believe. Judging by skin color and controlling the path in the individual's pursuit of happiness is something only a human who uses emotional thinking and is part of a manufactured culture of useful idiots believes. @outdoorsforlife Keep up the good fight against psychopathic humans who can't fight their demon to control others. They can't make their bed so they must force others too. THEIR WAY!! XD what imbeciles.

the tv told the fool Jordan Peterson bad so no matter what you say... jordan peterson bad*caveman voice... what useful idiots. xD