Would you support a Dan Crenshaw/Tulsi Gabbard ticket for 2024?

[BjornIronPeenus]

To represent both sides as independents. The two party system has to go. Thomas Jefferson who lost the election to John Adams became vice president which allowed shared power.

Yes

No

[Anonymous]

Do what I do. Wait for him to come home, on the bed with your head down and ass up, put a buttplugg or dildo into your vagina and tell him to put it up you butt. Have lube ready, butter works in a pinch.
You might want to try anal by yourself. I rub my clit while doing it.
Oh make your butt is clean and you haven't had a big meal recently. I had a serious accident while doing anal with a one night stand while drunk, the sheets got covered in crap as did he. Thankfully he used his credit card.
A good tip i find is too while in the shower unscrew the shower head and stick the hosepipe up your butt with the water on ( not too hot or cold) and let the water fill up your anal cavity until you've an extreme urge to poop, run to the toilet quick as you can and let all the water out along with any poop. It takes a while and just when you think your done pooping more comes out. Do this 2-3 times, be sure to shower yourself down after when your sure your done pooping the water out because that water drips out of your butt still and stinks

[SuccessfulHornDog]

MHO.

[ShortCircuit]

Tulsi Gabbard's anti-interventionist foreign policy is why most independents like her, and is also the only reason some right-wingers find her tolerable (myself included), because she's terrible on everything else. Her foreign policy is also the #1 thing she campaigned on.

... And Dan Crenshaw is a warhawk. He's literally Tulsi's polar opposite on her defining issue. So I don't know where you came up with the idea that those two would make a compatible ticket.

Maybe it would be a good ticket for the American people if there were a way to cherry pick Tulsi's foreign policy, and let Crenshaw take the reins on everything else. But even then, Tulsi and Crenshaw would probably clash too much to really work together. It would be like putting Ron Paul and the chairman of the Federal Reserve on a ticket together.

[BjornIronPeenus]

Dan Crenshaw is not a Warhawk where you get that information? I don't think they're that opposite based off their interviews with Joe Rogan.

[ShortCircuit]

- "We bring the fight to the enemy so that they don't bring it to us. There is a common misconception that if we just let them fight their own wars, they will leave us alone. This is wildly untrue for two main reasons. First, groups such as the Islamic State will always try to attack the homeland. And second, even if we manage to prevent them from attacking the homeland, we cannot stop the cascade effect of instability and chaos that ensues when the United States leaves a power vacuum."

- voted NAY on the Iran War Powers Resolution (which would've prevented Trump from using military force against Iran without approval from Congress)

- "The U. S. should continue to meet our foes on the battlefield and inflict damage on their infrastructure, leadership, and capabilities."

[BjornIronPeenus]

I see nothing alarming about those statements. ISIS needed to be destroyed and it only took a year to do it without another major ground war for U. S. troops. Presidents don't need approval from congress to use military force. The last quote says nothing about being a warmonger.

[ShortCircuit]

If you don't see a problem with those quotes, you just might be a warhawk too.

[BCA6010]

Tulsi can't be trusted. She says whatever it takes to get an agenda through, but doesn't really stand for anything herself. The only reason she had any following at all in the primaries was because she wasn't as radical as anyone else who even made it to the voting period.

Crenshaw is okay, but his support among conservatives is pretty fickle. He supported (and as far as I know continues to support) some extremely dubious red flag laws against firearm ownership.

So no, this would be a pretty terrible ticket. You could run one or the other alongside somebody else maybe, but not together; the enthusiasm simply isn't there.

[Anonymous]

Just as long as it's not a poor Republican like Donald Trump, Have people ever in their born days supported the most hated Man alive and that happens to be Donald Trump he got a lawyer from New York is bringing him to justice for all hidden crimes Trump committed but see everything is hush-hush... On stage, he plays one hell of a nice guy but behind closed doors, Mr. Trump is something to write home about, he used anger and hate to win the White House, and sure enough, it worked... He banned Muslims call the Muslim religion radical, he called Mexican people drug users/ rapist and some are good people and he made fun of disabled guy and he late Sen McCain was POW and found alive but Trump wanted him to be found dead? So anyone is better than Trumps and that includes his whole family

[normalice]

I agree the two party system must go, but any serious effort to do so should start by trying to fracture the Republican party, first, as they have the most political capital and will just dominate politics completely (becoming a one party system) if democrats are the first to fracture.

[RolandCuthbert]

Trump will be running again in 2024.

The Republican party is his.

[BjornIronPeenus]

No way he will he ain't gonna waste his time. They said the same about Hillary.

[RolandCuthbert]

Hillary and trump are two different animals. Trump has an army.

Hillary has nothing.

[BjornIronPeenus]

The chances of him winning again aren't going to be any better in 2024. It's smarter to find a younger "Trump" instead. Plus he will be too old by then.

[RolandCuthbert]

He doesn't need to win. Look at the trump supporters in this forum. They are delusional. That's all he needs. Their loyalty.

This is a treasure trove and it is raw power in the Republican party. Every Republican will have to kiss his ring.

[BjornIronPeenus]

I fail to see your point. If he doesn't need to win then why would he run again in 2024? Trump was needed to shake up the typical Bush type scum bags in the Republican Party.

[RolandCuthbert]

How can you not see my point in a forum full of trump supporters? These mugs are claiming election fraud. . . on his say so alone. The Republican leadership cannot disavow trump for fear of retaliation from his supporters. They obey trump, they do not obey McConnell, Graham or anyone else.

It is funny that you think trump ran to accomplish some "goal".

[BjornIronPeenus]

Voter fraud is not uncommon in elections, I can see why he has concerns. Republican leadership needed a wakeup call that we don't want any more establishment corrupt dirtbags. Why would a billionaire waste his time becoming president if he had no goal? He obviously wanted to make a difference after all the damage from the last administration.

[RolandCuthbert]

Haha! Keep telling yourself that.

I wonder what will you tell yourself when he comes out with TrumpTV.

"Oh. . . he is just putting corporate Republicans in their place."

LOLx10!!!

[BjornIronPeenus]

The Bush family and other fake Republicans have been kicked to the side and will never see a comeback thanks to Trump.

[Kurαȷ]

No, they are both cunts and both terrible candidates.
Tulsi doesn't represent the other side by any definition, and well Crenshaw is just a plain retard.

[SuccessfulHornDog]

Can you name the most successful independent presidential candidates and what impact they had on the election?

[BjornIronPeenus]

No I couldn't. I'm assuming you think we should just stick with the two party system because you think change is not an option?

[SuccessfulHornDog]

I am a registered Libertarian. I have voted third party multiple times. I have written in presidential candidates and I know about previous independent candidates

[BjornIronPeenus]

What's your point? Libiterians fail because they don't have a clear message.

[SuccessfulHornDog]

You accused men of think ingwe should just stick with the two party system but I belong to a third party.

I dont want to belabor this but if you are intertested in promoting this then you should learn the history of the most successful independent party campaigns in recent history

[NorthwestRider]

Ross Perot
Theodore Roosevelt
Strom Thurmond

[NorthwestRider]

This election, Jo Jorgensen helped Biden to win in some key states

[NorthwestRider]

Lol one is super anti war and very populist and the other one is a Warhawk and part of the establishment

[NorthwestRider]

Not sure they run on the same ticket

[Vulvalicker]

Depends on their support for the 2nd amendment and how tough they are with foreign policy

[BjornIronPeenus]

Dan is very pro 2nd amendment. Both are against useless wars.

[Vulvalicker]

Idgaf about useless wars. I’m concerned mor about their dealings with China and Russia. If they’re as pussy as Obama/Biden I don’t want them

[Vulvalicker]

Trump got us out of useless wars but you didn’t give a fuck because you voted for pussy Biden that never got us out of anything

[Vulvalicker]

Pussy Obama/Biden weakened our military so bad those two pussies allowed China to become superior in the China sea where 25% of the worlds trade happens. But you’re a pussy just like Obama/Biden thinking we can all join hands and sing Kumbaya. You’re so fucking stupid you don’t know who your enemies are

[Vulvalicker]

I will gladly go to prison and face the death penalty if I could put a bullet between your eyes for what you just did to my country. Give me your address

[joeldalton]

100%. I wouldn’t care if it was Crenshaw/Gabbard or Gabbard/Crenshaw.

[Anonymous]

I can't wait to see Tulsi in the thong bikini portion of the debates.

[Iron_Man]

I only support Republicans

[BjornIronPeenus]

So support Dan Crenshaw. Sharing the power is the only option.

[Iron_Man]

It depends if Marco Rubio’s running I have to hear all the platforms

[LivvyM]

Who'd of thought Solid snake was now in politics

[OddBeMe]

Sorry, I’m anti pirate

[Hermes-Paris]

Who?

[Tea-Spaghetti]

Yes Tulsi Gabbard!