3.6K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. The decision has already been made - to the extent that China has a dog in that hunt, it backs Iran - and thus the Palestinians. This not being a matter of morals but of cold eyed ruthless strategic calculation. China having quietly signed a treaty of mutual cooperation with Iran a couple of months ago and thereby by default sided with the Palestinian cause.
The object of the game here is to put pressure on the Arab states - as suppliers of oil to an energy dependent Chinese economy - and on the United States as China's strategic rival. Thus by default China backs the Palestinians. Though the Chinese do not care a fig for the Palestinian cause - and insofar as that cause has become not nationalist, but Islamist may even be faintly hostile to it. (China, it being recalled, having a VERY bad relationship with - and is indeed committing genocide against - its' Uighur population, which is Muslim.)
Palestinian national identity is relatively thin gruel and why, in fact, it has become less of a force in the Middle East. Indeed, it is why the Palestinian cause is now led mostly by pan-Islamist forces - see also HAMAS. Pan-Islam being a forced that defines identity not in national terms but in religious ones.
The further irony being that after the Palestinian nationalists supported Iraq against Kuwait in the 1990-1991 Persian Gulf War, the Arab states began to abandon the Palestinian cause. Such today that the principle benefactor of the Sunni Muslim Palestinian Arabs is Shiite Muslim Persian Iran.
Thus today, the current fireworks in the Middle East is more deceptive than not. The Palestinian cause - as a nationalist cause - is largely dead. Being more akin to a civil rights movement than a nationalist cause. The Arab states have largely abandon it in favor of peace with Israel as a counterweight to Iran.
The Palestinians, never having had a deep sense of national identity, are recurring to a more general sense of Arab and Muslim identity. In this the Iranians are backing them largely as a way to pressure their Arab rivals - particularly Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Jordan, the latter two of which already have peace treaties with Israel.
Suffice to add that if Saudi Arabia - keeper of the Muslim Holy Cities of Mecca and Medina - were to make peace with Israel, it would likely split the Muslim world wide open. Particularly along the Sunni/Shiite divide but even within Sunni Islam.
In a nutshell, this is less about Palestinian national identity - which is fading - than it is about Iran's conflict with the Sunni Arab world. The predominantly Sunni Muslim Arab Palestinians finding themselves in an alliance of convenience with Iran, and in effect being Iran's catspaw. It being added that unless things get wildly out of hand, the Arabs are apt to sit on their hands and let Israel and Iran settle the matter over the Palestinian's heads.
China really has no stake in this particular conflict beyond using it as an indirect lever to get cheaper oil from the Arab states, and pressuring the United States. The latter benefiting from the de facto alliance between the Arab states and Israel.
The question then is problematic. Who OUGHT the Chinese support. That is a complicated moral question and morals seldom play a part in the international arena. Whom they do support is the Palestinians, but only insofar as that is a function of their support for Iran as a cudgel against the USA and - in a different way - the Arab states.
It being well to remember that an iron rule of the international arena is, as Lord Palmerston said, "We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow." This China does with ruthless brutality.12 Reply
Asker+1 yI think you said what I’m thinking g better than I can even say it to myself. As a Chinese (American) I find myself more supporting Iran (and it’s allies like Lebanon) rather than the Sunni Arab states (namely Saudi Arabia). I have no direct feeling for Palestine but just how it fits into the alliances I already personally feel attached.
- +1 y
Well, why you should feel attached to the alliance is a little unusual - it would be like me getting attached to NATO. It exists and serves US interests - I don't get "attached" to it accept insofar as it serves the interests of my country, and perhaps because I have visited some its' members and am something of an admirer.
In the Middle East case what you often find in much of the world is an anti-Israeli feeling. The reasons for this are complex - and sometimes morally questionable. However, how that may have shaped your own views I cannot say, other than to add that such questions are best addressed dispassionately and without undue emotion.
See also my response to this question: Who do you support? ↗
Most Helpful Opinions
- 6.7K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
u +1 yChina has to stay away, that's what makes political sense to them.
117 Reply
Asker+1 yOk thanks
Asker+1 yAlthough to me it makes no political sense for america to be involved either
- +1 y
America is in it for political, historical, military, geographical, economical, strategical, security and many other reasons.
The US... HAS to be involved, is not a choice. - +1 y
"America is in it for political, historical, military, geographical, economical, strategical, security and many other reasons."
Yeah, I forgot that we Americans were born in the Middle East. That's our land, right? - +1 y
@NotARobberYet Congratulations
- +1 y
@NathanDavis Congratulations to you for supporting this corrupt empire! It needs moral destitutes like you to tell others that our crimes against humanity are not a big deal, but us working for "political, historical, military, geographical, economical, strategical, security and many other reasons."
Liar. - +1 y
@NotARobberYet You're way to dense for any adult conversation, so nevermind a complicated one such as this, so get lost kid, go play "morals" and "humanity" at your keyboard warrior group support.
- +1 y
It's not my fault that I find you a disgusting human being. It might be your lack of character...
- +1 y
@NotARobberYet You have no idea what taste is, or humanity, nor character... but that's not why I won't address this subject with someone like you, So go take nap you kid.
- +1 y
Nah, in fact I have. And that's what makes me laugh at people like you... You're a sad, little "man" who overcompensates his littleness with such a big ego. You're laughable when you act condescending.
- +1 y
Mr. Big Ego, I'm not here to prove that you're the stupidest kid in the room. You can do it yourself if you explain what *reasonable* "political, historical, military, geographical, economical, strategical, security interests America has in the Middle East.
Do it! - +1 y
Have some warm mlik first, don't forget that.
- +1 y
@NotARobberYet You barely have a brain cell to type, so I won't stress the other two you need to stay alive.
- +1 y
You need an ego check, Mr. Big Ego.
- +1 y
@NotARobberYet And you need to go back to elementary and work on your comprehensive reading.
And just to clarify, I am not in favor nor against interventionism in the region.
I am merely pointing out why America is currently there, and why China is NOT currently in the region.
This was a simple question, for which I gave a simple answer, that is it, I never took part or any side.
If you're still here and have not fainted, congratulations again. - +1 y
Okay, I get that. My point is that we Americans might or might not agree with our foreign policy, but we still have the idea that our interests are legit, or at least more legit than the interests of other countries, because we're "exceptional."
- +1 y
@NotARobberYet In America we sure like to make exceptions with ourselves, and just to serve our own interests, I do agree with that. And that's not something I support, but it's definitely there.
662 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. I personally think Israel but China could go either way. America is supporting israel so if west supports israel, china might follow along the lines of the UN or whatever. However, china is the biggest competition to america so they could help palestine, but then they have their concentration camps for muslims in china so I think that would be the biggest hypocrisy. They are very likely to be neutral, at least on the outside, because israel is more debated amongst americans and Europe but there is the oil question so...
110 Reply- +1 y
Do you support the Israeli aggression against the Pakestinian people?
- +1 y
You know I meant Palestinians, stupid girl. Are you autistic?
- +1 y
Okay, so several things to say.
1. Learn how to type properly then,. I was skimming over the word and only focused on the ‘pak’ part, I would apologise but
2. You’re being a dick
3. Autism isn’t something you can just throw around or do you mean bloody dyslexia since that is the one to do with reading/writing
4. No I don’t agree with the israeli aggression against palestine. Israel is clearly more powerful and ethnically cleansing muslims and oppressing them and when palestinians do fight back against this, they’re labelled as terrorists or criminals - +1 y
You're definitely autistic. Bye.
Asker+1 y@NotARobberYet no you’re being silly learn the difference between Pakistan and Palestine please I not all agree with you but right now you are being annoying and this girl is factually right.
Asker+1 yOil question? The Levant has no oil right?
- +1 y
Blue anon, I never talked about Pakistan in this thread, but I get it that English isn't your 1st language.
Daisy isn't sincere about her thoughts, she's just paying lip service to the Palestinian cause as she'd never hold their favorite politicians accountable for their support to Israel.
Asker+1 y@NotARobberYet In your first post you say "Pakestinian people". But it seems you are overly defensive in all of your discussions here with people so I am going to tune you out.
- +1 y
Yeah, yeah. It's called a typo since 'L' and 'K' are side by side on a keyboard and everyone could get it by the context.
- 3.8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yI’m Chinese and I support both and neither because the bible says not to interfere in somebody’s else’s quarrel or take sides.
10 Reply
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
6Opinion
- 1.3K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yChina should be neutral, is communist, had no history in that region, non of the side is theyr religion so that will be the best decision.
10 Reply - 4.7K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yBoth countries are awful and we should ignore everything going on over there.
02 Reply
Asker+1 yYou mean China should ignore?
- +1 y
No, I mean everyone should ignore everything going on over there. Let those two savage countries kill each other.
Anonymous(25-29)+1 yI dont think China does have any time to look what’s happening up in other countries
10 Reply
Anonymous(36-45)+1 yI can't see them supporting Israel but it would be smart for them to stay neutral
10 Reply
Anonymous(36-45)+1 yFuck China and every Chinese troll that supports China.
00 Reply
+1 yPalestine, which is what China has been doing.
00 Reply10.6K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. China doesn’t need to get involved
06 Reply
Asker+1 yWhy is America involved then?
Asker+1 ySo can China then
Asker+1 yGood question I don’t know haha
- 429 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yFuck’n the CCP!
01 Reply
Asker+1 yYeah China is the best
Who do you support; Israel or Palestine?
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News
Most Helpful Opinions