
Do you think people can be truly sapiosexual?


I'm a heterosexual woman. I don't believe with all that sexuality crap they keep making up as I go along and spewing it. Shallow people think looks as the most important. People like me care about the person regardless of how a person looks. If I don't love the person then there's no point to a relationship. I'm not going to use a person for sex and now they're not going to take advantage of the person. People who dance looks most important looking from the sexual aspect parent that doesn't guarantee they love you. That's why people can be dating and married for a decade and want to know why they have so much problems and want to know why this spouses or Partners treat them like crap. Because again, it's about the intent. It all boils down to what their intentions are and their overall purposes is. For me it is most certainly not important. And I don't take too kindly to men who only see me for my body or just my intelligence. I just seen me for me, or don't bother at all. Plenty of women you can screw around with.
Well, I'm not "fully" Sapiosexual, but it is a factor in my attraction. I cannot be attracted to an unintelligent person or someone with a crap attitude. I do also need physical attraction, but it is not the only factor that matters. All forms of attraction are spectrums and though there are definitely extremes on all spectrums, most of us aren't completely one thing or another, more of a mix of more factors.
The naming side of thing is annoying.
however it’s happened for years where intelligence does factor in to things.
it’s not going to happen out in the pub and chatting to someone.
however it does where a person is working with someone or it’s their tutor etc, then this intelligence is a thing,
this is particularly true for those that require and emotional connection rather than purely physical.
Demisexual is a thing, and pretty much everyone has it in some percentage.
A person with a very high level of emotional attraction needs, will be very much more open to this type of intelligence than just looks.
obviously, there are limits in regards to attraction from looks etc.
if you work or live around a university town, you do see some odd pairings.
No. In my experience, most women don't want a man who's smart, because it means they can't manipulate that man, play mind games, or out-argue him. It may offend you to admit this, but I consider myself pretty intelligent and any woman who has figured this out tells me that it "intimidates" them, but for the above mentioned reasons that they don't outright admit. It's hard to control, manipulate, or gaslight an intelligent man. And whether women admit this or not, I believe they're always trying to psychologically control men.
So no; no woman is "sapiosexual." I don't even think any woman (who wasn't a genius herself) even wants intelligence in a man.
Opinion
50Opinion
Its a fad.
Just like most fetishes like foot fetishists and whatnot, a percentage of the population is genuinely aroused by it. Same with this "sapiosexual" shit. But im 99% sure most of the people who say it are saying it just look smart or something.
I also value intelligence a lot in a relationship (and lets be honest, most do), but this doesn't make me a sapiosexual. People are just desperately looking for labels to put on themselves to stand out or whatever, and end up doing the exact opposite.
People are attracted to being pissed on so it’s not that far fetched to think women like intelligence. But do you think it’s the kind of intelligence that you can tell them word for word from the encyclopedia about the Grey Wolf or the confidence to know what your saying it the truth while you tell them about how the alpha pack leader Grey wolf dominates over the pack and leads them to a cruel precision?
Women like intelligence but not nerds because they don’t like intelligence. They like the confidence that comes with it and the control men have when their intelligent.
The only difference between confidence and arrogance is winning.
This sexual naming is getting outta control. Unless is something gross, dangerous or against the law, who the hell cares?
That being said, of course people can feel drawn to intelligent people, and get emotionally repelled if someone clearly lacks wisdom. Intelligent/wise people generally have more interesting lifestyles. That’s normal. And attractive people generally have higher than average IQs.
But if people were truly sexually aroused by intelligence and wisdom, they would get aroused when reading Plato.
It's complicated.
Generally people idealize others they are attracted to and belittle those who are less attractive in their perception. It means being smart but ugly is less effective than being dumb like a bun but good looking. It's easier to attract people with good look it's difficult to keep them without any eloquence and knowledge.
Nevertheless it's a different if a guy has high social status. He has lot of people who talk positively and respectful about him or he has some talent. This attracts girls sometimes much more than good look, but being tall and handsome is never a disadvantage in matter of attraction.
Yeah but I'm not talking about just attraction here. Getting turned on is not the same as getting attracted. When you're attracted, you're mostly just curious about the person, and you don't know them either. But when you're turned on by a person, you know them already in most cases. In such a scenario, what is it - looks or brains - that gets you more often than the other.
"Nobody would put up with a dumb person."
As a man who has a verified 145 IQ and multiple degrees, I've often dated girls who almost flunked out of high school and are literally super dumb. I find intelligence almost irrelevant in a woman. Sure its nice, I've dated some very intelligent girls but having a kind heart, sweet personality, morals and being trustworthy are essential, while highly intellectual conversations are not.
I think this whole "intelligence" is sexy is PC nonsense. I was just reading a study the other day where they found men who rated intelligence in a woman as highly important. Then they put them in a room with very smart women and very dumb women. They almost exclusively chose to go on dates with the dumb girls over the smart ones. As i said before, more simplistic moral attitudes and general kindness are far more important and smart women tend to struggle in those areas.
I tend to think about it on the lines of how that morality cone to be? Was it passed on through generations, friends, etc? Or was it developed out of a person's own experiences?
In the case of the former, I think those people are good to settle down with, but maybe not the right ones to grow with as I tend to think that they'd rather hold on to their old ways of doing things than changing their views as the world progresses.
In the case of the latter, I believe what you said is true about them not having simplistic moral values because those views were changed when they started experiencing the world. But I respect the thought process that goes on for creating that morality as that would be key to making my life easier whenever I need help in dealing with any issues.
Although I do agree that it's difficult to keep those women with you for a longer period of time. But ain't that going to keep me on my toes, trying to become a better version of myself? That's a challenge I relish.
I dont find it to be "better version of myself" they often push towards. there's a certain type of dumb person who is a good person and a kind thats just as bad as anyone, same with smart people. Its just easy to identify good simplistic morals ie never lie to someones face. A dumb person who believes that usually believes exactly that with no exceptions. Its too complex for them to bother to make exceptions or they just dont feel its up to them to decide. While a certain kind of smart person will feel capable enough to themselves to decide upon exceptions. This i find to be a problem such as with marriage, where someone with simplistic morals might say divorce is wrong. Where a smart person with complex morals might say the same thing but it its your wife how man exceptions to the rule do you hope she has? None really lol.
Well, whether we like it or not, people change and in many cases, they outgrow relationships. In that case, would it be better to get smothered with a dumb person for the rest of your life or would it be better that the other person understands your circumstances and says 'well, shit happens' and agrees to a divorce? I would like you to think without the alimony part here.
Also, not being able to lie - I see that as a disability. Because lying is not only used for cheating, it is also used to save people from getting hurt. To put it in perspective, I would rather be with a person who can believably tell our kids how well we are doing in life even during the tough times than with a person who would just tell them the truth and make them come to terms with it.
" I would like you to think without the alimony part here." This is real life and thems the facts.
"than with a person who would just tell them the truth" well thats your choice. I dont believe i lying to people. I am smart and do have exceptions but after all my experience its better to tell a painful truth than live a beautiful lie. But thats your opinion.
I saw another post on gag that was a poll which is more important for a girl kindness or intelligence. Of which kindness was much more chosen by men. Just something of note.
If polls are to go by, it's turning out to be rather close here than one would've expected.
And kindness needn't come at the expense of intelligence. It's like women saying money comes with age in men... that ain't true anymore.
But just to get an idea of where you stand, let me ask what would you choose from the following:
1. Smart + kind + ugly
2. Dumb + kind + beautiful
2. Because beautiful is far more beneficial than smart. Which would you choose?
That gets said a lot but beauty lasts a very long time. If one eats healthy and exercises and pays attention to their appearance a woman can remain attractive from 18 to say 60. (I personally know a late 50s yoga instructor with a perfect body and still pleasant face with nice feminine presentation). So say 40 years. You can bang a swamp monster for 40 years but i certainly would find that 100% not acceptable. 😂
Okay, so that's where we differ. I'm not just looking at banging here. I'm looking at raising great kids through this union.
Also, in case you haven't noticed, they all feel the same down there when you're in business. Doesn't matter what the face looks like - the dick feels what it feels.
Anyway, you get turned on by the looks, I by the brains - and that's that. To each his own I guess.
by the way, the polls have become much more interesting since the last time I referred to it. Intelligence is now leading for the first time, albeit by the slightest of margins... don't know for how long though 😅
"I'm not just looking at banging here. I'm looking at raising great kids through this union." But how do you stay motivated for decades to someone who is not attractive? Plus dont you want your kids to be attractive? Physical characteristics are quite hereditary while intelligence is not as hereditary. Ie two smart parents are about as likely to have an average intelligent child as a smart and a dumb parent. Where two parents with attractive features are more likely to have attractive kids than one good looking and one ugly parent.
"Dude, read a bit about genetics before claiming things out of thin air." I have. This was an important issue for me until i studied it. Intelligence is a group of traits that work together to make someone intelligent. A particular trait on its own does nothing and in one combination of traits can make someone smart yet in another dumb. So in practicality it is genetically passed on as a "regression to the mean" (google that phrase and intelligence to get tons of research on the topic). Meaning no matter the intelligence of the parents, they are most likely to have a more average intelligent child. Two brainics will most likely have all less intelligent kids than themselves. Two dummies are likely to have smarter children than themselves. Two smarties will only be a bit more likely to have a little more average intelligent kids than say a smart and a dumb. The difference is so tiny i dont think its worth factoring in personally. Id rather a hot dumb girlfriend than an ugly smart. My kids may be 30% more likely better looking vs 2% more likely smart. I think thats the winning deal.
medlineplus.gov/.../
Read on, bro!
But I get your point. You're interested your progeny be better looking than them being smart. I get it. As I said earlier and repeating a third time, to each his own. Cheers.
And? What you posted doesn't say anything that disagrees with what i said for example "These studies have not conclusively identified any genes that have major roles in differences in intelligence. It is likely that a large number of genes are involved, each of which makes only a small contribution to a person’s intelligence." Complex traits like this typically have a relationship such that they regress to the mean. However a simple summary of 2 paragraphs is not going to dive into much.
here's a good summary and example off wikipedia just to get an idea: "Polygenic traits often appear less heritable at the extremes. A heritable trait is definitionally more likely to appear in the offspring of two parents high in that trait than in the offspring of two randomly selected parents. However, the more extreme the expression of the trait in the parents, the less likely the child is to display the same extreme as the parents. At the same time, the more extreme the expression of the trait in the parents, the more likely the child is to express the trait at all. For example, the child of two extremely tall parents is likely to be taller than the average person (displaying the trait), but unlikely to be taller than the two parents (displaying the trait at the same extreme). See also regression toward the mean."
There was a girl who said she find intelligence sexy and said how special my way of thinking is so I was like okay so let's hook up and she said that she doesn't just want sex. I was like bitch then don't say that intelligence is sexy in this context. I also had a girlfriend who in theory was really into my mind when I was popular, but having the same mind when I started to hangout less with our mutual friends miraculously she started to be bitching on me and intelligence was not the main thing anymore. Most of the time it's just bs, and people say that they are sapiosexual who think that intelligence is an std and they'll catch it with the social status that comes with being intelligent.
Physical attraction is supreme to me. I can’t be with a less than attractive woman no matter how smart or kind. That’s why at 37 years I’ve only had 1 nightmare of a girlfriend.
I think we have evolved to favour physical beauty because it indicates a healthy partner and therefore a greater chance of survival for our progeny.
Looks are important in a sexual relationship.
And a person with a brain would know that.
So a win-win for the brain pickers? 🤔
As the smart person would train/improve her/himself to be sexually/visually etc pleasing for her/his partner.
I once masturbated listening to a Ted talk
it’s the mental stimulation for me 🤷🏾♀️ I never gave it a label but intelligence is much more gratifying than looks…even if the person is ugly.
However there is a difference between ugly and repulsive 😂
Gurrl, that went from 0 to 1000 reaaally quickly. 😂
I prefer intelligence above looks, but that doesn't mean looks don't matter, its not an all or none situation. You cannot be entirely attracted to some one based solely on their intelligence, that is why any one who claims to be sapiosexual is also not dating some one who is hideiously deformed.
However that doesn't mean that people will refuse to date some one who is physically attractive if they are not attracted to their mind, again this is a false binary.
I absolutely am sapiosexual. Yeah for sure if somebody has Intelligence it, and even raw intelligence that's not necessarily from an institutionalized path I am like so turned on.
That’s a huge lie. Most nerds , guys from science fields from top universities struggle through their whole life for even getting a plain girlfriend. Most science Nobel laureates had struggled to get a girlfriend. But if they are conventionally attractive then only intelligence is a plus point. This happens to women too , but women can get dates easily than similar men.
The funniest thing about it is that you have to be stupid to think that’s a real thing. It’s something only midwits believe in.
100%. Not just better but smarter. Midwits are all about pretending to be a lot smarter than they actually are.
God is not wicked. The same God that made the beautiful mind, made the beautiful body. He never gives good mind without a good body.
Well, in that case God makes a lot of mistakes.
An example:
www.ted.com/.../lizzie_velasquez_how_do_you_define_yourself
Being sapiosexual doesn't mean that looks don't matter.
It all depends on her personality. Neither of those things matter as much as her personality.
I'll like this answer, because it's true for me too
Thanks, Nathan.
I think humans are ugly creatures in general so yeah...
Why do we have to change ourselves and cover ourselves then if that's the case?
Because we got brains that helps us enjoy the aesthetics of nature, and then the same brain helped us develop technology so that we could wear the colours we like.
We alone have the means to do it, so we do it. Other animals either don't have the brains of the physical structure to create such stuff, so they don't. But all animals are attracted to colours same as humans.
I find humans aesthetically ugly.
I'm only going to look at someone to assess their basic health. Other than that, I'd much rather look at a different animal.
I'm better suited for ice and snow rather than heat and presumably mosquitoes.
And it's not that easy.
I don't mind "talking" to people, I like communication. But I don't understand body language, and I find eye contact to be physically painful. When you throw in judgement on things I can't control, it's far too much. I don't do it and I wish everyone else would stop doing it.
Well, body language is easy. Just notice what the other person is doing and later on think of why would you do it. If you can come up with a scenario, then that's one sign you've learnt. That curve is not an easy one, but it's not an impossible one. And by the way, learning body language helps in communicating with animals too, cause that's our natural language; words are artificial.
@MoonStalker you’re something. From all you've said like you a lot
Other animals are easier to understand. They don't lie. They're consistent unless something's wrong.
People can't lie through body language. I think you're confusing it with facial expressions.
Facial expressions are totally apart from body language. Body language is actually how a person is using their body, which does not include the face, during a communication - like how they're using their hands, what's their stance, how they're walking, sitting, etc.
Yes, but they try to hide it sometimes. And your face is part of your body. My chinchillas aren't going to try to hide that they're sniffing me, or looking at me, or that they're displeased with me. If I'm making them unhappy, they tell me. I can understand them. I can't understand humans, and they only make it worse by saying what they don't mean, and trying to hide their true meanings and feelings.
Neurotypical homo sapiens. Which would include all of those groups you mentioned except boyfriend/girlfriend as I don't have one. And the language I have the most trouble with would be the language of lies and hypocrisy.
Haha right. Ok, first things first - lying and hypocrisy are not language. Lying is an art of using language, and hypocrisy - well there's no way to defend it - it's used by dumb people to justify the things that they do.
Now, since you understand that it's not easy getting away from humans, you need to learn how to lie and how to spot a lie. On second thought, I think you already know how to do the latter, but are not comfortable with learning the former. This may be because you think liars are degenerates who only go around cheating people and breaking their trust. Well, I wouldn't disagree with that, but that's not the only reason people lie. Many times they lie to save a person from feeling hurt, or to help someone out when truth might actually jeopardize them. In that, lying becomes an act of courage. That's because no matter what you do, every lie is uncovered sooner or later.
Hence I say that lying needs to be learnt - not for causing people hurt, but for doing the opposite.
Hypocrisy should always be abhorred and people who practice it must be distanced. Spotting a hypocrite is pretty easy - you just need to match how they conduct themselves with how they want others to conduct themselves - that's very much the crux of it. They're not necessarily bad people, but they're definitely stupid people who cannot be trusted going forward in life.
Lying makes my stomach burn, and I end up confessing, assuming that I wasn't caught within 30 seconds. I've learned to look for loopholes and to use my words carefully. But lying just isn't something that I can do without the truth coming out. Out of my mouth. I don't think most people get the burning feeling, but if they do, then I will never understand why they lie about things that only hurt.
Because more often than not, they don't see the bigger picture. They're mostly thinking about escaping the current moment. For a lot of bad liars, planning comes after the act. For the good ones, their lie is part of a bigger plan. More like they think it through before lying. Thinking it through is the only thing that can keep your stomach from burning - for a period of time, because every lie is caught sooner or later. But anyway it won't burn as bad as it generally does.
For a relationship yes for a celebrity crush or instant attraction no
Yes, I dated few very intelligent PhD level of intelligence, in looks department they are avarage or below avarage, once date above avarage, but she had only MSc.
I liked them more the very nice looking low IQ speciment as she is not able to hold proper conversation and only knows about makeup, some silly diet she seen on FB or gossip... and not even able to cook, when even I can cook.
Yes, I prefer intelligent even, if she is avarage or below avarage in looks department.
I definitely fell for my current boyfriend's brain first
We went to the same high school, I barely talked to him the first year even though we had the same classes, and I wasn't interested in him in the slightest. Then he reached out to me in the start of our second year, just about something practical, he wasn't looking to date me, but after that we started texting regularly. I noticed we had the same kind of humor, very similar interests and views. I also realized how smart he was, and I am very much attracted to intelligence, since I want someone who can keep up with my nerdy conversation topics xD.
I find high intelligence very attractive, but not in a sexual way. Not everything that attracts me to a girl or not has to do with sex.
Not everything in a relationship is about sexual stuff, sure it might be easier to get hard with a dumb and hot body than with an intelligent but obese body, but enjoying their company as a whole will be harder, depending on the person. That affects the relationship.
When I say "turned on", I don't mean it literally. But who knows? Maybe there are people who masturbate to people talking about brainy stuff.
lol, so people who are sapiosexual, looks don’t matter to them? It’s kinda bs in my opinion. Looks attract me, personality makes me stay. Although, intelligence is a huge turn on
Sure. I liked a guy like that once. He was average looking, but I was very attracted to him. He was very very intelligent. He knew random science facts and he loved science and yk? He was a very good conversationalist. I never got bored of him. And there was this other guy, who was a model, I was attracted to him at first, but he wasn’t so smart… he was a little dumb, not being rude, but yeah. I had a hard time making a conversation with him, but with the first guy, it was amazing. Looks do matter, but it doesn’t matter much
No. There’s maybe a little point of interest about it, but it’s not *the sole defining aspect of their sexuality*.
People just want obscure labels for themselves because it makes them feel interesting and special. People want to be able to identify as things, it gives them an identify to cling to.
lol it's bullshit.
A relationship of only the minds is not a sexual one, it is platonic.
There are some chubby comedians I find more attractive than models.
I didn't even know there was a word for this, I didn't even know it was a 'thing'.
It's normal to be, because someone being smart is important, I don't know why there's even a word for that.
I don't consider it a sexual orientation. That's like saying you're attracted to intelligence and you don't care if they're male or female. Which is ridiculous. Unless you happen to be bisexual as well.
Well I do find intelligence sexy... but only in women!
Looks are a key factor attractive and turn on. But added intelligence ir clicking together makes it tenfold. A balanced of both is something amazing
Nope.
Only one partif someone have created an obsession that it must be to open up certain kind of feelings.
When it comes to it there are workarounds even if the person in question claims otherwise since most people aren't the exception.
No it’s bullshit. It just means they find intelligence attractive.
Depends on what you mean by truly. I've observed that brain only comes before looks after there's enough looks to go around.
posh nonsense. and at the end of the day, what matters is that your partner is reliable, not so much a genius.
Lol @bean2k good one.
@stri_dante how can you rely on a person who can't think on his toes? Or somebody who can't find effective solutions to your problems. I agree he doesn't have to be genius, but if he needs to ask a friend about any issues that he or you are facing maybe in life or at work, I don't think he can be relied upon.
You have to have some form of physical attraction to a person.
A man is a man and a woman is a woman. I don't fancy all this touchy feely sexuality stuff.
I found Bill Gates very handsome. Dan Ariely if he asks I marry him without a doubt. So yeah. Intelligence matters to me most.
I'm thinking you're attracted by the behavior of these men. The confidence, how they talk, behave, etc. I understand that these are very intelligent men as well, but that's what I'm sensing from your response.
The reason being I don't consider what I watch people doing or saying on TV as them being their honest selves. I mean Bill Gates recently got called out for being too flirty (for the lack of a better word... ok, I respect the man) and who knows what Dan does in his personal life.
My point is people rehearse before getting on a podium or on a talk show, so that's not the real them. You can only know about people's intelligence really when you know them personally. And I'm not talking about being good at math or psychology. I'm talking about sense of humor, street smartness - things that tell you about their personality.
Intelligence can be attractive, but it’s not the only thing in the equation by any stretch of the imagination. I think most people are mostly attracted to looks, with things like personality and intelligence coming in with a smaller percentage.
Very much so. I have to have a mental connection and see intelligence or it won't work.
IMHO, either can work. It all comes down to the chemistry between the two.
Sure! Some people really are turned on by intelligence. Not many are. But they exist.
Still think an uglier smart guy would get thrown away though. Same for women sadly
If you can get horny from this
I can get horny from playing Call of Duty
That's because those people are saps.
Sap - one who is easily deceived or cheated. some poor sap would probably fall for that telephone scam.
Intelligence, Kindness, Looks: Pick two at best.
True, but my point is you are only going to get two at best.
I'll take looks any day. I don't need my bitch to figure anything out, that's for sure. LOL
Nobody wants to fuck ugly.
I am trysexual, i try it and if I like it I keep doing it.
I consider myself a sapiosexual, but at the same time, she has to be at least average looking.
It's a bullshit thing people say to try to seem deep or interesting.
People truly believe in whatever gives them. Its their baseline, foundation.
They are just kinks and people not experienced enough to know the difference.
Yes, they beat off when not together and don't tell each other they beat off to the other
Brains can make people entitled so no intelligence isn't the most important trait
No, if there were true sapiosexuals out there, I wouldn't be single.
The majority of women care only about money, looks, and height.
My ex was sapiosexual
at least, it is for INTJs.
Yup, I am
Yeah it requires being almost asexual like myself
We have jargonized sex to the ridiculous.
I like dumb girls
Another example of women lying on surveys lol.
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions