
Do you think that forcing people to sacrifice their bodies, their organs, their health, and even their lives, against their will should be legalized?


I don't like how you're trying to manipulate us :)
If we're talking about organ donation or dying for another person then of course you shouldn't be forced to do it.
But if we're talking about abortion of a child that you created by WILLINGLY partaking in an activity that you damn well knew could result in it then it's a completely different story.
The primary function of sex is to create life. I think anyone over the age of 12 knows that and everyone who partakes it should also know that contraception is not 100% effective. You KNEW that when you CHOSE to have sex. That's why I'm against abortions out of convenience (ie when your life isn't threatened and you weren't raped) as I'm against men's right to abandon their children born to women they don't want to be with by avoiding financial responsibility. Yes, sex feels good and is fun but guess what, IT'S NOT A TOY. It comes with consequences and if you don't understand that the 1% can be you and aren't willing to deal with the outcome then don't do it. And that's for both men and women. If you're that immature that you will sacrifice another person's "body, organs, health and EVEN LIFE" to avoid the consequences of the actions that you CHOSE to do FOR FUN then you're not ready for sex and don't deserve to be treated like an adult. Your question is very ironic because in that example you're the bad guy forcing someone to sacrifice their very existence for nothing else than your convenience.
Although I do not completely agree with what you write, your point of view deserves full attention, especially about sex and mental maturity. Very difficult topics mind...
Do I consent to being hit by a car if I cross a busy street? There's a chance it could happen right? But I agreed to be crossing the street. Not to be hit.
You can consent to sex without consenting to pregnancy. It's why we have birth control. It's why stealthing is rape.
@Smashingdoozy Sure, but what has stealthing to do with this?
According to that IVF should be illigal. In IVF not all zygote are introduced. only few & rest are discarded. I am completely against anti abortion & pro life. It is wrong. It takes away women's right to choose & with all contraceptive in this world none comes with assurance that it will be 1000% effective.
@mstbooblover it's about consenting to one thing not the other. I consented to safe sex with a condom not without. I consented to sex, not pregnancy.
Obviously the usage goes out the window when you don't take any precautions to prevent.
But also if we use the "you knew what you were getting yourself into" argument. Then we shouldn't give liver transplants to recovered alcoholics or lungs to ex smokers. They knew what could happen. So they can suffer the consequences
@mstbooblover he's referring to the thousands of viable fertilized eggs that are thrown out because they're no longer needed. It's basically abortion.
@Smashingdoozy yes.
@Smashingdoozy yes we don't give liver transplant to alcoholics & lung transplant ( very hard to perform & not much sucessful) to smokers. There are many children born with inborn errors of metabolism that requires it they are made into priority. But yes alcoholics do get liver transplant because of politics , power & money.
@Smashingdoozy Do not exeggerate. When a man cums inside a woman, only one spermatozoide will have the chance to fertilize the present ovum. The same with trees producing an incredible amount of nuts, from which only a few will germinate. That's just nature.
@Smashingdoozy The function of crossing the street is to get to the other side. The function of sex is to create a new life. Those two things can't be compared but if you really want to then crossing the street could be pregnancy and getting hit with a car would be losing it or having an ill child.
Also, you said you consent to having protected sex and not to getting pregnant. Well, you had protected sex but only another person can respect your consent, not condoms or contraceptives. Your argument is beyond stupid. Taking it you knew it could fail and you took the risk and another human paid with their life for the risk you took i. e. you effectively forced another person to sacrifice their life for your sake. That's the reality of the situation, you did it, so why creating this entire topic to seek approval? Are you really ok with your decision and what you did? Well, whatever, you did it so own up to it.
We are one of the only species to have sex for fun. Sex is not just for reproduction, it's ignorant to see it like that.
Smashingdoozy... Your disbelief does'nt change or cancel or op out the truth regardless. Point is , if you think your valued and your Not of GODS spirit , you much less dont matter to GOD and that there values someone as Nothing. The quickest way to heavens junk yard is Denial of GOD. So wether or not you believe it or not God does'nt care about your belief if it is'nt of his spirit. Dead in spirit is twice plucked up by the roots. Religions ) of any kind are GODS enemy as well. They're mans commandments , not GODS.
You can believe in whatever you want but you can't force other people to believe in or follow your religion. There's a few dozen religions in the world, just because yours says one thing doesn't make it right or wrong.
I assume you're don't having children now? So you and your wife don't have sex right? Because it's immoral to have sex for fun.
But again it's not premarital sex if you never get married 🤪
@Djaay I wish you would understand not everyone is a believer so again the rules don't apply so telling people they're immoral (which is judging by the way) is just pointless. Walk away. If there really is a god then I'll get what I deserve 🤷🏻♀️ in the meantime I'm gonna have fun fucking my boyfriend
@Djaay aight. 3rd fundamental tenet of the satanic temple (which I'm a part of) "One’s body is inviolable, subject to one’s own will alone" 4th tenet "The freedoms of others should be respected, including the freedom to offend. To willfully and unjustly encroach upon the freedoms of another is to forgo one's own."
Subarugirl... What opinion? Just truth thats a reminder . Dont worry about being forced into believing , GOD gave you free will to choose your destiney. But i do know scripture does also imply that those who are against GOD or deny him won't be able to understand the spirit or GODS words.
@Djaay No it's not truth, it's your opinion. I could start talking about Norse religion and Santa and call it truth... doesn't make it so. I was raised in the church for the entirety of my childhood, from the day I was born until I moved out. I understand perfectly, I also understand the people are capable of some pretty impressive mental gymnastics to justify the way the chose to behave. You are not spreading the gospel, your trying to rub your perceived moral superiority in peoples faces. You claim to be Christian yet your behavior is anything but Christlike. I don't care what you believe in, but I don't tolerate hypocrisy.
@Djaay You're so quick to point out everyone else sin while you are living in your own.
Matthew 19:9 - And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery.
Mark 10:11 - And he saith unto them, Whosoever shall put away his wife, and marry another, committeth adultery against her.
Luke 16:18 - Whosoever putteth away his wife, and marrieth another, committeth adultery: and whosoever marrieth her that is put away from her husband committeth adultery.
Mark 10:2-12
2 And the Pharisees came to him, and asked him, Is it lawful for a man to put away his wife? tempting him.
3 And he answered and said unto them, What did Moses command you?
4 And they said, Moses suffered to write a bill of divorcement, and to put her away.
5 And Jesus answered and said unto them, For the hardness of your heart he wrote you this precept.
6 But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female.
7 For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and cleave to his wife;
8 And they twain shall be one flesh: so then they are no more twain, but one flesh.
9 What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.
10 And in the house his disciples asked him again of the same matter.
11 And he saith unto them, Whosoever shall put away his wife, and marry another, committeth adultery against her.
12 And if a woman shall put away her husband, and be married to another, she committeth adultery.
So unless you were lying about getting divorced, you are currently living in adultery according to the words of Jesus... For someone who seems to care so much about following the word of your god, it would seem you don't know it very well.
@Djaay well according to the words of Jesus, if you have sex, you become one flesh and married in the eyes of god. That was made pretty clear when Jesus spoke to the woman at the well in John Chapter 4. 17 “I have no husband,” she replied.
Jesus said to her, “You are right when you say you have no husband. 18 The fact is, you have had five husbands, and the man you now have is not your husband. What you have just said is quite true.”
Commanded commandments 😂😂😂
If women don’t want children they shouldn't be sexually active with a man. If there were no doctors around, who thee “hell” is gonna terminate the abortion? NOBODY!
Im all for abortion. But a grown-adult-woman should be responsible enough to not become pregnant if she isn’t ready or financially ready. She should take full responsibility for her actions. There are condoms available everywhere, there is plenty of amazing sex toys available. There are birth control devices that can be implanted.
There should be no reason for an abortion to take place at all if you are smart enough and grown enough.
Rape is a different story. Incest is a different story. And being homeless is a different story. In that case yes. Terminate it. Sterilize the homeless. Lock up those who practice incest.
BUT IN THIS DAY AND AGE.. A SMART GROWN WOMAN WHOS GOT HER HEAD SCREWED IN RIGHT, WOULDN’T BE IN NEED OF PRACTICING ANY ABORTION.
(I’m 24, poor, going to school, living with mom and dad, and if I want to have fun and get frisky, I’ll use any of my 20 sex toys, or I’ll use condoms with my sex-friend)(I’ve never had to partake in no abortion).
Well it's your choice, but I was 19 when my birth control failed, along with plan b and I ended up getting pregnant. Birth control isn't 100%, it can also cause cancer, blood clots, strokes, and a bunch of other life threatening complications. However accidents happen and nearly 300,000 women die a year from pregnancy related complications.
If you don't want an abortion, don't get one. How ever what you can't do is tell someone else what they can't do with their own body.
But I digress, this question isn't about abortion, its about whether you think it should be legal to forced someone into donating, or forced into having your body parts used against your will.
So stay relevant, and answer the question or this comment will be removed for irrelevance.
@emyywolf what you say makes sense about being responsible with sex and birth control but nothing is 100%.. that’s the thing& even for some women I heard they got their tubes tied and used condoms with their partner still have gotten pregnant. I am similar in your shoes 23, saving money helping my family,&working part time and each time I’ve had sex I’ve used condoms with the guy because I’m not financially ready for a child yet but I’d never get an abortion just my thoughts because I wanna be a mom someday but I’m not trying to have a baby yet and I’m aware even condoms can fail, even the pill itself, the implant but I’d step up and be the best mom I could be with bravery and courage if anything happened but I believe everyone has the choice to decide if they want to have that child& telling someone what they can and can’t do with their bodies is pretty messed up but going around having unprotected sex with different guys isn’t responsible either, at the end of the day tho people are gonna do what they want.
To answer your question, no.
But this has nothing to do with abortion. Being pregnant is not an illness. People have been pregnant and lived longer than people that can't even get pregnant.
Would you, if you could back to the time your mother had you, tell your mom "don't sacrifice your body, health, organs and freedoms for me!" (if you answer with yes, please reach out to people who can help you by the way). You want to exist, right? Any idea of how you would argue for your life that don't sound like you are pro-life? There aren't any.
by the way I'm not even anti-abortion, I think most women are life-loving people, even more so than men probably and most abortions are ended before the first trimester. So on-demand until the first tri-mester is fine with me. I am just disgusted about how people are talking about a human life.
And yes, as an atheist, this "it's just a bunch of cells" argument doesn't work on me. I don't believe in a soul - you and I are a bunch of cells. If you kill something because it's just a bunch of cells, that means basically you'd kill anyone that is an inconvenience to you if you wouldn't have to fear consequences and could dehumanize them enough.
I just want it to be treated as the difficult decision it should be. I'm not asking much here.
I am on your side in this. The left sees me as extreme right and the right sees me as left.. I can't win lol.. On that same token this is what the left must face now. Let me break it down for you.. The pendulum always swings left and right. There is always balance. This time though, the left as pushed things so incredibly out of balance, With things like pushing trans sexualisim on children, Hell teaching children as young as 5 years old about things they shouldn't even be concerned about until they are in their teens. There is a reason that the right calls the extreme left groomers... and trannies stealing women's sports records.. and places like California trying very hard to decriminalize pedophilia, that this was bound to happen. i would call this a backlash.. I saw this coming miles and miles away. But the left kept pushing and pushing and pushing.. Then the George Floyd riots happened, and then the repeated riots.. over race.. The silent majority woke up and said "This stops immediately".. I strongly disagree with where this is going, but the left brought it on them selves.
Opinion
66Opinion
I don't think many people would complain if everyone was signed up to be an organ donor as a cost of obtaining a driver's license though it would fall into a gray zone. I'm not seeing mandatory suicide booths being installed anywhere, or the previous happening though, so the question is kind of confusing me.
Lending space to a baby is part of the human design behind pregnancy. Funny how in ancient times, women looked forward to it! Sure, it was a little uncomfortable for a few months, but having children over time actually makes women MORE powerful, not less!
This idea that having children must be assumed only in the light of torture, and that children must be viewed as the enemy, came from the mind of a woman who escaped from a MENTAL ASYLUM! Those in political positions who lapped up her dogma like thirsty horses, and then tried to make teaching that view become public policy, were SOCIOPATHS!
this is a such a typical answer from a man who has never had to experience the hell that child labor and pregnancy is for most women who have to go through it... women are denied jobs for being a mother... It's kind of ironic how you act like you are an expert on something that you have never had to personally experience.
Women said it first. I merely reiterated what they had to tell me. And you think men never suffer? Who usually pays the hospital bill? Who gets to stress the most over how to pay anything? Who faces the most judgment over parenting? Whom do the corporations teach children to hate? You know that anxiety over a woman being pregnant can lead to a male equivalent of morning sickness?
Also, while a man doesn't carry a child inside for 9 months, who is the first to get blamed for life if the child grows up to be a monster, even if evidence points to the mother?
And raising children can be dangerous for men too. We're just as likely to get hit by a truck pulling the brat out of the street. We're just as likely to get mugged on our way to work. We're just as likely to wind up in the hospital for any of a thousand other reasons, and children can be as much a liability as an asset in recovery for both.
This idea that another human being existing is such an annoyance to someone, that it gives them the right to kill an unborn child, is no different than the twisted logic of a woman who will back her van into a lake to drown her kids because she's bored of them.
Change your attitude!
Those who cannot ease the grief of a woman who wanted to be a mother, by raising children from the dead, should never assume a right to kill a child either.
If you're gonna play God, you can't half-ass it. Otherwise, you're just a devil.
We're authorized to kill in self-defense, against the already-born. Or, in a position of office, only those condemned in court or in time of war, of a capital offense. Never, are we commissioned to snuff a helpless fellow member of the species, merely because of selfish desire. Or the illusion of convenience.
And baby blood drinkers can burn at the stake!
Tell me you were never a parent with out telling me you where never a parent. Try growing a human inside your body, while working full time to put your spouse through school. Push a person the size a water melon out of a hole the size of a golf ball, have your genitals stitched up, and try to recover from that while almost dying in the process. Thensuffer though an internal infection that also nearly kills you all while expected to nurture and care for an infant with nothing but your tits for at least 6 months... Then be expected to "bounce back" be mother, wife and employee.. You don't have a uterus and do not have to experience any of those things so you can sit your ass down and shut up about something that literally has nothing to do with you. A clump of cells the size of a quarter in my uterus is not more important or more valuable than my life and wellbeing or the well being of those I am responsible for.
*were
I'm an uncle. And my siblings will tell you the exact same things I've told you.
You have no clue what you are talking about, not about pregnancy and child birth or being a parent. So you can take a seat.
Ask my sisters. There are plenty of seats left.
She's more than welcome to talk about her experience and her thoughts on it, she's lived through it. However, I won't have the audacity to tell her what she can and cannot do to her own body. Forced pregnancy is torture.
And sucking a child's brain out, or treating them with drugs like they're an insect, and poisoning the mother to bring that about, and cutting children apart limb from limb, isn't torture? Remember Gosnell, and how he went about performing abortions? Women had horror stories to share about his so-called "clinics"! I've got a friend who is ashamed to admit she had one. Said after her horrific experience with abortion, she'd prefer being pregnant to that! Children are not the enemy. The lies of hedonism are.
You realized that the majority of abortions are performed before 12 weeks and can be completed with a pill... just like plan B. What are you getting so worked up about? This has nothing to do with you or your body, and it will never be a decision you would have to make. No children are not the enemy, the enemy is people who try and control women's bodies. It's the people who are charging women with murder for having a miscarriage. It's the rapists who receive lesser sentences than the women who terminate a pregnancy as a result of rape. It's the 11 year old child who died from being forced to be pregnant as the result of rape from a man in his 40s.
Still no excuse. Morality here is what it is. It is not decided by your "feelz," or mine. Nor by your anatomy or mine. Never has been, never will be.
If you want to talk about morality… how is it moral to force a woman or girl to put her life at risk for a clump of cells she never wanted. If you want to argue that the embryo or fetus is another body then morally you would agree that a person cannot be forced to sacrifice their life or health against their will to help another person. That’s why people aren’t forced to donate blood, and why they can’t harvest organs from corpses with out consent.
"Clump of cells" = proven a farce. You're pulling out every cliche lie in the book at this point. Your cow isn't sacred, never capable of being. Moloch belongs on the ash heap of history. Spirit drinkers warrant a noose. Organ harvesters deserve only to be tossed into a volcano! With all modern medicine affords to save both, only an incompetent doctor imagines abortion is "the only way." And should then lose his license. And do you wish to speak for women killed in botched abortions, or are you programmed to not care about that?
The state of Nebraska's calloused lack of concern about this perverse and depraved ongoing injustice was literally what drove a grieving father to assassinate the demonic monster known as George Tiller.
Your illusion of convenience is bought with blood money, acquired via innocent blood you will never be able to repay. Stew in that!!!
I care about people who are dead because they did have the ability to make choices that would have saved their life. The nearly 300 thousand women who die every year from pregnancy related complications. Id rather give teenagers the choice to be able to have a life rather than force them into a life threatening situation that are preventable... but hey if you want to force 12 year old girls into life threatening situations go ahead/
Once again; the tech exists to save both. If doctors refuse to use it, there's a bigger issue going on. But to act like abortion is guaranteed going to save their lives is folly; given how many die at baby chop shops thinking abortion will save them. You're literally saying that because a house cat is risky, that women are safer being put in a tiger cage!
And safe abortions are safer than back alley abortions... if this were about lives, you would value the ones that already exist then potential ones. This is all easy to have an opinion about when it doesn't directly effect you
Back alley abortions outnumber the other variety anyway. Because selfish women and selfish grandparents would rather go to a seedy place on the "down low", than a place that is going to charge more and keep a paper trail. That's how you get Gosnell with his House of Horrors.
You're also dishonest about the movement being about safety. The overwhelming majority of abortions only happen, because women don't want to face the consequences of sex. They did a dumb thing for fun with some man they don't want to commit to, and God is holding them accountable, and the idol of self won't stomach that!
Do you have any evidence that back alley abortions out weigh those performed by medical professionals? I never said the movement was about safety, its about bodily autonomy and equal rights.
The child is denied any autonomy or rights. And no one has a right to do what God forbids. Such rights, by definition, cannot exist. Especially when an infant's rights must be made null to make way for it. Rights are a zero sum game. Beyond what was spelled out from long ago, creating any new "right" for any category of human being, requires denial of a preexisting right to some other category.
Same with the rainbow movement: any push to guarantee that a profligate can force a baker to bake a specific cake with a specific political cause endorsed on it, denies the baker his right to live in peace, to believe for himself, and to serve others by choice. He is no longer an autonomous business owner, but a slave to profligates and the spirit of profligacy. Yet courts run by judges who defend the indefensible, regard this lawless anarchotyrannical enslavement of the baker as if it were "the highest good"! And then, in the name of rainbow "solidarity," judges let convicted child killers off the hook!
The land is cursed for such perversion!
It’s called a fetus, and bodily autonomy is the right to do what you want to your own body. Because of bodily autonomy you cannot be forced to allow someone else to use your blood, your organs, your bone marrow with out your consent. I have a hard time that you would be okay with allowing your body to be used without your consent….
Fetus is Latin for small child. The body inside your body is not your body.
And even if you consider it a separate person, people cannot be forced to sacrifice their life or safety against their will, with our their consent by being forced to donate parts of their body…. You totally okay being forced to donate part of your liver, blood, bone marrow? You’re totally onboard with the government dictating who gets it, regardless of weather or not it puts your safety and life at risk?
Nature doing what it's designed to do, and you facing the consequences of sex, which you're not too dumb to figure out, is only comparable by cynics and liars to having one's kidney stolen by the government. Or being poisoned with gene rape jabs. You spread your legs, you already signed up for what comes next.
Child-bearing serves the cause of life. The other scenarios serve the causes of death and money. Not morally equivalent.
Nature also designed cancer, heart attacks, erectile dysfunction and parasites… you think those should take their course too?
Cancer is part of the Curse. Still a pitiful deflection.
What curse? I’m not talking about magic, I’m talking about science
I think the real question is do we really want freedom?
And if not, who's ideas should we be living under.
If we are to be a free country, abortion should be up to the individual person. Ultimately, it should be the woman's choice regardless of what I or anyone else feels.
But a doctor shouldn't have to do it if they disagree.
If we aren't free to make our decisions, how are we going to grow as people? We will live our lives focusing on staying within the lines rather than being who we truly are. And then there's no honesty, which makes everything fake and meaningless.
Very wise point of view.
I actually like this response. I believe in individual choice. So a woman can get an abortion if she chooses, however the doctor shouldn't be forced to do it if they don't believe in it.
@ShadezMcgee Of course the doctor should never be forced. A doctor also has a conscience according which he should act. The problem is moral, as well for the woman as the doctor.
@DaySpring we need laws, but laws are needed to prevent chaos. The decision to make or a mend a law should be a careful balance between ensuring order but allowing freedom.
For instance, murder being illegal unless you have a reason to believe that person was trying to kill you.
This law exists almost everywhere in the world but how the law is specifically worded and used changes from place to place, having different remifications. Every other law has similar consequences.
Yes, sure human societies need laws, although those can't cover all situations. I consider laws as a direction to follow, and not as absolute dictates.
. To be honest that whole sentence that hoe paragraph that whole question just made my stomach turn I swear I'm going to throw up because of the fact who in the fuck do people think they are to even think that you can control or force or make somebody do what you want them to do not what they want to do and it's their body the reason why I said I'm going to throw up is because that's where we are all headed right now that's what our government wants to do to all of us in so many find my new detail Waze and they're doing it and we are allowing them I see things and I feel things deeper than most people in your whole question is what is happening that's why I feel so sick to my stomach right now it's the truth it's what's happening it seems like it's just one big manipulation after the other
No I don't. But let's be real hear, the reasons women choose abortion have little to do with any of that. The reality is that in more than 90% of abortions the reasons for choosing one are things like not being ready to be a parent, not wanting a child to interfere with education and career plans, not being in a healthy relationship with the father, and other personal reasons.
But women always use the "bodily autonomy" argument instead of the real reasons because they know that would open up the question of why men shouldn't be able to opt out of parenthood for exactly the same reasons women do.
We operate just like the Nazi. Experimentation on babies-like the Womb you women believe you have right to turn into Gas Chamber and exterminate life. Harvesting organs and parts like Nazi Monsters. You people don’t even realize you’ve been under the influence of Nazi’s ways brought over by US GOVT in 1940-45.
—Why do I waste my time with the “perfect life people” in America. Watching pigs go to slaughter…
You mean like the draft where hundreds of thousands of men had to have their limbs blown off and shot in the head when it wasn't their choice?
At least for pregnancy, the woman chose to have sex, but the man didn't choose to be born into a sexist system where only men have to fight and die during war. Just like in Ukraine now how the men would be put in prison if they don't stay and fight to the death, but women can freely leave.
and when have you ever been drafted? You realize the last draft was 49 years ago... you weren't even alive then...
Say that to the millions of women in military
Whose looking after the weans if both men and women are called up to war? The reason women aren't as they are needed to look after children. What you propose leave weans to the wolves while we go fight? A mother without her kids is no use to anyone as her mind will be on her children not war.
If you are asking for abortion then yes women have right to abort baby in safe period when aborting the baby will not harm that Women. & No abortion made illigal will do nothing but push to young women to poverty & towards non registered persons or quacks who will do abortion in non sterile manner ending up killing that women. Young people do make mistakes in their teens but they don't have to pay for lifetime for that. Also young women in their teens are more likely to have complications that women in their 20s. That said I have worked in country where abortion were illigal ( I was intern) & belive me it only destroy lives of young women.
I’m guessing you’re talking about abortion, like the rest of the shrill mob of women shook they’d have to take responsibility for their choices. However, are we not forced to do all of those things to live? Ie work, where our years and health are sacrificed.
There was controversy years ago by scientists harvesting organs from babies and kids to experiment on. Some people didn't know they done that and still fighting for the remains of their children. This is modern day UK with modern day graverobbers.
The horrors you describe sound something like Africa or China where they kidnap poor people to rob them of their organs. Horrific
no. the limits of the authority of the govt is at a persons skin and about 5inches out from that to account for all the bacteria that keeps them alive.
Thus no jab required.
don't have to donate organs
that also means they can destroy themselves or whatever is inside of them they have domain over. that is the right. In my view, even if they are considered nuts.
We can offer help though should they seek it.
ah... it's good to be somewhat libertarian...
i support abortion for rape, incest, poverty, and medical reasons
but if you're just inconvenienced? yea. fuck you. lazy slut. have the baby.
it isn't your body, you share a society with me and your actions affect me and those future kids are my future taxpayers who will pay my retirment. so if you want to steal my money. you better have a better reason than just "eh, id on't feel like it"
have a greater sense of community, and responsibility to others.
@Subarugirl right 😂😂😂 and make him pay an arm and a leg in child support for that attitude
@007kingifrit I'm pro ensuring a healthy and happy future generation so we don't keep getting more messed up. Babies should only be born into families that want them, and it should not cause things like 35,000 in debt on the birth alone.
Babies aren't a consequence, they're entire human beings.
@kudoma imperfect solution fallacy. your generation is so spoiled you think anything less than perfect shouldn't exist. life will work out.
the cost of child birth being 30k is because hospitals take advantage of insurance companies and demand they pay huge amounts... and since iinsurers do the consumer doesn't get pegged with the price so they don't do anything.
I don't know who's spoiled but it sure isn't me or my generation. Life has been "working out" for trillions of years and we still ended up here with these lying judges trying to take away American's constitutional rights to privacy and bodily autonomy. Women aren't going to be only ones affected by this. They won't stop at this forced baby boom that they didn't get during covid.
Regardless of whether the judges lied, my right to determine how my body is used is covered in the constitution. Over 72% of Americans believe it is up to the woman to decide, and that the right is covered within the scope of our constitution. I want you to ask yourself why they are suddenly deciding to overturn this despite how unconstitutional it is.
Of course not. I don't like the government interfering with people's personal choices about their bodies and their reproductive health. Any sane person will understand how putting restrictions or even banning the choice of what people choose to do with their bodies is wrong and outrageous.
In China they do executions and each execution save over 5 lives cause their organs are donated to people who need liver transplants and executions are for causes like rape and sometimes assault and of course all murder too. My dads friend’s life was saved through a transplant he got from an criminal execution’s body.
In answer to the question, No. I do not think it should be forced.
I’m answer to the hidden question, a baby is not a part of your body just because it’s growing inside of you. It’s something that is meant to eventually be removed after a certain amount of time. Something that is meant to be removed after a certain amount of time isn’t a part of your body. Sure an arm or a leg can be amputated, but it’s not necessary unless it absolutely needs to be.
The less control the government has over us the better. So the answer is no. And if this is designed to aid a pro-choice argument, then the answer is still no. My feelings about abortion don't override my feelings about too much government interference, especially in marriage or giving birth.
No ofcourse not! The world is already fucked up enough as it is these days! Forcing people to do things what they don't want, is mentally traumatizing for huge amounts of people already. They can be broken for their whole life when they get forced to do things they don't want!
Asks the woman who supported vaccine mandates calling people names because they refused to inject their bodies with experimental gene therapy.
It's a yes or no question.
1. Don't have unprotected sex,
2. Fly to a different state or Mexico to get it done. Mexico cheap. California will pay for it.
3. Get hysterectomy
4. Abortion also destroys the women body and increase the chances of slow babies
5. dont let random dudes but in you and except TAX DOLLARS TO clean it up
This is not relevant to the question. Please answer relevantly or your comment will be removed for irrelevance.
Yes I think it should be legalized
So you are totally okay with being forced to donate, part of your liver, blood, bone marrow.. against your will?
Sure I'm a organ donor already
So you're on the bone marrow, liver, and kidney donor list?
To save a family member sure
That's not the question. Are you okay with being forced to donate to anyone?
Sure I'm fine with saving somebody life
Great! Who are you giving your kidney to?
What you're describing is murder, nobody forced girls to have a football team run a creampie train on them every night until they got pregnant, we'd simply tell them that their reckless behavior doesn't give them the right to end a separate human life
No. You can't even use organs from dead people to save someones life without the dead person's prior authorization.
Yes but then if your talking about abortion then it's generally a choice to get pregnant in the first place.
Are you familiar with consent?
If you consent to have sex then you consent to the possibility of pregnancy.
Pregnancy is a natural consequence of letting a man ejaculate inside your vagina.
and what if you didn't consent to letting him ejaculate inside of your vaginal canal? What if contraceptive fails?
Yet 99.99999% of abortions are due to failure to use contraception of some kind or the after morning pill.
where does that statistic come from? Did you get that from an actual study or just make it up?
I got pregnant after the morning after pill failed to work, its not as effective as you might believe... and you realize that the morning after pill is an abortive right? It forces a menstrual period where everything in your uterus is flushed out including an embryo. An abortion pill works similarly up to about 11 weeks gestation. 93% of medical abortions are performed during the first trimester, before 13 weeks.
Uh huh. You don't have to lie to me to justify how you choose to live your life, I dont care and nobody else does.
I'm not lying... I guess the truth just doesn't fit your view of how you think things should be...
Nope, it's not a side effect. It's a risk, but not a "side effect"
Carelessly bringing life into the world results in people with opinions like yours who don't believe children are humans. They aren't pawns, numbers, or consequences. They deserve a family that wants and loves them.
Having sex doesn't mean you want kids, maybe it does for you but that's not the case for everyone. I have sex with my husband but we don't want kids for another 5 years. Consent to sex is not consent to raising a child.
It's more like if you drive your car and don't put on your seat belt
Most people who get into accidents are wearing there seatbelts... but accidents are still accidents, and still happen even if preventative measures are taken.
No one is arguing that unprotected sex can result in a pregnancy, just like protected sex can result in a pregnancy. The idea is whether you are then forced to bring a human into the world. A human that will likely rely on social programs that people like you don't support. It will also force the mother into over 35,000 in medical debt, not to mention the costs of raising a child if you don't thrust the child into a broken foster care system that will end in the same cycle of poverty and reliance on social programs.
There are exceptions, but the people who will be most impacted by changes in the law are those who can't take time off work to go to another state for an abortion. Or those who already have 3 kids and can't afford another.
To remove access to abortion is inhumane and just puts everyone at risk.
Diabetes kills 1 million per year, who is responsible. The government or the people eating too much sugar?
Pregnancy and diabetes isn’t the same thing but if you wanna get into it are you referring to type one or type two diabetes
Diabetes another first world problem
Actually diabetes one and two are drastically different and is a medical problem that affects people on a global scale... so if you want to get into to let's, which type of diabetes are you referring to?
Yerp first world problems
Actually diabetes effects people globally... do you understand what that means? Or even the difference between type one and type two diabetes?
America had the highest covid deaths, 40% of covid deaths in America were due to diabetes
Comorbidity is only so high because of how many people in America are diabetic. Of course that's going to be a comorbidity.
Food legislation in America is worse than any other developed country so I'm really not sure where you're going with this. Preventive medical care in America is also garbage so I'm REALLY not sure what you're trying to say here.
Obesity isn't only about overeating. It's also about eating terrible foods (bad regulations ont he foods going in our bodies), genetics (out of the individuals control), lack of sufficient exercise/movement (also mostly out of an individual's control in the primary demographic affected by obesity: poor people).
And the leading cause for death in the united states is heart disease... what is the point you are trying to make?
Both a direct result of choices in the majority of cases like unwanted pregnancy
Okay I take it you don't really know anything about diabetes then... most motor vehicle collisions are a direct result of driving, but they aren't going to deny you medical care because it was your choice to drive...
Most UTI's are direct result of sexual activity, should they be denied treatment because it was the direct result of the choice they made.
Is the treatment surgical?
Like abortions, most can be resolved with just a pill, or a series of pills. How ever, if allowed to progress far enough surgical intervention may be necessary.
I mean I understand your argument and honestly I don't know. Abortion should be legalized. I do however feel we should put more attention into having better medicine so that women don’t need to get abortions for health related reasons. Because by than their should be ways to reverse any of the negative affects pregnancy has.
I think if they are a terrible criminal then yes but at the same time I wouldn't like the idea of possibly having a pedo or murders organs in me but if I was really despite I'd try to see the good in it
Do you think being overdramatic is really helping your argument? Or are you really this poorly educated? I knew the school system was bad; just not that bad.
yea like im an atheist and not against all abortion but some of these women make me hate abortion purely because of how bad they are
No, making people take an experimental drug is wrong.
No of course it shouldn't be forced, however if nobody agreed to donate, then many thousands of people who are living because of the sacrifice those people made would now be dead.
No, I don't. Against their will (so, no freedom?). isn't freedom what the u. s. is built on. THE FREEDOM TO CHOOSE
THE FREEDOM TO HARVEST OTHER PEOPLE'S ORGANS! YEA MURICA!!!
What is the reason and motivation for the question? I feel it is lacking some context here.
I'm just curious if people thing that it should be legal or not.
Right, that I get that, but is it stemming from something else or drawing parallels from it? When I read the question I assumed you asked it because of the Roe v Wade taking the headlines.
No but the laws are made by men who who don't have any laws on what can and can't do with theirs
bullshit. roe v wade was decided by a panel of 9 men the firs ttime
law also says i can't rape or hit with my body
Those are called "soldiers," deary. It's what they get paid for.
That is a illegal, and this question is obviously with in the context of North America. How ever, if you want to talk about crimes against humanity in Central Africa and the Middle East, I suggest you ask your own question so that it stays on topic.
yes, but people are not allowed to legally harm their own bodies with their will because drugs are illegal,. we should only be allowed to harm them against their will, law makers are so smart
Yes to some extent, most of us don't know what's better for us and humanity once we are gone. To busy with our own agendas wants needs pricessing feelings sweeping and moping most of us misses great good or even what good for us in short period
HELL NO!!! It SHOULD either be up to you or your family/loved ones. Neither of the EXTREMES SHOULD be followed or enacted.
Apparently bodily autonomy isn’t important to right wingers. So I’m a bit scared they’d be fine with that level of big government.
This from the party that wants to mandate that people be drugged against their will to work a goddamn job.
Fuck off with your bullshit.
So you believe in restricting freedom of movement and freedom to assemble. Nice.
Tell me again about how much you value democracy?
Then they should get their ovaries removed.
Give it a rest already.
So is that a yes or no?
Id rather hump a cactus
Omfg just stop! No one forced you to do the deed. You do the deed expect the consequences of your actions.
I believe this question was a little more general than just talking about abortion. But you said yes, if you cause the need yourself?
Like, if you become pregnant because you had sex, you should have to subject your body whatever the fetus needs? Or if you cause a car accident, and one of the people you injured needs something? Like part of your kidney for example? Giving up your kidney should be mandatory because you’re responsible for the need to begin with?
Would that be fair to say?
This isn't about pregnancy this is about weather you think a person should be able to be legally forced to donate parts of their body against their will?
Okay that's enough. You wanna talk abortion take it somewhere it is relevant.
@Subarugirl Sorry, she brought it back up.
@UCrayCray Then take it the conversation somewhere else where it is relevant
It’s pretty obvious you’re asking this question to bait people into a discussion on Roe vs Wade so you can give them shit over their views.
Its a yes or no question. So what do you think, yes or no?
Please protect the world and kill your offspring in the womb. You sound like it would be doing everyone a favor.
Ok, so this is another one of your pro-abortion posts, right?
Yes or no, do you think it should be legal for someone to be forced to donate parts of their body to someone who needs them to live?
I'm not arguing anything. I am asking a question. Do you think being forced to donate parts of your body to someone else should be legalized?
If you're not going to answer the question why even comment. It's a yes or no question..
You never answered the question
Ok, fine. Abortion only to save the life of the woman.
That's not the question
Yes, but you think motherhood is a curse, so your opinion isn't very valid.
That's not the question either, why comment if you aren't going to answer the question. It's a simple yes or no.
yes, it should be.
So you are totally okay with being forced to donate bone marrow, blood, or part of your liver against your will..
Nope.
That's what I thought.
When you want to stop being ridiculous, so will I.
This question was answered during WWII and to be perfectly honest enough said the answer is a definite No unless you're a monster!
Hell no. Just because governments would allow it, doesn't make it right. Same goes for war and slavery.
Here it's legal
I'm exempt because my body is like a real lemon of a motor, fit only for the clapper, I guess the human version would be being fed to some pigs or something
It's, it's called draft and military service.
You, as one example, are personally responsible for 13 of those, along with way more.
how could forcing people to do that be "Legal"? HELL NO!!!
I think all lives have value, so no one should have their life taken without their consent.
this is illegal under the european court of human rights, thats why forced vaccinations are illegal in Europe.
Nope. I'm not a total piece of sanctimonious shit.
No never. why would such a thing be done? It can only be done to those who commit bad crimes.
yeah good point. Abortion should only be legal if the woman's life is in danger.
This question isn't about abortion. It's about weather you think someone should be able to be forced to donate parts of their body against their will.
In the namesake of what’s fair for an unborn child, absolutely
Bruh😂gtfo
I will never sacrifice my life money and career for an unwanted fetus😂😂😂😂😂
@Brittanyroseee that’s the problem. You’re making this all about yourself when you have a moral obligation towards the unborn child
It is about myself. My mental health and financial status and freedom matters more. An unborn fetus is worth nothing until it is born.
@WhiteBoyChill i have absolutely no moral obligation to care for a child I don’t want nor need. I use birth control, and I don’t even have sex but if i ever were to have a boyfriend or husband one day and fall pregnant, it will be aborted. I don’t want kids. I value my money, privacy, freedom, fun, and career over having a child. No i would not carry the unwanted fetus for 9 months just to give birth to it and give it away. Pointless and 9 months of my life and time wasted.
Sorry but i will never sacrifice my life, freedom, money, career, or privacy to care for a child. I will be miserable being a parent i know it. I hate responsibilities and a child is a fulltime career. I want to have a fulltime career that im passionate about that i get paid from. Being a stay at home mom 24/7 sounds so boring! I love my privacy and being around a crying toddler throwing a tantrum changing diapers is disgusting. I prefer having pets instead. They are cute and I’d rather clean up a mound of dog 💩 than change an infants dirty diaper
@Brittanyroseee glad I’m not dating you then. Perhaps maybe that’s why you’re having trouble finding a guy
@WhiteBoyChill because I don’t want kids?😂😂😂😂😂😂
@WhiteBoyChill what is so bad about being career driven and wanting to make money and have pets instead of having children? I don’t think being a mom is for me. I would lose my patience within a minute with a screaming crying child.
@WhiteBoyChill are you the type of man to tell women that they must have children?
@Brittanyroseee you’re just not my type is all
@Brittanyroseee only thinking about yourself and to hell with everyone else
@WhiteBoyChill yes myself matters more😘
@WhiteBoyChill I don’t want kids
I am pro-choice, so, I say that forcing people to sacrifice their bodies should not be legal.
No one should force anyone against their will
Isn't that already legal and happening? Here is why i am childfree.
Hell no, my body my choice
What is this about. I’m sorry I don’t understand.
Ohhhhh… I think I get it. And I too like Subaru cars. But I’d have a sticker on it that says “I’m conservative”
You go first and let us know how it goes!
what would the point of that be…
What the fuck have I just read? smh
@Agape93
Well thank you for explaining and enlightening me with all this.
Naturally I did not for one moment take into consideration that this was directed solely to the USA.
Just how the bloody hell do these idiotic quangos think up these completely outrageous and totally unjustifiable nonsense?
@007kingifrit
Where in Europe do you live?
invalid question , id ont need to live in Europe to know their laws
It's funny I was arguing with a guy yesterday and he said tons of people are desperate to escape socialist and communist country just to live in America and I was trying to get to see reality that America and capitalism is not what it is cracked up to be and tons of people are actually escaping from America to live in other countries or at least take advantage of their health care lol
@007kingifrit
Just who the hell do you think you are telling me it's an invalid question... i was merely asking, considering you are so conversant with European Law
You can also add your opinion below!