Is denying asylum to refugees because you don't have the resources immoral? (Page 2)
Click "Show More" for your mentions
Most Helpful Opinion(mho) Rate.
Learn more
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
28Opinion
No.
Your people first then if you have extra, other people after.
Not at all? How are we supposed to take care of other countries' people, if we don't even have enough resources to sustain our own people
It's better to colonise their country instead so they have more democratic governments / presidents like Joe Biden, Borris Johnson and Macron.
it's not immoral no. countries should focus on their people first
How would you feel being turned away when you have nowhere to go?
No food/water. That must suck but yea I understand your anger. I don't blame you for saying that
A lot of necessary things to keep a country intact are immoral.
Oh but if it were a dinosaur they wouldn’t say all that. They’re racist!
Sounds to me like you are the refugees.
Basically yes.
An estimated 16% of my population is living in a relief camp.
No. The citizens must come first
yes you are right
Obviously no
You can earn a lit 'o bit of tax money from refugees since they have to spend for food. I think they can build their own shelters. I d accomodate them abandoned house / sites
no it isn't
Nope