The existences of Federal law enforcement like the FBI allows the Federal Government to bypass the constitutional check by the States upon the abuse of their few legitimate domestic power provided by the Federal Constitution.
The original Federal constitution didn't provide for any kind of Federal law enforcement beyond that of borrowing the State's militia, nor did it provide almost anything in the way of Federal Domestic laws outside of the territories and A1S8C17 districts.
True. USA Marshals would be better. They have been compromised though so we are not seeing the best out of the FBI. Just like the army too. The US has a problem right now for sure. It has dramatically changed in the last 5-10 years. I wish they would completely cut the tie with Israel. They are the problem. The US seems to be run by j-e-w-s.
A republican (ironically the party of law and order), would say
Marjorie Taylor Greene (a republican, and a nut job), literally said "defund the fbi"
This coming from the party of law and order
When will they get it through their thick heads that republicans ARE NOT, and I repeat ARE NOT, the party of law and order. They are the party of chaos and lawlessness. I'm a democrat, I've never been in trouble
@progboy If you had ever worked for a Government agency you might have realized directors particularly of the larger agencies are helpless puppets of what information is given to them by staff.
The larger the origination the less they even know what their agency is doing. Remember theses "leaders" are just visitors they are entirely reliant upon what the FTE people tell them.
If there was no FBI, then there would be so much crazy crap going on you have no idea how much stuff they stop from happening, but they don't make it public
There was No FBI prior to the 1930s and not so much stuff went on.
Today the FBI are a tiny minority of "law enforcement" in this country, even combined with all other Federal branches they make up less than 10%.
That they focus on particular crimes does not make them indispensable nor necessary. indeed even among those crimes they do focus on they usually require State and local forces to do the bulk of the work, except in select few high profile cases.
Theses "crimes" to the extent the legislator we actually elected for domestic government agree they should be crimes can easily go back to being handled by the States as they were before.
The problem with the FBI is as an Federal domestic "law enforcement" agency they are and have always been effectively unaccountable. This is due to the subject of their abuses being too obscure and politically insignificant in a continental sized country for the responsible Federal Government to care about it more than any of the Federal issues of the day like war/peace, trade, currency etc...
Thus making the FBI and what ever politicians abuse it to do effectively unaccountable.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
39Opinion
There is no way to reform this corrupt oligarchy. Clear them all out!
I wouldn’t say “abolished” but their powers should be severely limited.
The existences of Federal law enforcement like the FBI allows the Federal Government to bypass the constitutional check by the States upon the abuse of their few legitimate domestic power provided by the Federal Constitution.
The original Federal constitution didn't provide for any kind of Federal law enforcement beyond that of borrowing the State's militia, nor did it provide almost anything in the way of Federal Domestic laws outside of the territories and A1S8C17 districts.
I would trust the U. S. Marshals Service far more than I trust the sh*tshow that is the KG... FBI.
Fuck no! How else will I know which terrorists have the biggest prize for finding them?
Simples...
Some areas of the FBI are useless and just money pits.
It needs reforming, but then, a lot of Americas public institutions need reforming.
The FBI should be made to do things differently than what they do
Reform is better than abolition.
But the US can survive without the FBI, but there would be problems.
As bad as the FBI is, the problem is that it also happens to be a useful organization in a lot of ways.
Lol and replaced with what? The whole system is corrupt they would just established it under a new name the F. B. I. Is not the head of the snake.
I voted “no” it should be reformed. They need to purge out everyone that’s in there, and get good people back in
I don't know but it seems that these people want to abolish all figures of authority to get rid of law and justice. Imagine the chaos.
I would personally replace them with the USA Marshals. I'm not a man without a plan!
True. USA Marshals would be better. They have been compromised though so we are not seeing the best out of the FBI. Just like the army too. The US has a problem right now for sure. It has dramatically changed in the last 5-10 years. I wish they would completely cut the tie with Israel. They are the problem. The US seems to be run by j-e-w-s.
A republican (ironically the party of law and order), would say
Marjorie Taylor Greene (a republican, and a nut job), literally said "defund the fbi"
This coming from the party of law and order
When will they get it through their thick heads that republicans ARE NOT, and I repeat ARE NOT, the party of law and order. They are the party of chaos and lawlessness. I'm a democrat, I've never been in trouble
Go tell that to the Californian governor.
Right, cause he "did anything bad at all"
He went somewhere without a mask. Like republicans haven't done that before
I was referring to how lawless California is but okay.
The Democrats are the party of delusions
The FBI is run by political hacks. If it is kept it should be run by a civil libertarian. Like Ron Paul-level civil libertarian.
Not abolished. Rather, purged of all politically motivated leftists.
Like the Republican director who was appointed by Trump?
@progboy If you had ever worked for a Government agency you might have realized directors particularly of the larger agencies are helpless puppets of what information is given to them by staff.
The larger the origination the less they even know what their agency is doing. Remember theses "leaders" are just visitors they are entirely reliant upon what the FTE people tell them.
If there was no FBI, then there would be so much crazy crap going on you have no idea how much stuff they stop from happening, but they don't make it public
There was No FBI prior to the 1930s and not so much stuff went on.
Today the FBI are a tiny minority of "law enforcement" in this country, even combined with all other Federal branches they make up less than 10%.
That they focus on particular crimes does not make them indispensable nor necessary. indeed even among those crimes they do focus on they usually require State and local forces to do the bulk of the work, except in select few high profile cases.
Theses "crimes" to the extent the legislator we actually elected for domestic government agree they should be crimes can easily go back to being handled by the States as they were before.
The problem with the FBI is as an Federal domestic "law enforcement" agency they are and have always been effectively unaccountable. This is due to the subject of their abuses being too obscure and politically insignificant in a continental sized country for the responsible Federal Government to care about it more than any of the Federal issues of the day like war/peace, trade, currency etc...
Thus making the FBI and what ever politicians abuse it to do effectively unaccountable.
Ask Americans, other nationals have No Concern
No - why would you think that? Because they raided Trump's dump?
The FBI has done plenty more than that or have you not been paying attention?
They don't worry me all that much.
Yes. Absolutely.
The FBI needs to be dismantled and a new organization put in it's place.
We would be far better off without any Federal organization at all and instead going back to the original system that required consent of the states.
Of course not.
Yup. 100%